AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+) › Anyone uses pro cinema speakers, subwoofers here ? the BIG stuff ?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anyone uses pro cinema speakers, subwoofers here ? the BIG stuff ? - Page 2

post #31 of 178
Thread Starter 
with that size of front wall width, i'd do a 5meters cinemascope screen with a projector like the WD2000 from mitsubishi for instance (2000ansi lumens real) and an ISCO II lens.
that's still 17FTL more than SMPTE recs of 13FTL. (2000/114sq ft).
you would have no problem of spacing between speakers. and the field of view would be more cinematic (with the frame width, you'd have left about 40cm from screen edge till wall).
think HD . 1080i even on 720p and the ISCO on that size would blow you away.
Only condition is to have a MINIMUM 1500ansi lumens from the projector. Minimum.
especially if you go with a Screenresearch which EATS lots of lumens. more than the typical microperforated screens. dont baffle the subwoofers until you have made all tests of best
positioning the beasts.
on Dolby website i think there are technical guidelines for properly position the mains and surrounds (orientation, tilting, height). as this size of room is a small mini cinema already
post #32 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwikas View Post


At this stage I'm thinking to build a room 6 metres (20') wide, 11 metres (36') long and use a 4 metre (157") wide perf'd screen. If I put the L & R 3632's just inside the edge of the screen it means that I'll only have about 857mm (34") between the closest edges of the L & C arrays and C & R arrays. The 3632's are 762mm (30") wide........at that spacing they might to be too close....what do you think? I may have to put the L & R arrays out past the edge of the screen a little so as I can space them a bit more. I know I'll have to test this though......

Indeed 34" might be a bit close. Move them out past the screen. You can always make a grille to cover them.

What about your rear speaker positions? How have you managed the placement of these?

If I recall you plan to use wall mount surround units...if so Digital04 is more familiar with those and could probably give you better advise on placing them.

Commercial cinemas use "arrays" of surrounds. Since your room has a good bit of length, you may need to do the same, only in a smaller scale. In a nice long room such as yours you might do four units (2 on each side) for side surrounds and another pair on the back wall for rear center duty for 7.1 material.

Placing the surrounds will depend on if your going to have two rows of seats and which row will be the main(best optimized) row. I've found in ht environments that it's a bit of a challenge to get even surround coverage to multiple rows without compromising the sound field some. Especially using direct radiator speakers. Again Digital04 is more versed in using these so I defer to him

I'm a big multi-channel music nut and to keep the tone even throughout the room I'm running 4670 floor-standers as my side surrounds. If you looked at my pics they were in the back corners...well I've since moved them to directly even with my rear row of seats and firing perpendicular (straight out) from the wall. The horns have a wide enough dispersion that it gives a really nice enveloping sound to both rows. Though the sound is a bit strong for the ones sitting on the ends.

I'm still deciding what to do for rear centers but i want to use the same components that are in the other speakers. I'm probably going to have to build them myself.
post #33 of 178
Hey Digital04,

Every time we talk, my screen gets larger and the weight of my wallet gets smaller.

Yeah, I CAN fit a 5 metre wide screen into the room but DO I REALLY WANT TO?

At the present moment I'm more likely to do what Ken suggests and move the L & HR out a little more. But I am still some way off getting this room built so I'm going to leave the projection issues for later.

By the way, what's the recommended minimum viewing distance for a 4 metre screen when using the WT2000? Can you tell me?

The reason I want to get the speaker system sorted out ASAP is that it's extremely hard to get JBL PRO stuff down here and when it does become available it's is ridiculously expensive. I got lucky and landed a couple of 3632 MF / FF sections for an unbelievable price. Since the AUS$ / US$ exchange rate isn't too bad for us right now, I'm wanting to get the rest of the speakers and JBL parts out of the USA as soon as I can.

I'm all set on using three 3632 arrays at the front and two 4645C's (or 4648'sa) as subs.........

But what about surrounds? I notice Ken is wanting to match his speakers and I understand his reasons.....particularly for multi channel music. He already has two 4670's also and just needs to get a couple more - or at least he needs the drivers. In my case, I don't have any surrounds what-so-ever.

If I match my surrounds with the 3632 array's (which are a LF: M115H-8A and a HF: 2418H-1), the only JBL speaker system that comes close is the smaller 3622N array. It doesn't have the MF section. But to use 3622's as surrounds would be an expensive exercise.

As Ken says I could go to a total of 6 surrounds with 2 on each side and 2 at the back or........I could just shorten the room and have 1 on each side. I thought that I might use the EV ZX-1's and simply fix them directly onto the wall.

I guess it comes down to what sort of surround sound stage I'm wanting. Since multi channel music is not really a big thing for me, I imagine timbre matching the surrounds isn't so critical.
post #34 of 178
Ken / Digital,

There was some discussion on PRO gear here too.......

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...&highlight=ZX1
post #35 of 178
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwikas View Post

Hey Digital04,

Every time we talk, my screen gets larger and the weight of my wallet gets smaller.



Yeah, I CAN fit a 5 metre wide screen into the room but DO I REALLY WANT TO?

i would if have THAT large a room as you will/do. you'd be set up for 20years...

At the present moment I'm more likely to do what Ken suggests and move the L & HR out a little more. But I am still some way off getting this room built so I'm going to leave the projection issues for later.

By the way, what's the recommended minimum viewing distance for a 4 metre screen when using the WT2000? Can you tell me?

i would say first row at 3.5meters. it depends a lot on the screen perforations. if it's a Stewart's like (5%+ density) microperforated you sure can. make sure you test different screens before. have 3 rows, well spaced (leg room).at least 70cm between each seats.

The reason I want to get the speaker system sorted out ASAP is that it's extremely hard to get JBL PRO stuff down here and when it does become available it's is ridiculously expensive. I got lucky and landed a couple of 3632 MF / FF sections for an unbelievable price. Since the AUS$ / US$ exchange rate isn't too bad for us right now, I'm wanting to get the rest of the speakers and JBL parts out of the USA as soon as I can.

I'm all set on using three 3632 arrays at the front and two 4645C's (or 4648'sa) as subs.........

4645C are real subs/ 4648 are 'bass reinforcements' down to 35-40hz.

But what about surrounds? I notice Ken is wanting to match his speakers and I understand his reasons.....particularly for multi channel music. He already has two 4670's also and just needs to get a couple more - or at least he needs the drivers. In my case, I don't have any surrounds what-so-ever.

8340A or 8330 or those from QSC also. for home theater sound.

If I match my surrounds with the 3632 array's (which are a LF: M115H-8A and a HF: 2418H-1), the only JBL speaker system that comes close is the smaller 3622N array. It doesn't have the MF section. But to use 3622's as surrounds would be an expensive exercise.

don't, it's overkill. if you want to listen to SACD DVDA, get yourself 5 columns (TRIANGLE KLIPSCH BW DALI etc etc) in your living room. and a sub. positioned in a circle...

As Ken says I could go to a total of 6 surrounds with 2 on each side and 2 at the back or........I could just shorten the room and have 1 on each side. I thought that I might use the EV ZX-1's and simply fix them directly onto the wall.

yes, 2 Left 2 right 2 EX BACK. as i did.

I guess it comes down to what sort of surround sound stage I'm wanting. Since multi channel music is not really a big thing for me, I imagine timbre matching the surrounds isn't so critical.

see above.
post #36 of 178
Can't much help on seating distance. I just know with my 13hd(16x9 native lcd) that 14-feet is about as close as you want to sit to a 118" diagonal screen. That said...the Mit's is dlp and should have a smoother image with far less screen door.

Surrounds...again hard to say. But in your case trying to do all 3632's would be quite the undertaking to say the least.

I use my room for probably at least 50% music and 30% movies and 20% hd satellite(hi-def sports mainly). Since music is my main use at the moment...i feel the overwhelming need to have all 6 or 7 speakers match. Especially after hearing how easy the non-matching RS-7's were to locate.

Now that hd dvd/bd is out...my room-use ratio may change a bit. It's hard to go back to 480p dvd's after watching an hd movie via satellite...the new hi-rez dvd's look even better than sat. from what few demo's I've seen personally.

I just hope they start putting out movies I would actually want to own...
post #37 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by llumpire View Post

Has anyone mentioned the Meyer Sound Lab, EAW, SLS Audio or other self-powered theatrical speakers? Anyone have any thoughts on these competitors?

I am currently using an all EAW Cinema Systems line up. I'm using the CB-153X LCR's and CR82FM surrounds. These are not powered models. The CB-153X's are pro cinema speakers designed for smaller cinemas, they have a 90 x 90 conical dispersion pattern that works well in the short throw home theater environment. I've gone through quite a few pro audio speakers in the past year looking for the right set for me (QSC, EV, JBL) and the EAW's are the one's I've chosen to live with. I like the three way design, IMO the 8" midrange reproduces voices with less sibilance and harshness than the two way systems with 12" and 15" LF/MF drivers that I've auditioned. The 15" LF driver in the CB-153x maintains authority in the mid and upper bass regions, crossed over to LAB12 v3 subs at 80Hz for subwoofing duty.


I've posted some more info and pics here.
post #38 of 178
mysphyt,

Looks like a great system.

How are you liking your ref50? I'm without decent processing right now due to a lightning strike. I've seen a few of these going fairly cheap on ebay and agon and was wondering how these sound. I remember back 6yrs or so ago that the ref30 was regarded by many as the pre/pro to have. I'm looking at the sher. p965, outlaw 990 and other similar priced new and used units.

Though I hate to spend a bunch of cash on a processor now cause within a year all the new hd audio formats will be common. I'll probably just buy a low-mid level receiver with pre-outs to tide me over for now.

Thanks,
Ken
post #39 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenWH View Post

mysphyt,

Looks like a great system.

How are you liking your ref50? I'm without decent processing right now due to a lightning strike. I've seen a few of these going fairly cheap on ebay and agon and was wondering how these sound. I remember back 6yrs or so ago that the ref30 was regarded by many as the pre/pro to have. I'm looking at the sher. p965, outlaw 990 and other similar priced new and used units.

Though I hate to spend a bunch of cash on a processor now cause within a year all the new hd audio formats will be common. I'll probably just buy a low-mid level receiver with pre-outs to tide me over for now.

Thank you,

Prior to the Ref50 I used a low-mid level Denon reciever with an Ebtech unbal/balanced converter to drive the system. The Ref50 with balanced outputs, a full feature set and cleaner sound was a huge step up for me. With that said, I'd think twice about buying the same model today (Series 1) as it has been superceded by the Ref50 S2 and won't support emerging formats.
post #40 of 178
Do any of you guys have experience with Danley products? The SH-100 looks like it might make for a good HT speaker. The DTS-20 sub has gotten some attention over in the subwoofer forum.

http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/
post #41 of 178
Quote:
Originally posted by mysphyt.
I am currently using an all EAW Cinema Systems line up. I'm using the CB-153X LCR's and CR82FM surrounds. These are not powered models. The CB-153X's are pro cinema speakers designed for smaller cinemas, they have a 90 x 90 conical dispersion pattern that works well in the short throw home theater environment. I've gone through quite a few pro audio speakers in the past year looking for the right set for me (QSC, EV, JBL) and the EAW's are the one's I've chosen to live with. I like the three way design, IMO the 8" midrange reproduces voices with less sibilance and harshness than the two way systems with 12" and 15" LF/MF drivers that I've auditioned. The 15" LF driver in the CB-153x maintains authority in the mid and upper bass regions, crossed over to LAB12 v3 subs at 80Hz for subwoofing duty.



mysphyt,
How are you managing your LF - MF/HF cross overs for the L / C / R speakers?

I'm going to be using EV Q66 pro series amps but these can't be fitted with crossover cards like the EV CPS series which are specifically designed for cinema use.

As Ken pointed out earlier, some of the newer Crown amps like their CT series can be retro-fitted with ScreenArray PIP modules. One of these modules is made specifically for the JBL 3632's but I'm not into buying another set of amps......

EV do make the Dx38 Sound System Processor which could be used......$$$$ perhaps!

Also, I'm interested to know more about the Behringer Feedback destroyer and Parametric EQ that you are using....your schematic shows it's hooked up to your centre channel amp and your subwoofer amp.....can you tell me more about its function?

Thanks.

post #42 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwikas View Post

mysphyt,
How are you managing your LF - MF/HF cross overs for the L / C / R speakers?

Just using the bass management of the B&K Ref 50 processor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwikas View Post

I'm going to be using EV Q66 pro series amps but these can't be fitted with crossover cards like the EV CPS series which are specifically designed for cinema use.

As Ken pointed out earlier, some of the newer Crown amps like their CT series can be retro-fitted with ScreenArray PIP modules. One of these modules is made specifically for the JBL 3632's but I'm not into buying another set of amps......

EV do make the Dx38 Sound System Processor which could be used......$$$$ perhaps!

Also, I'm interested to know more about the Behringer Feedback destroyer and Parametric EQ that you are using....your schematic shows it's hooked up to your centre channel amp and your subwoofer amp.....can you tell me more about its function?

Thanks.

The Behringer is currently doing equalization duty for the subs and center (lvery light on the center). It is connected in series between the processor and power amps. The equalization is primarily room mode correction for the sub and some HF compensation for the center because it is mounted behind fabric and the LR are not. It is an OK unit as long as you are careful to keep all your signals within operating limits.

What I'd love to have is a Lake Processor. I'd use it on the L/C/R/SUB. It is up to 4 channels in so to do the full 7.1 would require 2. I'd also consider a Rane Dragnet DSP system or dBX 4800 DSP.
post #43 of 178
What do you guys think about three of these

http://www.djmart.com/jbl-3678-loudspeaker-system.html as LCR and 4 of these

http://lydrommet.ravn.no/artikkel/pr....html?id=15432

In a room 4 by 8 meters with some leaking. Is it possible to combine such a setup with commercial subwoofers like SVS pb12plus/2 or is it not recommendable?

thanks guys

all the best

PTT
post #44 of 178
Thread Starter 
PTT
hi
with experience, i would advise to go for full range front LCR. with JBL it's models like the 4670 4675C for instance. GKF it's 505 and Exclusive (2x15', 105kg).
it allows you the best possible home cinema bass set up: LCR in full range down to 30-40hz and the subwoofers doing the LFE + the <40hz.
It's important to have a good sound pressure (acoustic pressure) match that the LCR be big speakers, if you combine them with 18" gunners.
Otherwise, it's better the leave the LCR in "small" form (80hz for instance).
This is my next upgrade. Ken is doing the right thing.
I cut my 3677 at 50hz but their 50-80hz range pressure is not match to the 18'' subwoofers. There's too big a difference in pressure and there's thus a big drop in pressure in the 60-80hz zone because of this crossover. And we all know how important this zone is in film sound. in fact the 40-80hz zone is way more important than the 20hz zone. test for instance an explosion or a gun shot and cut the mains and then cut the sub. you'll lose a lot more by cutting the mains.
post #45 of 178
Hi guys...just an update on my quest for proper rear centers. I'm about 80% done with building my "frankenstein's monster" rear centers.

Basically I've built a pair of wedge boxes 2.3cu.ft. in volume with medium fill. I stuffed a 2225h 15" woofer and a couple 4"x8.5" ports in each and tuning is around 50hz. The volume and port config was suggested over at a JBL forum.

On top will go a 2445 comp drivers sand 2385a lens on each. Xover point will be 500hz to match the rest of my speakers. Now in boxes this small I know it won't have the greatest bass extension but it should suffice.

I also replaced my damaged pre/pro with a Sherwood P965 which has an adjustable crossover. I'm pretty happy so far with the 60hz setting for the 4675's and 4670's.
post #46 of 178
Thread Starter 
hi Ken
the Sherwood has independent crossover ?
i would cut your main at 40hz or 35hz.

just did another test, LCR at 50hz and 80hz but this time i corrected the subs in the 50-63hz region ( a little boost to compensante from the crossover region losses + different acoustic output from the 3677).
no picture ! the 50hz cut is way better, because there's that bass wall in front of you and the subs go deeper because they concentrate on the infra and the amp gives all his power to the LFE + 50hz-20hz range. So, it's lesser evil than having the 3677 cut at 80hz.

BUT ! , again, the ideal is 3x double 15" mains LCR + 2-4 18" gunners
the BASS wall. very important. it also reduces room modes !
and if the front wall is on its left and right front heights made of subs only, +LCR twin 15", you probably have no more room modes in the bass and an incredible wall of bass + incredible unlimited headroom. but this also requres to properly treat the front wall completely, perhaps baffling the speakers and subs inside an acoustic wall.
post #47 of 178
Thank you very much mr digital. By the way do those speakers you mentioned need alot of space behind them, like most big hifi speakers does.

I have some experience with some rather big hornloaded 15" speakers and placing them to near the rear wall made them sound muddy /slow in the bass region.

But the JBL is probably made for placement near backwall?

Also I am confused by the crossover issues. Do I need an external active crossover ? Could I eventually use my Denon 3806 for such?

Thanks again this is very interessting thread. I would like to learn some more about this pro stuff. Seems like regular home theater is missing out on alot:-)

all the best
PTT
post #48 of 178
Quote:


BUT ! , again, the ideal is 3x double 15" mains LCR + 2-4 18" gunners
the BASS wall. very important. it also reduces room modes !
and if the front wall is on its left and right front heights made of subs only, +LCR twin 15", you probably have no more room modes in the bass and an incredible wall of bass + incredible unlimited headroom. but this also requres to properly treat the front wall completely, perhaps baffling the speakers and subs inside an acoustic wall.


Digital, this is what I intend to do in my cinema. That is, build a full front baffle wall and flush mount the three 3632's into it..........with the MF / HF compression drivers angled downwards.

My only problem might be mounting the two 4645C's into the same wall. I'll probably have little space to fit them......particularly if they ideally should be underneath the 3632's. Do you think the 4645's will (could) work okay alongside the 3632 ScreenArrays?

I see that other people - including Ken, have mentioned that his subs sound better mounted against the side wall.....I'm going to have to experiment once the room is built.


Originally Posted by KenWH.

Quote:


Basically I've built a pair of wedge boxes 2.3cu.ft. in volume with medium fill. I stuffed a 2225h 15" woofer and a couple 4"x8.5" ports in each and tuning is around 50hz. The volume and port config was suggested over at a JBL forum.

On top will go a 2445 comp drivers sand 2385a lens on each. Xover point will be 500hz to match the rest of my speakers. Now in boxes this small I know it won't have the greatest bass extension but it should suffice.

Ken, I wish I was as proficient and knowledgable. Anyway, where there's no appropriate level of skill, parting with money will have to suffice

I've been studying up on the 8340A's for surround duty and while I'm sure they'll be okay, I'm leaning more towards the AC2215/00's. This is because they have the same drivers in them as the 3632's and that's got to be a good thing..


Originally posted by mysphyt
Quote:


What I'd love to have is a Lake Processor. I'd use it on the L/C/R/SUB. It is up to 4 channels in so to do the full 7.1 would require 2. I'd also consider a Rane Dragnet DSP system or dBX 4800 DSP.

Mysphyt, those look like great processors but don't you need to have amps with HD15 connectors to use them? I don't think the Q66's would work with any of these unfortunately.

I'm actually not sure securing any equalizers or crossovers right now because as Ken pointed out earlier, a good pre/pro may be able to handle all this. I haven't got my front end yet and wont be for a little while. I'll get this once the cinema is built - along with the projector.

The annoying problem down here though is that to get an equaliser or crossover when you need it means you'll be paying retail. A couple of good crossovers and equalisers (Rane & EV) have just become available to me at good prices and it's rare for them to come up......it's a kind of catch 22.
post #49 of 178
Guys..........

I've just found this......in terms of an outboard sound processor for the ScreenArrays (and surrounds)...........what about this as a unit?

http://www.jblpro.com/pages/electron...ive.htm#DSC260

Any ideas as to it's suitability for my intended setup? Thanks
post #50 of 178
Thread Starter 
Hi guyes

the 3806 is an excellent tool, this receiver has audissey EQ and independent crossovers. it will serve you perfectly. for instance crossover LCR at 60hz, surrounds 80hz.
or you can try all SMALL crossover at 60hz.
the speakers are all "front bass reflex" so you can push them against the front wall, that you will have treated acousticly of course. it's not compulsory to baffle wall the speakers though, especially the subs since you first have to experiment where ideally to place them against the front wall or as Ken did and as Tomlinson recommends often, to place them at mid point against the side walls (+/-).

as for external crossovers, i'm more familiar sort of with the XC3 LF3 SF3 from QSC that you plug into the DCA amps. very easy to use (sort of ). for bi triamp, subsonic cut, compensate for screen loss.
post #51 of 178
Digital,

Just to clarify, are you saying that with a good processor like the 3806, you don't really need need external crossovers like say a Rane 22B and/or equalisers? If that's the case, I'll look to get a unit like this when I'm ready.

Thanks for the advice about the front wall. I'm going to be building a room within a room so it will have a separate internal front wall anyhow...I may as well design it properly use it as a baffle wall....

However, I can see that my subs may not be positioned up front.......perhaps more likely down the side.
post #52 of 178
Thread Starter 
hello
yes the 3806 can do front biamp and independent crossovers so for each channel independently (! like a Lexicon processor for instance).
be sure sur first launche the Audissey EQ setup as it's compulsory before you can adjust the crossovers FQ per channel.

make sure the front wall is heavy, like concrete (then add the acoustic treatment). it must be solid, to give full "support" to the front speakers in the lower frequencies.

test for the subs positioning in the room. thing is however than you ideally need three large front speakers if you want to start creating that "wall of bass", since your subs might be placed elsewhere (on the side walls for instance). you got to test the two possibilities (sibs on the side walls or subs on the front wall)) and see what gives best results.
post #53 of 178
Thread Starter 
what works as tested if seating area in middle of room: (idea is to get even bass at all rows):

subs front L or R corner + rear opposite corner (opposite diagonal corners)

subs at front mid side walls ( Tomlinson Holman likes that a lot)

full height subs L+R and along front wall (very expensive)

a sub at heach wall mid point (what you do Ken at least 1/2 of it )

a sub in each corner

in all cases accoustic resonators necessary.
post #54 of 178
Kwikas, you may want to change your text color. Those of us using the alternate AVS color scheme (light grey background) are getting headaches from the yellow lettering!
post #55 of 178
Hi Greg.

Thanks for advising me. My screen seems to show that my yellow color posts are the same color as all the others who have contributed here (including your message).....

What about this?
post #56 of 178
Go into your profile and fix the settings...
post #57 of 178
I've used both Altec and JBL theater drivers and speakers in my hi-fis and HTs for many years and I prefer the Altec stuff. Modern JBL stuff sacrifices nuance and tonality for broad bandwidth, insane power handling and constant coverage, older JBL stuff often sounds better, mainly the woofers and horns not the compression drivers.

Best I had was a set of Altec A5 VOTs, next in preference were A7-500s. With their model 515 woofers and 1.4" 288 drivers the A5s have a little more heft and ease in the midrange than the A7s with their 416 woofers and 1" 802-902 drivers.

Of course Altec multicell and radial horns sound much nicer than JBL's (or anybody's) constant-directivity horns (IMO). The old Altec "Hollywood" tar-filled multicells are the finest horns I've heard, better than Edgar saladbowls even.

In my new house I'm using Altec 605 Duplex studio monitors as my mains, some A7-500s are in the garage awaiting new paint, then I'll move them into the HT and use the 605s as rears.

No doubt 515s will some day find their way into the 825 VOT cabinets and the 802-511s will someday be replaced with 288s on 1005 multicells, thus do A7s morph into A5s.
post #58 of 178
Can any of you guys tell me what you think about using JBL AC2215/00's as surrounds rather than the 8340's? The drivers in the 2215/00's are the same as in my 3632 ScreenArrays.........

Also your thoughts on using one JBL 4642A sub vs 2 4645C's?

Crown and JBL have recently released the CDi series of amps specifically designed for JBL theatre speakers. In their recommended data for a system which is exactly what I want, they suggest using one CDi1000 amp for each of the 3632's (biamped), one CDi2000 amp for the 4642A sub (bridged mono) and one CDi2000 amp for six 8340 surrounds.
post #59 of 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwikas View Post

Can any of you guys tell me what you think about using JBL AC2215/00's as surrounds rather than the 8340's? The drivers in the 2215/00's are the same as in my 3632 ScreenArrays.........

Also your thoughts on using one JBL 4642A sub vs 2 4645C's?

Crown and JBL have recently released the CDi series of amps specifically designed for JBL theatre speakers. In their recommended data for a system which is exactly what I want, they suggest using one CDi1000 amp for each of the 3632's (biamped), one CDi2000 amp for the 4642A sub (bridged mono) and one CDi2000 amp for six 8340 surrounds.

Now that I've finished my surrounds and hear how seamless the sound is...I totally suggest using surrounds that match the fronts as much as possible.

I can give you some insite on the subs your looking at also. I have a 4642a which I ran "stock" for about a year. Paired with a qsc plx1602 it is an excellent sounding sub. About two months ago I dropped in some 2242 drivers which are used in the 4645c's into the 4642 cabinent. I would suggest just going with two 4645c's as the drivers are a setup from the ones in the 4642.

Overall I have more output...deeper extension without losing any sound quality after doing the driver swap.
post #60 of 178
Quote:


Originally posted by KenWH
Now that I've finished my surrounds and hear how seamless the sound is...I totally suggest using surrounds that match the fronts as much as possible.

I can give you some insite on the subs your looking at also. I have a 4642a which I ran "stock" for about a year. Paired with a qsc plx1602 it is an excellent sounding sub. About two months ago I dropped in some 2242 drivers which are used in the 4645c's into the 4642 cabinent. I would suggest just going with two 4645c's as the drivers are a setup from the ones in the 4642.

Overall I have more output...deeper extension without losing any sound quality after doing the driver swap.

Ken,

I can't get better advice than that. Actually, I suspected that the 2215/00 speakers would be better sounding than the 8340 surrounds in my system. I was pleased when I found that JBL actually make a cabinet that uses a couple of the same drivers found in the 3632's.......they should be a good match up. I'll run 3 pairs of 2215/00 surrounds using the EV Q44's. The EV Q66's can do duty on the 3632's.......

Great advice on the 4642A vs 4645C too - thanks. I'll go with two 4645C's......

Quote:


Originally posted by Tom Brennan
I've used both Altec and JBL theater drivers and speakers in my hi-fis and HTs for many years and I prefer the Altec stuff. Modern JBL stuff sacrifices nuance and tonality for broad bandwidth, insane power handling and constant coverage, older JBL stuff often sounds better, mainly the woofers and horns not the compression drivers.

Best I had was a set of Altec A5 VOTs, next in preference were A7-500s. With their model 515 woofers and 1.4" 288 drivers the A5s have a little more heft and ease in the midrange than the A7s with their 416 woofers and 1" 802-902 drivers.

Of course Altec multicell and radial horns sound much nicer than JBL's (or anybody's) constant-directivity horns (IMO). The old Altec "Hollywood" tar-filled multicells are the finest horns I've heard, better than Edgar saladbowls even.

In my new house I'm using Altec 605 Duplex studio monitors as my mains, some A7-500s are in the garage awaiting new paint, then I'll move them into the HT and use the 605s as rears.

No doubt 515s will some day find their way into the 825 VOT cabinets and the 802-511s will someday be replaced with 288s on 1005 multicells, thus do A7s morph into A5s.

Tom,

Perhaps slightly off topic but what amps are you using to drive the Altec's may I ask? Did you - or do you, run pro amps with these? Given the history you've had with pro cinema speakers, I'm interested to know whether you (or anyone else here) can comment on something I've heard as regards the use of pro amps.

I have been told on more than one occassion that pro amps perform best when they're running hard - by that I mean at higher power output. Apparently, they can have a tendancy to falter or 'power oscillate' at lower volumes..........I'd be interested to hear what you may have found. I never heard this comment made by others on the forum when I was 'shopping' for my pro amps.....but perhaps they all run theirs at full blast........

Quote:


Originally posted by mysphyt
Prior to the Ref50 I used a low-mid level Denon reciever with an Ebtech unbal/balanced converter to drive the system. The Ref50 with balanced outputs, a full feature set and cleaner sound was a huge step up for me. With that said, I'd think twice about buying the same model today (Series 1) as it has been superceded by the Ref50 S2 and won't support emerging formats.

mysphyt,

Would you buy the ref50 S2 to replace your S1 and if you did, how much of the crossover and EQ could be handled by the ref50 S2? Would it negate the need for a Dolby Lake, DBX Drive rack or Rane etc?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+)
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+) › Anyone uses pro cinema speakers, subwoofers here ? the BIG stuff ?