AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Dynaudio Owner's Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Dynaudio Owner's Thread - Page 104

post #3091 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by rydenfan View Post

The new Synergistic Tesla stuff is fantastic. I am a believer in cables and have tried many different ones and LOVE the new Tesla stuff. I have Accelerator speaker cable, T2 power cord on my pre, and T3 power cord on my amp. I want to add an Acoustic Reference interconnect at some point. You owe it to yourself to audition them. The good Synergistic dealers all have plenty of cables available for demoing, as they know you must hear the cables in your system to get the right synergy.

I think it is possible PAL tried to become a dealer and it did not work out or something. Because he leaves to bring up the same story everytime Synergistic is mentioned, even though he has the story totally wrong If you wish to get more info on this story or Synergistic in general just shoot me a PM so we do not derail the thread too far.

Agree with you here. I upgraded my major power cords first. I have not got to the IC's or Speaker Cables yet.

I currently have T2, T3 and Precision. I love these cords. Also, I am a REL Guy and would really like to try one of their REL Spec cables. This will be next but the IC's and Speaker Cables may need to wait in line behind a new Amp.

Sorry. Back to Dynaudio. Just expressing my fondness for Synergistic Research as well.

Rick
post #3092 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by pal1982 View Post

Just a lil FYI on Synergistic Research the Tesla has been known to cause issues in some amps... Simaudio for sure... have had customers that have called me with issues with them.... can't tell you on here exactly what but um... lets just say its confirmed.... and it can be detrimental to expensive electronics.

P.S. The TARA's were so good i switched every cable in my store that's 3 rooms of cables out for them, i was that impressed... it's not snake oil technology its real!

PAL be careful with these comments you could be on shakey legal ground, HITMAN is right, if there's a problem you should clarify. If synergistic sees these comments it could be sticky. I've tried Synergistic as well with no real problems in my system, IC was between the cd and pre-amp.
post #3093 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by HTMAN21 View Post

What is your estimated price?

could the 360 be the much awaited baby sapphire? I think a nice custom finish on these babies could go a long way to satisfying that sapphire lust
post #3094 of 19342
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by HTMAN21 View Post

What is your estimated price?

The retail price will be $6500/pair. Considering this speaker has the Estoar2 tweeter as found in the Confidence C1 ($7000/pair), AND has dual 8" woofers and a dedicated mid, this thing should be a downright steal!

Seems like a similar driver-array as the Contour S5.4 ($10,000/pair) in a more traditional configuration and in a more traditional cabinet.
post #3095 of 19342
The 360 looks like an incredible speaker. Its too bad the speaker grilles cover the entire front of the speaker though. Kind of a new look for Dynaudio, hides that beautiful veneer.

Bill
post #3096 of 19342
Looks like Dynaudio is targeting the Focal Electras, I cant quite figure out though what officially sits higher on the totem pole, does this new speaker now supersede the 3.4 or is it in a lateral position?
post #3097 of 19342
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynero View Post

Looks like Dynaudio is targeting the Focal Electras, I cant quite figure out though what officially sits higher on the totem pole, does this new speaker now supersede the 3.4 or is it in a lateral position?

Though I haven't heard this speaker (in fact I don't think anyone has in the general public because I think the Focus 360 was on static display at RMAF), it reminds me of the overlap between the Excite X36 and Focus 220. I think the Focus 360 should be shipping early November so we should all know soon enough.

This price point has heavy competition as you noted, so its good to see Dynaudio is coming ready for battle with this latest release.
post #3098 of 19342
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Mac View Post

The 360 looks like an incredible speaker. Its too bad the speaker grilles cover the entire front of the speaker though. Kind of a new look for Dynaudio, hides that beautiful veneer.

Bill

Though I would've liked a similar look to the Focus 220 only larger, Im guessing that the Focus 360 is designed to offer high-end Contour level performance in a more conservative styling and cabinet design. I really like the modern and sleek Danish styling of the Contour 3.4 and 5.4, but I DO understand that some people are overwhelmed by the modern styling. Now we have a speaker that can achieve similar performance, but not attract so much attention if thats makes sense.
post #3099 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by AudioArchitect View Post

Though I would've liked a similar look to the Focus 220 only larger, Im guessing that the Focus 360 is designed to offer high-end Contour level performance in a more conservative styling and cabinet design. I really like the modern and sleek Danish styling of the Contour 3.4 and 5.4, but I DO understand that some people are overwhelmed by the modern styling. Now we have a speaker that can achieve similar performance, but not attract so much attention if thats makes sense.

I would imagine that soundwise the Focus 360 would definitely give contour level performance. If I were to guess and this is just a GUESS: ) It'll probably have more slam than the 3.4 but not as much as the 5.4.

The midrange of the 3.4 would probably be a little more refined and I would guess that the cabinet would be more solidly built ( hey the 360's got three drivers and an esotar tweeter, they gotta cut corners somewhere ) so maybe better imaging and soundstaging from the Contours.

I would guess for the voicing the Contours would be more neutral and maybe open, the Focus sweeter and more forgiving. Why do I say this> Simply from experience with both the sound of the current Focus and Contour models THEN AGAIN, the opposite could just as easily be true, that esotar tweeter is I think the unknown element in all this but i don't think they'll make it to be as revealing or as refined as the Confidence or Contour models.

I would imagine that they're ramping up production at this point and the 360 has been voiced so it's just a matter of time I guess.
post #3100 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by AudioArchitect View Post

The retail price will be $6500/pair. Considering this speaker has the Estoar2 tweeter as found in the Confidence C1 ($7000/pair), AND has dual 8" woofers and a dedicated mid, this thing should be a downright steal!

Seems like a similar driver-array as the Contour S5.4 ($10,000/pair) in a more traditional configuration and in a more traditional cabinet.

Very interesting that they went with Esotar2. I wonder if a second Center Channel will make it to the line-up like the Contours?

Rick
post #3101 of 19342
Two things mentioned that I thought of also... The grills covering the whole front was a bad move imo. Not saying this will sway me in any way, just would of been much nicer seeing the veneer while the grills are still in place... And the cabinets; I own 220's now and have been pondering my next path (so was thrilled when I stopped by this thread yesterday!) but was wondering how the Focus cabinets would do with more bass emanating from them. Surly Dyn would strengthen them more to handle the lower stretch no resonance.
Looking forward to hearing some thoughts! Nice to have a few options to go to from the 220's---> 360's? 3.4's? used 5.4's? used C1's??? Hmmm...
post #3102 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynero View Post

I would imagine that soundwise the Focus 360 would definitely give contour level performance. If I were to guess and this is just a GUESS: ) It'll probably have more slam than the 3.4 but not as much as the 5.4.

The midrange of the 3.4 would probably be a little more refined and I would guess that the cabinet would be more solidly built ( hey the 360's got three drivers and an esotar tweeter, they gotta cut corners somewhere ) so maybe better imaging and soundstaging from the Contours.

I would guess for the voicing the Contours would be more neutral and maybe open, the Focus sweeter and more forgiving. Why do I say this> Simply from experience with both the sound of the current Focus and Contour models THEN AGAIN, the opposite could just as easily be true, that esotar tweeter is I think the unknown element in all this but i don't think they'll make it to be as revealing or as refined as the Confidence or Contour models.

I would imagine that they're ramping up production at this point and the 360 has been voiced so it's just a matter of time I guess.


Its going to be really intruiging to find out if the 360 will out perform the 3.4s...My guess is that the 360 will be a lot more flamboyant but the 3.4s will be a lot smoother. I just dont know why Dynaudio did not put the Esotar2 tweeter in the 3.4s. Come to think of it...
Mick, do you know if Dynaudio will allow customization of the 3.4s by adding and Esotar2 tweeter and will that affect the crossover?? I'll gladly send mine(3.4s) to be customized
post #3103 of 19342
This new speaker should really be a nice contender in it's price point. I will be excited to hear what it can do.
post #3104 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynero View Post

I would imagine that soundwise the Focus 360 would definitely give contour level performance. If I were to guess and this is just a GUESS: ) It'll probably have more slam than the 3.4 but not as much as the 5.4.

The midrange of the 3.4 would probably be a little more refined and I would guess that the cabinet would be more solidly built ( hey the 360's got three drivers and an esotar tweeter, they gotta cut corners somewhere ) so maybe better imaging and soundstaging from the Contours.

I would guess for the voicing the Contours would be more neutral and maybe open, the Focus sweeter and more forgiving. Why do I say this> Simply from experience with both the sound of the current Focus and Contour models THEN AGAIN, the opposite could just as easily be true, that esotar tweeter is I think the unknown element in all this but i don't think they'll make it to be as revealing or as refined as the Confidence or Contour models.

I would imagine that they're ramping up production at this point and the 360 has been voiced so it's just a matter of time I guess.

Dynero,
While I had some time with the 360's prior to going to the RMAF, they were not even close to being broken in but I would have to say that with my knowledge of the entire line and specifically the differences between the Focus and Contour, you guess is probably spot on! The S3.4 in an incredible speaker, it is one of the most balanced loudspeakers I have ever heard. I believe the 3.4 could definitely benefit from the use of an Esotar2 tweeter and a modification while possible just isn't going to happen right now. The Esoter2 tweeter is more detailed and refined than the Esotec tweeter in the 3.4 but I wonder if it would throw off that balance of the 3.4, sometimes it is better not to mess with a good thing. With that being said I believe the 360 will have incredible detail and refinement in the high frequency, unbelievable output and the midrange that Dynaudio is known for, a baby Contour S5.4 rather than Sapphire. I have attached some pictures of the 360 at the RMAF to give everyone a better idea of the size of the 360.
LL
LL
post #3105 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynlunatic View Post

Dynero,
I have attached some pictures of the 360 at the RMAF to give everyone a better idea of the size of the 360.

The Sapphire still gives me goose bumps. Stunning.
post #3106 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by CETA1 View Post

The Saphire still gives me goose bumps. Stunning.

This is a quote from one of the reviewers at RMAF:


If there's anything I expect from Dynaudio, it's superb bass. Dynaudio's 30th-anniversary Sapphire ($16,500/pair) certainly produced copious amounts of bass. But the speaker gave me far more than sheer volume. In combination with the Wadia 781i transport/DAC ($15,000), Pass Labs XA100.5A monoblocks ($16,000/pair), Grand Priz Monaco Amplifier Stand, and XLO Signature 3 SE-1 power cords ($1100/8'), S3-2.2 balanced interconnect ($900/m), and S3-4.2 digital cable ($455/m), the system delivered some of the most well-proportioned, beautifully delineated bass I've ever heard. The opening of Mahler's Symphony 2 is rich with the sound of cellos, violas, and basses, and this system nailed each and every line with rare beauty. On the other end of the spectrum, soprano Elly Ameling's voice radiated angelic sweetness. Pictured with the equipment they represent are Dynaudio's Michael Manousselis (l) and Wadia's Martin E. Cooper (r).

From Soundstage!:
post #3107 of 19342
I have a question regarding combining a C1 with a Stand4.

Is it "better" to screw the C1s directly to the stands rather than placing them on top? This may be a silly question because Dynaudio seems to have designed both products with this in mind, but I'm just curious.

Also, is it better to fill both columns of the Stand4 or would filling one column suffice? I know John Atkinson mentioned filling them 2/3 full with cat litter or sand, and Dynaudio seems to encourage filling one column only (by providing only one plastic sleeve per stand to put inside the columns).

And regarding any questions about components, I'm using Bel Canto 1000s and a Lyngdorf preamplifier/subwoofer system, along with a Sony XA777ES. Sounds terrific, although I hope to get to Goodwins in Boston at some point to compare the sound to Simaudio components. I just haven't had time to pull everything apart and make the drive down lugging all the gear. Of course, if I screw the speakers down and fill the stands with litter, I may never do the comparison.
post #3108 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynlunatic View Post

This is a quote from one of the reviewers at RMAF:


If there's anything I expect from Dynaudio, it's superb bass. Dynaudio's 30th-anniversary Sapphire ($16,500/pair) certainly produced copious amounts of bass. But the speaker gave me far more than sheer volume. In combination with the Wadia 781i transport/DAC ($15,000), Pass Labs XA100.5A monoblocks ($16,000/pair), Grand Priz Monaco Amplifier Stand, and XLO Signature 3 SE-1 power cords ($1100/8'), S3-2.2 balanced interconnect ($900/m), and S3-4.2 digital cable ($455/m), the system delivered some of the most well-proportioned, beautifully delineated bass I've ever heard. The opening of Mahler's Symphony 2 is rich with the sound of cellos, violas, and basses, and this system nailed each and every line with rare beauty. On the other end of the spectrum, soprano Elly Ameling's voice radiated angelic sweetness. Pictured with the equipment they represent are Dynaudio's Michael Manousselis (l) and Wadia's Martin E. Cooper (r).

From Soundstage!:

Mick,

That's some list of equipment in the chain with those Sapphire's.
post #3109 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by VT Skier View Post

I have a question regarding combining a C1 with a Stand4.

Is it "better" to screw the C1s directly to the stands rather than placing them on top? This may be a silly question because Dynaudio seems to have designed both products with this in mind, but I'm just curious.

Also, is it better to fill both columns of the Stand4 or would filling one column suffice? I know John Atkinson mentioned filling them 2/3 full with cat litter or sand, and Dynaudio seems to encourage filling one column only (by providing only one plastic sleeve per stand to put inside the columns).

And regarding any questions about components, I'm using Bel Canto 1000s and a Lyngdorf preamplifier/subwoofer system, along with a Sony XA777ES. Sounds terrific, although I hope to get to Goodwins in Boston at some point to compare the sound to Simaudio components. I just haven't had time to pull everything apart and make the drive down lugging all the gear. Of course, if I screw the speakers down and fill the stands with litter, I may never do the comparison.

The C-1 definitely benefits from bolting directly to the Stand 4, mainly from the standpoint that it creates the structural integrity of a floor standing speaker and when you fill both the tubes of each stand you increase that structural integrity by about 30Lbs per speaker. Both tubes are meant to be filled and the reason why only one bladder is provided for each stand is because the front tube does not need a bladder. The rear tube gets the bladder because of the wire hide in the rear of the tube, the front tube has no holes thus it seals it self once bolted down. John Atkinson claimed their was a resonance at a certain frequency when the tubes were completely filled so he suggested filling them 2/3's full. I don't think kitty litter is a good way to go because it lacks the density of sand. Play sand if dust free, is dense and is not dangerous like lead shot.
post #3110 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mozvz View Post

Mick,

That's some list of equipment in the chain with those Sapphire's.

I am not familiar with the cables but the Wadia player and Pass amp combined with the Sapphire is a pretty magical combination.
post #3111 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynlunatic View Post

Dynero,
While I had some time with the 360's prior to going to the RMAF, they were not even close to being broken in but I would have to say that with my knowledge of the entire line and specifically the differences between the Focus and Contour, you guess is probably spot on! The S3.4 in an incredible speaker, it is one of the most balanced loudspeakers I have ever heard. I believe the 3.4 could definitely benefit from the use of an Esotar2 tweeter and a modification while possible just isn't going to happen right now. The Esoter2 tweeter is more detailed and refined than the Esotec tweeter in the 3.4 but I wonder if it would throw off that balance of the 3.4, sometimes it is better not to mess with a good thing. With that being said I believe the 360 will have incredible detail and refinement in the high frequency, unbelievable output and the midrange that Dynaudio is known for, a baby Contour S5.4 rather than Sapphire. I have attached some pictures of the 360 at the RMAF to give everyone a better idea of the size of the 360.

I was wrong, those sapphires are in a league of their own a baby 5.4 indeed. I agree with you re the 3.4 and not adding an esotar tweeter, the 5.4 did sound much smoother and airier but the treble balance of the 3.4 was different, a little hotter but not spitty, metallic or brittle. It's sound reminds me of a cross between the esotar and a Focal Be tweeter. I think the esotec can be more forgiving of the partnering amp if the amp is on the warm or neutral side, while the disadvantage of the esotar tweeter is if it's partnered with a warm and dark amp, cable or source can sound a little dark. But when it comes to a natural sound i think the esotar really sounds more authentic and scoops up more detail.
post #3112 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by CETA1 View Post

Very interesting that they went with Esotar2. I wonder if a second Center Channel will make it to the line-up like the Contours?

Rick


The Contour SCX would be the appropriate match to the new 360, it uses the Esotar2 tweeter and while it has a metal baffle it still matches very nicely to the 360.
post #3113 of 19342
I'm getting ready to list my B&W 703s and am going to purchase the 220s or the 3.4s. I know that that the 3.4 is a BIG step up in most if not all aspects but price is really playing a role. If I could get the right amount for the 703s I would buy the 3.4s.

This may or may not be the place to ask, but what should I list the 703s for? They are a solid 9/10 and are in Maple finish. I have boxes, manuals,feet/spikes and packaging for them as well. They have about 20-25 hours on them. Thanks for any help given.
post #3114 of 19342
Quote:
I'm getting ready to list my B&W 703s and am going to purchase the 220s or the 3.4s.

You might try sending a PM to GSWAUL who subscribes to this thread. We replaced his B&W 703's with the Focus 220. It was between the 220's and the S1.4 monitors. Ultimately, he chose the 220 because of it's low end depth capabilities, but I know he preferred the S1.4 tweeter. Both of which he preferred over his B&W's.
post #3115 of 19342
Quote:


This may or may not be the place to ask, but what should I list the 703s for? They are a solid 9/10 and are in Maple finish.

This model is not difficult to sell, however, the Maple finish is. Their new retail is $3300 and I think if you can get $1650 for them you better take it.

Personally, I feel the Focus 220 betters the 703's and has a smoother top end. The retail price is the same.

The S3.4 is a significant step up from the 220 and the 703's imho. If you can go that route I would. Save your pennies and get what you really want is the best advice I could give you.
post #3116 of 19342
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by the6thorder View Post

I'm getting ready to list my B&W 703s and am going to purchase the 220s or the 3.4s. I know that that the 3.4 is a BIG step up in most if not all aspects but price is really playing a role. If I could get the right amount for the 703s I would buy the 3.4s.

This may or may not be the place to ask, but what should I list the 703s for? They are a solid 9/10 and are in Maple finish. I have boxes, manuals,feet/spikes and packaging for them as well. They have about 20-25 hours on them. Thanks for any help given.

As Ttowntony mentioned the Maple finish is the tricky part, as it doesn't sell as well as the darker finishes right now. I would start at $1900, but expect to get about $1650-1750.

Good move to the Dynaudios, you wont regret it.
post #3117 of 19342
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynlunatic View Post

John Atkinson claimed their was a resonance at a certain frequency when the tubes were completely filled so he suggested filling them 2/3's full. I don't think kitty litter is a good way to go because it lacks the density of sand. Play sand if dust free, is dense and is not dangerous like lead shot.

Agreed. Kitty litter usually has a weird smell to it as well. Apparently Atkinson has never been to a Home Depot before.

To the original poster, check out your local home improvement store and go to the garden department, and they have more types of "industrial" sand that you will know what to do with.
post #3118 of 19342
Thanks for the help, and thank you Mick for the good advice, as always.

I bought some play sand at Home Depot today, and hope to dry it out over the weekend. Then it's both columns screwed to the C1s, 2/3 filled and off to the races.
post #3119 of 19342
Quote:
Originally Posted by VT Skier View Post

Thanks for the help, and thank you Mick for the good advice, as always.

I bought some play sand at Home Depot today, and hope to dry it out over the weekend. Then it's both columns screwed to the C1s, 2/3 filled and off to the races.

Start 1/2 filled then if you still feel you require more coupling go to 2/3 filled. (We have found that in many rooms 1/2 filed was preferable to 2/3 filled.)
post #3120 of 19342
I've been having a little trouble getting my C2s repaired. The local distributor have been fantastic (I live in Australia) it's just a problem with logistics. Is there someone I can contact from Dynaudio directly to explain my situation?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Dynaudio Owner's Thread