AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Klipsch owner thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Klipsch owner thread - Page 620

post #18571 of 22410
Pineville, La. I used to go to a Knights of Columbus summer camp at "Camp Maryhill" that was in Pineville. This was back in the late 70's early 80's. Fun place.
post #18572 of 22410
I'm planning my home theater and have pretty much decided on the THX Ultra2 system. A couple of questions. First, I see that Klipsch recommends locating the two subs next to each other. Their diagram shows them together at the front of the theater. Have you THX U2 owners experienced an advantage with this setup? Or, do you recommend something else? I realize a lot has to do with room dynamics, just looking for general experience here.

Second, I like the idea of buying a system that's been designed to optimally work together. However, I also read a lot about the great capabilities of many other subwoofers. That would seem to be about the only place that I would think about substituting another brand in the system. Any experience with this? Using maybe a couple of Hsu's instead of the KW-120s? Or are the 120s simply that good that one wouldn't consider other approaches?

Thanks for your advice.

Chuck
post #18573 of 22410
Chuck, can you tell us about your room (dimensions), your listening habits and goals...do you need to stay stealthy? or will anything fly?
post #18574 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Miller View Post

I'm planning my home theater and have pretty much decided on the THX Ultra2 system. A couple of questions. First, I see that Klipsch recommends locating the two subs next to each other. Their diagram shows them together at the front of the theater. Have you THX U2 owners experienced an advantage with this setup? Or, do you recommend something else? I realize a lot has to do with room dynamics, just looking for general experience here.

Second, I like the idea of buying a system that's been designed to optimally work together. However, I also read a lot about the great capabilities of many other subwoofers. That would seem to be about the only place that I would think about substituting another brand in the system. Any experience with this? Using maybe a couple of Hsu's instead of the KW-120s? Or are the 120s simply that good that one wouldn't consider other approaches?

Thanks for your advice.

Chuck


As far as subwoofer location, you kind of just have to play with it and see what sounds best. I recommend doing the 'sub crawl' and go with the position that sounds the best to your ears. I personally prefer my subwoofers in the front corners. I think that although the ultra2 subs are good, you can get a much better sub for way way less from companies such as, svs, hsu, Ed, chase, jute, or Seaton. Lots of information with regards to those brands on this board. Buying something like say, a pair of quad hsu vtf15's would yield better performance and save you a big chunk of change. Good luck with your ventures and keep us updated with your journey!
post #18575 of 22410
Thanks for the replies.

Tony, this will be a dedicated theater room in my basement. Rough dimensions are 19'Wx21'L with 8' ceiling. The length dimension assumes that I build a screen wall in the front of the room and plan to locate the front speakers behind that wall, presumably including the subs. I hope to put my equipment room behind the screen wall as well, but need to study that more to see where it would fit and how I would make it not be distracting during movies. It will be a bat cave, so any lights will definitely show up. Currently planning 133" diagonal 16:9 AT screen. Usage will be about 90% movies and 10% music.

Marty, the interesting part of your reply is "you can get a much better sub". I know you are talking about value, but for the price that I believe I can buy the KW-120s for, I think they would be roughly in the same neighborhood as the best Hsus, for example. So the real question for me is would I get better LF performance from the other brands you mentioned? If so, I'd get the THX U2 system without the subs and amp.

My current audio plan is KL-650 LCRs behind the screen or screen wall. Then I'd like to go in-wall for the rest. So KS-7800 side surrounds, KL-7800 rear surrounds and KL-6502 front effects or "heights". I plan to drive this will a Yamaha RX-A3010 AVR with the idea that I can upgrade if necessary to add an Emotiva 3-channel amp for the LCRs. I would try it with just the Yammy first though. My last home theater that got sold with the last house had a Yamaha DSP-A1 and Klipsch Reference speakers. Don't remember the models. So I'm a fan of the Klipsch/Yamaha connection. I loved the sound in my old theater.

Of course, this leaves open the debate on direct vs. indirect surround speakers. Is there a consensus among this board as to the merits of one over the other and in what positions? The THX U2 system comes with indirect sides and direct rears. I presume that at least Klipsch thinks this is the best sound. Do others agree or disagree?

Probably TMI and if so, I apologize. Thanks again for your replies.

Chuck
post #18576 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Miller View Post

Thanks for the replies.

Tony, this will be a dedicated theater room in my basement. Rough dimensions are 19'Wx21'L with 8' ceiling. The length dimension assumes that I build a screen wall in the front of the room and plan to locate the front speakers behind that wall, presumably including the subs. I hope to put my equipment room behind the screen wall as well, but need to study that more to see where it would fit and how I would make it not be distracting during movies. It will be a bat cave, so any lights will definitely show up. Currently planning 133" diagonal 16:9 AT screen. Usage will be about 90% movies and 10% music.

Marty, the interesting part of your reply is "you can get a much better sub". I know you are talking about value, but for the price that I believe I can buy the KW-120s for, I think they would be roughly in the same neighborhood as the best Hsus, for example. So the real question for me is would I get better LF performance from the other brands you mentioned? If so, I'd get the THX U2 system without the subs and amp.

My current audio plan is KL-650 LCRs behind the screen or screen wall. Then I'd like to go in-wall for the rest. So KS-7800 side surrounds, KL-7800 rear surrounds and KL-6502 front effects or "heights". I plan to drive this will a Yamaha RX-A3010 AVR with the idea that I can upgrade if necessary to add an Emotiva 3-channel amp for the LCRs. I would try it with just the Yammy first though. My last home theater that got sold with the last house had a Yamaha DSP-A1 and Klipsch Reference speakers. Don't remember the models. So I'm a fan of the Klipsch/Yamaha connection. I loved the sound in my old theater.

Of course, this leaves open the debate on direct vs. indirect surround speakers. Is there a consensus among this board as to the merits of one over the other and in what positions? The THX U2 system comes with indirect sides and direct rears. I presume that at least Klipsch thinks this is the best sound. Do others agree or disagree?

Probably TMI and if so, I apologize. Thanks again for your replies.

Chuck

I myself think if you have the room the dynamics with the Heritage line trumps the THX line hands down . As for subs the SVS & hsu trump the Klipsch THX subs & sub amps both sonically & value wise as well . Are the THX more WAF Yes , but as you state what will you really see once the lights go down & the movie starts , I myself value Dynamics over what the audio gear looks like in the lighted room after the movie is over .. I M H O ..
post #18577 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony123 View Post

Pineville, La. I used to go to a Knights of Columbus summer camp at "Camp Maryhill" that was in Pineville. This was back in the late 70's early 80's. Fun place.

Yep been there many times, its still up and running.
post #18578 of 22410
Chuck, in your sized room, you are within the design parameters of that system. I had 3 KL650's in a 6000cf room and they were overtaxed. I eventually blew out a horn by overdriving a receiver. If you get this system, go with that Emotiva. I did that and it was a noticable improvement. All that aside, I ended up switching over to LaScalas and there is hardly comparison. The LS have more detail and much greater dynamics. If you're doing an AT screen and the speakers will be hidden anyway, then it doesn't matter much how big they are. Same idea with subs. Most of the value in the KW120's is that they are impressive for their size. However, if you are able to accomodate larger boxes, the price for that performance goes down.

I really like the U2 system. But it didn't meet my expectations (for my 6000cf room) and I would recommend going used Heritage. Heck, I've got less money in three LaScala than I did in those KL650's. But I've not heard the U2 system in a smaller room and would suspect it to be supurb.

And, never TMI. We all enjoy chatting about this stuff.
post #18579 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffer65 View Post

Need some advice. I'm using a pair of Athena SCT S3s for L/R, but my center & rears don't match. I am considering upgrading the whole thing. i want to stick with bookshelf speakers. My listening is about 75% movies, 25% music.

living room is 10 x 14 x 8, carpeted. Open to the kitchen/dinette that has a ceramic tile floor.
Equipment I want keep includes a Parasound HCA1000 (110 watts/channel) for the mains, Yamaha 965 AVR powers the center & rears.
Velodyne CT 100 sub (10 inch front firing 100 watt)
20" sand filled stands

Klipsch is on my list of brands to audition. Would the RB 61s on the 20" stands with the matching center be enough for this room? The RB 81 is quite a bit more $ so I don't if I could justify that.
Would my existing sub be able to keep with the 61s?
Does anyone use the Synergy surrounds with the Reference fronts?

Thanks for the help.

I use rb61 with synergy ks20s in the rear! The combo sounds good but the first chance I have to get rs52 I'm upgrading.
post #18580 of 22410
Tony, I tried to send you a PM but it got rejected and said your message quota has been exceeded. I'm interested in some recommendations on the Klipsch U2 system and other HT components in your theater. Can you send a PM to me so that we can have that discussion?

Thanks,

Chuck
post #18581 of 22410
Chuck, I'll clean it up in the next few minutes. Please try again.
post #18582 of 22410
Hi Guys..

Which one is better?

KS-525-THX Surround Speakers VS RS-62 II Surround Speaker.
post #18583 of 22410
I spent about an hour on the phone one day with a Klipsch design engineer over this topic. His recommendation was that the RS62 was a better performer. That's what I went with. I think the horns are the same and the 62 has the larger woofers at 6.5".

I can testify that they have no trouble meeting any goal you might have for a side surround! I've been very pleased.
post #18584 of 22410
Thanks so much Tony123
post #18585 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Miller View Post

Thanks for the replies.

Tony, this will be a dedicated theater room in my basement. Rough dimensions are 19'Wx21'L with 8' ceiling. The length dimension assumes that I build a screen wall in the front of the room and plan to locate the front speakers behind that wall, presumably including the subs. I hope to put my equipment room behind the screen wall as well, but need to study that more to see where it would fit and how I would make it not be distracting during movies. It will be a bat cave, so any lights will definitely show up. Currently planning 133" diagonal 16:9 AT screen. Usage will be about 90% movies and 10% music.

Marty, the interesting part of your reply is "you can get a much better sub". I know you are talking about value, but for the price that I believe I can buy the KW-120s for, I think they would be roughly in the same neighborhood as the best Hsus, for example. So the real question for me is would I get better LF performance from the other brands you mentioned? If so, I'd get the THX U2 system without the subs and amp.

My current audio plan is KL-650 LCRs behind the screen or screen wall. Then I'd like to go in-wall for the rest. So KS-7800 side surrounds, KL-7800 rear surrounds and KL-6502 front effects or "heights". I plan to drive this will a Yamaha RX-A3010 AVR with the idea that I can upgrade if necessary to add an Emotiva 3-channel amp for the LCRs. I would try it with just the Yammy first though. My last home theater that got sold with the last house had a Yamaha DSP-A1 and Klipsch Reference speakers. Don't remember the models. So I'm a fan of the Klipsch/Yamaha connection. I loved the sound in my old theater.

Of course, this leaves open the debate on direct vs. indirect surround speakers. Is there a consensus among this board as to the merits of one over the other and in what positions? The THX U2 system comes with indirect sides and direct rears. I presume that at least Klipsch thinks this is the best sound. Do others agree or disagree?

Probably TMI and if so, I apologize. Thanks again for your replies.

Chuck

The THX Ultra system is a nice system. Placing of subs up front near mains, allows for the use of a higher crossover point, if wanted. Since the subs have more surface area, they can move more air, so you can get increased output, higher up the bandwidth with a higher crossover point. Now, I would only consider that for the front three speakers, because of localization issues, if you go above 80hz for the surround speakers. It works for the front three, because the subs are near the mains and center.

For in wall surround speakers I would use the KS-7800-THX on the sides and KL-7800-THX for the rear surrounds. This is assuming that the KL-7800-THX speakers are not going to be too close to the listeners.

For subs the Klipsch the KW-120's are good subs, but there are a lot of good subs out there. You will be able to get more output with a good quality sub that uses a larger driver, but those subs will be larger, taking up more room. You just have to decide if you want to mix and match or stay the same. If we can help you with selection, give us a call.
Reply
Reply
post #18586 of 22410
I have a 5.1 system and am pretty happy with it except my surrounds. I have Klipsch RB-25 left and right speakers, matching center channel and surround speakers. The problem is the placement of the surround speakers. I have them hanging from the 10' ceiling and all the surround sound goes 'over' the listening position (couch in pics). Relocating the surround speakers is not really an option. I have my reciever (HK AVR 635) calibrated by manually using a SPL meter to adjust gain to each channel and have measured distance from listening position to each speaker. I have actually increased the gain to the surround speakers in an effort to get more of a surround sensation. What do you guys think of the position and orientation of the surround speakers (see pics)?

Is this location (hanging from the ceiling) just a no go for these speakers or can their orientation (angle, tilt, rotation) be adjusted to improve surround or should I just dump them and go with something else? If something else, any suggestions?
LL
LL
post #18587 of 22410
I just put an order in for a 7.1 Klipsch system. I'm getting:

RF-82 II for the mains
RC-62 II for center
RS-52 II for surrounds
RB-81 II for surrounds
SW-112 for sub

Probably going to play with the surrounds to see which I like better for the sides or rears. I just know I'm freakin excited! =^D
post #18588 of 22410
^I just ordered a 115 SW for my sub work... let me know how you like the sw-112.
I'm going to be running my 115 with the heritage line mains.
post #18589 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCF34 View Post

I have a 5.1 system and am pretty happy with it except my surrounds. I have Klipsch RB-25 left and right speakers, matching center channel and surround speakers. The problem is the placement of the surround speakers. I have them hanging from the 10' ceiling and all the surround sound goes 'over' the listening position (couch in pics). Relocating the surround speakers is not really an option. I have my reciever (HK AVR 635) calibrated by manually using a SPL meter to adjust gain to each channel and have measured distance from listening position to each speaker. I have actually increased the gain to the surround speakers in an effort to get more of a surround sensation. What do you guys think of the position and orientation of the surround speakers (see pics)?

Is this location (hanging from the ceiling) just a no go for these speakers or can their orientation (angle, tilt, rotation) be adjusted to improve surround or should I just dump them and go with something else? If something else, any suggestions?

Bump...
post #18590 of 22410
From the glare in the photo I can't tell how they are pointed right now. Are the drivers angled down at the couch or are they pointed forward? If they're pointed forward you're not going to get good sound no matter what sort of speakers they are. Make sure they're angled at the couch.

You should explore more placement options though. Those speakers are meant to be beside the listener and not necessarily that far above. Have a look at the dolby website and they have a placement guide. Either way, its not a kllipsch issue.
post #18591 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonnash View Post

From the glare in the photo I can't tell how they are pointed right now. Are the drivers angled down at the couch or are they pointed forward? If they're pointed forward you're not going to get good sound no matter what sort of speakers they are. Make sure they're angled at the couch.

You should explore more placement options though. Those speakers are meant to be beside the listener and not necessarily that far above. Have a look at the dolby website and they have a placement guide. Either way, its not a kllipsch issue.

Thanks. The woofers are pointed slightly down and slightly inward toward the front of the room. The woofers are definetly more pointed forward toward the front of the room than toward the listening position. If I rotated them almost 90 degrees so that the two speakers almost point inward towards each other and angled them down more towards the ground do you think that would help??

Even if it does sound better with that positioning, it will probably look like sh*t because the speakers are so large. If these speakers can't work in this position what do you think about Klipsch in-ceiling surround speakers located in the ceiling between the can light and the current speaker position? I understand the Klipsch in-ceiling speaker has a woofer than can be angled so it would direct sound and be inward toward listening position. Thoughts??
post #18592 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCF34 View Post

I have a 5.1 system and am pretty happy with it except my surrounds. I have Klipsch RB-25 left and right speakers, matching center channel and surround speakers. The problem is the placement of the surround speakers. I have them hanging from the 10' ceiling and all the surround sound goes 'over' the listening position (couch in pics). Relocating the surround speakers is not really an option. I have my reciever (HK AVR 635) calibrated by manually using a SPL meter to adjust gain to each channel and have measured distance from listening position to each speaker. I have actually increased the gain to the surround speakers in an effort to get more of a surround sensation. What do you guys think of the position and orientation of the surround speakers (see pics)?

Is this location (hanging from the ceiling) just a no go for these speakers or can their orientation (angle, tilt, rotation) be adjusted to improve surround or should I just dump them and go with something else? If something else, any suggestions?

I assume those are RS25 surrounds. I have RS35 mounted to the left and right of the LP which I feel is a better orientation and have no problem with the sound surrounding me.
post #18593 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCF34 View Post

I have a 5.1 system and am pretty happy with it except my surrounds. I have Klipsch RB-25 left and right speakers, matching center channel and surround speakers. The problem is the placement of the surround speakers. I have them hanging from the 10' ceiling and all the surround sound goes 'over' the listening position (couch in pics). Relocating the surround speakers is not really an option. I have my reciever (HK AVR 635) calibrated by manually using a SPL meter to adjust gain to each channel and have measured distance from listening position to each speaker. I have actually increased the gain to the surround speakers in an effort to get more of a surround sensation. What do you guys think of the position and orientation of the surround speakers (see pics)?

Is this location (hanging from the ceiling) just a no go for these speakers or can their orientation (angle, tilt, rotation) be adjusted to improve surround or should I just dump them and go with something else? If something else, any suggestions?

I assume those are RS25 surrounds. I have RS35 mounted to the left and right of the LP which I feel is a better orientation and have no problem with the sound surrounding me. Actually they are left and right and a few inches behing the LP.
post #18594 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCF34 View Post


Thanks. The woofers are pointed slightly down and slightly inward toward the front of the room. The woofers are definetly more pointed forward toward the front of the room than toward the listening position. If I rotated them almost 90 degrees so that the two speakers almost point inward towards each other and angled them down more towards the ground do you think that would help??

Even if it does sound better with that positioning, it will probably look like sh*t because the speakers are so large. If these speakers can't work in this position what do you think about Klipsch in-ceiling surround speakers located in the ceiling between the can light and the current speaker position? I understand the Klipsch in-ceiling speaker has a woofer than can be angled so it would direct sound and be inward toward listening position. Thoughts??

The in ceiling speakers would get more sound to the seat if you can't mount them on the wall. The way you have the speakers now and even angled in is just like putting your front speakers on 7 foot tall speaker stands. The sound flies over your head. Horns are very directional and if you aren't in the direction of the horn you won't hear them as they should be.
post #18595 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSchu18 View Post

^I just ordered a 115 SW for my sub work... let me know how you like the sw-112.
I'm going to be running my 115 with the heritage line mains.

When I listened to it in store, it sounded like it was going to be more than enough for my space. I thought about the 15", but didn't want to put down more money than I already had =^P I figure if I ever need more, I can always go with another 12" and that will be enough for any space I'll ever be in.
post #18596 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonnash View Post

The in ceiling speakers would get more sound to the seat if you can't mount them on the wall. The way you have the speakers now and even angled in is just like putting your front speakers on 7 foot tall speaker stands. The sound flies over your head. Horns are very directional and if you aren't in the direction of the horn you won't hear them as they should be.

Thanks. Any good suggestions for in ceiling speakers that would go well with the RB-25 left and right and center channel?

And actually my left and right channels are in built-ins that are about 6' from the ground and my center channel is on a floating shelf below the plasma and that shelf is about 5' high. Lastly my SV Sub (2x12" subs) is located in the back left corner of the room (u can see the cherry enclosure in one of the pics in post above). Looks like my system is pretty much screwed up all around.
post #18597 of 22410
I am getting a set of RS-52 IIs for surrounds and the website says they handle 100 watts RMS @ 8 Ohms. Currently I have an Onkyo TX-SR706 which appears to have 100 watts RMS @ 8 Ohms as well. The problem is, I plan to upgrade my receiver to something 3D capable when I get a new TV. I was looking at the Onkyo TX-NR818, but it looks to be 135 rms @ 8 ohms. Is this going to be way too much power for the RS-52s to handle? Should I be looking more at the 717 which is 110 rms, or is that still going to be too much? The dealer said that you don't really reach the full wattage of the amp unless you turn it all the way up, is this true? I would just rather not blow the speakers if one day I decide I want to 'test' how loud my speakers can go...I would like the higher power because of the rest of the system I am getting, but I also don't want to chance blowing the surrounds...please give me some guidance!!!

here is the system I am getting:

RF-82 II for the mains
RC-62 II for center
RS-52 II for surrounds
RB-81 II for surrounds
SW-112 for sub

I guess I could go with RS-62s for surrounds, but I just don't know if I want to spend that extra money...
post #18598 of 22410
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCF34 View Post

Thanks. Any good suggestions for in ceiling speakers that would go well with the RB-25 left and right and center channel?

And actually my left and right channels are in built-ins that are about 6' from the ground and my center channel is on a floating shelf below the plasma and that shelf is about 5' high. Lastly my SV Sub (2x12" subs) is located in the back left corner of the room (u can see the cherry enclosure in one of the pics in post above). Looks like my system is pretty much screwed up all around.

In addition to in ceiling surround sound recommendations (RC-2650 / CDT-2650-SC / CDT-2650-C II) here is a pick of my front wall showing set, center channel, and left and right channels. As you can I can't really do anything with any of those speakers (putting left and right on stands in front of fireplace is a no go because of a 7 month old getting more mobile every day).
LL
post #18599 of 22410
Couple questions I have a little extra money coming at the end of the month and wanted to upgrade my bedroom system. Israel the rb 41 ii good speakers and will the txsr 607 I have be too much for them
post #18600 of 22410
Hey guys,
I'm looking to get some feedback on some upgrades I'm in the process of doing. I recently picked up a Yamaha RX-A2010 and decided at that time to make a few upgrades to my HT. Right now, I currently have the 1st gen Reference 52 lineup (RC-52, RF-52, RS-52). While doing some in-store research on a good sub to supplement my Klipsch RPW-10D, I accidentally found a great deal on the RC-64 ii Center speaker from my local electronics store. So I had them order me one as they were out of stock. While I was there, I happened to get a quick audition of the RF-7 ii pair that they had and I was pretty impressed. Unfortunately, their demo room is not the greatest so it was hard to gauge how they might sound at home. Still, I was impressed enough that I am planning to pick them up, so my question is, how much of a difference should I expect to see between what I have now and changing out the fronts and center? My basement is not huge by any means (maybe 12x14?) but I do like rich sound and there is always the possibility that I might move into something bigger, so I don't mind if this all sounds like overkill. I am also seriously considering adding the Emotiva XPA-5 to the set, but I'm still researching it like crazy because I've never owned an amp before.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Klipsch owner thread