AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › HDTV Software Media Discussion › Industry Insiders Q&A MASTER THREAD [separate thread for Xbox/Add On & PS3]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Industry Insiders Q&A MASTER THREAD [separate thread for Xbox/Add On & PS3] - Page 14  

post #391 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butler5 View Post

So with the IPTV for the 360 if all you have is Time Warner Cable in you rarea, with not even talks of AT&T o rsuch bringing IPTV, then I will not be able to get IPTV for th e360. I am very confused on this. So it appears this will only help people who live in places where they are served by FIOS or IPTV providers? Can some insider please xplain how this will work?

IPTV by definition means a TV service provided by your IP network provider, not TV over generic IP services. So yes, you'd need to have an IPTV service for this to work.

The basic idea is to let a 360 work as an additional IPTV set top box, without requiring an additional purchase, and something else to stick in the room. I'd love to have this for the bedroom, or my office. But I live in a Qwest neighborhood...
post #392 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by amirm View Post

It is up to Toshiba. In their presentation, they said they expect standardization to be completed by Q4, 2007. So I guess this means they will submit it soon.

TL-51 has higher bandwidth because it packs the bits closer and spins the drive at 1.5X I believe. So it goes exactly where BD-50 is today and maybe passes it a bit... Quite an amazing technological feat considering the fact that it does not resort to .1mm recording and all the grief that comes wiht that...

I have a question for any insider regarding the new TL 51g HD DVD disc. Supposing that 1st and 2nd gen HD DVD players can actually read the disc (I would ask, but I assume nothing is definite until the spec is finalized), could a transfer initially made for Blu-ray be easily/cheaply ported over to HD DVD without a new transfer being made? And if so, can the 1st gen machines (X/A1 and 360) play a 5.1 PCM audio track?
Thanks for any info.
post #393 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet View Post

If this has been asked/answered already my appologies.

Lots of conversation going on at HTF about this and since I haven't heard any insider tips thus far I'm compelled to ask:

Why has Warner Brothers dropped Dolby True HD tracks from several BD titles that are provided on the (otherwise identical) HD DVD editions? Superman Returns is a prime example. This seems to be a key factor in why owners of both formats are choosing to buy the HD DVD edition over the Blu-ray in these cases... to get the Dolby True HD.

Arguments about lack of full decoding in first-gen BD players is moot given that all BD players are compatible with Dolby True HD and can extract the core DD stream pending future software updates to extract the full lossless LPCM (and the PS3 can extract full LPCM from Dolby True HD right now).

Please advise. Is Warner choosing to do this to favor HD DVD and its sales or are there other technical obstacles behind the disappointing omission of Lossless audio tracks on their BD discs?

And to take that a bit further,

Given that Warner are presumably using a LPCM master to put into the TrueHD encoder in the first place and that ALL BD players support PCM and that their BD50 releases have a fair bit of unused space on them, why not simply put a lossless PCM track on BD?

Also, why are Warner persisting with such low bit rate DD and DD+ encodes on the majority of their titles? How about a minimum of 1.5Mbps, or preferably some kind of lossless (master downsampling not included) for all discs?

Are these technical or political decisions?
post #394 of 4841
The maximum bitrate for the good old Dolby Digital is 640 kbps.
post #395 of 4841
Amir,

I know this was touched on back when it was first announced in mid November, but I can't remember if anybody directly asked this question. With Bandai Visual being included in the CES press release of studios that support HD-DVD, and with Bandai Visual announcing back in November that they would be using VC-1 for their HD-DVD release, hopefully you can answer these two questions I have. First, Bandai Visual is a Japanese company, so most likely their home country releases won't have english subs/dubs. Will "Bandai Visual USA, Inc.", its own wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, or "Bandai Entertainment", Bandai's North American distributive unit, be supporting HD-DVD by releasing content in the US? Do you know if any US releases, or at least releases containing english subs/dubs are in the works? Secondly, is Bandai Visual exclusively supporting HD-DVD? Thirdly, and I assume I know the answer to this one but figure I'll ask anyways, with the demonstration as CES of the networking capability of the HD-DVD format, is there any word that Bandai Visual is at the very least aware of the Additional Subtitle Stream support in the HD-DVD format, and if so, do you have any information you can divulge that they are considering employing that to provide additional subititles for their japanese only releases? I assume that last question is one WAY too obscure cookie jar for you to have you hand in it, but I figure it doesn't hurt to ask.

Thanks!
post #396 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by benwaggoner View Post

IPTV by definition means a TV service provided by your IP network provider, not TV over generic IP services. So yes, you'd need to have an IPTV service for this to work.

The basic idea is to let a 360 work as an additional IPTV set top box, without requiring an additional purchase, and something else to stick in the room. I'd love to have this for the bedroom, or my office. But I live in a Qwest neighborhood...

Thanks for the answer. It's kind of a downer though as it appears that it will be years before I can take advantage of it, so I'm not sure why MS is doing this if they can't provide the service to the installed base in the US.
post #397 of 4841
I'm sad that there is no 360 V2 with HDMI announcement today as I was hoping to hear one after the articles on engadget.com. Oh well. If it wasn't announced today I doubt we will hear something in the next few weeks.

So Sony announced a $32,999 70" XBR3 with x.v.Color. A little out of my price range. The set doesn't say it is HDMI 1.3, is that what they mean by x.v.Color? That they are supporting the extra colors of HDMI 1.3?

Would I be able to see a difference on the existing 360 HD DVD over the VGA at 1080p?

I am thinking of buying either 42" XBR3 or 52" XBR3, but I may wait until later this year for a newer XBR model that supports HDMI1.3 or x.v.Color if someone can tell me if I will see a difference between current cable broadcasts on HD or the 360 HD DVD.

Thanks.

And where is the 360 HDMI announcement? Grrr...
post #398 of 4841
Just a bump for my question about the lack of Dolby True HD tracks on various BD titles (Superman Returns) that are present on the HD DVD edition...
post #399 of 4841
Quote:


Originally Posted by amirm
It is up to Toshiba. In their presentation, they said they expect standardization to be completed by Q4, 2007. So I guess this means they will submit it soon.

TL-51 has higher bandwidth because it packs the bits closer and spins the drive at 1.5X I believe. So it goes exactly where BD-50 is today and maybe passes it a bit... Quite an amazing technological feat considering the fact that it does not resort to .1mm recording and all the grief that comes wiht that...

Amir, your description suggest that the 51G disc is not a triple layer but a dual layer disc.

Any confirmation that this could actually be the case?
post #400 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brimstone-1 View Post

So has the equation changed regarding "Deep Color" and "xvYCC", with the improved HD-DVD disc capacity, and the arrival of HDMI 1.3? Are we going to see movies encoded with "Deep Color" and "xvYCC" color space at some point down the road? Say by 2009 maybe? Disc capacity certainly won't be an issue will it?

Doing >8-bit was never a disc capacity issue, it was a limitation of decoders, bitstreams, etcetera. Doing more is going to require another generation of formats.

Quote:


LED and Laser backlighting is confirmed to be taking off now, so home user displays are going to be ready for it.

Or is this still not going to happen for a long time? I asked about this in the old thread and the impression I got was the outlook was bleak.

I wouldn't say bleak - 8-bit done right can look great, even with forthcoming displays.
post #401 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Derks View Post

Amir, your description suggest that the 51G disc is not a triple layer but a dual layer disc.

Any confirmation that this could actually be the case?

He wrote TL-51 right in his post. TL = triple layer.
post #402 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by puddy77 View Post

Can the 1st gen machines (X/A1 and 360) play a 5.1 PCM audio track?
Thanks for any info.

Sure, it'll play back PCM just fine.

I don't know of any titles that have used it, since TrueHD is mandatory, but it's in the spec.
post #403 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet View Post

Just a bump for my question about the lack of Dolby True HD tracks on various BD titles (Superman Returns) that are present on the HD DVD edition...

Don't take this as gospel, because I thinks it's a pretty weak arguement...

Blu-ray uses the unique Dolby Lossless to allow Blu-ray devices to leverage the core DD stream separate from the DTHD stream.

Long story short, Dolby Lossless != DTHD, therefore they would have to do *some* modicum of work, not just a straight port.

At least that's what an insider told me.

Ooops...gotta ask a question...insiders, does this sound reasonable?
post #404 of 4841
I have a question that may have been covered already, but I haven't seen it -- HD-DVD and region coding.

Let's put aside whether content providers will or should use it. I'd like to know if region coding exist at all and is hardcoded in the HD-DVD specs.

If so, how many regions? Could it be implemented at will should a legal necessity arise? And what about the players already in the market?

thanks to all in advance!
post #405 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azumi View Post

I have a question that may have been covered already, but I haven't seen it -- HD-DVD and region coding.

Let's put aside whether content providers will or should use it. I'd like to know if region coding exist at all and is hardcoded in the HD-DVD specs.

If so, how many regions? Could it be implemented at will should a legal necessity arise? And what about the players already in the market?

There is no region coding in HD DVD whatsoever.

The possibility of adding it is being looked at, but there is no commitment to do so, nor is there any extant support in any existing titles or players for it. If it did happen (far from a given) it wouldn't be for a while.
post #406 of 4841
Could anyone shed some light on the Windows CE 6.0 Broadcom SoC reference design? Will the system support playforsure or even act like a V2 Vista MCE extender?
post #407 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomsHT View Post

I am very surprised that you say you don't know if there is anyone besides Sony replicating BD50's or not currently but that doesn't directly answer my question anyway.

Replication isn't an area I spend much time focusing on....
Quote:


I understand a company will be allowed to create there own BD50 disks if they are capable of doing so but what are the issues of creating such a disc (Total HD) when it is being bundled with an HD DVD side? Would they need Sony/BDA approval to do such a thing?

No issues whatsoever. As long as the disc meets all Blu-ray media spec criteria, the fact that it may also meet HD-DVD media spec criteria is of no concern from a BD licensing standpoint.

Quote:


Out of the announced titles scheduled for release soon I see 13 titles that are announced for being released on BD50 disc's. Only 3 out of all 13 of these BD50 titles reach being 2 hours in length.

I don't understand where so many movies this short in length (under 2 hours) are being put onto BD50g discs. Is it because of this extra functionality and how it is being inputted that requires this much space?

I've seen no indication that anyone other than Lionsgate is pursuing this method of providing a PiP user experience.
Quote:


Are BD50 discs going to be required for all these 90 minute movies that have any PIP type features?

Unlikely if they're using secondary video.
Quote:


With the promise of more BD50 releases I expected to see more longer running movies being announced, although I do see an increase of BD50's announced I don't see any even reaching 2.5 hrs on a BD50 scheduled. I would appreciate anyone that can shed some light on this matter and whether or not this is the average length of a movie that has extras that we can expect.

I have no idea whether your observation that most of the movies are short is statistically correct. Nonetheless, I've seen nor heard no evidence suggesting there is a concerted effort to avoid releasing longer movies (there clearly are some, like Kingdom of Heaven).
post #408 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by amillians View Post

Blu-ray uses the unique Dolby Lossless to allow Blu-ray devices to leverage the core DD stream separate from the DTHD stream.

Long story short, Dolby Lossless != DTHD, therefore they would have to do *some* modicum of work, not just a straight port.

At least that's what an insider told me.

I thought this was the case as well (Amir said so some months ago, referenced by me more recently), but more recently he claimed this was not the case and that Blu-ray titles with TrueHD would need a companion DD track. Based on other information I've seen I tend to believe Amir's old story (that there is a core DD track within the lossless Dolby stream, a la DTS), but I would like to see definitive indication of this.
post #409 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talkstr8t View Post

I thought this was the case as well (Amir said so some months ago, referenced by me more recently), but more recently he claimed this was not the case and that Blu-ray titles with TrueHD would need a companion DD track. Based on other information I've seen I tend to believe Amir's old story (that there is a core DD track within the lossless Dolby stream, a la DTS), but I would like to see definitive indication of this.

Blu-ray Dolby TrueHD spec requires a core Dolby Digital stream, that's why Warner didn't port it over from their HD DVD counterparts: it would have required reauthoring and reencoding.

"Legends of Jazz" indeed has a core DD stream, running at 448Kbps. This can be output thru the SPDIF port on BD players. Even though they didn't have to, they also offer a separate Dolby 5.1 track at 640Kbps...a different sounding mix (as well as a PCM 2.0 stereo version)!
post #410 of 4841
Amir-

I know you have answered a few questions on the TL51 spec, but I have some...

1) Is it your feeling/understanding that Toshiba plans on submitting the TL51 spec to become part of the actually HD-DVD spec. I know they showed off the TL45 spec but nothing came of it. Obviously if they don't, then it's a bit of a moot point from most of our perspectives.

2) You also mentioned the TL includes an increase to 1.5x read speed, which coupled with the density increase would greatly increase bandwidth. If the TL spec becomes part of the HD-DVD standard, is there any reason the 1.5x spec or increased density could not carry over to the SL and DL specs? I can't think of a situation currently where the higher layer count can support a higher read speed than a lower layer count.

Thank you,
Chris
post #411 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Talkstr8t View Post

I thought this was the case as well (Amir said so some months ago, referenced by me more recently), but more recently he claimed this was not the case and that Blu-ray titles with TrueHD would need a companion DD track. Based on other information I've seen I tend to believe Amir's old story (that there is a core DD track within the lossless Dolby stream, a la DTS), but I would like to see definitive indication of this.

Amir's newest claim is the correct one. In order to import a TrueHD track into BD, you need an AC3 encode of the same material. At that stage, they are interweaved. Dolby's software will create a compliant TrueHD stream for both formats in one pass. The fact that Warner decided not to use it on some of their BD releases is puzzling because they already did the work.
post #412 of 4841
Quote:


Blu-ray Dolby TrueHD spec requires a core Dolby Digital stream, that's why Warner didn't port it over from their HD DVD counterparts: it would have required reauthoring and reencoding.

I get that, but how much work can it really be? Aren't we literally just talking about pushing a button?

My thought was that maybe since the core is coupled into the MLP-based Dolby True HD stream for BD, that it might increase the bandwidth/bit-space needed which might tax a single-layer 25 gig BD if the HD DVD was already pushing those limits.

Thoughts?

Something seems wrong IMO. It's hardly "equal" support when the HD DVD gets the lossles audio but the BD version doesn't!!!
post #413 of 4841
Fyi just finishing Emmy award dinner... When I get back to hotel will answer questions put to me....
post #414 of 4841
Amir, is there a Universal Studios announcement (titles) still forthcoming?

[fingers still crossed for Jurassic]
post #415 of 4841
Talkstr8t I noticed you are a Blu Ray insider...what is your position...what company do you work for.
post #416 of 4841
Amir,

A bit off topic but since you are avideo enthusiast, I'm wondering if have had time to wander the booths. Mainly, have you seen the 8th gen Pioneer plasmas that they are claiming to be amazing? If so, what is your take on it's PQ?

Thanks,
Robert.
post #417 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by amirm View Post

Fyi just finishing Emmy award dinner... When I get back to hotel will answer questions put to me....

Please be sure to let us know about that amazingly innovative game controller that won an award.
post #418 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertR1 View Post

Amir,

A bit off topic but since you are avideo enthusiast, I'm wondering if have had time to wander the booths. Mainly, have you seen the 8th gen Pioneer plasmas that they are claiming to be amazing? If so, what is your take on it's PQ?

Thanks,
Robert.

I only had a couple of hours to look around. But did try to see the new Pioneer but it was not on display yet. I understand however, that it uses a filter to achieve its better black and as a result, its screen is more reflective. Given the fact that I think reflections are an issue already for Plasma, that does not seem a full step forward to me. Our contacts say the current FH-1 is superior as a result.

On the other hand, I was pretty impressed with the new Sharp LCDs with 3000:1 contrast ratio. It was great to see black and detail in blacks, rather than shades of gray (or blue in the case of some other LCD makers). I tried to look for vertical banding that people complain about but I only saw it once and that could be in the content but I have no seen that kind of artifact before. So for now, a guarded thumbs up for the Premium LCD line from Sharp.
post #419 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad_cincy View Post

Please be sure to let us know about that amazingly innovative game controller that won an award.

Oh, I let someone else do that .

But this was a real honor, winning an Emmy award for Windows Media in streaming architecture. As most of you know, the heart of Windows Media is Windows Media Video which is the same codec as VC-1. So for those of you who are a fan of VC-1, this is an award for you as much as it is for us.

This was the third Emmy award that I had gotten over the years for the products that I have managed but it was the most special as we got recognition from the traditional judges for new ways of delivery content.

Microsoft also won a second Emmy for DirtectX 10.
post #420 of 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schlotkins View Post

Amir-

I know you have answered a few questions on the TL51 spec, but I have some...

1) Is it your feeling/understanding that Toshiba plans on submitting the TL51 spec to become part of the actually HD-DVD spec. I know they showed off the TL45 spec but nothing came of it. Obviously if they don't, then it's a bit of a moot point from most of our perspectives.

Yes, as far as I know, they are going to propose it to DVD forum for standardization.

Quote:


2) You also mentioned the TL includes an increase to 1.5x read speed, which coupled with the density increase would greatly increase bandwidth. If the TL spec becomes part of the HD-DVD standard, is there any reason the 1.5x spec or increased density could not carry over to the SL and DL specs? I can't think of a situation currently where the higher layer count can support a higher read speed than a lower layer count.

Persumably machines which are compliant with the new TL spec, will be able to read single and double layers just as fast (minus the small difference between 15/17). So yes, that makes logical sense.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Software Media Discussion
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › HDTV Software Media Discussion › Industry Insiders Q&A MASTER THREAD [separate thread for Xbox/Add On & PS3]