Just recently installed the OPA637AUs replacing the LM4562NAs.
My system includes a powerful subwoofer with extension down to 21 hz. My music listening tastes are generally new hard rock including artists like Seether, Theory of a Deadman etc. As well I listen to Pop,Dance and R&B being J.Timberlake, Rihanna and others.
I find that the OPA637s excel in clarity, smoothness, being more refined in the vocal and upper frequency range of the scale. As well, the presentation is much more musical bringing warmer fluid harmonic textures not to mention better separation of the instruments. Bass seems to be more limited between the 30-75 hz(after numerous hours of usage) and not as controlled, defined or extended. Upper range fine details are all there but with more palpability, not as faint, subtle or thin. ( Possibley due to the opamp cap bypass making it just as revealing )
In comparison the LM4562s are much harsher, thinner and as said before more metallic in the upper range. Bass is much more extended, more grip and definitive than the 637s. Overall the presentaion is somewhat sterile but more dynamic or punchy. The OPA637s are somewhat laidback.
I could easily live with the OPA637s but I do miss the bass extension, definition and dynamics, rythmic pace, attack or slam factor. Between these opamps I would pick the Burr Brown OPA637s.
There will always be trade offs between opamps. No opamp is perfect. Its just finding the one that can cover the most bases in your sonic requirements for your own musical tastes.
With these 2 opamps I believe I've achieved the best of both worlds...............
My system includes a powerful subwoofer with extension down to 21 hz. My music listening tastes are generally new hard rock including artists like Seether, Theory of a Deadman etc. As well I listen to Pop,Dance and R&B being J.Timberlake, Rihanna and others.
I find that the OPA637s excel in clarity, smoothness, being more refined in the vocal and upper frequency range of the scale. As well, the presentation is much more musical bringing warmer fluid harmonic textures not to mention better separation of the instruments. Bass seems to be more limited between the 30-75 hz(after numerous hours of usage) and not as controlled, defined or extended. Upper range fine details are all there but with more palpability, not as faint, subtle or thin. ( Possibley due to the opamp cap bypass making it just as revealing )
In comparison the LM4562s are much harsher, thinner and as said before more metallic in the upper range. Bass is much more extended, more grip and definitive than the 637s. Overall the presentaion is somewhat sterile but more dynamic or punchy. The OPA637s are somewhat laidback.
I could easily live with the OPA637s but I do miss the bass extension, definition and dynamics, rythmic pace, attack or slam factor. Between these opamps I would pick the Burr Brown OPA637s.
There will always be trade offs between opamps. No opamp is perfect. Its just finding the one that can cover the most bases in your sonic requirements for your own musical tastes.
With these 2 opamps I believe I've achieved the best of both worlds...............












Too bad MS never saw fit to make a generic CMedia driver for Vista with all the enhancements exposed 

One is in use, one is used for "experimentation", and one is a spare. Make me an offer north of $200, and I might consider it.

