AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › EMOTIVA Thread Q&A [TECHNICAL TALK ONLY]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

EMOTIVA Thread Q&A [TECHNICAL TALK ONLY] - Page 482

post #14431 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by roybr549 View Post

Need some advice.

If you have. Speaker that is rated for 50-300 w,
Would an xpa-1 that is rated at 500w be too much?

No, as long as you're cautious of the master volume control on the preamplifier.
post #14432 of 16068
With regards to using 500 watt amps with speakers rated for at least half that power -

For movies, your speakers will likely have no issues, because movies have very short peaks of high power. And I have read that heat is a more common source of failure than mechanical failure ( the heat being generated by current through the voice coils.) So there's plenty of time, I think, for VCs to cool down with movies.

For music, I hope you are not pushing your speakers loud enough to damage them. That would imply SPL loud enough for hearing damage.

Some sources suggest have as much as twice the amp power as the speaker's continuous power rating.

Respected sources claim that speaker damage usually occurs when the amp is clipping, leading to high average levels which cause the voice coils to fail due to overheating (there are some good tehcnical articles online explaining the details.)

I would not consider using a 500 watt amp on speakers rated for 50 watts prudent though. Never tried it.
post #14433 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

Respected sources claim that speaker damage usually occurs when the amp is clipping, leading to high average levels which cause the voice coils to fail due to overheating (there are some good tehcnical articles online explaining the details.)

Just for the benefit of the OP, MJH, and for the avoidance of doubt, it is when an amp is underpowered that it will most likely clip and damage the speakers.

Personally, I think an amp of any (high) power output is good with any speakers, so long as one uses the master volume control with common sense.
post #14434 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post


That certainly holds true for preference. But, for movies, there is a reference standard and the units we buy should adhere to those standards. So long as they do, then we are free to change the sound characteristics any way we wish using all the various ways open to us.

And, of course, any unit that sounds 'bright' or 'warm' or whatever is, by definition, introducing a form of distortion. Neutral transparency is the goal for amplifiers (and AVRs). FWIW, I believe that all the high end units from Onkyo and Denon exhibit good levels of neutrality and alleged differences in SQ - at the flagship level - isn't a good basis on which to judge a purchase.

Independent measurements of these units shows their frequency response to be ruler flat 20Hz - 20KHz and their distortion levels equally low. If a unit passes the input signal unmolested it will clearly sound the same as any other unit that does the same.

Of course, ears are great listening instruments but they are truly terrible measuring instruments so the only way to evaluate if a unit is performing transparently is to measure it.

Measurements are fine as far as they go. Almost all objective measurements are made with steady state signals. The media that we play through our systems produce extremely complex wave forms. As a consequence, some components that measure well with steady state signals may not produce results that are as close to what the produced of the media intended as a component that did not measure as well with a steady state signal.

Trust your ears. You are the one that must live with your system.

I purchased my first "high end" speaker system over 35 years ago after auditioning speakers and amplifiers for almost a year. ( My dealer was very patient and understanding. He is an independent dealer and is still in business.) I still have the speakers. The only things that have changed is a new set of drivers and a new amplifier 15 years ago. When I visit a friend who has spent around $100,000 over the last 18 months upgrading his system, the only thing that makes me want to make any changes to my system is his 65" flat panel.

Yes, his system does sound better than mine, but not $95,000 better to my ears.
post #14435 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by RDHolmes View Post

Measurements are fine as far as they go. Almost all objective measurements are made with steady state signals. The media that we play through our systems produce extremely complex wave forms. As a consequence, some components that measure well with steady state signals may not produce results that are as close to what the produced of the media intended as a component that did not measure as well with a steady state signal.

Trust your ears. You are the one that must live with your system.

I purchased my first "high end" speaker system over 35 years ago after auditioning speakers and amplifiers for almost a year. ( My dealer was very patient and understanding. He is an independent dealer and is still in business.) I still have the speakers. The only things that have changed is a new set of drivers and a new amplifier 15 years ago. When I visit a friend who has spent around $100,000 over the last 18 months upgrading his system, the only thing that makes me want to make any changes to my system is his 65" flat panel.

Yes, his system does sound better than mine, but not $95,000 better to my ears.

I agree wrt to speakers. Other than the most important component in any system - way, way more important than amplifiers - the room, speakers are really where you can discern a difference between one and another.

I assume your friend who has spent $100,000 has a highly treated room - if not he's wasted a heck of a lot of money
post #14436 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

You're posting about failure in the Emotiva thread???

UMC anyone?

Yep! However, I kept it in the Emotiva thread as opposed to going to the Onkyo threads telling them to buy a UMC.
Onkyo knows better than to give a five year warranty. That could result in them having to sell their remaining interest in the company. If Onkyo has not problems I will concede that it is perfect. Just direct me to the non defective Onkyo thread.
post #14437 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUDCAT45 View Post

Yep! However, I kept it in the Emotiva thread as opposed to going to the Onkyo threads telling them to buy a UMC.
Onkyo knows better than to give a five year warranty. That could result in them having to sell their remaining interest in the company. If Onkyo has not problems I will concede that it is perfect. Just direct me to the non defective Onkyo thread.

This discussion comes up every few weeks and each time it is as pointless as the last. I don't know why you felt the need to restart it again. All units have problems and faults, no matter who makes them.

What I said which provoked you to bring up the discussion for the millionth time was this:

"The issue here really is one of which is the best buy for about $1,500 - the untested Emotiva XMC, from a company which has a very poor rep for pre-pros to date, or a proven unit from a major player such as Denon or Onkyo? In addition, if one chooses the Denon 4311, one gets a proven room EQ system, Audyssey's consumer flagship version, XT32 plus the ability to use the Audyssey Pro kit if one wants the ultimate Audyssey experience."

That is a factual statement. There is nothing in there that is even slightly contentious. It is, IMO, good advice to the OP who wants to spend $1,500 on a pre-pro. I am not telling him what he should do - just what he should consider before he makes a decision as to what to buy.
post #14438 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

This discussion comes up every few weeks and each time it is as pointless as the last. I don't know why you felt the need to restart it again. All units have problems and faults, no matter who makes them.

What I said which provoked you to bring up the discussion for the millionth time was this:

"The issue here really is one of which is the best buy for about $1,500 - the untested Emotiva XMC, from a company which has a very poor rep for pre-pros to date, or a proven unit from a major player such as Denon or Onkyo? In addition, if one chooses the Denon 4311, one gets a proven room EQ system, Audyssey's consumer flagship version, XT32 plus the ability to use the Audyssey Pro kit if one wants the ultimate Audyssey experience."

That is a factual statement. There is nothing in there that is even slightly contentious. It is, IMO, good advice to the OP who wants to spend $1,500 on a pre-pro. I am not telling him what he should do - just what he should consider before he makes a decision as to what to buy.

It would have been better advice if you said "Onkyo has had their share of problems". If you do not want the discussion restarted then tell the whole story.
post #14439 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUDCAT45 View Post

It would have been better advice if you said "Onkyo has had their share of problems". If you do not want the discussion restarted then tell the whole story.


Well at least I gave some useful advice. As opposed to regurgitating something that was as useless the last time as it was mentioned as it was this time.

If I gave a list of all the makes that had had problems it would be all of them. If you think that would be helpful, google a trade directory of AVR manufacturers. If you think it's only Onkyo that have had issues with various units, then you are deluding yourself I regret to say.

How about Denon? I suggested Denon as an alternative to the XMC too. You didn't mention Denon - any special reason for that?
post #14440 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Just for the benefit of the OP, MJH, and for the avoidance of doubt, it is when an amp is underpowered that it will most likely clip and damage the speakers.

Personally, I think an amp of any (high) power output is good with any speakers, so long as one uses the master volume control with common sense.

I assumed it was implied that you only clip when you run out of power Given enough power, clipping won't occur, as you point out.

As for why clipping causes damage, that's an interesting topic, in which even experts seem to offer slightly different explanations. It's clear it's not due to distortion...the speaker could care less about distortion, except if the distortion is a cause due to the effect of exceeding it's excursion limits (in which case, it's not distortion hurting the amp, distortion is the symptom.)

One thing the explanations seem to agree with...the cause is usually failure of the VCs due to excessive heat.

In case people are interested, here's a few links. They differ a bit in explanation. The second link focuses more on woofers ( not surprising, as it's a car audio site.

I post this because I see a lot of confusion from people thinking too little power blows speakers. If that was literally true, speakers would blow when no signal was going through them. Saying that too much power blows speakers is more accurate, IMO - as long as you understand the parameters. 1000 watt amps are not going to blow 1 watt speakers if the max power they are putting out is 1/4 watt. 200 watt amps should not damage 100 watt speakers under normal use, because their average power output is not 100 watts under normal use. But you need all that power for peaks, which could be 100 times average (based on THX's reference level of 20 dB dynamic peaks.)

http://sound.westhost.com/tweeters.htm
http://www.bcae1.com/2ltlpwr.htm
post #14441 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Well at least I gave some useful advice. As opposed to regurgitating something that was as useless the last time as it was mentioned as it was this time.

If I gave a list of all the makes that had had problems it would be all of them. If you think that would be helpful, google a trade directory of AVR manufacturers. If you think it's only Onkyo that have had issues with various units, then you are deluding yourself I regret to say.

How about Denon? I suggested Denon as an alternative to the XMC too. You didn't mention Denon - any special reason for that?

Why do you constantly regurgitate useless info? Your advice was partially useful. If only you had not stated that Onkyo has an excellent track record. I doubt any brand has more negative posts. As I have said numerous times, I like Onkyo. I also like the UMC. I have not denied the reported problems with the UMC and if I recommended it I would make it know that issues exist.
Denon has far fewer issues than Onkyo AFIK. So does Yamaha.
There is also the customer service issue. Onkyo has the worst and Emotiva one of the best.
post #14442 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUDCAT45 View Post

Denon has far fewer issues than Onkyo AFIK. So does Yamaha.

What are the relative sales numbers for these brands? It would be entirely too premature to knock one over another if the relative numbers are significantly different. In other words, if Onkyo sales are three times the number of Denon or Yamaha, you would expect higher # of issues.
post #14443 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUDCAT45 View Post

Why do you constantly regurgitate useless info? Your advice was partially useful. If only you had not stated that Onkyo has an excellent track record. I doubt any brand has more negative posts. As I have said numerous times, I like Onkyo. I also like the UMC. I have not denied the reported problems with the UMC and if I recommended it I would make it know that issues exist.

I wasn't recommending any brand. I was giving information useful in helping the OP make a decision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MUDCAT45 View Post

Denon has far fewer issues than Onkyo AFIK. So does Yamaha.

And you know that how?

Look, don't bother replying. I am done with this pointless discussion now. If you reply I will do you the courtesy of reading your reply, but I won't respond to it. I am sure the OP is able to decide which posts are useful to him and which aren't.
post #14444 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by CruelInventions View Post

I got over the faulty concept several years ago, thanks.

Pulled from a quickly Google searched user review of the Denon AVR-3312:



Note the bold: Exactly the polar opposite of what you describe. Not that either view is correct. It's yet another umpteenth example of the unreliable variability of anecdotal experience with respect to these types of components. It goes hand-in-hand with the assumed legitimacy of "sound signatures". Because this is a concept built upon the foundation of a house of cards, consumer interpretations can be found to twist in every which way direction; warm, neutral, brittle, cold, clear, detailed, etc. It has very little to do with any inherent "sound" of the component itself, but a myriad of other factors. But the belief still persists. Probably because it's easier and more comforting to be able to pin a particular sound impression upon the device itself as opposed to having to wade through the jumble of other possible factors: much less neat 'n tidy.

Anyway, we've all been down this road before. I'm out, the last word can be yours if you wish to respond (and I will show you respect by reading it ).

You're not over it yet, or you wouldn't have felt the need to dig up some comments that differed with mine and badgerpilot's.

As you were.
post #14445 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUDCAT45 View Post

There is also the customer service issue. Onkyo has the worst and Emotiva one of the best.

I have never had a problem with Onkyo's customer service. Repairing an out of warranty product is pretty good customer service IMHO. And there is no substitute to listening for your self. There are too many variables that go into an audio system without considering the unique individual listening to it. Everyone has there own bias and unique "wiring" and "components" within their body. I tried the Denon but preferred the Onkyo. Everyone has there own preferences. Choice is great, no choices would be boring!
post #14446 of 16068
I was just reading in another forum about the safety certification( UL, CSA,etc) that electronic devices should have, and possible insurance issues if a non certified device starts a house fire. It appears that Emotiva's products have no such certification, and instead have a "CE", which is under the European Union, and is nothing more than a declaration by the manufacturer that the product meets requirements in the EU for product safety, but said products do not get tested.
Quote:
The CE mark is unrelated to the requirements for product safety in the US. It is a generic mark used in the European Union (EU) to indicate that a manufacturer has declared that the product meets requirements in the EU for product safety. In the US, under OSHA's NRTL requirements, the product must have the specific mark of one of the NRTLs recognized to test and certify these types of products.

Does anyone know anything more about this? I have 3 Emotiva products, and all they have is the CE mark. I suppose this is yet another area in which Emotiva cuts costs to bring a component to market at a cheaper price.
post #14447 of 16068
Chu Gai has posted often about this subject and within this thread, as far as I can recall. Just do an advanced search within this thread for posts (not threads) with key words like, "UL" or "certification" under his specific user name.
post #14448 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by runnin' View Post

I was just reading in another forum about the safety certification( UL, CSA,etc) that electronic devices should have, and possible insurance issues if a non certified device starts a house fire. It appears that Emotiva's products have no such certification, and instead have a "CE", which is under the European Union, and is nothing more than a declaration by the manufacturer that the product meets requirements in the EU for product safety, but said products do not get tested.

Does anyone know anything more about this? I have 3 Emotiva products, and all they have is the CE mark. I suppose this is yet another area in which Emotiva cuts costs to bring a component to market at a cheaper price.

They have to have the CE mark - it's illegal to sell a unit here in the EU without it.
post #14449 of 16068
So is it true that the CE certification is nothing more than a corporation declaring that they are complying with CE regulations? No inspection or testing is done as with UL or CSA certification?

I tried searching for posts about this and comments by Chu Gai and only got limited results.
post #14450 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by runnin' View Post

So is it true that the CE certification is nothing more than a corporation declaring that they are complying with CE regulations? No inspection or testing is done as with UL or CSA certification?

I tried searching for posts about this and comments by Chu Gai and only got limited results.

You are partly correct. Here is all you'll ever likely want to know about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CE_mark
post #14451 of 16068
That link has a lot of legalese gobbleygook. But it appears with comments like this:

Quote:


By affixing the CE marking on a product, a manufacturer is declaring, at their sole responsibility, conformity with all of the legal requirements to achieve CE marking and therefore ensuring validity for that product to be sold throughout the European Economic Area.

that no certification or testing is done, which would be a cheaper route for Emotiva. They started this company several years ago and their primary marketplace has been North America, though they obviously are expanding. I guess that's one way to bring a cheaper product to market.
post #14452 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by runnin' View Post

That link has a lot of legalese gobbleygook. But it appears with comments like this:

that no certification or testing is done, which would be a cheaper route for Emotiva. They started this company several years ago and their primary marketplace has been North America, though they obviously are expanding. I guess that's one way to bring a cheaper product to market.

I thought the article was pretty clear.

But the issue for Emotiva is that without the CE mark they couldn't legally sell their units in the EU.
post #14453 of 16068
You are not allowed to bring a product to market within the EU without a valid CE certificate. There is no independent testing been done, but the manufacturer or importer has to declare (and make sure), that its product follows certain rules and standards. If found not to adhere afterwards he will get into all sorts of legal trouble.
post #14454 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by runnin' View Post

So is it true that the CE certification is nothing more than a corporation declaring that they are complying with CE regulations? No inspection or testing is done as with UL or CSA certification?

I tried searching for posts about this and comments by Chu Gai and only got limited results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by runnin' View Post

That link has a lot of legalese gobbleygook. But it appears with comments like this:



that no certification or testing is done, which would be a cheaper route for Emotiva. They started this company several years ago and their primary marketplace has been North America, though they obviously are expanding. I guess that's one way to bring a cheaper product to market.

CE allows a company to self certify that their product meets the appropriate standards applicable for that product. The standards for a toaster are obviously different from a DAC or a CD player. Further, a product may need to meet several standards in order to be legally sold. While I don't know if the following is a CE standard, there is a move in Europe to mandate tougher standby power consumption requirements which you can Google up for further information. So, if you see some personally cherished amps being phased out, it may be because their standby power consumption is simply too high.

While some companies just slap a CE logo on the product, others do go to the trouble of not only testing the product but indicating in their manuals just what CE standard they claim compliance with. Check the manuals of something like a Pioneer receiver and you'll see it written along with a sign off signature indicating responsibility. As to what Emotiva does, you'd have to ask them and they should have no problem answering questions in a public forum without derisive remarks. After all, a company that's in compliance has made an internal effort and commitment to play by the rules and one would think would be proud to make that publicly known.

The CE standard largely only has meaning overseas. In the US, other standards exist and there are differences from the CE ones. For example FCC Part 15 B. One will notice that Emotiva's current CDP has the FCC logo on the back while IIRC, the prior one didn't. However, the FCC is quite specific as to the language to be used in the manual and the manual for their current CDP does not conform. Whether that's because the people who write their manuals are clueless or because the company is fudging things, I don't know.

Also as a point of fact, products sold here that come from other countries must have a 'Country of Origin' sticker, label, printing, etc. If for example one buys interconnects that came from China, there ought to be some kind of indication of the country that made them. A company selling things like Chinese interconnects is not allowed by Federal law to remove them.
post #14455 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chu Gai View Post

Also as a point of fact, products sold here that come from other countries must have a 'Country of Origin' sticker, label, printing, etc. If for example one buys interconnects that came from China, there ought to be some kind of indication of the country that made them. A company selling things like Chinese interconnects is not allowed by Federal law to remove them.

Just for general info and completeness, that 'country of origin' regulation also applies in the EU.
post #14456 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Just for general info and completeness, that 'country of origin' regulation also applies in the EU.

Check out a 'German' speaker called Teufel. They seem to have found a way around it.
post #14457 of 16068
So when's the expected release date of the Xmc-1? I just noticed on their site last night along with a 100x5 amp. I'm curious if emotiva got it right this time around.
post #14458 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chu Gai View Post

Check out a 'German' speaker called Teufel. They seem to have found a way around it.

They can, of course, ignore the regulations... I am not sure about the ins and outs of the 'country of origin' regs - it may give an escape route somehow if, for example, the final assembly is done within the EU but using parts sourced 100% from outside the EU. 'Final assembly' of course for a speaker might be simply screwing the drivers in...
post #14459 of 16068
You would think that if the amp is properly grounded, and there's overload protection in transformer (would be a one shot fuse,) and it has thermal, voltage and current protection circuits for the power stage, it's pretty safe. I don't know that for a fact, just guessing.

You would also think, a company selling amps that can handle handle 5 amp peaks on multiple channels has taken steps to ensure the products they sell don't subject them to expensive liability lawsuits. I could be wrong of course.

My first XPA-3 "blew up," but did not catch on fire, so that was a good sign...I think
post #14460 of 16068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venomous View Post

So when's the expected release date of the Xmc-1? I just noticed on their site last night along with a 100x5 amp. I'm curious if emotiva got it right this time around.

I'm curious if Lindsey Lohan is finally sober and driving without hitting people. I'm also curious if N. Korea is going to finally stop their nuclear program.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › EMOTIVA Thread Q&A [TECHNICAL TALK ONLY]