AVS › AVS Forum › A/V Control & Automation › Remote Control Area › MX-700 software
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

MX-700 software - Page 3

post #61 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiVoComBlankMan View Post

As an example, I had a Solar PV system installed this past summer. Last fall when I was getting quotes, one contractor impressed me so much with his attention to detail and follow though I stopped getting quotes and hired him. Was he the cheapest? Don't know. Was he the most expensive? Don't know. Did he do a good job and was I happy with the installation? You betcha. My point is, it's not just about the cost.

Really? Do you think it would be fair if the PV system installer did all that work, and then when it came time to contract you hit him up with a list of parts on his bid with internet pricing well under what he proposed?

That happens, a lot.
post #62 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigpapa View Post

I just explained some of the issue in my previous post. Let me explain again, even though I've explained it before. Maybe you missed it.

1. CI's have been complaining, rightfully so, that the ebay/fleamarket internet sellers are way underselling their prices.

2. MX series remote sales aren't properly qualified and supported.

Ok ok ok, uncle. See it works much better when you're discussing and not attacking.

Yes I was angry. Was I justified in being angry, probably not. Overreacted.

When I needed to program my 700 last week and I went to update the software and found out after 4 years of being a good customer who did nothing wrong I was now cut off, I was pissed. Really pissed that a company would do that.

I've calmed down a lot now. A lot of that has to do with the people I've been bitching too. Both at the Forums and URC. Got to give them a lot of credit, and a apology, I was being a real ahole and they kept their cool. Wonder if I would have.

Other reasons for the impending calmness is there are a lot of people out there willing to help. I received the 850 Live Update enabled software anonymously. The way I was bitching I was surprised anyone would do that, I probably would have blown me off. Then contacting an AD and finding out, no I really don't have to pay the $399 MSRP. Then finally getting through to URC Tech Support this morning and getting the 700 Live Update enabled software sent to me with no problem what so ever. I was ready to beg and plead (not argue, that would have gotten me nowhere) but didn't have to.

Yep once I get home and verify that software is Live Update enabled I'm going to have a lot of apologizing to do.

Ya know, maybe a nominal fee or subscription to get the software upgrades might be in order. I'd bitch and moan about that but I'd get over it. Realistically, I bought my remote 4 years ago, what have I done since then to support URC financially that makes me think I deserve to continue to get free software updates? Mind blowing thought eh? I periodically upgrade my PC software and that isn't free. Maybe I'll go support URC by buying that 850 now.
post #63 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigpapa View Post

Really? Do you think it would be fair if the PV system installer did all that work, and then when it came time to contract you hit him up with a list of parts on his bid with internet pricing well under what he proposed?

That happens, a lot.

Well, yeah, doesn't everybody do that?

Point well taken. But in this case I'm pretty sure I got a better price on the components through him then I could have on my own. Or worst case the same. PV panels are in short supply and have been for over a year now. Demand has gone up and the manufacturers can't keep up. If fact there is a shortage of the silicon wafers used to make them. At least there was last time I checked. In fact I doubt I could have even gotten the panels on my own. This contractor does a lot of volume and has agreements with this particular panel manufacturer and it was not easy for him to get the panels I wanted.

But to your point, I never advocated that, I never would. It's just not right.

What I think is ok is what I did (now before you go saying well of course you think that, just listen). I bought my 700 along with the software, I programmed my 700 all by myself, and I went away. I did not ask an AD to bail me out for free or a minimal charge, I did not ask a CI to bail me out for free or a minimal charge, I did not ask URC to bail me out for free. I got exactly what I wanted, a remote that I could program on my PC and download to the remote. I be happy.

I will admit, the software was not always intuitive, and there was some stumbling at times to figure out how to do something. But if I couldn't figure it out I pretty much always found the answer in the manual. If not I just keep poking away at it till I did.

Afterthought:

I would at this point probably buy from you if you gave me the price I was looking for that I thought was fair knowing that you would not have to do any of the programming and you would not be spending any time supporting me after the sale. I've come a long way eh?
post #64 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiVoComBlankMan View Post

Ok ok ok, uncle. See it works much better when you're discussing and not attacking.

Agreed. You're not saying anything worth attacking now. The 'CI greed' and "it's all about money" stuff raises my ire. I think you were right to be aggravated, maybe even mad. But in the end, after the shock and inconvenience, it got handled as it should, and I'm happy you've still got a good working remote.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiVoComBlankMan View Post

Ya know, maybe a nominal fee or subscription to get the software upgrades might be in order. I'd bitch and moan about that but I'd get over it. Realistically, I bought my remote 4 years ago, what have I done since then to support URC financially that makes me think I deserve to continue to get free software updates? Mind blowing thought eh? I periodically upgrade my PC software and that isn't free. Maybe I'll go support URC by buying that 850 now.

This idea has been floated before. Not to dismiss it, but I'd think that money would be paid up front with the purchase price of the remote, and the AD should keep you on file to support you down the road. Then again, I don't know if I'd care either way, whatever works. I think URC is trying to shift some of the support responsibilities to the seller of the remotes, which I think is not only fair, but the right way to go. URC's has their responsibilities, not doubt, but they should be shared.
post #65 of 195
Just download and installed the software. I be Happy!

And support, that's one thing I don't have to worry about with the AD I deal with. They keep computer records of everything, I can go in there and they can tell me everything I've ever purchased. And as far a being above board, they've got one of the best, if not thee best reputations around.

Oh but, did you see that post over at RC where the guy bought a 3000 and he wants something changed and the AD won't give him the software and says he has to hire the AD @ $100 a hour? That is so wrong and exactly what worried me about this whole thing.
post #66 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiVoComBlankMan View Post

What I think is ok is what I did (now before you go saying well of course you think that, just listen). I bought my 700 along with the software, I programmed my 700 all by myself, and I went away. I did not ask an AD to bail me out for free or a minimal charge, I did not ask a CI to bail me out for free or a minimal charge, I did not ask URC to bail me out for free. I got exactly what I wanted, a remote that I could program on my PC and download to the remote. I be happy.

There's nothing inherently wrong with that. But, many people such as yourself unwittingly search for the best price, and purchase accordingly. They're likely to purchase from the grey marketeers least likely to help you out, or tell you up front that it's going to take several hours to get it tweaked just right (more for larger systems, less for smaller, etc). I don't think that's the best solution for all people. I merely wish that somebody like you would have to call and talk to a human, so they can give you a quicky speech about what you're likely to go through. If you agree or don't care, then fine. It's just the "BUY NOW" button isn't the best way of selling this type of product, even though many in this forum can do just fine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiVoComBlankMan View Post

I will admit, the software was not always intuitive, and there was some stumbling at times to figure out how to do something. But if I couldn't figure it out I pretty much always found the answer in the manual. If not I just keep poking away at it till I did.

That's all good. The only problem I have with this is that the grey marketeer doesn't care, they got their cash and they're done with you. URC cares because they have to field the phone calls. I (and URC) care because I want you to be prepared for this endeavour and enjoy your remote. You're obviously smart enough to accomplish remote programming, but I doubt most people know what they're getting into. Utilizing a good AD, in my view, would help let people know what the configuration process entails before the purchase to properly set expectations.

This just doesn't happen on the commodity exchange called ebay. I'm not against ebay at all, I'm against distro of these products as brand new from ebay without support. I still think people like you should be able to purchase these remotes and program them yourself. The only change will be process and channel, which will address the other problems. The avid DIYers haven't really been the problem, if at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiVoComBlankMan View Post

I would at this point probably buy from you if you gave me the price I was looking for that I thought was fair knowing that you would not have to do any of the programming and you would not be spending any time supporting me after the sale. I've come a long way eh?

We probably aren't that far apart. I'll sell stuff to cover my ass then add on some profit to pay for my vices. If it's double, then that's what I'll sell it for. Luckily, my core business isn't selling and programming MX remotes, otherwise I might be a tad bit vociferous in my opinions...
post #67 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigpapa View Post

There's nothing inherently wrong with that. But, many people such as yourself unwittingly search for the best price, and purchase accordingly. They're likely to purchase from the grey marketeers least likely to help you out, or tell you up front that it's going to take several hours to get it tweaked just right (more for larger systems, less for smaller, etc). I don't think that's the best solution for all people. I merely wish that somebody like you would have to call and talk to a human, so they can give you a quicky speech about what you're likely to go through. If you agree or don't care, then fine. It's just the "BUY NOW" button isn't the best way of selling this type of product, even though many in this forum can do just fine.

That's all good. The only problem I have with this is that the grey marketeer doesn't care, they got their cash and they're done with you. URC cares because they have to field the phone calls. I (and URC) care because I want you to be prepared for this endeavour and enjoy your remote. You're obviously smart enough to accomplish remote programming, but I doubt most people know what they're getting into. Utilizing a good AD, in my view, would help let people know what the configuration process entails before the purchase to properly set expectations.

This just doesn't happen on the commodity exchange called ebay. I'm not against ebay at all, I'm against distro of these products as brand new from ebay without support. I still think people like you should be able to purchase these remotes and program them yourself. The only change will be process and channel, which will address the other problems. The avid DIYers haven't really been the problem, if at all.

Back in 2002 when I was in the market for the 700 I looked at eBay, I found some great deals. A 700 for around $140 from someone I think in Naperville Illinois, so close I figured I might be able to drive down and pick it up. I pulled his eBay info (which then gave a lot more info then now), tried to check him out via all means available, but I was just too leery. That price, less then half retail was just too good to be true. Something was fishy, something had to be wrong. (Looked on eBay for him the other day, no longer an active user and a lot of no product no communication feedback towards his eBay demise.)

So I decided not to go that route and find the best legitimate deal I could. I landed up paying a lot more, almost retail but in light of recent events it looks like it was a wise choice.

I checked out eBay yesterday just for grins, 850 for $189 with a 1 year warranty to boot. Less then half of retail?? Seller had like 6 negatives in the last 6 months so I checked them out. One buyer was complaining that there was no serial number on his 850. The sellers response was not to worry he keeps the serial number on file and supports the 1 year warranty.
Red Flag! Red Flag! Red Flag!

But if you're a naive first time buyer and not aware of all this policy stuff you probably don't realize this to be a Red Flag.

And I knew exactly what I was getting into way before I bought the remote. I do extensive research on everything I buy that costs more then a buck ninety eight, tax included. I had the MX-700 Editor software downloaded and installed on my PC long before I bought. I was playing around with it and becoming familiar with it so I could see if I could do what I wanted to do with this remote. I did not want to spend $300 to $400 on the 700 and then be disappointed of find out I bought another programmable/learning remote that did not meet my expectations.

So I knew, without talking to anyone what it was all about. Now granted most people aren't as anal as me and probably don't take the time to do what I did, they just assume everything is going to be a cakewalk only to get a rude awakening later and then are forced to seek help.

So as I see it now, URC by making the software more difficult to obtain (without a serial number) has made it harder for someone now to do what I did beforehand so that they can find out what they are getting themselves into before they bite off more then they can chew.
post #68 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiVoComBlankMan View Post

So as I see it now, URC by making the software more difficult to obtain (without a serial number) has made it harder for someone now to do what I did beforehand so that they can find out what they are getting themselves into before they bite off more then they can chew.

I think a short conversation with a human would be more effective than freely available SW. It would probably take less time to achieve the same effect as tinkerin with the SW for a few hours. Most of the difficulties with advanced remote programming won't be known until the program is loaded and tested in the remote.

I just don't think it would be as effective as a human, a pro, giving advice. That's what they're there for, right?
post #69 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigpapa View Post

I just don't think it would be as effective as a human, a pro, giving advice. That's what they're there for, right?

I'm not saying a conversation wouldn't be effective for some, and coming from experts would be beneficial, but there is no way any conversation can convey all the nuances of the software. And I learn more and retain it better if I do it myself, hands on. That pretty much goes for anything.

Even if I had had that conversation I still would have opted to get the software and do it myself, that was my goal. I wanted a remote that I could program on a PC because that approach was easier then the remotes that were around at the time that you could program and create macros, but you had to do it within the confines of the remote itself which was/is more cumbersome. Lot easier to do it on a bigger PC screen using a mouse.
post #70 of 195
I'm in the same situation as most people reading this thread. I bought my MX-700 remote back in 2002 (i think). I emailed BlueDo (the store I bought it from) and they can't seem to find my order. So now I have to plead my case to URC just to get firmware updates. Sigh. I can guarantee that my next remote will NOT be from URC.
post #71 of 195
Dave,

It wasn't that bad. I finally got through yesterday morning (eventually they were closed Tuesday but nowhere did they say that, as in the recorded message you get when you call) and I thought I'd have to plead my case but I wasn't asked when/where I bought my 700, I wasn't asked the serial number either, just my email address so they could send me the software. When I got home it was in my inbox, I downloaded it, installed it and it is Live Update enabled.


(800) 901-0800
post #72 of 195
TiVoCom,

Which number did you call? I tried URC's headquarters number - (914) 835-4484 - but I got put through to voicemail.
post #73 of 195
Update: they called me back and emailed me the MX-700 Setup EXE file. Live Update works great
post #74 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiVoComBlankMan View Post

I'm not saying a conversation wouldn't be effective for some, and coming from experts would be beneficial, but there is no way any conversation can convey all the nuances of the software.

I'm not saying that all nuances of the SW should be explained, I'm saying that people should be told that it would take a few hours to get up and running, then several hours more with advanced tweaking, in most cases. In your case, you would have said "That's fine, I want to do it myself anyway." No problem. Most people will still want to do it themselves anyway, but at least their expectations were set.

Either way, this is wishful thinking, since I doubt most AD's will do this. If somebody wants to buy a remote for MSRP by hitting the BUY NOW button, then let em... I guess. I don't think these remotes should be sold that way.
post #75 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by davenull View Post

TiVoCom,

Which number did you call? I tried URC's headquarters number - (914) 835-4484 - but I got put through to voicemail.

If anyone else is interested this was the number I called: (800) 901-0800
post #76 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigpapa View Post

I'm not saying that all nuances of the SW should be explained, I'm saying that people should be told that it would take a few hours to get up and running, then several hours more with advanced tweaking, in most cases. In your case, you would have said "That's fine, I want to do it myself anyway." No problem. Most people will still want to do it themselves anyway, but at least their expectations were set..

Yep, good point, I don't mind the time, stuff like that is fun.
post #77 of 195
post #78 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by FullURCSoftware View Post

http://www.shipdog.com

So is this one of them Unauthorized Dealers I've been hearing about?

I don't find Shipdog.com listed on URC's site as a online dealer nor any listing for them in New York where their Corproate address is listed as according to Dealtime:

1412 Ave M #2395
Brooklyn, NY 11230

http://www.dealtime.com/xSI-~MRD-309620

Nor do I find them listed with the State of New York in their Corporation and Business Entity Database here:

http://appsext8.dos.state.ny.us/corp...y_search_entry
post #79 of 195
I have never done business with them. I found them through remotecentral, which has a CNET link to find where remotes are sold. Shipdog showed up and they have the software available for download (search by manufacturer - universal, and select a URC remote) - It turns out it is the software with live update enabled. They don't appear to have the mx-700, but my understanding is that the mx-850 software works fine for the mx-700 (haven't tried it though).

For example - here is a direct link to the mx-850. Notice the link below the picture for downloading the software.

http://www.shipdog.com/product.asp?i=UNIMX850

BTW - I had to do the 5,4, 3.. thing because AVS forum won't let new members post links until after 5 posts.
post #80 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by FullURCSoftware View Post

BTW - I had to do the 5,4, 3.. thing because AVS forum won't let new members post links until after 5 posts.

Yeah I figured that.

Wonder if that's legal for a non AD (at this point I'm assuming they are not authorized because I can't find anything that says they are) to distributed the software.

Now that I think about it, I would think not. I recall Eric Johnson saying something about (warning about I think) distributing copyrighted material.
post #81 of 195
You could also purchase my MX700/MX200 on ebay right now, I am including the current software
post #82 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfrjim View Post

You could also purchase my MX700/MX200 on ebay right now, I am including the current software

Yeah I asked Eirc if that was ok (if the software with LU was transferable cuz I'm thinking of getting a 850, or 950), his answer was "Of course". Just wanted to be sure, with all this policy BS going around I don't want to do something that would piss off URC and they cut off my copy of LU software.
post #83 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiVoComBlankMan View Post

Back in 2002 when I was in the market for the 700 I looked at eBay, I found some great deals. A 700 for around $140 from someone I think in Naperville Illinois, so close I figured I might be able to drive down and pick it up. I pulled his eBay info (which then gave a lot more info then now), tried to check him out via all means available, but I was just too leery. That price, less then half retail was just too good to be true. Something was fishy, something had to be wrong. (Looked on eBay for him the other day, no longer an active user and a lot of no product no communication feedback towards his eBay demise.)

So I decided not to go that route and find the best legitimate deal I could. I landed up paying a lot more, almost retail but in light of recent events it looks like it was a wise choice.

I checked out eBay yesterday just for grins, 850 for $189 with a 1 year warranty to boot. Less then half of retail?? Seller had like 6 negatives in the last 6 months so I checked them out. One buyer was complaining that there was no serial number on his 850. The sellers response was not to worry he keeps the serial number on file and supports the 1 year warranty.
Red Flag! Red Flag! Red Flag!

But if you're a naive first time buyer and not aware of all this policy stuff you probably don't realize this to be a Red Flag.

And I knew exactly what I was getting into way before I bought the remote. I do extensive research on everything I buy that costs more then a buck ninety eight, tax included. I had the MX-700 Editor software downloaded and installed on my PC long before I bought. I was playing around with it and becoming familiar with it so I could see if I could do what I wanted to do with this remote. I did not want to spend $300 to $400 on the 700 and then be disappointed of find out I bought another programmable/learning remote that did not meet my expectations.

So I knew, without talking to anyone what it was all about. Now granted most people aren't as anal as me and probably don't take the time to do what I did, they just assume everything is going to be a cakewalk only to get a rude awakening later and then are forced to seek help.

So as I see it now, URC by making the software more difficult to obtain (without a serial number) has made it harder for someone now to do what I did beforehand so that they can find out what they are getting themselves into before they bite off more then they can chew.

I still don't understand why people made this software live update as a big issue. I bought mx700 from ebay a couple years back and don't regret at all. To me software live update is almost useless, I either use "learn" or Discret hex Prono code. I don't remember if I ever used the code database.

This is my first post here, ever, since this seems so ridiculous. the above argument point only scare an average Joe or an AOL user, which should not be the case with MX product.
post #84 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxnews View Post

I still don't understand why people made this software live update as a big issue.

I think it's 3 reasons for most people: 1) the principle of having full support for something you paid for, 2) having the latest/greatest software and 3) remotes break, get lost, people buy used or open box that doesn't have a remote which means learning is useless.

I just picked up a MX-850 used a week ago. I bought it because I want to consolidated remotes and I fell into category 3 above (open box receiver with no remote). Downloaded the consumer version of their software through the website and had some of databases I needed but some where still missing. Luckily I work for a dealer so I was able to get the live update version through them and there is a big difference in the IR databases between the 2 versions. The latest updates had a new general code list that worked for my receiver plus it had my specific DVD player code list which the consumer version did not. Now remember the difference is between downloading the consumer version a week ago vs the dealer version with the latest live update patch.

So anyone that downloads from the website is missing alot of codes, that is not fair to the end user. In reality though the amount of people this screws is really minimal. Those that want to program themselves are vastly outnumbered by those who just pay a dealer to do it for them, and my case above is probably very rare.

Now reading some of the above posts, if URC is giving the live update version to those that call and request it, then it's even less of an issue since it means those that can program themselves can still get it.
post #85 of 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxnews View Post

I still don't understand why people made this software live update as a big issue. I bought mx700 from ebay a couple years back and don't regret at all. To me software live update is almost useless, I either use "learn" or Discret hex Prono code. I don't remember if I ever used the code database.

This is my first post here, ever, since this seems so ridiculous. the above argument point only scare an average Joe or an AOL user, which should not be the case with MX product.

The IR DB may not be a big deal but it may, firmware for the remote is. Enhancements to the Editor and additional functionality is also a big deal to some. To you it may not be, to others it may, you have to let them make the choice but in order to do that they have to know the story up front, not learn about it after they make the purchase and find out it's too late.

And you're also assuming no one ever loses a remote and the remote will always work forever even after that coffee, beer, or wine was spilled on it. And everybody backs up their configuration and never screws it up and never ever needs the remote again.

And remotes don't always have discrete On/Off or input changing codes (I know this first hand with two Samsung HDTV's) etc.

I could go on and on but there's no point to it, there's plenty of reason to have an up to date IR DB. If you don't need/use it don't assume others don't.
post #86 of 195
Just a quick note of confirmation. The MX850 software does indeed work on the MX700 because I tried it with mine last night.

Also, I got the Onkyo 504 receiver this weekend and tried learning the vol up and down only to find when the MX700 sent it to the receiver I can not press and hold the vol button because it only increments the volume by 1, so I had to press multiple to get it to go up or down.

I did the live update on the MX850 software, found the receiver listed, and those codes worked perfectly. So I can now hold down the volume, and as a bonus I also got discrete pwr on and off codes.
post #87 of 195
MovingTarget,
Thanx a million, I have the 800 and have also downloaded the 850 software. i havent tried it yet on my 800 but your experience amped me up. Im looking at the onkyo 604 and hope the 603 software works. I am still waiting for the optoma h72 to show up on the update though. None of the optoma downloads work. again, great report.
post #88 of 195
the move they are trying to make is this if they can get rid of the grey market they can keep the procved value of their remotes. so if ou have a market where they can set the price and it wount go down to others selling the producr for less. like the markup on the mx3000 is around $400 if they can stop people from selling at a disc then the prive and procived value will stay high and not go down over time.
post #89 of 195
Discrete power on/off codes are a MAJOR reason to need the full version of the MX-Editor with Live Update enabled. The no-live-update version currently on URC's site is only current as of July 2006. There's been a lot of gear introduced since then and the URC code database has been updated at least three times since then.

Sorry, but there IS a need to have the Live Update software. Sure, there are workarounds. But customers PAID for that software feature when they purchased the remote (the remote is useless without software). Regardless where they purchased the remote, they are STILL URC customers. The only exception would be a counterfeit remote.

Mark
post #90 of 195
Like everyone else I have the MX-850 full version software now, but would prefer to find a copy of the MX-800 full version with live update as I have an MX-800.

If anyone is willing to send me a copy please PM me. yousendit dot c0m is a great way to send it to yourself and then anyone who could use it.

I have no issues with using the software intended for the device I paid for, no matter how I get it.

Dennis
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Remote Control Area
AVS › AVS Forum › A/V Control & Automation › Remote Control Area › MX-700 software