Quote:
Originally Posted by bicker1 
I wish I were [wrong], but I'm not. Everything I said is accurate. I understand that you, like I, wish it weren't true, but that's just something we'll both have to accept.
Incorrect. The 7/1/2007 date affects only which physical boxes the MSOs can offer for rental. Again, I'm sorry you're mistaken, but you are, and there's nothing I can do to make what you're saying any less mistaken.
The laws supporting that have been in place for years. 7/1/2007 has no direct effect on that.

I wish I were [wrong], but I'm not. Everything I said is accurate. I understand that you, like I, wish it weren't true, but that's just something we'll both have to accept.
Incorrect. The 7/1/2007 date affects only which physical boxes the MSOs can offer for rental. Again, I'm sorry you're mistaken, but you are, and there's nothing I can do to make what you're saying any less mistaken.
The laws supporting that have been in place for years. 7/1/2007 has no direct effect on that.
I'll leave out all the irrelevant crap you wrote and post the first statement in the FCC Order. This should suffice to shut you up or at least provide everyone else with the clarity that you are full of shite. Furthermore, this order is directed toward benefitting consumers not MSO's.
Washington, DC - In its ongoing effort to promote competition and assure the
commercial availability of cable-ready DTV equipment, the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) today adopted a Second Report and Order in the Commercial Availability of
Navigation Devices proceeding.
I will add this, if you don't understand what the above reads you really are a moron.











Despite your protestations to the contrary, The 7/1/2007 date affects only which physical boxes the MSOs can offer for rental. It has nothing to do with the silliness you asserted, "enabling consumers to have a choice in the way they wish to deal with settop box rental." 



