Originally Posted by FrankJ.Cone
aC39 you have tunnel vision. There has been Cel animation since the 1930's or so and we still have it today, and yet we still develop greater quality live action. Billions have been spent to generate digital effects that look as life like as possible. The quest for realism does not mean there is no room for any other style (Look at the last 10 years, naimation has made a huge comeback).
There is a definite drive for realism in gaming from graphics and phisics to story and subject matter. At the same time we have more 'classic" games. They can and do co-exist.
And I daresay there would be a great deal of chaos if people stopped playing games and acted out in real life!
I've looked through the thread and nobody has bashed Nintendo or the Wii really. You just sort of showed up and went into some backlash mode with no reason.
So the Wii is incapable of some things other consoles will do. Whats the big deal? No need to go bonkers becasue of it.
wait a second... you're on crack right? I mean seriously.
This started because you bashed the Wii's graphics, which I said weren't important... you told me I bought into Nintendo's Hype machine, to which I refuted by stating why I'm interested in the Wii, coupled with my ownership and happiness with my 360.
Then you start this post by saying how important photo-realism is, and how its pivotal to the game industry (which is complete and utter ********) and then turn around and make it sound like I'm not able to accept the Wii's shortcommings? and to accept it?
Are you seriously bi-polar?
And on top of anything, you make it sound like I'm asking for a monopoly of bad graphics, when i've said I'm glad I can have the best of both worlds with a Wii and a 360, while its been you completely condemning bad graphics through all of this and basically making it out to be graphics > *.
Seriously dude, you disturb me.