AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1) - Page 598

post #17911 of 62212
So that none of us overbid, what do those normally sell for?
post #17912 of 62212
Someone interested in bidding should first contact Audyssey and ask if they would sell them a license . . unles the kit is for the Sound Equalizer or a Subwoofer Equalizer.

Being such an esoteric item, I doubt if there will be many (any?) bidders.

I think the MSRP is $600, but I could be mistaken.
post #17913 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Someone interested in bidding should first contact Audyssey and ask if they would sell them a license . . unles the kit is for the Sound Equalizer or a Subwoofer Equalizer.

Being such an esoteric item, I doubt if there will be many (any?) bidders.

I think the MSRP is $600, but I could be mistaken.

There is NO license needed for the sound EQ.
And a retail price of $2,500 for the EQ
post #17914 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Your pattern is what I use for my two row x three seat layout with rear row on a platform, but you should not sit the mic stand on a seat.

What is the reason the stand cannot sit on the seat?
post #17915 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayjr View Post

There is NO license needed for the sound EQ.
And a retail price of $2,500 for the EQ

MSRP of $2500 for Un-Balanced Sound EQ
MSRP of $5000 for Balanced Sound EQ
MSRP of $??? for Installer Kit pre-v3.0
MSRP of $550 for Installer Kit v3.0 and above.

I would ask the eBay seller what exactly you are bidding on...

Jeff is right, just because you buy an Installer kit doesn't mean Audyssey will sell you licenses to calibrate hardware that requires them.

I'd contact the eBay seller first just to make sure you know what you are bidding on (pictures don't mean anything), then contact Audyssey if you need any further clarifications.

That's my $.02.
post #17916 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toknowshita View Post

What is the reason the stand cannot sit on the seat?

Well, obviously, it *can* sit on the seat , but there could be vibrations transmitted through the floor through the seat through the mic stand to the mic, or picked up through the air by the seat and transmitted to the mic that would interfere. And there have been those that sat mic stands on seats whose results were unsatisfactory, were re-done with a boom arm and subsequently yielded mo better results.
post #17917 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by counsil View Post

I'd contact the eBay seller first just to make sure you know what you are bidding on (pictures don't mean anything), then contact Audyssey if you need any further clarifications.

I'd ask for the kit number. Audyssey will have a record of who bought it and maybe some insight into its . . umm, provenance. Caveat emptor.
post #17918 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

I'd ask for the kit number. Audyssey will have a record of who bought it and maybe some insight into its . . umm, provenance. Caveat emptor.

We are on the same wave length.

I was the one that requested a picture of the mic and pre-amp (with a shot of the serial number) from the seller that just sold the installer kit on eBay.
post #17919 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by counsil View Post

Look what I found on eBay...

http://cgi.ebay.com/Audyssey-EQ-Soun...d=p3286.c0.m14

This looks like a steal.

The last one someone posted went for $260: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=STRK:MEDWX:IT
post #17920 of 62212
The current ebay listing for the SEQ and Pro kit looks a bit suss to me.

The pro kit for $260 was a great buy (pity the seller wasn't prepared to ship intenationally).
post #17921 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenbr View Post

The current ebay listing for the SEQ and Pro kit looks a bit suss to me.

The pro kit for $260 was a great buy (pity the seller wasn't prepared to ship intenationally).

For someone with zero feedback and who only became an ebay member about one month ago, they certainly have a lot of stuff for sale . . and expensive stuff at that. PayPal is accepted, so there's recourse through them. Still . . .
post #17922 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenbr View Post

The pro kit for $260 was a great buy (pity the seller wasn't prepared to ship intenationally).

$260 for that kit was about right.

The Pro kit MSRPs for $550. That Pro kit was old, so the bidder would have had to pay to upgrade the software to v3.0/3.1 (another $150). So $260 + $150 = $410. Who knows what kind of abuse that Pro kit went through.
post #17923 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by counsil View Post

$260 for that kit was about right.

The Pro kit MSRPs for $550. That Pro kit was old, so the bidder would have had to pay to upgrade the software to v3.0/3.1 (another $150). So $260 + $150 = $410. Who knows what kind of abuse that Pro kit went through.

Not that it matters, but he did say it was brand new condition and never used. $150 for a software update!? Highway robbery.
post #17924 of 62212
Chris,
just posting this as a follow up to your clarification to me a couple of days ago, about the mid-range compensation option in the audyssey pro. Well, I am now trying it and I really like it.
My speakers are not bright at all by nature, and my room is very difficult, as an example I have a big Coffe table between the listening positions and the front speakers which spoils the sound.
The midrange compensation seem to clean up the top end beautifully and the sound is now extremely smooth and 'liquid', just as I like it, just as my old Kef beloved speakers used to be...talking about BBC....
Thanks a lot
post #17925 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayareakirk View Post

Not that it matters, but he did say it was brand new condition and never used. $150 for a software update!? Highway robbery.

I have learned to be skeptical when buying things off eBay. YMMV.

I said it was an upgrade, not an update. There is a huge difference.

v3.0 incorporated a lot of changes/upgrades over v2.5.

How much does it cost for upgrades to Microsoft Windows/Office again? Now we're talking highway robbery.
post #17926 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayareakirk View Post

Not that it matters, but he did say it was brand new condition and never used. $150 for a software update!? Highway robbery.

Highway robbery? This isn't something that's sold in huge volumes. When you deal with specialty software like this you can expect to pay a lot. Besides, if I'm not mistaken this is meant for a professional installer to use. Therefore it is a business expense.

Quote:
How much does it cost for upgrades to Microsoft Windows/Office again? Now we're talking highway robbery.

$50 for Windows 7. Not to bad. I don't know about Office, but then I wouldn't purchase that for home, I'd use that in a business, where again, it's the cost of doing business. People have really gotten spoiled by low-end consumer software, open source apps and piracy. Good software takes a lot of time and money. And we developers don't work for peanuts.
post #17927 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Mickunas View Post

$50 for Windows 7. Not to bad. I don't know about Office, but then I wouldn't purchase that for home, I'd use that in a business, where again, it's the cost of doing business. People have really gotten spoiled by low-end consumer software, open source apps and piracy. Good software takes a lot of time and money. And we developers don't work for peanuts.

Mini OT Rant - I agree, but that's a bad example Given the Vista debacle, MS should be giving 7 away for free and providing a refund for time wasted with Vista. It's sluggish, buggy - I cant even get the Vista screensaver to work for months despite following scrap of info I can Google.

Snow Leopard, however, was worth every penny
post #17928 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrang View Post

Mini OT Rant - I agree, but that's a bad example Given the Vista debacle, MS should be giving 7 away for free and providing a refund for time wasted with Vista. It's sluggish, buggy - I cant even get the Vista screensaver to work for months despite following scrap of info I can Google.

Snow Leopard, however, was worth every penny

Mini OT rebuttal - With the higher cost of Apple computers, users have less pennies for an OS upgrade.
post #17929 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrang View Post

Mini OT Rant - I agree, but that's a bad example

I was trying to be somewhat civil in my reply. Until Windows 7, Windows upgrades normally were > $100. Office upgrades were normally > $200.

Also, Audyssey's v3.0 upgrade 'works' and is a 'step in the right direction'.

FYI, I don't buy any Microsoft products unless they come OEM in pre-built computers. I have a friend that has worked for Microsoft almost since inception. All I have to do is email him and he sends me a retail box copy of whatever I want. I feel pitty for the people that actually had to pay for Windows Vista. Windows 7 should be a free upgrade, IMHO.
post #17930 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by counsil View Post

I was trying to be somewhat civil in my reply. Until Windows 7, Windows upgrades normally were > $100. Office upgrades were normally > $200.

Also, Audyssey's v3.0 upgrade 'works' and is a 'step in the right direction'.

FYI, I don't buy any Microsoft products unless they come OEM in pre-built computers. I have a friend that has worked for Microsoft almost since inception. All I have to do is email him and he sends me a retail box copy of whatever I want. I feel pitty for the people that actually had to pay for Windows Vista. Windows 7 should be a free upgrade, IMHO.

FWIW I'm upgrading from XP which itself was a cheap upgrade from 95 or 98. I think $50 or $100 for an upgrade from an 8 year old OS is just fine. But still, you all are talking about mass-produced, high-volume consumer software, in this case an OS even, and trying to compare it to a specialty low-volume application.

AutoCAD sells for $4k. If you're upgrading from last year, it's $500, two years ago $1k. Try handling that. Heck, Photoshop is $700 or $200 for an upgrade. MS is quite frankly charging very little for a complete OS, regardless of what you feel Vista is worth. Likewise $150 for Audyssey is nothing. I somehow doubt that Audyssey Pro is intended for the consumer market. The "Pro" in the name implies otherwise.
post #17931 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Mickunas View Post

I somehow doubt that Audyssey Pro is intended for the consumer market. The "Pro" in the name implies otherwise.

Of course it is for professional installers. Other than a few publicly accessible pages briefly explaining their installer program, everything else regarding it on their site is by login. But that doesn't seem to stop some from getting their knickers in a twist over an upgrade price that they'll probably never find themselves in a situation to pay.
post #17932 of 62212
The new Macintosh operating system upgrade was a whopping $29.
post #17933 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post

The new Macintosh operating system upgrade was a whopping $29.

But the previous one was about 100 USD more. And though I don't have it yet (upgrading my iMac and MacBook to Snow Leopard being a next-weekend project) I believe that the 29 USD Snow Leopard requires Leopard to already be installed. Those still running Tiger need to spring for the box that I think also includes iLife and iWork.

The markets are also totally different. In this economy, with Snow Leopard being (according to what I've read) fairly incremental, Apple didn't think they could get away with a three-digit upgrade price. But Audyssey's market (I would guess) is more price-inelastic, and it would be hard to call features such as Dynamic EQ or the ability to draw target response curves "incremental."

I don't have a problem with paying for software upgrades (within reason; if I buy something new and then two months later I'm expected to shell out a significant percentage of the product cost for new software, that's annoying) because after all what makes something like a Mac or Audyssey what they are is the IP and a lot of that is represented in software.
post #17934 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post

The new Macintosh operating system upgrade was a whopping $29.

After overpaying for the hardware, that's all Mac'ers have left for an OS upgrade.

But there's still hope!
post #17935 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post

The new Macintosh operating system upgrade was a whopping $29.

post #17936 of 62212
Oops. Sorry. I was looking for the Audyssey thread. I guess I stumbled into the "Mac vs PC software upgrade cost" thread instead. Darn hyperlinks.
post #17937 of 62212
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

After overpaying for the hardware, that's all Mac'ers have left for an OS upgrade.

But there's still hope!

Hey leave Apple alone. The stock share price is keeping me comfortable.
post #17938 of 62212
As for Me, I didn't know vista was bad, I've only been running it for a little over a year though. I remember Windows now there was some bugs.

Ron
post #17939 of 62212
guys...this is the Audyssey thread

please keep it On Topic

thanks
post #17940 of 62212
Does having "Double Bass" on or off affect audyssey calibrations??

If not, what does everyone think about double bass? Is it necessary?

Also, do the "pure audio" or "direct" settings on my onkyo receiver disable my audyssey calibrations in any way?

FWIW I turned the phase on my sub to 0 and turned the frequency all the way up to 160hz before calibration.

Thanks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)