AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem D2/D2v/AVM50/AVM50v/ARC1 tweaking guide
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anthem D2/D2v/AVM50/AVM50v/ARC1 tweaking guide - Page 1083

post #32461 of 40771
When we measure using arc, there are two options for subs.
One is in arc, where we have the option of one or two subs. We always chose one.
There is also an option in the d2 for one or two subs. Do we use one only when measuring? Then, post measurement, do we chose two subs?
Or, regardless of the number of subs we have, is the magic number always one?
Thx
Walt
post #32462 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by yacht422 View Post

When we measure using arc, there are two options for subs.
One is in arc, where we have the option of one or two subs. We always chose one.
There is also an option in the d2 for one or two subs. Do we use one only when measuring? Then, post measurement, do we chose two subs?
Or, regardless of the number of subs we have, is the magic number always one?
Thx
Walt

I believe it stays at one.
John
post #32463 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmusoke View Post

Have fun and no worries...all will be well sooner than you think. Please also post your ARC results to see what's going on in your setup.

How do we handle two subs using this procedure? One on, and one off?
And, if the subs are at very different distances from the listening position, should not the distance for each be handled individually, per test?
i.e. If the left sub is 16' from prime, set this distance in D2, and test per outline. Then, for the sub on the right, which is 20' from prime, set that distance in the D2, and proceed as per outline.(after turning off the left side sub)
walt
post #32464 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by yacht422 View Post

How do we handle two subs using this procedure? One on, and one off?
And, if the subs are at very different distances from the listening position, should not the distance for each be handled individually, per test?
i.e. If the left sub is 16' from prime, set this distance in D2, and test per outline. Then, for the sub on the right, which is 20' from prime, set that distance in the D2, and proceed as per outline.(after turning off the left side sub)
walt

You set the volume on each sub individually, 72dbs each should achieve 75dbs total, as for the distance you take the average of the two subs distances and enter that, so using your example (20' plus 16' = 18').

John
post #32465 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by yacht422 View Post

How do we handle two subs using this procedure? One on, and one off?
And, if the subs are at very different distances from the listening position, should not the distance for each be handled individually, per test?
i.e. If the left sub is 16' from prime, set this distance in D2, and test per outline. Then, for the sub on the right, which is 20' from prime, set that distance in the D2, and proceed as per outline.(after turning off the left side sub)
walt

I believe you set up each sub individually, setting each to 75dB and then averaging the distances. Phase and polarity are also done separately. ARC hears them as one.
John
post #32466 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post

I believe it stays at one.
John

Quote:
Originally Posted by studlygoorite View Post

You set the volume on each sub individually, 72dbs each should achieve 75dbs total, as for the distance you take the average of the two subs distances and enter that, so using your example (20' plus 16' = 18').

John

I agree with both Johns.

Also, when you run ARC, make sure both subs are on so that ARC can hear both of them at the same time. You will have to adjust the phase and polarity of your subs because ARC will not do that, and you should do that before you run ARC.
post #32467 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post

I believe you set up each sub individually, setting each to 75dB and then averaging the distances. Phase and polarity are also done separately. ARC hears them as one.
John

Actually, each sub should be set to 72db. The two of them together would then yield 75db.
post #32468 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja12 View Post


Actually, each sub should be set to 72db. The two of them together would then yield 75db.

Yes I now remember, thanks.
John
post #32469 of 40771
This would be a good time for me to remind Anthem that the next processor needs more then one sub channel. I consider it my duty to bring it up every few months.
post #32470 of 40771
john and john et.al:
i'd like to be certain that i posed my second question in the correct frame.
i.e. i was referencing the NULL method of setting sub levels, so as to agree with the LF.
Were your answers specific to that question?(if not, my bad)
It seems to me that when setting volume levels, distance matters.(it really does - there is a rapid drop off in dB's from near field to 18' away,= prime seating)
So - after reversing the LF leads, i should consider the two subs as one, having first set each one to 72dB?
thx
walt
post #32471 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by obie_fl View Post

This would be a good time for me to remind Anthem that the next processor needs more then one sub channel. I consider it my duty to bring it up every few months.

My Anthem uses 6 Sub Channels
post #32472 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by yacht422 View Post

john and john et.al:
i'd like to be certain that i posed my second question in the correct frame.
i.e. i was referencing the NULL method of setting sub levels, so as to agree with the LF.
Were your answers specific to that question?(if not, my bad)
It seems to me that when setting volume levels, distance matters.(it really does - there is a rapid drop off in dB's from near field to 18' away,= prime seating)
So - after reversing the LF leads, i should consider the two subs as one, having first set each one to 72dB?
thx
walt

My answer was not in reference to using the Null method, so please strike it from the record.
post #32473 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by yacht422 View Post

john and john et.al:
i'd like to be certain that i posed my second question in the correct frame.
i.e. i was referencing the NULL method of setting sub levels, so as to agree with the LF.
Were your answers specific to that question?(if not, my bad)
It seems to me that when setting volume levels, distance matters.(it really does - there is a rapid drop off in dB's from near field to 18' away,= prime seating)
So - after reversing the LF leads, i should consider the two subs as one, having first set each one to 72dB?
thx
walt

I also wasn't referring to those techniques as I am unfamiliar with them, sorry.
John
post #32474 of 40771
This was an AHA moment for me.
sorry for the initial confusion regarding my intent.
however, the question remains: using the null method for ensuring that the subs agree with the mains, do i treat each sub individually for null purposes, then have arc treat them as a pair for the measurement process?
Eh?
walt
post #32475 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by drhankz View Post

My Anthem uses 6 Sub Channels

You mean your Anthem provides one channel to six subs. I've scaled back from six to four. So far I've resisted any external sub DSP box (Audyssey, PBK, Velodyne SMS, ect) but life would be a lot more manageable if the Anthem had two or three more sub channels. Actually while they are at it I'll just take a 7.7 or 9.9 processor.
post #32476 of 40771
walt- For the null method yes do each individually. For ARC think of it as one subwoofer since the Anthem/ARC only has one sub channel.

ETA:This goes out the window if you are using the distance setting for phase control. Set the distance to an average of your subwoofers and adjust phase on the individual subwoofer amps.

ETA2: The distance setting has nothing to do with the level setting. At least in practice.
post #32477 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by yacht422 View Post

This was an AHA moment for me.
sorry for the initial confusion regarding my intent.
however, the question remains: using the null method for ensuring that the subs agree with the mains, do i treat each sub individually for null purposes, then have arc treat them as a pair for the measurement process?
Eh?
walt

No, you should have the both playing at the same time that you are adjusting the distance. Since you are using the null method, the distance with the lowest number is the one that you want to use. After you determine the distance, be sure to switch the cables on the back of your speakers back to black on black and red on red. Make sure you balance your subs before you set the phase.
post #32478 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by obie_fl View Post
You mean your Anthem provides one channel to six subs. I've scaled back from six to four. So far I've resisted any external sub DSP box (Audyssey, PBK, Velodyne SMS, ect) but life would be a lot more manageable if the Anthem had two or three more sub channels. Actually while they are at it I'll just take a 7.7 or 9.9 processor.
Yes - 6 Individually controlled Subs.
post #32479 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninja12 View Post
No, you should have the both playing at the same time that you are adjusting the distance. Since you are using the null method, the distance with the lowest number is the one that you want to use. After you determine the distance, be sure to switch the cables on the back of your speakers back to black on black and red on red. Make sure you balance your subs before you set the phase.
I'd suggest that this would work optimally only if he has already put both subwoofers in phase with each other and you can't do that with the distance setting.
post #32480 of 40771
again, thanks to all who responded.
walt
post #32481 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by drhankz View Post
Yes - 6 Individually controlled Subs.
Dr - You probably have answered this somewhere earlier in the thread but what if anything do you use between your sub amps and the Anthem?
post #32482 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by obie_fl View Post
Dr - You probably have answered this somewhere earlier in the thread but what if anything do you use between your sub amps and the Anthem?
I was WAITING for that question.

Rane - SM-26 - you can buy them on eBay Cheap.
I own 4 of them for many uses. I have never paid
more than $50 for any of them.
LL
post #32483 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by obie_fl View Post
I'd suggest that this would work optimally only if he has already put both subwoofers in phase with each other and you can't do that with the distance setting.
Yes, I agree. The subs will have to be in phase with each other first. Then, he will have to play a tone around his crossover. Then as the distance is being adjusted the one that gives the lowest SPL is the one that should be used.
post #32484 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by drhankz View Post

I was WAITING for that question.

Rane - SM-26 - you can buy them on eBay Cheap.
I own 4 of them for many uses. I have never paid
more than $50 for any of them.

Ah I thought for sure you would have one of those fancy Rane active crossover/limiter/compressor/graphic/parametric/EQ/Splitter/Mixer/Bottle Opener models. I may have to pick up an SM 26 especially since most of my sub amps are behind my screen now. Too bad the SM 26 doesn't have a polarity switch on the outputs it would be perfect for my use then, although a bottle opener option would come in handy too.
post #32485 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by yacht422 View Post
How do we handle two subs using this procedure? One on, and one off?
And, if the subs are at very different distances from the listening position, should not the distance for each be handled individually, per test?
i.e. If the left sub is 16' from prime, set this distance in D2, and test per outline. Then, for the sub on the right, which is 20' from prime, set that distance in the D2, and proceed as per outline.(after turning off the left side sub)
walt
Walt:

1. I assume the subs are in their optimal positions as well. With subs on opposite sides of the room, set the phase knob of one to 0 and the other to 180 or whatever angle gives you the best frequency response using "Quick Measure". Afterwards, then for each individual sub, set level to 72-73dB if you have 2 subs for a combined 75dB or so. The math isn't precise in the real world so 2 subs set at 72dB will not necessarily produce s combined 75dB, but its close enough anyways

2. Reverse the polarity of the LF speaker. All other speakers MUST be disconnected. You need to listen only to the 2-subs and LF speaker only.

3. Have a variable (external) frequency source that you'll use to vary the frequency over several values around the xover ferquency. If its 80Hz, then i'd take measurements every 5 Hz starting from 60Hz and up to 100Hz.

4. For each test frequency and (with RS meter in hand), vary the sub distance setting until you read a minimum SPL value on the RS meter. Make sure its the minimum by varying the distance around it in 0.5ft increments. You should be able to notice a rise in SPL reading as you go beyond or before the minimal point.

If, for example, the distance to get a maximum null is 8 feet, you'll also get another null at 16 ft, 24ft etc. Thus value is a function of your room dimensions. Please note these values down as you go!

5. Repeat steps 3 & 4 for the next frequency.

You can tabulate the data as i have in my simple attachment. Note that the term "1st NULL" refers to the initial distances i got the null. The term "2nd NULL". To decide which NULL column to use, I choose the one where the dataset had the least variance for all frequencies used in this test. Once i decided on the colum of data to use (2nd NULL in my case), i then computed the average distance from that column and then used that as the new distance value in the "Subwoofer Distance" setting menu.

In my case, it was 31 ft, yet the actual physical distance from my sub to my listening position is 12 feet. The two do NOT have to match. Th is OK. Folks who use Audessey are familiar with this as well.

6. Reverse the LF speaker polarity to normal (!!!) and re-connect the rest of your speakers to the amplifier.

7. Enjoy some deep bass LFE music/movies. This procedure is well worth the effort in all cases, imho. The bass sounds amazing and the subs seamlessly integrate well with the mains

 

Speaker Phase Calculations.zip 8.056640625k . file
post #32486 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by obie_fl View Post

Too bad the SM 26 doesn't have a polarity switch on the outputs it would be perfect for my use then, although a bottle opener option would come in handy too.

You Mean you can not get the wires in the right order???????????

I use a new technology called COLOR CODING
post #32487 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

Has anyone here tried "Treasure of the Sierra Madre", Blu-ray using HDMI Bitstream input into the D2v or AVM 50v?

That's this disc:

http://www.amazon.com/Treasure-Sierr...7573220&sr=8-1

It has a rare DTS-HD MA 1.0 track for the feature. I'm finding that HDMI Bitstream input produces corrupted audio in the V2.10c firmware.

I'm pretty sure this is a D2v bug, but I'd like to get confirmation from someone not using an Oppo Blu-ray player.

HDMI LPCM input works just fine.

The symptom with HDMI Bitstream input is that, although the D2v correctly determines the input is 48KHz DTS-HD MA with only the C channel active, it somehow gets confused and tries to produce output on all speakers, resulting in corrupted audio in the surrounds among other problems.

Pressing Select multiple times shows all speakers active for output (which is, of course, not correct). Pressing Mode once in my 5.1 speaker setup says the Mode for 5.1 input is None. Of course this isn't 5.1 input.
--Bob

Bob,

I just finished watching "The Green Berets". It's mastered in Dolby TrueHD 1.0. The Oppo 83 displayed this.

Was therefore surprised to see my D2v indicating 5.1 Dolby TrueHD 48kHz input when Select is pressed. However, only the Center has any output. Signal is clear and uncorrupted.

Ben
post #32488 of 40771
PLANNED OUTAGE NOTICE: AVS Forum will be closed and off-line starting Saturday (2/19) at 1:00AM ET. The outage is needed to replace a failed data drive and thus we have chosen to replace all the drives in the RAID array based on age. As such, we the site could be down for at least 4 hours and will not be able to be reached during this time. We hope to reopen by 5:00 AM ET 2/19. Thank you.
post #32489 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmusoke View Post

PLANNED OUTAGE NOTICE: AVS Forum will be closed and off-line starting Saturday (2/19) at 1:00AM ET. The outage is needed to replace a failed data drive and thus we have chosen to replace all the drives in the RAID array based on age. As such, we the site could be down for at least 4 hours and will not be able to be reached during this time. We hope to reopen by 5:00 AM ET 2/19. Thank you.

If I get the shakes, what should I take My wife is delighted.
John
post #32490 of 40771
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post

If I get the shakes, what should I take My wife is delighted.
John

Wife's happy for you'll get the chance to re-do the Valentines day thing you screwed up on...

I literary shook when i read bout this outage. Nights aren't the same without my AVS happy pills. A week ago, the cable police disconnected my cable from the hub (by accident it turned out). Returned home and internet with TV was down. Oh my, what a weird night that was! Can't log into anything, can't watch anything on TV. I had no happy BD disks to play on my Oppo, so i sulked in anger pondering my misfortune. Luckily, I was up 24 hours later. Now I vow to check my hub everytime i get an outtage(cable guy showed me how but i promised him i won't tamper with anything).

I could do w/o the TV, but the net? No way!!! I know, i'm addicted to AVS, even at work on my breaks and when things are slow. What to do???

Do we have an AVS anonymous group with a 12-step program? Who is the higher power we have to acknowledge on this one? Help!!!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem D2/D2v/AVM50/AVM50v/ARC1 tweaking guide