Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stitz
are you kidding me??? step outside of your castle in the sky and join the real world. Last time I checked this is a free country...
|
|
Originally Posted by Stitz
are you kidding me??? step outside of your castle in the sky and join the real world. Last time I checked this is a free country...
|
|
Originally Posted by Slaine
This statement simply isn't true for the majority of people who post here. I've certainly never asked for assistance or support from a dealer as I don't need it. I'm perfectly capable of setting up these devices myself.
And what exactly do you do for us? The majority of users on this board set these devices up themselves. Therefore, you provide no value to us whatsoever, as your services are never utilized. Yet you act like people are taking money out of your pocket simply because they choose not to pay an unhealthy premium for support services they'll never need or use. Bottom line, your train of thought here is heavily flawed. |
|
Originally Posted by Stephen Tu
Why are you not charging for the after sale care if they didn't buy from you, or if they did & didn't pay for programming? If you are providing valuable expertise & time, charge for it. Where you can get fair profit is by charging for programming & for consulting time.
I don't understand this complaining about having to compete with unauth dealers on hardware price. Say you think fair price & profit for you on a particular remote + programming is $500. Now, maybe you quote $350 for remote + $150 for programming. If customers are complaining "hey I can get remote for $250 on ebay, why should I pay $100 extra for remote from you?", then just change your quote to: "remote, $250, programming $250". Or "remote, $350, programming $250, -$100 discount on programming for getting remote from me". You get same amount of money, for customer that can't or doesn't want to program remote, what are they going to do but shrug their shoulders & pay you what you want? If you say you can't do that because some other competitor is willing to program the remote for less, then that just means you are trying to charge more than what the free market has determined is fair, tough. For the DIY customer who doesn't need programming, nor any support, if you are just taking down a computer web order, grabbing a box, stuffing it into a shipping box, slapping the UPS label on it, why should your "fair profit" be substantially higher than the unauthorized web retailer doing exactly the same thing? You aren't really providing any benefit here other than the warranty. (Companies not honoring warranties here is bogus too from the consumer point of view, they made profit selling the product, it's a way to generate profits dumping to grey market while dodging support costs, win-win for them). This "authorized dealer" & MAP programs are anti-competitive practices that hurt the consumer, just like the MAP of music CD companies that they were sued for and lost on anti-trust grounds. URC can play whatever games they want to try to keep prices high, but don't expect consumers to applaud them for it. They can get away charging more because they have a better product than the competition, currently, but only to a certain extent. At some price point some large segment of the market will turn to a competitor. |
|
Originally Posted by HeyNow^
It's very obvious from your posts that you are a URC lacky........
|
|
Originally Posted by Audiodynamics
Why don't you contract my company to do work for you and you'll see what we'll do for you.
|
|
Originally Posted by Slaine
I didn't buy my remote from the back of a van in some alleyway, I bought it from a legitimate retailer, who just doesn't happen to be recognised by URC as an authorized dealer.
|
|
Originally Posted by Slaine
Because I don't need to. I'm perfectly capable of doing the work myself, like most other AVS readers, as I explained earlier. Yet URC and their authorized dealers seem to think I should pay for this support regardless, by way of the exorbitant MSRP.
I have no reason to doubt that your company provides great service to your customers. However I don't think I should have to pay a premium for service I'll never use. In summary, I don't have a problem with dealers charging extra money for these items to offset the cost of the support services they provide. I do have an issue with URC no longer providing the required software needed to operate their own products to people who don't go this route. I didn't buy my remote from the back of a van in some alleyway, I bought it from a legitimate retailer, who just doesn't happen to be recognised by URC as an authorized dealer. How URC thinks it's a good idea to shun people who've bought these remotes through Best Buy, Buy.com, Amazon.com, etc is beyond me. The negative feedback on Amazon.com alone could cause them serious PR problems. Time will tell if this turns out to be a costly mistake for URC or not. Given their current attitude to customer support, I hope it does. |
|
Originally Posted by Audiophiliac
Good. Go buy a Harmony. :) I am sure URC wont miss you. And I am sure it will be just as good.
|
|
Originally Posted by Wire Monkey
So if they are a legitimate retailer but not recognised by URC how are they an Authorized dealer??
If they are on the up and up call them for the software, if they cant provide it well I guess it wasnt a legit retailer |
|
Originally Posted by Audiophiliac
Why do you think you deserve to get the service and support for free? Like I mentioned before, if you want to program the thing yourself, more power to you. Save the several hundred dollars by not paying a programmer, and buy your remote at an authorized dealer. But this somehow isn't enough for some....they want to have their cake and eat it too....they want a deep discount on the remote AND free software and service/support. Well, in the past, you were being done an over-generous service by URC allowing you to do such. And now that they are no longer offering that service, you feel you should still be entitled to it.
The way I see it, URC did something that RTI, Nevo, Crestron, AMX, among others, would never think of doing. They offered the same software that CIs use to their end users free of charge. They didnt have to.....and maybe they should never have made the software available to the public in the first place. But they were nice enough to for a long time... |
|
Originally Posted by Slaine
You're like a broken record with this "support" mantra. Let me state again, for the third time, that I have no intention of ever going to an authorized dealer or URC for service/support. The issue I and everyone else has with this move is that URC is preventing new owners of URC remotes from even using what they've just purchased, by preventing them from downloading the programming software.
Personally, I'm all set for now with the version of the software that I own. But people who unwittingly purchase URC remotes from the stores I mentioned earlier will have no choice but to return these remotes because they simply won't be able to use them. And that's a shame all round. |
|
Originally Posted by Slaine
I bought it from a legitimate retailer, who just doesn't happen to be recognised by URC as an authorized dealer.
|
|
Originally Posted by Wire Monkey
So if they are a legitimate retailer but not recognised by URC how are they an Authorized dealer??
If they are on the up and up call them for the software, if they cant provide it well I guess it wasnt a legit retailer |
|
Originally Posted by Craigslue
Is this suppose to stop you from doing a live update? I just did a live update for my 950 that I purchased three weeks ago. I know I got new IR codes because I checked to see if it installed IR codes for my Hd-DVD player and it did.
|
|
Originally Posted by Redhook
Just today I went to download the MX-Editor and they have removed the link from their site.
Not providing media for required software and then removing the download links is the lowest of the low. Not providing updates is one thing, but blocking use of an already purchased product is horrible. Right now google's cache still works. Better get it while you can. http://www.universalremote.com/produ...p_1.12.263.exe http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:T...s&ct=clnk&cd=1 |
|
Originally Posted by Slaine
This statement simply isn't true for the majority of people who post here. I've certainly never asked for assistance or support from a dealer as I don't need it. I'm perfectly capable of setting up these devices myself.
|
|
Originally Posted by Slaine
And what exactly do you do for us? The majority of users on this board set these devices up themselves. Therefore, you provide no value to us whatsoever, as your services are never utilized. Yet you act like people are taking money out of your pocket simply because they choose not to pay an unhealthy premium for support services they'll never need or use.
Bottom line, your train of thought here is heavily flawed. |
|
Originally Posted by Kendrid
Live Updates for IR codes aren't a huge deal if you have your original remotes, but not offering the software to end users is a bad move. It is sad that people are going to have to use Torrents to get the software like it is warez or mp3s. I guess techincally it is now in the 'warez' category.
I purchased my MX700 off of ebay. Six months later the d-pad 'enter' click stopped working. I was prepared to get it fixed (~$35 from URC) but the person I bought it off of had it fixed for me by URC. It turns out they were an authorized dealer selling on Ebay. They have no control over their distribution chain and this is a sad way to attempt to 'fix' their issues. |
|
Originally Posted by Ten 99
Well, the truth of the matter is that there should never be any such thing as an "unauthorized" dealer. If URC sold the remote to whomever business to resale, then it was an "authorized" transaction. The only unauthorized one that I can think of, is when it is stolen merchandise.
I'm all for dealers charging a fair price for their time to set up some programming or whatever. They deserve it. But don't build this price into a device that the consumer is forced to absorb, even when not necessary. |






