I am the current owner of an Infocus X1 which I have truly enjoyed. I have put about 3000 hours on 2 bulbs. I am now considering upgrading to a Mits HD1000Uor Optima HD70. I currently throw a 70 inch diagonal image, but can go as high as 82 inch diagonal. Although the image my X1 projects is still quite good, I have found that the images I see on rear projection tvs set up in semi light controlled rooms at the retail stores have a picture quality which is significantly better than my X1. Since I can see these images , but I can't see the image on the new projectors unless I buy one, it would be very helpful to know how the picture quality I seen on well set up RPTV sets in the retail stores compare with the ones of the new sub $1000 front projectors.
In viewing the picture quality in the stores, I find that I am having difficulty describing this quality. In this forum there are lots of terms used, such as, film-like, plazma-like, contrast ( a much misused term), pop, punchy, and others. I find these hard to relate to, but it easy to see the difference in the picture on my X1 and the ones on the RPTV's (50 to 65 inch). It would seem to me that some kind of agreement on how to describe the image quality in a standard way would be helpful for all of us on this forum. 'To me, the best description of the RPTV's is that they have an almost 3D look. This is combined with good sharpness in the picture and a bright image. My X1 looks dimmer and more 2 dimensional. Any thought on how to better describe the images we see on these sets? Also anyone who owns one of the new projectors and can give comparisons on the picture quality of those versus what you have seen on a reasonably displayed RPTV in a store would help me a lot with my buying decision.
In viewing the picture quality in the stores, I find that I am having difficulty describing this quality. In this forum there are lots of terms used, such as, film-like, plazma-like, contrast ( a much misused term), pop, punchy, and others. I find these hard to relate to, but it easy to see the difference in the picture on my X1 and the ones on the RPTV's (50 to 65 inch). It would seem to me that some kind of agreement on how to describe the image quality in a standard way would be helpful for all of us on this forum. 'To me, the best description of the RPTV's is that they have an almost 3D look. This is combined with good sharpness in the picture and a bright image. My X1 looks dimmer and more 2 dimensional. Any thought on how to better describe the images we see on these sets? Also anyone who owns one of the new projectors and can give comparisons on the picture quality of those versus what you have seen on a reasonably displayed RPTV in a store would help me a lot with my buying decision.



















