AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Rear Projection Units › 2007 Mitsubishi WD-XX73X and XX831 Owner's Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

2007 Mitsubishi WD-XX73X and XX831 Owner's Thread - Page 147

post #4381 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franchot View Post

Yes, that's the idea. But SSE is more easily seen (by me and the others that see it) in solid "fields" of light colors, especially white and bright areas. For example, an ice hockey field, a close-up of a white t-shirt, a big yellow sun, etc. So, it's not a thing I would constantly notice in a movie. It's just that I find myself noticing it, instead of enjoying the flick. Film grain doesn't bother me, but that does. And many people aren't bothered by it at all.

Okay, understood. For 20 or so years I supplemented my income as a part time (union) motion picture machine operator (I.A.T.S.E.'s official name for a theater projectionist) both indoor and outdoor (Ozoner). After a year's apprenticeship and some training by a couple of the old-timers the job made me hypersensitive to presentation problems and later found myself enjoying "going to the movies" much less because instead of watching the movie I would sit there and critique everything about the presentation, from optics to accoustics, tightness of gate springs, gate jumping due to poorly made splices, switching early before the second queue marks, etc.

If you ever get the opportunity, a family outing to the Lorraine Theater in tiny little Hoopeston, Illinois (120 miles S of Chgo) is worth the trip. There you will witness some of the finest, most modern presentation optics, brightest xenon lamps and 8-channel sound systems available today. The little 575-seat Lorraine is equipped for both 70 & 35mm film stock and is planning to add digital video capability next year..... all for a town of 4,200 people. Obviously this is a hobby for the fellow who owns it.
post #4382 of 9376
Cap'n Preshoot,

Thanks for the info. If I ever find myself in that neck of the woods, that theater will be the first stop on my agenda. I've also worked in movie houses many years ago but as a manager, and I came to admire many union projectionists. When I moved to Burbank, CA (the home of several movie studios) in the late 70's there was only one public movie theater in the entire city. And it was a drive-in.
post #4383 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by KX500RIDER View Post

Model:57831
New Direct TV +DVR (just released I think)

Happens w/ most NFL games (today it was Niners vs Chiefs)

Anybody see any issues with the greens on their sets?
The greens (the field) will look different colors and blotchy.
I see this right before the start of a play (so a wide shot from the camera).
It continues on through the play, if it stays wide.
Is this normal?

Also, on Nascar HD, the track looks blurry or shadowy.
Is this normal?

Just wondering if this is just what you get w/HD or it's all DLPs.

I am thinking of returning this set. For $2880 (plus $220 for the stand), I think you can get a 50" plasma. No 1080P, but I don't want to live with these issues.
I also heared the burn in issue was fixed with the plasma (so I can watch games).

Thanks for any replies.

Likely it's not your set.
Where's the signal coming from, OTA or from your new D* receiver? From your symptoms my initial guess would be you're watching MPEG-4 compressed video from one of the new KA-band satellites and likely therefore using one of D*'s new AT9 sat dishes.

How do I know this? Because I also have one and the MPEG-4 compressed video on the Houston stations looks like crap, especially on camera zoom-in shots for a couple secs until things stabilize. MPEG-4 compression does a poor job on action sports. Fortunately I am not a prisoner of MPEG-4 compressed locals. I am able to get all of my locals OTA with a small Radios Hack corner-reflector/yagi antenna mounted on the corner of my chimney

Don't fault the TV set. Call up DTV and bitch. The more of us call and complain the better chance of getting it fixed or at least improved.
post #4384 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcaillo View Post

I find this comment about color accuracy curious. While I am a big fan of the Mitsubishis, these sets are rarely as accurate in reproducing color than the Sony sets you describe. We sell both of them and I see them side by side every day. I have measured them many times and without significant alignment, the color on the Sonys is clearly more accurate in the condition that you would see them in the stores. You can get the Mits to be very correct, but OOB the Sony will almost always be more correct. Maybe not what you prefer but more correct.

I agree with you with respect to last year's Mitsubishis. But not this year's. Have you measured those?

Admittedly, I'm not a TV technician, and don't use technical equipment to measure color accuracy. But color accuracy--true color, not fantasy color--is quite important to me. To my eye, this year's Mitsubishis have more accurate color out of the box when using the "Low" color temperature.

But I will defer to an objective measurement of this year's Mitsubishis, once that becomes available.
post #4385 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by KX500RIDER View Post

Model:57831
New Direct TV +DVR (just released I think)

Happens w/ most NFL games (today it was Niners vs Chiefs)

Anybody see any issues with the greens on their sets?
The greens (the field) will look different colors and blotchy.
I see this right before the start of a play (so a wide shot from the camera).
It continues on through the play, if it stays wide.
Is this normal?

I've been noticing this as well. I can't figure out if its my set, or 8300hd cable box compressing everything. I always look at the field for a true measure of sharpness, as my previous Pioneer Elite 1100hd plasma would let you see detailed strands of grass even when the camera was at normal distance. I see that blotchy stuff on the field right now and I have tweaked this set to death. lol
post #4386 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by largdiag View Post

There is no PQ difference between the 732 and the 831. Both have the high contrast screen. If you like the high gloss black plastic look, then the 832 has that style. Any percieved improvement is likely by mesmeric synaptic suggestion. Why else would the TV be more expensive and have a higher model number? It must be better then. Believe me, its the high gloss plastic look your going for. Based on that, I recommend the 831 to match your decor..but thats about it.

Well, I'm a 732 owner and while I like to think thatthe 732 has the high contrastscreen, I must say that it really doesn't...at least not the same so called "high contrast" screen though.
I must admit that the 732's screen has very similar properties as those of the 831.
post #4387 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by KX500RIDER View Post

Model:57831
New Direct TV +DVR (just released I think)

Happens w/ most NFL games (today it was Niners vs Chiefs)

Anybody see any issues with the greens on their sets?
The greens (the field) will look different colors and blotchy.
I see this right before the start of a play (so a wide shot from the camera).
It continues on through the play, if it stays wide.
Is this normal?

Also, on Nascar HD, the track looks blurry or shadowy.
Is this normal?

Just wondering if this is just what you get w/HD or it's all DLPs.

I am thinking of returning this set. For $2880 (plus $220 for the stand), I think you can get a 50" plasma. No 1080P, but I don't want to live with these issues.
I also heared the burn in issue was fixed with the plasma (so I can watch games).

Thanks for any replies.

Check out some of Smeeg's posts on setting colors. He had a lot to say about the greens. However, I agree that most of what you probably saw was source-related.

It seems that we all now have some of the best TV's on the planet, and the source material has yet to catch up with it. At least we have "future-proofed" ourselves.

Peace.

PS: How has the plasma "fixed" the burnin issue? I thought it was inherent in the technology.
post #4388 of 9376
In regards to the plasma burn-in issue:
Word of mouth...that's it..not sure if accurate
post #4389 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourcery View Post

I agree with you with respect to last year's Mitsubishis. But not this year's. Have you measured those?

Admittedly, I'm not a TV technician, and don't use technical equipment to measure color accuracy. But color accuracy--true color, not fantasy color--is quite important to me. To my eye, this year's Mitsubishis have more accurate color out of the box when using the "Low" color temperature.

But I will defer to an objective measurement of this year's Mitsubishis, once that becomes available.

I am a technician and yes, I have measured and was refering to this year's models of Mitsubishis. The primaries are pretty close OOB but the secondaries are not. They can be brought in close with alignment, however. Once calibrated it is surprising how similar the SXRD and Mits DLPs are. There are things to like and dislike about both but the are fine products.

If you want correct color have your set calibrated. Typically, the gray scale is too low on the low setting and far to high on the high setting and like I said, the secondaries need work. You can play with it visually and maybe get good results, but the color decoding is tough to get right without some practice and the right tools.
post #4390 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred S View Post

The only thing I wanted to know for sure and couldn't find it before I purchased my set, is the speed of the color wheel. I think now that its 14K, but I still haven't found confirmation. I also wanted to know the dimensions of the base of the TV (not the total dimensions) for stand reasons and no one at mits new the answer!! But, I checked the mits site a couple days ago and now the full measurements are included on that site. For the 65831 the depth for the TV is almost 20", but the base depth is only 17" (in case anyone is interested )

I am also interested in knowing the speed of the color wheel!
post #4391 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcaillo View Post

I am a technician and yes, I have measured and was refering to this year's models of Mitsubishis. The primaries are pretty close OOB but the secondaries are not. They can be brought in close with alignment, however. Once calibrated it is surprising how similar the SXRD and Mits DLPs are. There are things to like and dislike about both but the are fine products.

If you want correct color have your set calibrated. Typically, the gray scale is too low on the low setting and far to high on the high setting and like I said, the secondaries need work. You can play with it visually and maybe get good results, but the color decoding is tough to get right without some practice and the right tools.

how do you calibrate out the green glob?
post #4392 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyMeister View Post

Well, I'm a 732 owner and while I like to think thatthe 732 has the high contrastscreen, I must say that it really doesn't...at least not the same so called "high contrast" screen though.
I must admit that the 732's screen has very similar properties as those of the 831.

it does...they are identical
post #4393 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by KX500RIDER View Post

Model:57831
New Direct TV +DVR (just released I think)

Happens w/ most NFL games (today it was Niners vs Chiefs)

Anybody see any issues with the greens on their sets?
The greens (the field) will look different colors and blotchy.
I see this right before the start of a play (so a wide shot from the camera).
It continues on through the play, if it stays wide.
Is this normal?

Also, on Nascar HD, the track looks blurry or shadowy.
Is this normal?

Just wondering if this is just what you get w/HD or it's all DLPs.

I am thinking of returning this set. For $2880 (plus $220 for the stand), I think you can get a 50" plasma. No 1080P, but I don't want to live with these issues.
I also heared the burn in issue was fixed with the plasma (so I can play games).
Burn-in issue:word of mouth..nothing more.

Thanks for any replies.

nothing like your describe. Just the opposite. I can imagine there could be a finer picture. We have cable. maybe its issues with satellite compression and losing some of the fidelity of the original signal.?
post #4394 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by largdiag View Post

There is no PQ difference between the 732 and the 831. Both have the high contrast screen. If you like the high gloss black plastic look, then the 832 has that style. Any percieved improvement is likely by mesmeric synaptic suggestion. Why else would the TV be more expensive and have a higher model number? It must be better then. Believe me, its the high gloss plastic look your going for. Based on that, I recommend the 831 to match your decor..but thats about it.

You really should stop posting your nonsense man. If you set both tv's on the same settings that is mistake number one. Number 2 the high contrast screen is the material the screen is made from is designed to cut down the amount of light that escapes the screen and increase the amount of light going out, which would make it have brighter whites and blacker blacks. Your issue is that fact that since you didnt want to pony up for the 831, you want to bash it on this thread. Anyone here who actually understands this technology and can do some real world critical viewing by optimizing both the 732, and 831 for a comparison will easily see the 831 is a significant step in light output, contrast, black level, and color contrast. Another thing if someone else says they compared both tv's by first making the settings the same first I swear I'm going to hang myself the from the rafters.
post #4395 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by largdiag View Post

it does...they are identical

Largdiag, how do you know this? because when I compared the two, I thought the 831 has a bit more 3D while viewing up close shots of people's faces.
post #4396 of 9376
BTW I founf this warranty whic I thought is pretty good...better than P$$$ C$$$ ...

http://www.newworldvideodirect.com/p...productid=1377

It has both the 5 yr Repair Master and the 3 yr bulb warranty combined.
post #4397 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by largdiag View Post

it does...they are identical

I suspect most here require some objective proof of your assertion, esp. since Mits' website lists the screen for the 831 but not for the 732. Also, no dealer who went to the line show has reported being told that the 732 has the high contrast screen. Though some see no difference between the two sets, most do see differences in picture quality, with the real issue being whether those differences are worth the $. For example, a number of people have said the 831 provides a deeper, more tangible image ("Plasmalike"), which effect would not be due to a brighter bulb.

Again, I saw no difference under bright lights running the 1080p Mits demo, but there were palpable (albeit not glaring) distinctions in darkened conditions with a 1080i DTV feed.
post #4398 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wahooslayer View Post

If I understand it correctly, these calibration dvd's only calibrate your dvd input? Is there a way to calibrate my stb with one of these disks, or is there a way to translate the dvd calibration info to my stb? Most of my viewing is through my stb, I am most interested in calibrating that input.

OTA - Watch a movie in HD that you're very familiar with and adjust the settings of the set as appropriate

STB - Same as OTA, above, or record HDNet's test patterns sent out early Tuesday morning (There's a link somewhere in this thread to a whole write-up on how to use the HDNet patterns)

You can't "translate" settings between the two because they don't apply. What works for your DVD player is almost guranteed to not be the same for the STB.
post #4399 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Thomas View Post

I will be purchasing the 57" Mits to replace my 52725 soon and was wondering if I should go with the 732 or the 831? Does the high contrast screen and 180w lamp make enough difference in PQ to warrant the extra cost?

I have the 52725 and my parents received their 57732 almost three weeks ago. I always thought my 52725 was superb but I am completely spoiled by their 57732. If you can afford the 831, then why not. But you will be supremely impressed with just the 57732. (If you're used to the NetCommand setup of the 52725, then this year's sets will irritate you a bit as they've changed a lot of how it works as well as introduced a bug or two)

Speaking of bugs. My 52725 has received three firmware updates in its lifetime. One would assume that Mitsu will be releasing firmware updates for the new sets at some point. Should a thread be started to list, track, and discuss firmware-addressable bugs for the 2006.5-2007 Mitsus?

The one bug I've found is that, after NetCommand has been fully setup to control an AVR, it will do everythign but turn the AVR on and off. (this works just fine on my older 52725 and the new set does power on and off the cable STB attached to it)
post #4400 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyMeister View Post

BTW I founf this warranty whic I thought is pretty good...better than P$$$ C$$$ ...

http://www.newworldvideodirect.com/p...productid=1377

It has both the 5 yr Repair Master and the 3 yr bulb warranty combined.


HOLY SHNIKIES!! thats a great price.

RudyMeister- have you purchased from this site before?
Can anyone else confirm that this is a legit site to purchase from? Ive never heard of them.

GREAT find-Thanks!
post #4401 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by spatel23 View Post

HOLY SHNIKIES!! thats a great price.

RudyMeister- have you purchased from this site before?
Can anyone else confirm that this is a legit site to purchase from? Ive never heard of them.

GREAT find-Thanks!

Never purchased anything from them but...this is a warranty purchase. Note the price of the TV $2500 and under ....but it's still cheap.

Once you purchase the warranty, you basically deal with Repair Master afterwards anyway. You then register with Repair Master etc..

They are a CNET certified store...have paypal..amex...etc...
post #4402 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyMeister View Post

Largdiag, how do you know this? because when I compared the two, I thought the 831 has a bit more 3D while viewing up close shots of people's faces.

He might be an annoyance and have no credibility due to his obvious and unfair anti-SXRD blather, but he is right on this issue. I checked and the part numbers for the screens are the same, as I said in an earlier post.
post #4403 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcaillo View Post

He might be an annoyance and have no credibility due to his obvious and unfair anti-SXRD blather, but he is right on this issue. I checked and the part numbers for the screens are the same, as I said in an earlier post.

Sorry I ddn't see your post earlier...but what???????????????


WoW!!!!! is this a typo mistake by Mits?
post #4404 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Urker View Post

Nonsense! You are a master of misinformation in this forum. First it was about the SXRD now its about the Mits!
IMHO, the 831 has much better PQ and less SSE (I would say 50% less) than the 731 or 732.

Since SSE has to do with the screen, the viewing position, and the intensity of the image, what you have seen likely has more to do with the alignment of the set and the viewing conditions, since the screens are the same. If you call the parts department and ask for the part number and pricing of both the fresnel lens and the lenticular screen you will find that they are identical in the two sets.
post #4405 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcaillo View Post

Since SSE has to do with the screen, the viewing position, and the intensity of the image, what you have seen likely has more to do with the alignment of the set and the viewing conditions, since the screens are the same. If you call the parts department and ask for the part number and pricing of both the fresnel lens and the lenticular screen you will find that they are identical in the two sets.


Can you call thema again and make sure they didn't make a mistake?

It's easy to make such a mistake
post #4406 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcaillo View Post

He might be an annoyance and have no credibility due to his obvious and unfair anti-SXRD blather, but he is right on this issue. I checked and the part numbers for the screens are the same, as I said in an earlier post.

If the screens are the same, then that 180W bulb is doing some very incredible things because the sets are otherwise the same optically.
post #4407 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trackman View Post

If the screens are the same, then that 180W bulb is doing some very incredible things because the sets are otherwise the same optically.

yes. the 831 and the 732 do wonderful things optically.....and identically.
post #4408 of 9376
For those concerned about the qualities (or lack thereof) of the Mitsubishi 73", check out the thread on the Samsung 71" HL-S7178W. Appears to be happy owners over there and the Samsung costs a lot less and has a five color wheel.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...2&page=1&pp=30
post #4409 of 9376
Found this company which has a BBB report. The report seems to show they're a good company.

http://americanesuperstore.stores.ya.../rmt52500.html
post #4410 of 9376
Quote:
Originally Posted by SailorKane View Post

The screens are NOT the same. The 831 has a "high contrast" screen. I have the 831 and like the screen. However, the screen on the 732 is also good. You have to look at both TV's yourself and see if the difference is noticable to you and worth the extra money. I feel that the 831 is probably worth a small premium over the 732, but I would have been happy with either set. Most people seem to find that the settings on the TV change the PQ far more than the difference in screen quality. So, ONLY if you spend the time to tweek the TV very well, would you detect any noticable difference.

Certainly the 831 is set up to be "top of the line", and the dealer margins are higher. Flip side of that means it is not as good a value for the consumer.

OK, to eliminate the neverending conjecture, this is directly from the Mits site detailing the feature upgrades from the 732 to the 831:

Models WD-57831, WD-65831, WD-73831
From 732 Series adds:
New! High Gloss Black Finish
New! High Contrast Screen
New! TurboLight 180TM
New! Redesigned Fully-Illuminated remote
New! Additional Simple Remote
Front IEEE1394 w/ DV Decoder

I'm not vouching for the accuracy of this information, I'm just a messenger.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rear Projection Units
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Rear Projection Units › 2007 Mitsubishi WD-XX73X and XX831 Owner's Thread