AVS › AVS Forum › Other Areas of Interest › Movies, Concerts, and Music Discussion › Wickerman? Steaming pile of Dog Do!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Wickerman? Steaming pile of Dog Do!

post #1 of 26
12/26/06 at 9:13am
Thread Starter 
I`m assuming The lack of a thread before mine speaks for itself.

I guess the bigger question is: Why did Nicolas Cage do this Movie other than the obvious reason? Most of his Movies are pretty good.

I was embarassed to have shown it as a feature Movie on Christmas Night... Had wanted to see this in the Theater when it came out, but didnt have time, so was really looking forward to seeing a good scary Movie, but it wasnt scary at all, and might rank as one of worst Movies all time, that I have seen.
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 26
12/26/06 at 11:37am
I recently watched the original and did not find it scary at all or even all that thought provoking. I think for the original, at least those that remember it when first released recall what the impact it may have created at that period of time. But for a first viewing now it did nothing for me.
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 26
12/26/06 at 12:51pm
I warned ya to stayyy away!


Hands down the worst film I watched all year..Lady in the Water should get the Best Picture nod before one more human is permanently scarred by watchin' Wicker Man!!

This felt more like a cheap 80s era`made for tv' movie than a mid-budget `scarey' BO movie!
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 26
12/26/06 at 1:06pm
Pretty bad. Pretty slow. Pretty shallow. Pretty Pretty grainy PQ in some parts, pretty nice PQ in others.

Despite all these "prettys" the show is BUFUGLY all around.
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 26
12/26/06 at 5:48pm
Yes a very big week of christmas dog do with this and Lady In the Water.Two wastes of time in one week.One actor in a bear suit and one lost in a script no one can figure out.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 26
12/26/06 at 6:07pm
So what about it exactly makes it the turd of 06'? I haven't seen it yet but with so many claims....I just want to hear why.
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 26
12/26/06 at 7:19pm
Has anyone that has commented so far seen the original and this new remake? If so, does it follow the same premise or did they change it for the times. Frankly, I can see how the premise may have worked in 1973 but I can't see how it can carry any weight in 2006. Maybe this was the problem and as a result they ended up with a convoluted mess.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 26
12/26/06 at 8:08pm
The climax is a big letdown...
The directing stinks....

still haven't gotten over how ridiculous some of Cage's reactions were (director driven I'm sure)

I mistook this movie for another movie I had seen the trailer for recently and was expecting some stuff that never materialized.

Not to mention the ,"We don't need men!" Undertones.
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 26
12/27/06 at 5:57am
The Original has 2 different version one is with 88mins runtime the other is 187mins! WTF?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070917/dvd
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 26
12/28/06 at 5:00am
Hm, I actually like it. Sure, not a great movie, but I thought it was well worth watching. Cinematography was interesting - the flashbacks that tweak, the soaring camera over the bee field, the varied and symbolic types of rooms - all done very well. Costumes were also very interesting, really added to the characters.

Sure, I have shoes that can act better than NC, but I really enjoyed this one.
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 26
12/28/06 at 7:16am
Yeah I was told to avoid this at all costs and to treat it as if it where in fact the black plague, itself.
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 26
12/28/06 at 8:48am
Ah, the light bulb just went off. I could have sworn the movie title sounded familiar but Nicolas Cage threw me off. I watched the original movie not too long ago (after a trip to IMDB refreshed my memory). The original was interesting given the actors in the movie and using the time (year) it was made for a frame of reference for the subject matter. And for us old timers you get to see Britt Ekland naked. I may have to watch the remake just to see how it compares.

larry
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 26
12/28/06 at 1:00pm
I'd have to agree. I saw this on a plane with my PB, I had to watch it because there was nothing else to see. Sad part is that Cage was actually listed as one of the producers of this movie. It was pure crap. And I really wanted to slap that Willow girl upside the head.
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 26
12/28/06 at 1:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by PooperScooper View Post

Ah, the light bulb just went off. I could have sworn the movie title sounded familiar but Nicolas Cage threw me off. I watched the original movie not too long ago (after a trip to IMDB refreshed my memory). The original was interesting given the actors in the movie and using the time (year) it was made for a frame of reference for the subject matter. And for us old timers you get to see Britt Ekland naked. I may have to watch the remake just to see how it compares.

larry

Agreed. The original was very unique. Especially Chris Lee's performance. And Britt's dance was way cool. I prefer the shorter of the 2 versions.
I too may have to watch the remake just to see how it compares.
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 26
12/29/06 at 6:49am
I'm pretty sure I watched the short version - from Netflix. I don't think I could have sat through 3 hours.

larry
Reply
Reply
post #16 of 26
2/12/07 at 7:48am
Loved the Original but really really disliked the remake.

Remake came off as a confusing, man-hating pile of steaming poo.
Reply
Reply
post #17 of 26
9/12/07 at 1:23am
Late to this one...and wishing I had been very VERY much later.
What a horrible ending to this!
The build up for a wickedly twisty ending....that...never....came.
WTF???
I was willing to overlook all of the flaws in logic, all the goofy/crappy characters, all of the HUH??? moments, if just for a great nasty and unpredictable coda.
But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
We get the most obvious cop-out final scene imaginable.

This is by far the worst movie NC has been in IMO.
Reply
Reply
post #18 of 26
9/12/07 at 4:59am
tisk tisk should have listened to us my boy!
Reply
Reply
post #19 of 26
9/12/07 at 5:47am
The original Wicker Man was a pretty decent little cult film. I have no interest in seeing the remake.
Reply
Reply
post #20 of 26
9/12/07 at 5:57am
it would be the all-time worst network tv movie I have ever seen if it was a network cheapo...that's how bad it is!
Reply
Reply
post #21 of 26
9/12/07 at 6:00am
I remeber laughing my ass off at the Highlight reel someone posted on youtube. It was hilarious but of course I never got teh urge to actully watch the flick. Cage does some cool stuff but he also tends to do certian movies just for the money.
Reply
Reply
post #22 of 26
9/12/07 at 6:44am
Well, it was so bad it was kind of enjoyable for that very reason..

I thought the actors were having fun with it. I loved the way Cage hammed up lines such as: "Step away from the bicycle!"

Doug
Reply
Reply
post #23 of 26
9/12/07 at 6:55am
"NO NOOO! not the bees AHHHHHH HAHHHAHAHHHHH mY FACE! MY FAAAAAACE!"
Reply
Reply
post #24 of 26
9/12/07 at 12:24pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by SbWillie View Post

tisk tisk should have listened to us my boy!

Actually, I hadn't read this thread.

I like NC and I have it on BD (blind buy).
I want my fnckin' $ back!
Reply
Reply
post #25 of 26
9/12/07 at 2:33pm
Thanks for the warning guys! I like N Cage, but this will not be his only stink fest - so be it.
I actually had the brain fart of my week and watched Sunshine last Night. Twinkies In Space with a guest appearance from Freddy! WTF !


Trust My Fellow AVSer's Warnings
Reply
Reply
post #26 of 26
9/12/07 at 9:11pm
heard the original was a "classic" so rented it in March-06.

emmmmmmm - average flick. I love Edward Woodward though. Mr Equalizer himself!

under appreciated actor IMO.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Other Areas of Interest › Movies, Concerts, and Music Discussion › Wickerman? Steaming pile of Dog Do!