I see that they have the Toshiba D-RW2 recorder on sale this week. I was wondering if it has good picture quality, good black levels and does a good job cleaning up bad analog video? I have a machine that pushes out bad analog video quality for some reason. I S-Video the signal into my Lite on and the picture looks real good. All of the snow and grain is gone. It has a smooth picture. I don't like my Lite on contrast level though. It looks too high when I take the disk to other TVs. Yet, the chipset or something makes bad video in look like good video out.
I don't know anything about Toshiba quality and its ablity to filter or clean up bad video. I read that Pioneer does that weakly and I agree. It is great for clean digital picture but not good if the video is bad. It sees the bad video signal and records it all -- bad or good. Same for Panasonic. Great for clean signal but doesn't filter out a messed up signal going to it. I also don't exactly dig my black level from my 330 Pioneer. The black is too black. When you take the disk to other players/TVs anything that is black jumps out more then anything else. I'm afraid if I get a Toshiba that I might have a black level problem of some sort.
Also, my Lite on can record anything right now. Yet, I'm hearing stories of Toshiba owners that can't even record HBO or HBO on demand because of the tight copy protection built into the Toshiba that I don't seem to read about with Panny, Pioneer, JVC, or Lite on. Does anyone know if this model has tight copy protection?
I'm going to keep my Pioneer and Panny still hooked up but if the Toshiba has better video quality, better black balance and does a better job cleaning up a dirty signal or video than the LSI chip Lite on does then I think I might get a Toshiba.
Anyone have this recorder? Anyone have a Toshiba and LSI Panny, Lite on, or JVC who knows what I'm talking about and tell me which one is better?
Basically, I would use it for both digital cable recording as well as transfering analog signal recordings off of my Tivo. I would actually take out my Lite on and put in the new Toshiba to do what my flaky Lite on is doing right now.
I don't know anything about Toshiba quality and its ablity to filter or clean up bad video. I read that Pioneer does that weakly and I agree. It is great for clean digital picture but not good if the video is bad. It sees the bad video signal and records it all -- bad or good. Same for Panasonic. Great for clean signal but doesn't filter out a messed up signal going to it. I also don't exactly dig my black level from my 330 Pioneer. The black is too black. When you take the disk to other players/TVs anything that is black jumps out more then anything else. I'm afraid if I get a Toshiba that I might have a black level problem of some sort.
Also, my Lite on can record anything right now. Yet, I'm hearing stories of Toshiba owners that can't even record HBO or HBO on demand because of the tight copy protection built into the Toshiba that I don't seem to read about with Panny, Pioneer, JVC, or Lite on. Does anyone know if this model has tight copy protection?
I'm going to keep my Pioneer and Panny still hooked up but if the Toshiba has better video quality, better black balance and does a better job cleaning up a dirty signal or video than the LSI chip Lite on does then I think I might get a Toshiba.
Anyone have this recorder? Anyone have a Toshiba and LSI Panny, Lite on, or JVC who knows what I'm talking about and tell me which one is better?
Basically, I would use it for both digital cable recording as well as transfering analog signal recordings off of my Tivo. I would actually take out my Lite on and put in the new Toshiba to do what my flaky Lite on is doing right now.














