AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Have HD-Ready TV, need cheap HD
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Have HD-Ready TV, need cheap HD

post #1 of 11
Thread Starter 
I have a HD Ready television. I just want to be able to see my local channels in HD w/o having to pay $17 a month more to my cable company.

What other equipment do I need? Any suggestion? Brands Models i.e
post #2 of 11
Probably something like this. http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=728392
Depending on wher you live connecting the set top box to an antenna will get your local channels or connecting a box that can receive QAM directly to your cable drop may get your locals from the cable with no extra charge.
John
post #3 of 11
Some TV's I've been looking at and researching have ATSC and QAM tuners while some others have just have the ATSC tuner and not the QAM.

Is a QAM tuner all that important or needed? Some of the TV's I've really liked just have the ATSC listed in their specs.

Thanks
post #4 of 11
Thread Starter 
Does this model have a qam tuner
post #5 of 11
Yes, the Samsung DTB-H260F discussed in the thread that ctdish linked to, has a QAM tuner. If you search through that thread, you'll probably find some posts by people using it with their cable connection.
post #6 of 11
Like I have been posting everywhere, I reccomend the Hughes HTL-HD. It's cheap on eBay, is a former DirecTV Satellite Box but doesn't require Satelitte service (or access card) to work, and has an ATSC tuner, though it doesn't have QAM. QAM is similar to ATSC. Think of QAM as the cable version of ATSC, basically digital channels that are free.

Not everyone has the ability to use QAM though, because for it to work, you must have a coaxial cable installed in your house by your local cable company. If you cancelled your cable service with them, but you still have the cable in your house, it may or may not work on your TV. People prefer QAM to ATSC because they don't have to deal with the hassles of possibly getting poor reception with an antenna.

Getting over-the-air digital channels with the ATSC tuner might be a hassle in that you may or may not have to play around with the antenna to get reception, but the picture quality tends to be better on ATSC than QAM, since ATSC uses less compression, to my understanding. ATSC also has more liberal requirments: simply an antenna, whereas QAM requires an installed active cable connection in your home (note: your QAM cable connection may still be active even if you don't subscribe to your local cableco any longer).

Hope this helps.
post #7 of 11
Thread Starter 
I currently subscribe to cable, so I know that the cable that is installed in my house is working. I would like to have the qam tuner in the device that I buy I think. I see that the Hughes models are about $30 so that is an incredible value. What am I going to gain with this damn qam? Thanks in advanced.
post #8 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbatdog View Post

I would like to have the qam tuner in the device that I buy I think. I see that the Hughes models are about $30 so that is an incredible value. What am I going to gain with this damn qam?

It was stated that the Hughes does not have a QAM tuner. QAM is for digital cable stations. ATSC is for OTA. OTA can be a pain since multipath often makes you loose the signal. It all depends on your antenna, rotator, antenna pre-amp, location etc etc... QAM is more stable but if you are not paying for digital cable then you better make sure that your cable company is passing the locals for free (ie unencryped).

Ed
post #9 of 11
topic title edited to make more specific
post #10 of 11
Thread Starter 
Has anybody tried that model of tuner that he suggested? The Hughes HTL-HD.

Does it work?
post #11 of 11
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Technical
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Have HD-Ready TV, need cheap HD