AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Recorders › Time Warner Cable Navigator
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Time Warner Cable Navigator - Page 523

post #15661 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNCHeel View Post

Interesting, the local office said there was a Cisco box and a Samsung box that they were giving out. Which would seem to mean that the 3272 is the only Samsung they are handing out around here. Of course since he thought it was a 320GB and not a 500GB he might be wrong about what types of boxes they have as well. I will have to check when I go back.

So its running 5.0.0_6 ODN. None of the lag that I had with the ODN box I tried about a year and a half ago. Stretched out menus are kind of stupid, instead of actually giving you more real estate to see more. Search is kind of cool compared to MDN. I will have to see if I can get by on 500GB. Otherwise..........maybe a heart transplant is in order.

Does anyone know where the IR "eye" is on the front of this thing. (Samsung 3272) Since I have two boxes in the same room the remote commands are activating both of them. I want to tape over it while I use the 8300.

You could take like three weeks to finish watching your recorded stuff on the MDN SA-8300, than just return it so they will take the charge off. I would DEFINITELY TAKE THE MDN BOX BACK NOW, (when caught up on your shows.) because you have the very best with a Whole House 500GB DVR! You will be first, (or among the first) to get new features and updates. That box is so rare to get for a single DVR user.

You could TRY to hook up your E-SATA drive to the Samsung 3272 just to see if it works. You must archive a lot of TV if you still need more than 500GB!

How is the speed of the new Samsung 3272 box compared to your MDN SA-8300? It's awesome that you got a 500GB whole house box as just a single DVR subscriber!!!!!!

Jack
post #15662 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satch Man View Post

I don't have multi-room, so if someone knows exactly what you get, that would be a big help. You were lucky to get a 500GB box!!!! Very lucky, as most divisions do not give them out as single DVR's.

Jack

I live near St. Pete,Fl.(Bright House) I got a Cisco 8742(which is very good!) and my friend got a Samsung 3272. Neither of us has whole-house. All the dvrs except the 8742 have been discontinued because of the new energy regs,but I'm sure TWC/Bright House will keep recycling the old ones as long as they can...they're not paying your electric bill.

BTW,your dvr uses more electricity than a energy star rated 21 cu. ft. refrigerator! http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20...nergy-at-home/
post #15663 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satch Man View Post

You could take like three weeks to finish watching your recorded stuff on the MDN SA-8300, than just return it so they will take the charge off.

Yeah, I don't think I am going to have a choice. THe 8300HD is starting to exhibit signs of dying. In addition to the recording playback issues, now I have some occasional reception problems on a few channels that are not occurring on the 3272. So the original problem is probably with the 8300HD and not with the outboard drive. In fact I am hoping that I can get through everything before it dies. I started watching all the stuff I can't get anywhere else, like through Netflix.

Quote:


You could TRY to hook up your E-SATA drive to the Samsung 3272 just to see if it works. You must archive a lot of TV if you still need more than 500GB!

Jack

My issue is that there are times of the year when I am away, (Summer and Fall) and don't do a lot of watching. So I get way behind. I end up with entire seasons of a show to watch. Right now I am catching up on House and starting on Homeland. What is a real PITA is when you get halfway through a season and have a screwed up recording and there is no way to get a copy because it isn't out on DVD yet and the network only has the last 5 shows available on its site. I had that 1TB drive at about 50% to 60% full. So I am going to have to be careful with that 500GB. Its probably a long shot but maybe that outboard SATA drive will work with the 3272.

You guys have got me curious about how many 3272s the local office has on hand. What is really odd is that this office used to be the dumping ground for the older outdated boxes, which is how I got the 8300HD.

I have an idea. If the local office has a bunch of 3272s on hand, you guys can go to your office and get a 8300HDC and mail it to me. I will turn it in and swap it for a 3272 and mail that back to you.
post #15664 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by sofast1 View Post

I live near St. Pete,Fl.(Bright House) I got a Cisco 8742(which is very good!) and my friend got a Samsung 3272. Neither of us has whole-house. All the dvrs except the 8742 have been discontinued because of the new energy regs,but I'm sure TWC/Bright House will keep recycling the old ones as long as they can...they're not paying your electric bill.

BTW,your dvr uses more electricity than a energy star rated 21 cu. ft. refrigerator! http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20...nergy-at-home/

Is Samsung going to release an energy efficient DVR too? Like with the Cisco 8742? It's really a double-edged sword. If the ONLY energy reducing DVR according to sources is the 8742, but BHN/TWC does not want to give that out to single DVR users, expect the refurbs to go on for a long, long, LONG, time. Unless the companies make a regular energy efficient DVR for single-room subs.

I actually thought the the Samsung 3272 and the Cisco 8642, both whole house units, were also energy reducing models? But as stated, the cable company is not paying the electric bill, so they probably don't even care that much.

I mean, we have a TWC counter rep saying that the Cisco 3272, a whole house unit was only 320GB, when it is 500GB. All Whole House DVR's are 500GB, and probably the next models will be 1TB.

However, as we know, the agents often times don't know the differences between ODN and MDN software versions of TWC/BHN Navigator, and just assume that they are the same. As there are TWC/BHN reps working in offices, WHO DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT NAVIGATOR IS, I could see them pushing out older boxes till they die a natural death. And if the local division office managers don't know about the boxes and features, the counter reps and CSR's aren't going to know either.

Jack
post #15665 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satch Man View Post

Is Samsung going to release an energy efficient DVR too? Like with the Cisco 8742? It's really a double-edged sword. If the ONLY energy reducing DVR according to sources is the 8742, but BHN/TWC does not want to give that out to single DVR users, expect the refurbs to go on for a long, long, LONG, time. Unless the companies make a regular energy efficient DVR for single-room subs.

I actually thought the the Samsung 3272 and the Cisco 8642, both whole house units, were also energy reducing models? But as stated, the cable company is not paying the electric bill, so they probably don't even care that much.

I mean, we have a TWC counter rep saying that the Cisco 3272, a whole house unit was only 320GB, when it is 500GB. All Whole House DVR's are 500GB, and probably the next models will be 1TB.

However, as we know, the agents often times don't know the differences between ODN and MDN software versions of TWC/BHN Navigator, and just assume that they are the same. As there are TWC/BHN reps working in offices, WHO DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT NAVIGATOR IS, I could see them pushing out older boxes till they die a natural death. And if the local division office managers don't know about the boxes and features, the counter reps and CSR's aren't going to know either.

Jack

I don't think the Samsung is energy star rated,but I imagine any new models now will(have to) be. Keep in mind that all energy star stb/dvrs are all not the same. Energy star has a minimum requirement,which some boxes barely meet and some surpass by a lot. I'm sure that TWC/BH makes their choices based on their cost,not ours(to operate). All the info is available on the web. Down here the Bright House reps are fountains of misinformation who couldn't care less. Some of the techs are very good though.
post #15666 of 18042
I am scheduled for an upgrade to Signature in a few weeks. Have any of you used HD boxes with non-HD TVs using the coax output? I want to be able to access programming recorded in HD on a non-HD TV and I think that is the only way to do it.
For me, with what I'm paying now, it'll cost me <5$ a month more to upgrade from a single SA HD DVR with 120gb, one HD and one regular box to two 500gb DVR's, another two HD boxes and much faster internet.
I know there was someone on here who had problems with his network, but mine is much simpler. My router is about to die anyway, so I'll try theirs and just use it in bridge mode and buy an airport extreme or timecapsule if it's problematic.
post #15667 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNCHeel View Post

I have an idea. If the local office has a bunch of 3272s on hand, you guys can go to your office and get a 8300HDC and mail it to me. I will turn it in and swap it for a 3272 and mail that back to you.

As I recall, these STBs have embedded serial numbers which are read back when the box is first booted. If that serial number does not match what the local TW database has in it's database, then it won't work.
post #15668 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satch Man View Post

Is Samsung going to release an energy efficient DVR too? Like with the Cisco 8742? It's really a double-edged sword. If the ONLY energy reducing DVR according to sources is the 8742, but BHN/TWC does not want to give that out to single DVR users, expect the refurbs to go on for a long, long, LONG, time. Unless the companies make a regular energy efficient DVR for single-room subs.

I actually thought the the Samsung 3272 and the Cisco 8642, both whole house units, were also energy reducing models? But as stated, the cable company is not paying the electric bill, so they probably don't even care that much.

I mean, we have a TWC counter rep saying that the Cisco 3272, a whole house unit was only 320GB, when it is 500GB. All Whole House DVR's are 500GB, and probably the next models will be 1TB.

However, as we know, the agents often times don't know the differences between ODN and MDN software versions of TWC/BHN Navigator, and just assume that they are the same. As there are TWC/BHN reps working in offices, WHO DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT NAVIGATOR IS, I could see them pushing out older boxes till they die a natural death. And if the local division office managers don't know about the boxes and features, the counter reps and CSR's aren't going to know either.

Jack

8642 and 8742 both carry Energy Star rating, although the 8742 is somewhat lower in power consumption.

Energy Star STB List
post #15669 of 18042
I'm going to need to replace my unit. Which is the best one to get these days?
post #15670 of 18042
Piss poor DVR Management once again results in a duplicate recording and missed recording. I really hope TWC is working on making Whole Home DVR more functional because this is happening WAY too much with multiple people scheduling recordings across two DVR's that can't see each others Series Lists. I can't even blame my wife because Navigator is so bug ridden, she just thinks it's not scheduling.

I record Holmes Inspection and she records Walking Dead Both at 9:00. Well, tonight I find no Holmes Inspection, but two instances of Walking Dead! She scheduled it on both DVR's. I can sometimes catch these using the new TWC TV app because this list shows all DVR's and if I see multiple listings, I'll delete them, but I am so sick of having to babysit the machine. Even the online DVR manager is crap for this because you can only see one DVR at a time. I should have virtually NO conflicts with 4 available tuners. Navigator is too stupid to see the same show recording on both to cancel one and allow the other by itself. I'm still finding SD material as well when an HD channel is available. I was putting off DirecTV because the lack of HD that TWC has, but I may have to take a harder look at it again. I could use a central 5 tuner unit and they offer one. Thing is, many of the issues I'm reporting to Time Warner get answered with a call back telling me I need a service call because the box didn't "pass tests". Really? They are chalking up obvious Navigator flaws to signal level snapshots. The weather has been damp and cold, so I haven't been under the crawl space to install my distribution panel and eliminate the mess TWC left so I could have fluctuations with signal. However, they are not the cause of these issues.

So, it remains that Navigator is TWC's Achilles Heel for me (and most others). I just really wish there was a way to contact the dev team when I report issues. The feedback form is obviously being read because I get and email or a callback, but it's by a person that doesn't understand the issues. It would be nice to have clear lines of communication to explain. I still can't believe we don't have a Guide Filter. This is such a simple thing as Parental Controls already exist.

Kind of stuck just tolerating it because no third party option has VOD or PPV access. Just hoping TWC gets a good release of Navigator out with a decent feature set. I am trying to get requests in for the 8742 as I hear it's much speedier with no Guide Lag.
post #15671 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenJF3 View Post

Piss poor DVR Management once again results in a duplicate recording and missed recording. I really hope TWC is working on making Whole Home DVR more functional because this is happening WAY too much with multiple people scheduling recordings across two DVR's that can't see each others Series Lists. I can't even blame my wife because Navigator is so bug ridden, she just thinks it's not scheduling.

I record Holmes Inspection and she records Walking Dead Both at 9:00. Well, tonight I find no Holmes Inspection, but two instances of Walking Dead! She scheduled it on both DVR's. I can sometimes catch these using the new TWC TV app because this list shows all DVR's and if I see multiple listings, I'll delete them, but I am so sick of having to babysit the machine. Even the online DVR manager is crap for this because you can only see one DVR at a time. I should have virtually NO conflicts with 4 available tuners. Navigator is too stupid to see the same show recording on both to cancel one and allow the other by itself. I'm still finding SD material as well when an HD channel is available. I was putting off DirecTV because the lack of HD that TWC has, but I may have to take a harder look at it again. I could use a central 5 tuner unit and they offer one. Thing is, many of the issues I'm reporting to Time Warner get answered with a call back telling me I need a service call because the box didn't "pass tests". Really? They are chalking up obvious Navigator flaws to signal level snapshots. The weather has been damp and cold, so I haven't been under the crawl space to install my distribution panel and eliminate the mess TWC left so I could have fluctuations with signal. However, they are not the cause of these issues.

So, it remains that Navigator is TWC's Achilles Heel for me (and most others). I just really wish there was a way to contact the dev team when I report issues. The feedback form is obviously being read because I get and email or a callback, but it's by a person that doesn't understand the issues. It would be nice to have clear lines of communication to explain. I still can't believe we don't have a Guide Filter. This is such a simple thing as Parental Controls already exist.

Kind of stuck just tolerating it because no third party option has VOD or PPV access. Just hoping TWC gets a good release of Navigator out with a decent feature set. I am trying to get requests in for the 8742 as I hear it's much speedier with no Guide Lag.

Yes,

To echo what Ben said above, TWC REALLY NEEDS a better conflict resolution tool that could be recognized across applications/devices! Meaning, that whether you are scheduling a show through Navigator, I-Phone, I-Pad, Remote DVR Manager, the system could somehow KNOW that a duplicate program or time slot was about to be entered and than say:

"You have already scheduled a recording of (show name) at (show time) Do you want to:

Keep the original show as scheduled?

Replace the original show with the new show?

The Recording Log as it is now is STUPID because it only tells you about conflicts and issues after they have happened and you can't do anything about them. Additionally, the generic information does not give specific reason for the conflict. The current message:

"The set top was unable to record the program" or "The channel is not currently available" does not give a WHY reason for the problem or issue. If recording set-up allowed for proper REAL-TIME CONFLICT RESOLUTION, customers would not be having these conflicts, or at least much fewer of them. DVR's and their software, especially in this day and age should NOT have to be babysat for conflict resolution!

I also heard that Remote DVR Manager and Navigator Series Manager have different ways of dealing with recording conflicts? Is this true, and if so, what is the priority sequence for each device?

Jack
post #15672 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrralan View Post

I'm going to need to replace my unit. Which is the best one to get these days?

For DVR's.

The newest whole house models are the Cisco 8742 (really new and hard to get) and the Cisco 3272. The Cisco 8642 is a good box for Whole Home. But there are reports that the Samsung 3272 is faster. The new Cisco 8742 is REPORTED to be very fast with no guide lag.

These models are harder to get for single DVR subs, because many divisions give them out to Whole House and Signature Home subs only. Whole House DVR's all have 500GB's.

For non-whole huse DVR subs, the Samsung 3270 is good. There are some reports of conflict with HDMI sometimes with the box. But the Samsungs are faster than the Cisco's. You will generally get 320GB's with the newer boxees. I found out that the Samsung 3090 was a very good box, BUT Samsung discontinued it in favor of the 3270 series.

It should be noted that the Samsung 3270 and 3272 do not have PIP. This feature was removed by Samsung.

Cisco has a the Cisco 8642, which is faster than the widly distrubuted single-room SA-8300HDC. It has a bigger 320GB hard drive.

Have not had a non-DVR box for years, so can't comment too much on them. If you are a non-DVR subscriber, I would just get a Samsung over a Cisco box. They are faster.

Jack
post #15673 of 18042
I'm in Charlotte NC & had to get my remote replaced so I decided to swap out my old SA-8300HD DVR at the same time. I have had my 8300HD for years and never had a problem until this last software upgrade we got in January. Since then it has been buggy as heck and missing recordings so I assume it was finally time to swap it out. My local TWC office gave me a Cisco 8742HDC. I don’t have the signature service / whole house DVR service, just this one DVR. Besides being about a 1/3 the size of my old SA DVR box it seems to be pretty snappy in its performance. Of course I haven’t really used it much yet so I will have to see how it handles my scheduled recordings.
post #15674 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by e137811 View Post

My local TWC office gave me a Cisco 8742HD.

Where in Charlotte are you? Which TWC office did you go to to get the 8742? I'm trying to hunt one down. Does anyone have any info about its non-DVR sibling, the 4742? I want to get one of those as well for my Signature Home setup.
post #15675 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satch Man View Post

I am "almost positive" that the counter guy gave you wrong info and that the Samsung 3272 is 500GB. There IS a rarer version of the Samsung, the 3090, and I believe that is 320GB. I heard reports of a very very small percent of Samsung 3090's have the 160GB hard drive.

The Samsung 3272, Cisco 8642, and the newest Cisco 8742 are Multi-room boxes. I believe they all come with a 500GB hard drive.

I think someone said on the Samsungs, you can see the amount of drive storage by looking through the vent cracks at the drive and it is on there.

Jack

The Samsung 3270 is 320GB. /Dan
post #15676 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by mvc753 View Post

Where in Charlotte are you? Which TWC office did you go to to get the 8742? I'm trying to hunt one down. Does anyone have any info about its non-DVR sibling, the 4742? I want to get one of those as well for my Signature Home setup.

I'm up in the University area. I went to the office in Huntersville. Market Square Shopping Center 14219 Reese Blvd. Huntersville, NC 28078. It's exit 23 off of 77.
post #15677 of 18042
There is an office off the John Street exit off 485 in Mathews also.
post #15678 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satch Man View Post

For DVR's.

The newest whole house models are the Cisco 8742 (really new and hard to get) and the Cisco 3272. The Cisco 8642 is a good box for Whole Home. But there are reports that the Samsung 3272 is faster. The new Cisco 8742 is REPORTED to be very fast with no guide lag.

These models are harder to get for single DVR subs, because many divisions give them out to Whole House and Signature Home subs only. Whole House DVR's all have 500GB's.

For non-whole huse DVR subs, the Samsung 3270 is good. There are some reports of conflict with HDMI sometimes with the box. But the Samsungs are faster than the Cisco's. You will generally get 320GB's with the newer boxees. I found out that the Samsung 3090 was a very good box, BUT Samsung discontinued it in favor of the 3270 series.

It should be noted that the Samsung 3270 and 3272 do not have PIP. This feature was removed by Samsung.

Cisco has a the Cisco 8642, which is faster than the widly distrubuted single-room SA-8300HDC. It has a bigger 320GB hard drive.

Have not had a non-DVR box for years, so can't comment too much on them. If you are a non-DVR subscriber, I would just get a Samsung over a Cisco box. They are faster.

Jack

The 8642 has a 500GB drive
post #15679 of 18042
Has anyone else just "lost" an upgraded version of the program search?

Last week I picked up a 3272 to replace my dying 8300HD. I haven't tried ODN in a while, was pleased to see it operate much faster than before. The other interesting thing was what I presumed was an upgraded search menu for ODN. It was a full screen black background, with catagories listed down the left hand side. Once you drilled down to a show, you got an entire screen with a show description, an "album cover" picture of the show, and the menu for selecting recording options including a list of all channels that ran the show. I have been using the 8300 for the most part as I am trying to watch all my recorded shows before I return it. I used the 3272 today for the first time in a day or so and that search menu was gone, replaced by the old standard looking menu. WTF?
post #15680 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNCHeel View Post

Has anyone else just "lost" an upgraded version of the program search?

Last week I picked up a 3272 to replace my dying 8300HD. I haven't tried ODN in a while, was pleased to see it operate much faster than before. The other interesting thing was what I presumed was an upgraded search menu for ODN. It was a full screen black background, with categories listed down the left hand side. Once you drilled down to a show, you got an entire screen with a show description, an "album cover" picture of the show, and the menu for selecting recording options including a list of all channels that ran the show. I have been using the 8300 for the most part as I am trying to watch all my recorded shows before I return it. I used the 3272 today for the first time in a day or so and that search menu was gone, replaced by the old standard looking menu. WTF?

UGHHHHH!!!!

That new search system is sever-based, not boxed based. Although it is exclusively for ODN, I heard TWC will be starting with Signature Home subs and than working their way down through each model box. Pending they can work around the older ODN memory restrictions, TWC wants to get the new search system to all ODN boxes rolled out in quarterly installments to all areas.

One of these things I presume happened:

1.) The advanced search was "down" when you tried it, and TWC has the regular search in place as a back up. OR.

2.) They are getting some bugs out of Advanced Search, or maybe working on some more features for it, and need to take it down to do that.

3.) You'll get it indefinitely, eventually. When Ben got his, there were a couple of times when it said "Not available." Note that he is a Signature Home sub, and was one of the first to get advanced search. According to TWC, the first areas to get advanced search were:

Parts of New York
Parts of LA
Parts of Texas.

4.) Another thing. TWC rolled out a Beta today for Remote TV on PC for all versions of ODN/MDN Navigator. (Some restrictions for I-Guide at this time.) You can read about it here:

http://www.twcableuntangled.com/

In so doing, they may have needed to turn off the advanced search temporarily to get this new feature working on all the boxes. If Advanced Search is not back within say 24 on your box. (If you had it before) call and ask what's going on with it.

Jack
post #15681 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satch Man View Post

For DVR's.

The newest whole house models are the Cisco 8742 (really new and hard to get) and the Cisco 3272. The Cisco 8642 is a good box for Whole Home. But there are reports that the Samsung 3272 is faster. The new Cisco 8742 is REPORTED to be very fast with no guide lag.

These models are harder to get for single DVR subs, because many divisions give them out to Whole House and Signature Home subs only. Whole House DVR's all have 500GB's.

For non-whole huse DVR subs, the Samsung 3270 is good. There are some reports of conflict with HDMI sometimes with the box. But the Samsungs are faster than the Cisco's. You will generally get 320GB's with the newer boxees. I found out that the Samsung 3090 was a very good box, BUT Samsung discontinued it in favor of the 3270 series.

It should be noted that the Samsung 3270 and 3272 do not have PIP. This feature was removed by Samsung.

Cisco has a the Cisco 8642, which is faster than the widly distrubuted single-room SA-8300HDC. It has a bigger 320GB hard drive.

Have not had a non-DVR box for years, so can't comment too much on them. If you are a non-DVR subscriber, I would just get a Samsung over a Cisco box. They are faster.

Jack

Do the Cisco boxes have the same power cord as the 8300HD?
post #15682 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrralan View Post


Do the Cisco boxes have the same power cord as the 8300HD?

Yes. Corrected below as I am refering to only the 8600 and 4600 Series. Thanks for the clarification on the newer models. I'm still hunting for documentation on them.
post #15683 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrralan View Post

Do the Cisco boxes have the same power cord as the 8300HD?

THe 8742HDC DVR does not. It has an external power brick, with plugs into the unit using a traditional round power plug.

The 4742HDC non-DVR unit uses the same cord as all the other models.
post #15684 of 18042
Last night I set to record "Person of Interest". I record it every week but last night it stopped after 30 minutes. The record set up is for an hour. My question is where can I find that episode? It is not on In Demand -- none of the PI shows are there. I can't find it anywhere on the net. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks IHTWC!!!!!!!
post #15685 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjpjr View Post

Last night I set to record "Person of Interest" but it stopped after 30 minutes. My question is where can I find that episode?

We started watching that episode about 10 minutes in and then deleted it, or I would burn you a DVD of it. Full episodes are on the CBS PoI site, but they are delayed a couple of weeks - I think the one up now is from 2 weeks ago. I know that doesn't help you much, but at least you can get to it later.
post #15686 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjpjr View Post

Last night I set to record "Person of Interest". I record it every week but last night it stopped after 30 minutes. The record set up is for an hour. My question is where can I find that episode? It is not on In Demand -- none of the PI shows are there. I can't find it anywhere on the net. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks IHTWC!!!!!!!

I hesitate to offer this, since you're asking you may not be familiar with it... If not, download uTorrent client here:
http://www.utorrent.com/downloads

Then choose either a HD torrent of the show:
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/70391...SpastikusTV%5D

Of a (smaller) Low Res version:
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/70379...LOL_%5Beztv%5D

And finally, if you don't have a robust enough player (MKV files can be tricky for some), get the VLC media player here:

http://www.videolan.org/vlc/

You may need to add codec packs as well, a best bet is:
http://www.codecpackguide.com/klmcodec.htm

If this is all new, it may seem daunting, but knowing this will relieve a lot of frustration, as almost any TV shows you may miss are available within a day or so for watching. I would however avoid downloading obviously pirated material - While TV may very qualify, it doesn't seem to me to be much different than 'taping' a show and watching it later. You do pay for your cable service, so I would think you have the paid for right to view this show.
post #15687 of 18042
Thanks that should work. I have some of that already loaded.
post #15688 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbrain28 View Post

I would think you have the paid for right to view this show.

You would think so but does the copyright owner?
post #15689 of 18042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary J View Post

You would think so but does the copyright owner?

I would think the moderators would agree 'that' discussion belongs elsewhere, besides, I have to assume we differ on opinion.
post #15690 of 18042
Obviously you have not hung out in any of the media player threads here.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Recorders
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Recorders › Time Warner Cable Navigator