AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Showtime Now Butchering Movies: Credits, Pop Ups, Down-Res'd Sections
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Showtime Now Butchering Movies: Credits, Pop Ups, Down-Res'd Sections - Page 2

post #31 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic View Post

[size=5]
If they are indeed doing this?

As they have done with the bug and then with upconverting everything between movies, they do it several times in the week or two leading up to measure response - and then go for it. We are clearly past the experimenting stage now.

I could have sworn I put you on my ignore list. Well, back you go.

You can keep bitching and moaning about it here or you can do what I say and send Paul Selbano an email (provided someone posts it). Paul is a cool guy and has been very responsive in the past.
post #32 of 228
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicker1 View Post

This was a remarkably self-centered and self-indulgent message. It projected only puerile frustration that you care about something that others don't care about. It is unfortunate, in some ways, but very fortunate in others, that we're not all carbon copies of each other. There is no need, nor any benefit, in us all holding everything as dear as everyone else does. If you go through life expecting everyone to believe only as you do, care about things only as much as you do, etc., you're going to live a very miserable life.

As they say, you don't cook a frog by throwing it in boiling water. You do it by putting him in the water and slowly turning it up so he doesn't hop out.

Hello Frogs.....

Years ago, nothing got on the credits.

Then Networks started promoting other shows via audio over the credits.

Then they moved that to video as well as audio.

Then they put their previews split screen with over the credits and sped them up in an effort to put in more spots.

And for the 2 Hour Season Premiere and Season Finale of 24 we were treated to the opening of the second hour over the top of the credits from Hour 1.

Amazing how many don't learn from history....

Hello frogs.


OTA had no bug on HD in the beginning.

Then a very opaque bug.

Then bugs had motion added.

Then Fox put bugs in color.

This season ABC goes to a bigger logo with HD and NBC adds a logo with .com on it.

And CBS has a higher color overlay over the program.

Here we go again........

Amazing how many want HDTV for a better picture and how really blind they truly are.
post #33 of 228
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveFi View Post

I could have sworn I put you on my ignore list. Well, back you go.

You can keep bitching and moaning about it here or you can do what I say and send Paul Selbano an email (provided someone posts it). Paul is a cool guy and has been very responsive in the past.

That's as comical as the Fox News haters claiming Fox News is biased and wanting to block Fox on their TV with the bankrupt FoxNewsBlocker as they don't like their views. So much for wanting unbiased/all sides of a views.

Ignore all you want. Thank god we live in a country where you have that right.

As is said, if a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, did it really make a noise?

Well, I'm still not here and that just leads you to one sided ignorance from failure to examine all sides of an issue - which goes without saying.
post #34 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic View Post

That's as comical as the Fox News haters claiming Fox News is biased and wanting to block Fox on their TV with the bankrupt FoxNewsBlocker as they don't like their views. So much for wanting unbiased/all sides of a views.

Ignore all you want. Thank god we live in a country where you have that right.

As is said, if a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, did it really make a noise?

Well, I'm still not here and that just leads you to one sided ignorance from failure to examine all sides of an issue - which goes without saying.

So my suggestion to contact someone directly at Showtime who's been responsive to issues such as this is "ignoring the problem"? The rest of your post just makes me realize how out of touch with reality you are.

What the hell are you talking about?

Folks, I suggest you just ignore Fanatic. This is just par for the course with him. While he does bring up a good issue, I recommend doing what I say, and contacting Paul Selbano directly (I know his email has been posted multiple times in the forum, I just can't seem to find it).
post #35 of 228
Thread Starter 
LOL...The truth comes out, as I suspected, so much for being on ignore.

It's a good thing you aren't honest as otherwise you would have never know to contact Paul as no one else bothered to raise the issue.

Again, if a tree falls in a forest and no one is around, does that mean it make a sound.
post #36 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveFi View Post

I recommend ... contacting Paul Selbano directly (I know his email has been posted multiple times in the forum, I just can't seem to find it).

His email is paul.seblanoatshowtime.net (replace the at with @).
post #37 of 228
Thread Starter 
Well, let's see - in the last 36 hours.....

Soul Plane again had it's credits butchered.

However Coach Carter and Wicker Park did not.

Think maybe they are retreating on their policy?

Nope, Coach Carter and Wicker park were Paramount titles - the same company that essentially owns Showtime - though split in 2 different companies with Mr. Redstone running both - it appears Showtime does not want to butcher movies that their related studio owns - only those of other companies....

The Curve - non Paramount - butchered

The Field - MGM - butchered

Missing In America - non Paramount - butchered

Notting Hill - Universal - butchered

Shooting Gallery - non-Paramount - butchered


BUT they left the credits of Weeds and Brotherhood intact.....

Imagine that.

No hypocrisy there...
post #38 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic View Post

Soul Plane again had it's credits butchered.

What the hell are you doing watching Soul Plane...again? You have got to be the most HDTV watching person I've ever come across!
post #39 of 228
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Alexander View Post

What the hell are you doing watching Soul Plane...again? You have got to be the most HDTV watching person I've ever come across!

Actually I have yet to watch it, lol.

I have had Showtime going to hard drive full time for the last week to see what exactly is going on with this new issue.

I skim the credits at high speed of the roughly 12 titles a day. Takes maybe 5 minutes.

The do not overlay on Children's movies in the morning (Big surprise) so you are clear on Heathcliff! They also don't overlay on Paramount Titles or their own Original Productions - again - hypocritics.

Anyway...thus far they have only promoted Dexter starting in X number of days. I hope this ends when it actually starts.

Anyway, for payback, I think an organized Boycott of reporting watching Dexter should happen - if one is a Nielsen household or gets a weekly diary.

That's the one way to "pay them back" and show them that this doesn't work.
post #40 of 228
Thread Starter 
Well, lets see on Thursday....

Alfie - no ads for Dexter run over credits.

The Cookout - ads for Dexter run over the credits.

Hmmm........

Alfie is Paramount

Cookout is Lions Gate

wow! what a coincidence!!!!!!

Weeds - no credit intrusion.....

Brotherhood - no credit intrusion.....

who'd of thunk it?

Damn Hypocritical Bastards.

Do it to other people's films and programs - just not to your own.

I wonder why? lol.

But it's the credits - no one cares - we'll do it to anything we don't own - but not anything that we own!
post #41 of 228
Unless there something going on other than the credits rolling by then I don't stick around for the credits.
post #42 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by spid View Post

Unless there something going on other than the credits rolling by then I don't stick around for the credits.

And that's your right. But what about those of us that want to see them? We're screwed. If they just left the credits intact, everyone is happy -- those that don't like them can go away, while those that do can enjoy. I doubt anyone would take the time to call or write in to complain that the credits were left in!

I can understand this kind of thinking when it comes to broadcast TV (though I still don't like it) -- they're scared silly that you'll get bored and change the channel -- but on a pay movie channel? Do they think people are sitting there all day waiting for the next movie to come on??
post #43 of 228
Yes, you're screwed. That's a pretty typical situation folks who have niche interests encounter. Sorry it didn't work out for you.
post #44 of 228
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Alexander View Post

Why?

So I can beat you in this thread:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...=630174&page=4
post #45 of 228
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicker1 View Post

Yes, you're screwed. That's a pretty typical situation folks who have niche interests encounter. Sorry it didn't work out for you.

And you will be too as Showtime is owned and run now not by the cable division of Viacom as it was up until December 05 but by the CBS division of Showtime.

Again, just look at the "advancements" every year in HD from no bug, to bug, to moving animated bug, to presented in HD in clear overlay to the current animated HD in blue box etc.

You are just to blind to see the writing on the wall and know that if I am screwed, so are you.

As Max Pomeranc said in Searching for Bobby Fischer, you've already lost and you don't even know it.
post #46 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicker1 View Post

Sorry it didn't work out for you.

Actually, it did work out for me. I don't subscribe to these channels for these very reasons. Why pay to be annoyed? If there's a movie I want to see, I just rent the DVD. The pay movie channels lose, not me.
post #47 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic View Post

And you will be too as Showtime is owned and run now not by the cable division of Viacom as it was up until December 05 but by the CBS division of Showtime.

Amazingly, that doesn't bother me in the slightest. They provide precisely what I expect, because my expectations are defined by their promises, not by my indeterminate hopes and dreams.

Quote:


You are just to blind to see the writing on the wall and know that if I am screwed, so are you.

On the contrary, you're just too blind to see how unreasonable your expectations are.
post #48 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by videojanitor View Post

Actually, it did work out for me.

What I was referring to is your subscription to Showtime, which clearly didn't work out for you, as you yourself admitted:
Quote:


I don't subscribe to these channels for these very reasons. Why pay to be annoyed? If there's a movie I want to see, I just rent the DVD. The pay movie channels lose, not me.

They lose you; they don't lose. You have no idea how much your own personal subscription is worth to them; you have no idea how much the things that annoy you are worth to them. For all you know, the latter is worth far more than the former.

This is really part of the problem, I think: mass-market customers believing their own patronage is worth far more than it really is -- that their termination of service costs the mass-market service provider more than that which dissatisfied the customer is worth to the service provider. It's a form of commercial arrogance on the part of the customer. Just because something annoys you gosh-golly it must annoy everyone else the same way, the same amount, and with the same result.

And that arrogance goes deeper sometimes. I've seen some mass-market customers actually claim that the service provider has no clue about this -- implying that the service provider is befuddled with regard to why such customers terminate service, or that the service provider doesn't realize the value lost due to such terminations versus the value gained from the "causes" of those terminations. It's really quite laughable, since generally the service provider is actually actively researching such things, on a continual basis, while the customer is just speaking off-the-cuff, based on their own visceral reactions.
post #49 of 228
HDTVFanAtic: It's ironic that you're SOOOOO disappointed with Showtime that you continue to pay them 3x over what most people pay them. Yet you still do... If this bothers you so much, cancel your subscription to them.
post #50 of 228
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hall View Post

HDTVFanAtic: It's ironic that you're SOOOOO disappointed with Showtime that you continue to pay them 3x over what most people pay them. Yet you still do... If this bothers you so much, cancel your subscription to them.

Can I pitch in to get you a pair of reading glasses or is there a bigger issue with actually understanding the written word?

This has been asked and answered.

Or maybe you are just a writer for SNL trying to find something funny to say - and like last night's show - used re-hashed material and it still wasn't funny.
post #51 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicker1 View Post

Amazingly, that doesn't bother me in the slightest. They provide precisely what I expect, because my expectations are defined by their promises, not by my indeterminate hopes and dreams.

On the contrary, you're just too blind to see how unreasonable your expectations are.

\\\\

http://www.answers.com/topic/fanatic
post #52 of 228
Put on your reading glasses and count up how many (who bothered to comment in this thread) care about this so-called "issue" vs those who don't care.

Lay off the personal insults too. It doesn't help.....
post #53 of 228
Has anyone e-mailed Paul at Showtime about this (as suggested earlier in this thread)? I sent an e-mail to Paul (around a year ago) the last time credits were butchered, and Showtime ended the practice shortly thereafter.

At the risk of being flamed, I also am bothered by Showtime resuming the butchered credits.
post #54 of 228
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougRuss View Post

\\\\

http://www.answers.com/topic/fanatic

Third time that has been posted - another SNL writer from Saturday night....or worse yet, someone who schedules movies for Universal HD.
post #55 of 228
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hall View Post

Put on your reading glasses and count up how many (who bothered to comment in this thread) care about this so-called "issue" vs those who don't care.

Lay off the personal insults too. It doesn't help.....


Clearly you care as you are still reading and posting here.

Or maybe I'm just a Democrat who believes that Democratic Population is too stupid know what they really want and needs someone like a bigger Government to help them out.

With your lack of caring, I can see why they have that belief.

Maybe 99% of the people reading this thread can't look at things from the other side of the table because if they did, they'd see the logic. We see how these things start and where they go - as witnessed by the time line of intrusions in OTA bugs and graphics.

But of course, you would never be guilty of that.....


http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...36#post8397536


Quote:
Originally Posted by hall View Post

99% of people can't look at things from the other side of the table because if they did, they'd see the logic.

Congratulations on proving your own point you made towards others in the other thread.
post #56 of 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic View Post

Third time that has been posted - another SNL writer from Saturday night....or worse yet, someone who schedules movies for Universal HD.

Ooops.... This just in:

http://www.answers.com/topic/egomaniac
post #57 of 228
Who cares about credits. Why do I want to know who the "key grip" was? If you really want to know buy the movie. Cut the credits out all together and offer more viewing material.
post #58 of 228
HFA commented:
> if the lack of response here is any indication - its only going to get worse. <<br />
I didn't post here, because I was assuming that a direct contact would have more of an impact. Perhaps not. But here's the e-mail I sent them on their contact page...

Quote:


Hi, Tony.

I need to say, in the most strenuous way, that Showtime-HD needs to STOP butchering their movie credits with advertising overlays for other programming on the channel.

Showtime is a PAY channel. We expect to see the programming there uncut, unedited, and commercial-free... within the context of a program. It's not a free, garbage-loaded channel like TNT-HD. That means no popups, scrolls, or other garbage. And no shrinking or overlaying of the credits. I'm paying for those, and when I want to see them, I should be able to.

I didn't respond immediately, because I only saw this twice personally, but according to reports on some of the major web Forums, it's becoming more prevalent, as you attempt to promote other programming (e.g. Dexter). For crying out loud... it's not like you don't have loads of other time during interstitials (which can be as long as you want them to be) to ADVERTISE other programming. Do it BETWEEN the films, not DURING the films... even the "lowly" credits.

This is a CHANGE at Showtime. It didn't use to be this way, and your viewers have certain (reasonable) expectations that you're violating. Please don't lower yourself to the level of the likes of TNT-HD. The next thing you know, you'll be running the credits off in a double-speed sidebar, with most of the screen used for advertising, similiar to what the crappy broadcast channels (Fox, CBS, etc.) are already doing. Don't go down that path!

I'll tell you right now... this will NOT promote Dexter. All it will do is generate animosity from your best viewers. Showtime-HD needs to respect and be considerate of their viewers, and discontinue this practice immediately.

Please...

Best regards,

- Tim
post #59 of 228
Some interesting comments...

PooperScooper wrote:
> If given a choice between OAR or butchered credits, I'll take OAR and go to IMDB for credits. It could be worse, they could start doing pop-ups ala TNT, the worst HD channel in existense. <<br />
and Marc,

> I'll take OAR vs. OC (Original Credits) anyday. <<br />
Could be worse? Given a choice? Why do you feel you have to sacrifice one to get the other? What's wrong with having both? These are some strange apathetic attitudes.

So as long as it's possible that a situation COULD be worse, you're satisfied with crap, as long as it's better than the worst-case scenario? Come on, Larry.

I'm not going to go through and respond to every comment here. It's obvious that there's a contingent that as soon as they sense the fade-to-black before the credits, BANG, they're up and out of their seats. That's fine for those folks. I don't begrudge them that (in their own homes... the theatre is another story). One of the nice things is having options.

OTOH, some feel differently, and at least sometimes might like to read a few of the creds, or enjoy the music after a film, or catch a clever post-film segment interwoven into the credits, or take time to decompress after leaving an emotional alternate experience while returning to the "real world". I find it disturbing that those in group1 seem willing to say, "to hell with you. who gives a d@mn? you're nuts."

[Let's turn it around. How would you guys enjoy being strapped into your seat, with your eyeballs propped open, and forced to watch the credits? Pretty obscene, right? So why are you so intolerant of another POV?]

- Tim
post #60 of 228
Even though I rarely sit through credits having the credits butchered would detract from the movie experience a little to me. Sometimes when I see a movie that has particularly moved me I do find myself sitting through the music in the credits.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Showtime Now Butchering Movies: Credits, Pop Ups, Down-Res'd Sections