First off you room looks fantastic.
When I had my single sb12 I has the same feeling. I lived it for a short while. Then kind of forgot about it and was never wowed. Now I traded up to a pb12 it's been over a month and I am still giddy about it.
Your room is much bigger than mine Sony am not sure the 2 sb12 is enough. But you will DEFINitly get more output and extensions from the ultras and you will never get the grinning your face.
When I had my single sb12 I has the same feeling. I lived it for a short while. Then kind of forgot about it and was never wowed. Now I traded up to a pb12 it's been over a month and I am still giddy about it.
Your room is much bigger than mine Sony am not sure the 2 sb12 is enough. But you will DEFINitly get more output and extensions from the ultras and you will never get the grinning your face.

















I read your post with interest and mixed feelings. I just upgraded from a single SB12 to dual PB12-Plus, but I have yet to install the second one due to complications. Your room doesn't look like it's excessively large -- I don't think it's way larger than my 1600 cu ft living room -- so I can relate. By the way, I don't think it's necessary to upgrade to the Plus to obtain good bass: as I said earlier, I found my SB12 had better bass than my Plus at first, before finding the best location for my new acquisition.

The trick is, upgrading from my crappy old 60W 8" sub to the SB12 was a night and day difference, and I think I was half expecting the same from an upgrade to the Plus. However the advantages of a bigger sub show up differently: much more subtle at lower volumes (a bit more extension, a bit more slam), and it reveals itself at listening levels that I have rarely explored yet (as I mostly listen at -20 dB from reference in order not to wake up sleeping toddler & girlfriend; not a personal preference
). I really look forward to see what differences a second sub will make in my room.
but yeah a REW measurement with the calibration file loaded will yield more credence to those results. The reason why I'm a bit skeptical is that the PB12-NSD is ported and below the tuning frequency (19 Hz I think), it should drop faster than the SB12. Mind you, the SPL at 20 Hz is so high with respect to the SB12 that even at 15 Hz you'll have more output with the PB than the SB, but the drop is really sharp, at 24 dB/octave at first; then you hit the HPF that the DSP applies to protect the driver since the cabinets unloads below tuning, which adds *another* 24 dB/octave to the slope for a very sharp 48 dB/octave cut-off. This is visible in the REW measurements I took last week (although irrelevant because at that point the SPL is negligible).
I've not tested sub-20 Hz tones at loud settings to be frank. At low volume they sound like puttering, p-p-p-p-p, simply slower and slower as you reduce the frequency. I suspect what we're hearing is distortion/harmonics: the waveform as played by the woofer is not a perfect sine anymore (because of the filters and inherent limitations of the motor) and thus, it can be thought of as a 10 Hz fundamental and higher-order harmonics. Those harmonics at 20, 30, 40, etc. Hz are themselves audible.
