AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Deal or No Deal? Deal! News Corp gets stock back, Liberty Media gets DirecTV!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Deal or No Deal? Deal! News Corp gets stock back, Liberty Media gets DirecTV!

post #1 of 86
Thread Starter 
Rupert Murdoch and John C. Malone have settled their long-running corporate feud, as Mr. Murdoch's News Corporation agreed to buy out Mr. Malone's big stake in the company in exchange for a controlling stake in DirecTV, cash and other assets valued at $11 billion, according to people briefed on the transaction.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/06/bu...rtner=homepage

Will this have any effect on D* programming? Can we expect a better or worse DirecTV under Malone?
post #2 of 86
Let's hope that it speeds up the launch of more HD channels. Malone being a cable guy & all, should do a better job of acquiring HD channels than Murdoch. PQ, well that's a TBD thing, depending on when the 2 ne birds go live.
post #3 of 86
This is very weird. He has wanted Directv for so long, and now he sells it??
post #4 of 86
He wanted it back in the days when satellite had a significant advantage to cable. Now that cable is gaining a significant advantage over satellite (thanks to 2-way services, bundling, etc). I wonder if he'll make an offer for a cable co.
post #5 of 86
Whatever it is that is planed; they lost me. I just had my TW install done on the 3'rd.I had been with D* for 10 years. I guess what spoiled me was having Voom for that short period of time.
I have their dvr and it has the hdmi-out.(S.A. Explorer 8300 HD)
I have so many new channels and also got Stars and C-Max hd +inhd 1&2)
I have no idea why they haven't included our local ch.5.----I still have my ota antenna;but the rest of the folks have to watch ch.5 in SD.
A year back I thought the mpeg 4 was going to give us more HD,but that didn't happen.
post #6 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slickone View Post

Let's hope that it speeds up the launch of more HD channels. Malone being a cable guy & all, should do a better job of acquiring HD channels than Murdoch. PQ, well that's a TBD thing, depending on when the 2 ne birds go live.

lol - Malone is a financial guy who just happened to find the right platform for his numbers in cable.

Rupert was much more of a media guy.
post #7 of 86
Ask former TCI subscribers to describe the guy in charge of their cable company and "slumlord" would have been more accurate than "king of cable."

TCI's network was described as maybe the most backward large cable network when John Malone sold TCI to AT&T.

with that track record I'm not sure this is good news for DirecTV subscribers.
post #8 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic View Post

lol - Malone is a financial guy who just happened to find the right platform for his numbers in cable.

Rupert was much more of a media guy.

Meaning that if Malone is such a financial wizard, he should recognize that the potential for growth lies in HD viewership, and hopefully uses that to his advantage. As for his track record with TCI, yes it was bad, very bad. We don't what will totally happen, but stay tuned............
post #9 of 86
Whatever it means, this is big.
post #10 of 86
D* should have _tons_ of room for new HD by this time next year (new sats going up).
post #11 of 86
When Starz HD launched they must have shown LOTR in every available format during the first month it aired. Which would have been okay if subscribers could have found out in advance the SD version was on Saturday in prime time and the HD version was going to run Sunday at 3 a.m. Never seen another pay channel do that.
post #12 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxfan View Post

He wanted it back in the days when satellite had a significant advantage to cable. Now that cable is gaining a significant advantage over satellite (thanks to 2-way services, bundling, etc). I wonder if he'll make an offer for a cable co.

Maybe he'll buy Comcast or TWC; that would be a good one....
post #13 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slickone View Post

Meaning that if Malone is such a financial wizard, he should recognize that the potential for growth lies in HD viewership, and hopefully uses that to his advantage. As for his track record with TCI, yes it was bad, very bad. We don't what will totally happen, but stay tuned............

Again, if you want to know what he thinks of HD, look at StarzHD - and how they normally have about 1/2 the number of HD Titles per month that HBO and SHO air - and a large portion of the titles actually marketed as HD are in reality Upconverts.
post #14 of 86
If Murdoch called D* a turdbird while he owned it, I wonder what he'll call it now.
post #15 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic View Post

Again, if you want to know what he thinks of HD, look at StarzHD - and how they normally have about 1/2 the number of HD Titles per month that HBO and SHO air - and a large portion of the titles actually marketed as HD are in reality Upconverts.

At least there's a chance that D* might actually carry it. Granted I didn't like Starz HD when I had Comcast.
post #16 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVFanAtic View Post

Again, if you want to know what he thinks of HD, look at StarzHD - and how they normally have about 1/2 the number of HD Titles per month that HBO and SHO air - and a large portion of the titles actually marketed as HD are in reality Upconverts.

It would be interesting to know just how much influence Mr. Malone has with Starz!. I was always under the impression Mr. Sie was calling the shots, while he was there.
post #17 of 86
Well, as when News Corp bought DirecTV nothing much will change at all in the short term. About all there will be is some upper management change.

Sat launches will still happen next year.
Tons of HD added will still happen next year.
HR20 will still roll out.

Perhaps there will be some changes come 2008 but then how will we know if the "changes" were planned all along or new from Liberty.
post #18 of 86
Like Ken said, this is big.

Any guesses on whether or not they will get FCC approval?
post #19 of 86
As long as the sats go up D* subscribers should be OK.
post #20 of 86
What about the possiblity of an mpeg4 Tivo now?
post #21 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by billyrayvalentin View Post

What about the possiblity of an mpeg4 Tivo now?

It's not possible.
post #22 of 86
Liberty Media owns Starz, so maybe we will get Starz hd?
post #23 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by brad31 View Post

As long as the sats go up D* subscribers should be OK.

Maybe, If they are not sold off
post #24 of 86
From Murdoch's side, I am sure this is far more about getting Malone's 19% voting stock in News Corp. then about his belief in the future of D*.
post #25 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slickone View Post

Meaning that if Malone is such a financial wizard, he should recognize that the potential for growth lies in HD viewership, and hopefully uses that to his advantage. As for his track record with TCI, yes it was bad, very bad. We don't what will totally happen, but stay tuned............

right. the potential for growth lies in an extreme minority of subscribers who have an affinity for expensive equipment, cheap service, and bitch about everything...
post #26 of 86
With all the additional transponder capacity Liberty will announce it's multichannel plan of new QVC regional/multilingual HD feeds in every market.
post #27 of 86
From Bloomberg, By Andy Fixmer and Cecile Daurat

News Corp.'s Murdoch, Liberty's Malone May End Battle

Dec. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Billionaires Rupert Murdoch and John Malone may end two years of wrangling over Liberty Media Corp.'s stake in News Corp. with an $11 billion asset swap that gives Liberty control of DirecTV Group Inc.

Murdoch's News Corp., the third-largest U.S. media company, agreed to buy back the 19 percent voting stake held by Malone's Liberty in exchange for News Corp.'s 39 percent of DirecTV, $550 million in cash and some other television assets, the New York Times reported, citing unidentified people briefed on the accord.

The agreement ends a tussle that started in 2004 when Malone began building a stake in News Corp. Murdoch, who described the standoff as a ``cloud over the company,'' installed a poison-pill takeover defense to stop Malone increasing his holdings. By swapping assets and exchanging a limited amount of cash, the companies will save money on taxes, said Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Michael Nathanson.

``This deal will help Liberty and News Corp. each avoid literally billions in capital gains taxes on their investments in News Corp and DirecTV, respectively,'' said Nathanson, who is based in New York and rates News Corp. shares ``outperform.''

Shares of Liberty Capital tracking stock gained $2.27, or 2.6 percent, to $90.20 at 10:49 a.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market composite trading. Before today, they had gained 25 percent since they began trading in May. New York-based News Corp. gained 64 cents, or 3.1 percent, to $21.46 in New York Stock Exchange trading.

News Corp. spokesman Andrew Butcher declined to comment yesterday. John Orr, a spokesman for Englewood, Colorado-based Liberty Media, didn't return calls seeking comment.

Consolidating Control

A contract may be signed within two weeks, the New York Times reported, citing an unidentified banker briefed on the deal.

News Corp. may now buy back more stock to strengthen Murdoch's grip on the company, Bank of America analyst Douglas Shapiro said in a note to clients last night.

``Murdoch seems focused on consolidating the family's control of the company, and there are no obvious uses for the cash,'' Shapiro wrote. Shapiro, who rates News Corp. a ``buy,'' said a deal may boost News Corp.'s earnings per share by about two percentage points through 2010.

Murdoch, 75, invested in DirecTV, the largest U.S. satellite- television provider, in December 2003. The strategy to create a global satellite-television business became less attractive after U.S. cable-television companies began offering telephone and Internet services in packages that satellite-TV providers couldn't match.

`Better Negotiator'

``Malone is the better negotiator here,'' said Laura Martin, an analyst with Soleil Securities in California. ``The best strategist on earth, Rupert Murdoch, is disassembling his satellite empire at the speed of light.''

The deal vaults Malone, 65, into the spotlight again as a media operator. He hired Chief Executive Officer Greg Maffei last November to convert Liberty's investments into businesses without incurring a tax bill.

Liberty's insistence on a transaction that minimizes taxes held up the talks. The companies had discussed swapping the stake for DirecTV as far back as September.

Taking the stake in El Segundo, California-based DirecTV would give Malone a stake in a satellite-TV provider with almost 16 million customers. It also gives the company an outlet for its networks including the QVC home shopping unit and Starz Entertainment channel.

If a deal is reached, Liberty Media may reduce its stake in DirecTV to as little as 21.5 percent, Maffei said yesterday at the UBS AG investment conference in New York. ``Just that alone is financially attractive,'' he said.

Liberty Media may also keep the stake or seek full control of the business, Maffei said. All those options would minimize taxes. ``One of the appeals of DirecTV is there's a lot of financial flexibility,'' he said.

``Malone is just a great financial engineer,'' Martin said.
post #28 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooby View Post

D* should have _tons_ of room for new HD by this time next year (new sats going up).


Isnt that what people said like a year ago?
post #29 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by hokiefan View Post

Isnt that what people said like a year ago?

No. This year was always local HD, next year was room for 150 national HD channels. But, with new ownership, who knows what will be done with the bandwidth now?
post #30 of 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken H View Post

No. This year was always local HD, next year was room for 150 national HD channels. But, with new ownership, who knows what will be done with the bandwidth now?

This is what scares me. I've been sticking with D* over E* cause I knew 2007 was the year the wait is supposed to pay off. But now, who knows what is going to happen. Maybe the satellites will get launched and all of the planned HD will go live. But then again maybe not. Maybe Malone will want to use all that bandwidth for shopping channels. Maybe he'll sell the new satellites to Charlie and pocket the cash. Who knows, and that's scary. He seems more concerned about maximizing profits which is bound to make the customers suffer.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Deal or No Deal? Deal! News Corp gets stock back, Liberty Media gets DirecTV!