If you can find some of these, you could do it wirelessly: http://www.wiredathome.com/products/ButtKicker-BK%252dLINK-Wireless-RF-Link.html
Featured Stories
Topics Discussed
- categorySpeaker Systems
Related Forum Threads
- Northeast Speaker Shoot-Out: AVS Members Demo 2-Channel Systems Last post on 4/29/13 at 10:49am in Community News & Polls
- Is there a better value than the pl-89s? Last post on 3/2/13 at 2:50am in Speakers
- Small room speaker purchase advice needed Last post on 3/2/13 at 5:08am in Speakers
- 5k To Spend on 7.1: GoldenEar Technology TritonCinema Two or what else? Last post on 3/2/13 at 6:13am in Speakers
- How to set up Sony BDPS390 with my Polk 3000 Soundbar Last post on 2/25/13 at 10:59am in Blu-ray Players
Seaton Sound SubMersive1 - Page 258
AVS Top Picks
- kbarnes701
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 10,417 Posts. Joined 1/2008
- Location: UK
- Select All Posts By This User

Sure thing:
Crowson Website
Unboxing Video & Installation
Behringer iNuke1000DSP Amplifier
Thanks!
- Gary J
- Trader Feedback: 0
- calculating status...
-
- online
- 7,136 Posts. Joined 3/2000
- Location: 4000' or sea level
- Select All Posts By This User

If you can find some of these, you could do it wirelessly: http://www.wiredathome.com/products/ButtKicker-BK%252dLINK-Wireless-RF-Link.html
They appear to be discontinued. Perhaps some interference problems. I went with the wires.
- craig john
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Packer Backer
-
- offline
- 9,398 Posts. Joined 10/2003
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Select All Posts By This User
- Gary J
- Trader Feedback: 0
- calculating status...
-
- online
- 7,136 Posts. Joined 3/2000
- Location: 4000' or sea level
- Select All Posts By This User
- rx-8
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Where's the remote Edith?
-
- offline
- 425 Posts. Joined 11/2002
- Location: Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada
- Select All Posts By This User
Welcome to the club - they are a joy to listen to.
- BrolicBeast
- Trader Feedback: +4
- 1080pROFESSIONAL
-
- offline
- 1,278 Posts. Joined 9/2009
- Location: DC Metro Area
- Select All Posts By This User
- bsoko2
- Trader Feedback: +2
-
- offline
- 4,199 Posts. Joined 4/2007
- Location: Olympia, WA
- Select All Posts By This User
- audioguy
- Trader Feedback: 0
- 16,800 Watts of Fun!
-
- offline
- 2,591 Posts. Joined 6/2001
- Location: Roswell, GA
- Select All Posts By This User
Dual stacked SubMersives?? A serious smile configuration !!
- Sick Mother
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 195 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Location: West Palm Beach, FL
- Select All Posts By This User

Bought a Audyssey Pro Kit and ran it tonight on my Integra DHC 80.3. Huge improvement with bass and SQ. Pro set my crossovers at 50 for the LCR and 60 for the 4 surrounds. I did try 80 hz crossover but got the best audio SQ with the 50 hz. I have dual stacks of 2 Submersives in each front corner and Pro set those trims at -1 and the seat shakes and vibrates at -5 on the volume. Bass is pretty much the same either at 50 or 80 crossover so I went with what sounds best for me for SQ. Using Pro with XT32 is a improvement with overall bass and SQ. WOW pod scene was 116 db (not running hot from set trims) with both 80 & 50 crosssovers. Those JTR speakers are damn efficiant with audio freqs.
Bsoko2, out of curiosity, why didn't you go all JTR or all Seaton?
- RMK!
- Trader Feedback: +3
- Señor Member
-
- offline
- 4,267 Posts. Joined 10/2005
- Location: 95608
- Select All Posts By This User

Bought a Audyssey Pro Kit and ran it tonight on my Integra DHC 80.3. Huge improvement with bass and SQ. Pro set my crossovers at 50 for the LCR and 60 for the 4 surrounds. I did try 80 hz crossover but got the best audio SQ with the 50 hz. I have dual stacks of 2 Submersives in each front corner and Pro set those trims at -1 and the seat shakes and vibrates at -5 on the volume. Bass is pretty much the same either at 50 or 80 crossover so I went with what sounds best for me for SQ. Using Pro with XT32 is a improvement with overall bass and SQ. WOW pod scene was 116 db (not running hot from set trims) with both 80 & 50 crosssovers. Those JTR speakers are damn efficiant with audio freqs.
So you are saying the pro kit made a huge difference in SQ. Did you set individual filters and if so on what channels/frequencies? How many Audyssey positions did you run?
Sorry for all the questions but my experience with the pro kit vs standard XT32 was not much (if any) difference in SQ.
- kbarnes701
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 10,417 Posts. Joined 1/2008
- Location: UK
- Select All Posts By This User


Bought a Audyssey Pro Kit and ran it tonight on my Integra DHC 80.3. Huge improvement with bass and SQ. Pro set my crossovers at 50 for the LCR and 60 for the 4 surrounds. I did try 80 hz crossover but got the best audio SQ with the 50 hz. I have dual stacks of 2 Submersives in each front corner and Pro set those trims at -1 and the seat shakes and vibrates at -5 on the volume. Bass is pretty much the same either at 50 or 80 crossover so I went with what sounds best for me for SQ. Using Pro with XT32 is a improvement with overall bass and SQ. WOW pod scene was 116 db (not running hot from set trims) with both 80 & 50 crosssovers. Those JTR speakers are damn efficiant with audio freqs.
So you are saying the pro kit made a huge difference in SQ. Did you set individual filters and if so on what channels/frequencies? How many Audyssey positions did you run?
Sorry for all the questions but my experience with the pro kit vs standard XT32 was not much (if any) difference in SQ.
My experience with the Pro kit is that it is more the 'icing on the cake' than a profound difference in SQ. It is certainly nowhere near the difference from going from XT to XT32. If you use the Target Curve Editor and independent measuring software together, then Pro can make more of a difference as you 'fine tune' it.
- bsoko2
- Trader Feedback: +2
-
- offline
- 4,199 Posts. Joined 4/2007
- Location: Olympia, WA
- Select All Posts By This User
My room is fully treated and would be considered a med to small (2300 cu ft) room. One of the big changes between Pro and XT32 was that the ideal crossover dropped 5 hz. XT at 55 and Pro at 50; center 55 to 50 and mains 70 to 50. I had run REW in the past before Pro and it showed the ideal crossover at 50 hz. I know I do need to take more time and rerun REW to check on exactly what crossover is the most effective now for my room.
- kbarnes701
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 10,417 Posts. Joined 1/2008
- Location: UK
- Select All Posts By This User
I don't know. The main advantages of Pro over regular XT32 are:
- Individually ranked crossovers
- Filters created after the desired crossover has been selected
- Higher quality, calibrated mic with better tolerances
- Target Curve Editor
- Ability to save and reload as many measurements as you have storage room for
- Ability to use up to 32 measurement positions
Some of those might be expected to give a better calibration in any room including more challenging ones. But I still believe, from my experience, that the differences are subtle. Pro also uses the underlying version of MultEQ in the AVR/AVP, so a Pro calibration on an XT machine does not deliver a result as good as just a regular XT32 calibration without Pro.
- Blackdevil77
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 700 Posts. Joined 2/2012
- Location: Nassau County, Long Island, New York
- Select All Posts By This User

I don't know. The main advantages of Pro over regular XT32 are:
- Individually ranked crossovers
- Filters created after the desired crossover has been selected
- Higher quality, calibrated mic with better tolerances
- Target Curve Editor
- Ability to save and reload as many measurements as you have storage room for
- Ability to use up to 32 measurement positions
Some of those might be expected to give a better calibration in any room including more challenging ones. But I still believe, from my experience, that the differences are subtle. Pro also uses the underlying version of MultEQ in the AVR/AVP, so a Pro calibration on an XT machine does not deliver a result as good as just a regular XT32 calibration without Pro.
Do you think the difference is enough to warrant the cost of the pro kit plus license ($700 bucks!)? I was looking to pick up a kit
- kbarnes701
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 10,417 Posts. Joined 1/2008
- Location: UK
- Select All Posts By This User


I don't know. The main advantages of Pro over regular XT32 are:
- Individually ranked crossovers
- Filters created after the desired crossover has been selected
- Higher quality, calibrated mic with better tolerances
- Target Curve Editor
- Ability to save and reload as many measurements as you have storage room for
- Ability to use up to 32 measurement positions
Some of those might be expected to give a better calibration in any room including more challenging ones. But I still believe, from my experience, that the differences are subtle. Pro also uses the underlying version of MultEQ in the AVR/AVP, so a Pro calibration on an XT machine does not deliver a result as good as just a regular XT32 calibration without Pro.
Do you think the difference is enough to warrant the cost of the pro kit plus license ($700 bucks!)? I was looking to pick up a kit
It's a difficult call. First off, if you do not have a unit with XT32, then you will get far more difference in SQ by upgrading to XT32. If you already have XT32, then the improvements are subtle. But that doesn’t mean they are not real. Personally, I would not be without Pro simply for the Target Curve Editor and the ability to save and reload prior measurements at will. It does make a difference to SQ, but it is more subtle than the difference between XT and XT32. If I had never have bought my Pro kit I would always have been wondering what I might be missing, and that was another good enough reason for me to buy it.
I'd also consider what else you have done in the quest for improved SQ. If you have not yet applied room treatments (assuming WAF etc permits) then that will bring bigger benefits than moving from XT32 to Pro IMO. I assume your speakers are all you want right now and I know that if you have one or more Submersives, then you are not lacking in that area. If I had to choose between spending 700 bucks on room treatments (and you can do your room a few times over for that money if you DIY them) and 700 bucks on Pro, I would first choose the treatments. If the latter are not an option for you, or you already have them in place, then yes, I personally would buy a Pro kit just for the better mic, the greater flexibility and the ability to save and reload known good calibrations. You will find SQ improvements as I did I am sure. Specifically, I found that Pro made for a noticeable improvement in the integration of the surrounds - the 'bubble' was noticeable better. I may have also noticed improvements in imaging and separation and clarity in the treble - but some or all of those may have been placebo.
I would also say that to get the very best out of Pro you need independent measuring gear like OmniMic or REW. If you have that, then measure the room with XT32 alone, measure again after running Pro and see what you find. I bought Pro before I bought my measuring gear - if I was going back in time, I'd do it the other way around now, based on my experience.
You may care to check out the Pro FAQ, linked in my sig for more info too.
- djbluemax1
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 1,561 Posts. Joined 10/2004
- Location: MI
- Select All Posts By This User
If you already have XT32, then my personal recommendation for that $700 (we love spending other people's money) would be, listed in order:
1) measuring equipment if you don't yet have any (i.e. REW, XTZ, Omnimic or similar)
2) acoustic treatment if you don't have any (beginning with bass traps)
3) then the Pro kit.
The reason for the order is that 1) will allow you to see the results you're getting in your room and is invaluable with things like optimizing the placement of your sub(s), speakers and even potentially your MLP if those are flexible. You can check crossover optimization, room anomalies etc.
Ideally, you should use 1) to assist with 2) as knowing where acoustic problems lie in your room and setup allows you to target the specific issues to apply acoustic treatment for.
1) & 2) will provide better bang for the buck, and finally, 3) to fine tune.
Max
- kbarnes701
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 10,417 Posts. Joined 1/2008
- Location: UK
- Select All Posts By This User
Email Luke at Audyssey. If there is no dealer in your area you can buy the Pro Kit direct from Audyssey. Luke will sort it out for you. His email address is JLoke@audyssey.com
- kbarnes701
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 10,417 Posts. Joined 1/2008
- Location: UK
- Select All Posts By This User

Good points Keith. With the caveat of being an XT32 non-Pro user, I've looked at the measured and graphed results between XT32 and XT32 Pro for the exact same setup in the same room and although there were some improvements, as Keith said, they're subtle.
If you already have XT32, then my personal recommendation for that $700 (we love spending other people's money) would be, listed in order:
1) measuring equipment if you don't yet have any (i.e. REW, XTZ, Omnimic or similar)
2) acoustic treatment if you don't have any (beginning with bass traps)
3) then the Pro kit.
The reason for the order is that 1) will allow you to see the results you're getting in your room and is invaluable with things like optimizing the placement of your sub(s), speakers and even potentially your MLP if those are flexible. You can check crossover optimization, room anomalies etc.
Ideally, you should use 1) to assist with 2) as knowing where acoustic problems lie in your room and setup allows you to target the specific issues to apply acoustic treatment for.
1) & 2) will provide better bang for the buck, and finally, 3) to fine tune.
Max
+1. I bought 1 and 3 the other way around and can confirm that your way is much better/more useful.
- RMK!
- Trader Feedback: +3
- Señor Member
-
- offline
- 4,267 Posts. Joined 10/2005
- Location: 95608
- Select All Posts By This User
Good points Keith. With the caveat of being an XT32 non-Pro user, I've looked at the measured and graphed results between XT32 and XT32 Pro for the exact same setup in the same room and although there were some improvements, as Keith said, they're subtle.
If you already have XT32, then my personal recommendation for that $700 (we love spending other people's money) would be, listed in order:
1) measuring equipment if you don't yet have any (i.e. REW, XTZ, Omnimic or similar)
2) acoustic treatment if you don't have any (beginning with bass traps)
3) then the Pro kit.
The reason for the order is that 1) will allow you to see the results you're getting in your room and is invaluable with things like optimizing the placement of your sub(s), speakers and even potentially your MLP if those are flexible. You can check crossover optimization, room anomalies etc.
Ideally, you should use 1) to assist with 2) as knowing where acoustic problems lie in your room and setup allows you to target the specific issues to apply acoustic treatment for.
1) & 2) will provide better bang for the buck, and finally, 3) to fine tune.
Max
+2
I think the Pro Kit may be more of a salve for the tweaker (
). Audyssey is the best way to get good sound at multiple seating locations in a room and I can only imagine the difficulty in using conventional measuring and EQ methods to get optimal sound over multiple seating locations. Nearly every measurement I see posted on these boards are taken from a single point in space. Move the mic 6 inches in any direction and you get a different FR. Move it a foot or two and you get a very different FR.I haven't use ARC or Trinov but Audyssey XT32 has made the most impact on my rooms sound. The Pro Kit does allow for extra measuring positions and tweaking what Audyssey does within the context of the automatic filters Audyssey applies and so does allow for improvements in the FR. My comments were related to the audibility of those tweaks and in my experience, they were certainly not dramatic ...

- kbarnes701
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 10,417 Posts. Joined 1/2008
- Location: UK
- Select All Posts By This User
Maybe, but there are audible and measurable benefits from using Pro too.
True - but many people will take several mic position measurements and then average the result to closer emulate the Audyssey mic positions they used. This is very easy to do with REW.

Also true. As Max and I said earlier, the benefits of Pro are much more subtle than, say the difference between XT and XT32. Your experience confirms what many have said on the Audyssey Pro thread.
- Gary J
- Trader Feedback: 0
- calculating status...
-
- online
- 7,136 Posts. Joined 3/2000
- Location: 4000' or sea level
- Select All Posts By This User

Audyssey is the best way to get good sound at multiple seating locations in a room and I can only imagine the difficulty in using conventional measuring and EQ methods to get optimal sound over multiple seating locations. Nearly every measurement I see posted on these boards are taken from a single point in space. Move the mic 6 inches in any direction and you get a different FR. Move it a foot or two and you get a very different FR.
Exactly, but you will find a lot of people in the forum are more interested in optimizing a single seating position at the expense of others. Either they have one person HTs or they convince themselves that others in the room just do not care about (or could appreciate) good sound as much as they do. I would rather optimize the listening area that Audyssey was engineered to do rather than try to trick it into doing something else by playing whack-a-mole with different mic positions and measurements.
- Blackdevil77
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 700 Posts. Joined 2/2012
- Location: Nassau County, Long Island, New York
- Select All Posts By This User
I have 2 Submersive HP's and the XT32 does a wonderful job and balancing out the bass. Even in the atrocious, untreated room everything is in at the moment. I have a DHC-80.3 processor with a full Seaton set up with Cat 12C's as LCR and am waiting on Sparks for surrounds that I ordered a few weeks ago.
- RMK!
- Trader Feedback: +3
- Señor Member
-
- offline
- 4,267 Posts. Joined 10/2005
- Location: 95608
- Select All Posts By This User

Maybe, but there are audible and measurable benefits from using Pro too.
True - but many people will take several mic position measurements and then average the result to closer emulate the Audyssey mic positions they used. This is very easy to do with REW.
Also true. As Max and I said earlier, the benefits of Pro are much more subtle than, say the difference between XT and XT32. Your experience confirms what many have said on the Audyssey Pro thread.
I would hope the the +or-3db filters would lead to measurable differences but it is the audible part that I find unreliable.
As for the measuring, I get the easy part with REW. The not so easy part is the EQ device itself and what speakers are being EQ'ed. If just the L&R have filters applied what about the CC and surrounds. I have had members say that the surrounds "don't need EQing" but they are speakers playing a good amount of content. EQing 2 speakers out of 5 or 7 or 11 seems to me to be a half measure.
Nothing wrong with being a hobbyist and experimenting/playing with these tools but I think that the real science involved is beyond most of us. That's why I contend that Audyssey is the best answer for good sound in most rooms for most folks.
That said, tweak on my brothers ...

- Mark Seaton
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 5,729 Posts. Joined 7/2000
- Location: Chicago, IL, USA
- Select All Posts By This User
+/-3dB or more can be hard to hear when they are narrow peaks or dips. When you start expanding out to an octave or more in bandwidth adjustments, +/-0.5dB can be easily audible from a starting reference point. This is nothing new and matches well understood matters of audibility, hearing sensitivity and realities with real program material.
While yearns for a simple, single measurement plot to which then can bulldoze flat, the reality is that audible equivalence or similarity varies every time the decay vs frequency changes in the room, which is complicated further in being a 4D problem most often visualized in 2D or 3D.
How well can we hear a dip that's 5Hz wide and 3dB deep?.
How well can we hear a dip that's 8Hz wide and 7dB deep?
Based on your above, the reason I ask is to find out how sensitive our hearing is to these types of expected fluctuations one might find in a standard REW frequency graph.
- Bill Fitzmaurice
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 5,241 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Location: New Hampshire
- Select All Posts By This User
- Seaton Sound SubMersive1
AVS Top Picks
Recent Discussions
- › The prepress system 15 seconds ago
- › 'Revolution' on NBC 16 seconds ago
- › The Official AVS Antenna and Related Hardware Topic! 23 seconds ago
- › Bricked LG 42pj350, lg mode 1.6.10 on firmware 3.32 24 seconds ago
- › Is it time to ditch my Bluray ISOs for MKVs? 1 minute ago
- › Aerial Acoustics Owners Thread 1 minute ago
- › great white balance but primaries a bit off. 1 minute ago
- › Microsoft fires the first shot in the "NEXT" generation.... 1 minute ago
- › Saturday Night Live 2012-13 2 minutes ago
- › Official Panasonic S60 Series Discussion Thread 3 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 by Natros
- › Epson V11H501020 PowerLite Home Cinema 3020 2D and 3D 1080p Home... by sailorb
- › BenQ W1070 1080P 3D Projector by jakob_s
- › Elite Screens ER110WH1 Sable Fixed Frame (110" 16:9 AR) by DDT0C
- › Elite Screens ER100WH1-A1080P2 Sable Fixed Frame Projection Screen by DDT0C
- › Peerless PRG Mount, Black by DDT0C
- › Epson 5020UB Powerlite Home Cinema 3D Front Projector by DDT0C
- › Sony VPLHS20 Cineza Digital Home Entertainment LCD Projector by varkeast
- › JVC DLA-RS45 Home Theater Projector 1080P HDMI by jmccarei
- › Sharp DT 510 DLP Projector by rdcollns
New Articles
- › Projector Review Contest by Nick Val
- › "List Your Gear to Win Some Gear"... by Nick Val
- › Most Economical Thin Client PC`s from RDP... by RDPThinClients
- › Media Browser 3 Announced by xzener
- › AVS Guide to Media Servers, Part 1 by Scott Wilkinson
- › Join the AVS Team! by Nick Val
- › 25 Top Blu-ray releases for 2012 by Ralph Potts
- › Sony Launches 4k Ultra HD Flat Panel - AVS... by Scott Wilkinson
- › Clarus Power Cords by Good Tunes
- › A Theater Is Just Is Not A Theater, Unless... by David Bott
About AVS | Join the Community | Advertise | Contact Us
© 2013 AVS is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map













