AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1) - Page 768

post #23011 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

20Hz tuning is different from what I suggested. What I suggested was 15hz tuning (1 port blocked) but set the subsonic filter at 20Hz. Setting the subsonic filter to 20Hz does not mean the subwoofer is tuned for 20Hz. Are you sure they said 20Hz tuning or set the subsonic filter to 20Hz?
A subwoofer with a damaged voice coil is not a good thing. I suggest asking SVS about checking the voice coil. It is really not that risky to check it, you just have to be careful. It is hard to characterize the sound of a damaged voice coil. It depends on the extent of the damage. Was it a loud clank that startled you?

SVS said to tune it to 20Hz and set the subsonic filter to 20Hz as well. I remember reading in the manual to never have the tuning and subsonic filter unmatched.

The sounds that I hear from certain scenes are not clanks. They are like crackles, like a mini firework. It's almost like the sound of a spark.
post #23012 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal33 View Post

SVS said to tune it to 20Hz and set the subsonic filter to 20Hz as well. I remember reading in the manual to never have the tuning and subsonic filter unmatched.

The sounds that I hear from certain scenes are not clanks. They are like crackles, like a mini firework. It's almost like the sound of a spark.

The manual addresses a generic case. A lower tuning point reduces cone excursion. A higher tuning point (like 20Hz) increases the chance of bottoming out. What it gives you is higher output in the range you really care about. So once calibrated, the hope is you wouldn't turn it up too loud but then you are reaching limits far away from reference and hence I am suggesting the safer route of going with lower tuning to decrease cone excursion and also set the subsonic filter higher so you don't send really low frequencies at high levels to the woofer. Again, you may want to ask SVS. A bottom out is usually a clank that is soft (Soft bottom out) or loud (hard bottom out). Spark? Thats odd. Was there ever a time, you heard a loud clank/snap?

-Jai
post #23013 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

It's all about the frequencies and SPLs at those frequencies. I cruised along happy as a clam with my dual co-located Hsu TN-1220 HO's ... until Iron Man. Now I have two co-located pairs.

Double your present sub config!

I agree. You (terminal33) have a HUGE room and you are talking about some of the most notoriously LFE heavy movies available. "9" is getting a rep as one of the most intense LFE movies ever released, and Iron Man of course is already notorious.
post #23014 of 62235
Ok, I have read the FAQ on Audyssey dual sub set-up but wanted to know if I could get any more tips or advice.

I have dual subs; however, they are on opposite sides of the room and NOT symmetrical to each other or the listening positions. I already have them level matched via a SPL meter at the main listening/measuring point.

I have an Onkyo 605 with Audyssey 2EQ, which only really sets the distance of the subs...and does not apply any sub filters

My plan is to have them both on and run Audyssey. Any advice would greatly be appreciated!!
post #23015 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by audyssey View Post

You can extend to about 8 meters with a high quality cable. The mic signal is low so beyond that the cable impedance will start to roll off the high frequencies and this will cause the filters to overcompensate.

hey there. just a quick question about extending the cable for the audyssey mic. i own an onkyo pr sc 5507. today i purchased a 5meter extension cable (stereo), but the onkyo shows an error when running the calibration process. do i need to buy a mono plug, as the plug that comes with the onkyo is just mono? is the extension cable too long?
any suggetions are highly appreciated!
post #23016 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

The manual addresses a generic case. A lower tuning point reduces cone excursion. A higher tuning point (like 20Hz) increases the chance of bottoming out. What it gives you is higher output in the range you really care about. So once calibrated, the hope is you wouldn't turn it up too loud but then you are reaching limits far away from reference and hence I am suggesting the safer route of going with lower tuning to decrease cone excursion and also set the subsonic filter higher so you don't send really low frequencies at high levels to the woofer. Again, you may want to ask SVS. A bottom out is usually a clank that is soft (Soft bottom out) or loud (hard bottom out). Spark? Thats odd. Was there ever a time, you heard a loud clank/snap?

-Jai

There was never a time that I heard a loud clank or snap. I first heard it with WOTW when the pods were emerging and it just sounded like the crackling of a firework. When I lower the volume, then it's gone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by batpig View Post

I agree. You (terminal33) have a HUGE room and you are talking about some of the most notoriously LFE heavy movies available. "9" is getting a rep as one of the most intense LFE movies ever released, and Iron Man of course is already notorious.

So what you guys are saying is to tune (the ports) the sub at 15Hz, but set the subsonic filter (the knob on the back of the sub) at 20Hz? This won't damage the sub?
post #23017 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by batpig View Post

I agree. You (terminal33) have a HUGE room and you are talking about some of the most notoriously LFE heavy movies available. "9" is getting a rep as one of the most intense LFE movies ever released, and Iron Man of course is already notorious.

Indeed, IronMan was the Blueray that led me (with the members help here), to set my LFE setting to a minus -10 on my AVR. The explosions are now contained to the movie itself and not my modest Rythmik F12G single "sealed" sub (great for music btw). It only affects movie playback and that's where I needed the "bandaid", pun unintentional... If I had a larger room to deal with, and did not live in an apartment with neighbors above and below me, like many I would go with more subs.
post #23018 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal33 View Post

There was never a time that I heard a loud clank or snap. I first heard it with WOTW when the pods were emerging and it just sounded like the crackling of a firework. When I lower the volume, then it's gone.



So what you guys are saying is to tune (the ports) the sub at 15Hz, but set the subsonic filter (the knob on the back of the sub) at 20Hz? This won't damage the sub?

Yes. IMHO tuning the sub to 15Hz and setting the subsonic filter to 20Hz is a safer approach than tuning the sub to 20Hz and setting the subsonic filter to 20Hz. With the former, you will compromise on SPL. Approach the point of failure with slow increments of master volume while finding out the limits of your subwoofer.
I am beginning to wonder based on your description if you are clipping your amp. What is the subwoofer trim level set to and at what position is the gain on your subwoofer?
post #23019 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

Yes. IMHO tuning the sub to 15Hz and setting the subsonic filter to 20Hz is a safer approach than tuning the sub to 20Hz and setting the subsonic filter to 20Hz. With the former, you will compromise on SPL. Approach the point of failure with slow increments of master volume while finding out the limits of your subwoofer.
I am beginning to wonder based on your description if you are clipping your amp. What is the subwoofer trim level set to and at what position is the gain on your subwoofer?

My sub trim level is at -3.5 and the gain is at 11:00.
post #23020 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal33 View Post

My sub trim level is at -3.5 and the gain is at 11:00.

You are probably clipping. As others have indicated this is a large room. To pressurize 7000 cu ft is not easy. Have you corner loaded ths subs? If not, you may want to try that. Also, setting the subsonic filter to 20Hz will give you some more headroom. If this is a clipping issue indeed and not a bottoming out issue, then tuning the sub to 20Hz as SVS suggested is the way to go. The reason you maybe encountering this with Audyssey turned on is it maybe applying some boosts that can also eat up headroom quickly if it is in the lowest octaves. Adding another sub is expensive but it will give you 6dB more headroom when colocated.
post #23021 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepstang View Post

Ok, I have read the FAQ on Audyssey dual sub set-up but wanted to know if I could get any more tips or advice.

I have dual subs; however, they are on opposite sides of the room and NOT symmetrical to each other or the listening positions. I already have them level matched via a SPL meter at the main listening/measuring point.

I have an Onkyo 605 with Audyssey 2EQ, which only really sets the distance of the subs...and does not apply any sub filters

My plan is to have them both on and run Audyssey. Any advice would greatly be appreciated!!

A big problem with 2 subs that are not co-located is that they may be at different distances from the main listening position. This means that their sound output will arrive at different times. To solve that problem, you can either buy a device which will introduce a delay to the nearer sub or you can buy an SVS AS-EQ1. I would suggest getting the AS-EQ1. Not only does it solve the problem of varying distances, it also provides an Audyssey filter with twice the resolution as MultEQ XT and the capability to do 32 measuring points.

Mark
post #23022 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by stardustcowboy View Post

hey there. just a quick question about extending the cable for the audyssey mic. i own an onkyo pr sc 5507. today i purchased a 5meter extension cable (stereo), but the onkyo shows an error when running the calibration process. do i need to buy a mono plug, as the plug that comes with the onkyo is just mono? is the extension cable too long?
any suggetions are highly appreciated!

The stereo cable will work electrically. Perhaps it's not of sufficient quality to extend the connection that far?
post #23023 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal33 View Post



So what you guys are saying is to tune (the ports) the sub at 15Hz, but set the subsonic filter (the knob on the back of the sub) at 20Hz? This won't damage the sub?

To be perfectly clear, we are universally saying that you need more displacement, i.e. MORE SUBWOOFER(S).
post #23024 of 62235
Why is it I have a $400 sub in a 11,000 cubic feet Great Room (2 story) and it seems perfectly adequate?
post #23025 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary J View Post

Why is it I have a $400 sub in a 11,000 cubic feet Great Room (2 story) and it seems perfectly adequate?

For the very same reason there are Hyundai accents and Bugatti Veyrons.
post #23026 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary J View Post

Why is it I have a $400 sub in a 11,000 cubic feet Great Room (2 story) and it seems perfectly adequate?

What other subs have you had in that great room?
post #23027 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

For the very same reason there are Hyundai accents and Bugatti Veyrons.


Ok I'll spell it out for you. He said his bottoms out. Mine never bottoms out. Cheaper sub, bigger room.

Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal33 View Post

I have the same problem as post above. Last night I watched "9" on blu ray and it caused my sub to bottom out in multiple scenes. I usually watch movies at -12, but I had to watch it at -20 last night in order for my Ultra PB-13 not to bottom out.
post #23028 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary J View Post

Ok I'll spell it out for you. He said his bottoms out. Mine never bottoms out. Cheaper sub, bigger room.

His requirements are different from yours.
How close is your sub to your listening position? At what master volume levels do you usually listen? Have you tried the movies he is talking about, to be specific War of the Worlds and 9 at close to -10 MV?
post #23029 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary J View Post

Why is it I have a $400 sub in a 11,000 cubic feet Great Room (2 story) and it seems perfectly adequate?

Low expectations?
post #23030 of 62235
I am not sure why any of that is relevant but it has been tested for stress a few times. The point is I keep seeing he needs more subs when it seems there is something wrong with the one he has.
post #23031 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal33 View Post

My sub trim level is at -3.5 and the gain is at 11:00.

I suggest that you contact SVS tech support. Ask for Ed. He is very aware of the exact issue that you are encountering. Just don't mention my name.

I will respond to your PM right now.
post #23032 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by stardustcowboy View Post

hey there. just a quick question about extending the cable for the audyssey mic. i own an onkyo pr sc 5507. today i purchased a 5meter extension cable (stereo), but the onkyo shows an error when running the calibration process. do i need to buy a mono plug, as the plug that comes with the onkyo is just mono? is the extension cable too long?
any suggetions are highly appreciated!

Go with as short an extension as will work. I also suggest you match the extension to the mic plug. They should be able to fix you right up if you bring the mic into Radio Shack, or other friendly neighborhood electronics store.
post #23033 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary J View Post

I am not sure why any of that is relevant but it has been tested for stress a few times. The point is I keep seeing he needs more subs when it seems there is something wrong with the one he has.

Those are all very relevant. Your subwoofer maybe built into your couch or you use it as your coffee table, who knows. Yes, there maybe something wrong with his sub, we don't know. If there is nothing wrong with his subs, then of course he is reaching it's limits and logically, the question of does he need one more comes up. This
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary J View Post

Why is it I have a $400 sub in a 11,000 cubic feet Great Room (2 story) and it seems perfectly adequate?

does not make any sense, without elaborating what was just asked of you.
post #23034 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHAz View Post

Note: I was looking through this thread and the beginning of my comment sounded harsh in a way I did not intend, so I'm changing it.

I'm not sure I understand you. Could you tell us what you mean when you say the sub goes weak? During measurement, the system is simply playing a test sweep through the sub. It's at a pretty low level, but it is not making any changes whatsoever to anything about the sub during the sweeps themselves. It is possible that you have become accustomed to you sub calibrated a bit high, or to some big peaks that make bass overall seem louder, and you may miss these if Audyssey makes your system flatter. Also, some folks here feel that Audyssey/their receivers set their subs too low, so they turn them up. Personally, I find I am happier with my system with the sub turned down a couple of dBs from where Audyssey/my Denon set it. But thtats just me, and I don't know whether it's something about my room, my sub, the setup, or just me that makes it work better for me. Bottom line is if you think the sub is too quiet turn it up. Your head will not explode, lightnning will not strike, etc. But first you might try living with it as calibrated for a week or two. You may re-acclimate to more accurate sound (if that's what's going on) and find things are too boomy if you turn it up.

Beyond the scope of your question but lately I've been wondering whether different people fasten onto different aspects of the bass performance. Assuming that my sub is not ruler flat throughout my room after calibration (a VERY safe assumption) it seems to me that I am bothered by the sound whenever the sub/bass seems to be too loud to match the rest of the sound (mostly with music). I don't find myself identifying dips in my bass response, or wishing for more bass in any specific passage. Others may be sensitive in the opposite direction - - maybe the too-quiet parts of their frequency response in the bass bug them and the too-loud parts are subjectively more benign.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesky636 View Post

Yeah, we really need more info than what you have provided. Like JHAz said, what do you mean by "weak"? You also said that you have been changing the sub's position. What positions have you had the sub in? With the sub in a corner, the unequalized bass is usually too strong. Audyssey will (in general) create filters and trim levels to decrease the bass. Placing a sub in the middle of the room will result in weak bass (unequalized) where Audyssey will (in general) create filters and trim levels to increase the bass. Depending on how much increase is needed, Audyssey may not be able to flatten out the sub's response.

I had a Denon 1909 ,same sub ,same position ,never had that kind of problem ,during measurement sub's sound was normal ,after measurement sub was at -7db ,playing BD Spiderman 3 ,the scene were convict becomes Sandman ,i could fell the floor shake
Onkyo 807 ,same sub(tried a friends 12inch also) same spot ,first 2 Audyssey measurements ,no difference from Denon during and after measurment ,sub set to -12db ,same BD scene from Spiderman3 same feeling
I didn't like the -12 db thing so i tried another one(Audyssey) same Sub's position ,lower sub volume (from12o'clock to 10) ,sub sounds lower during measurement and stays that way after i am done ,sub level -9db ,same BD Spiderman3 same scene ,sub is low and stays low even when i manually increase sub's volume .
I set Audyssey OFF , same BD scene ,sub is back again giving the same feeling
Reading 807's thread and also asking there , i have also tried turning Loudness OFF / Preserve THX settings OFF = nothing ,the solution came when i did hard reset(restore ) ,lost all of my settings and started all over again ,First measurement all OK ,sub works fine ,if i try a second one i have the same problem again

Sub's position is the same for all measurements since problem came up
Never had that problem with Denon 1909 ,even after 10 Audyssey measurements
post #23035 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by batpig View Post

I agree. You (terminal33) have a HUGE room and you are talking about some of the most notoriously LFE heavy movies available. "9" is getting a rep as one of the most intense LFE movies ever released, and Iron Man of course is already notorious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

You are probably clipping. As others have indicated this is a large room. To pressurize 7000 cu ft is not easy. Have you corner loaded ths subs? If not, you may want to try that. Also, setting the subsonic filter to 20Hz will give you some more headroom. If this is a clipping issue indeed and not a bottoming out issue, then tuning the sub to 20Hz as SVS suggested is the way to go. The reason you maybe encountering this with Audyssey turned on is it maybe applying some boosts that can also eat up headroom quickly if it is in the lowest octaves. Adding another sub is expensive but it will give you 6dB more headroom when colocated.

Well I got home and played the cannon scene from TIH and set my volume at -20 and I heard the pops. I then looked on the screen of my AVR and noticed that it read "Audyssey Dynamic EQ." I then turned Dynamic EQ off and played the scene again. This time I was able to listen at -15 WITHOUT any popping. For some reason Dynamic EQ was on, but I thought I turned it off when I first calibrated my system.

I then watched the end battle scene at -15 and I heard a quick noise on my sub (which is corner loaded). It came in the beginning of the final fight when the Hulk uses the police car as brass knuckles and hits the bad guy multiple times. He then gets on the bad guy and punches him more. There's one bass burst right as the Hulk lifts his arm that caused a chuffing sound. It was less of a pop and more of a chuff this time.

I then changed the subsonic filter to 20Hz while leaving it tuned at 15Hz. (This is OK to do, based on the manual.) I replayed the same scene and I still heard the chuff, but it was softer and more brief. So it seemed that changing the SF to 20Hz DID help a bit. I even changed my sub trim level from -4.5 to -5.0 and turned down my gain by a hair, but I still heard a brief chuff on that part. I then went back to the cannon scene and was able to listen to it at -13 without any pop from the sub. I didn't go louder than -13.

So it seems now that the only part from TIH that causes my sub to make a funny noise is the end battle scene described above. The noise happens so quick that if you weren't listening for it, you probably wouldn't notice it.

My conclusion is that setting the SF to 20Hz did give me a tad more headroom, therefore I will leave it at that. Thanks for the suggestion. Also, I realized that for TIH, listening to it at -15 is not bad at all. I usually watch movies at -12 and so that has become my magical number to set all movies to. But even at -15, I was happy with the sound of TIH. Perhaps other movies will not provide the same level of sound at -15 and so I'll have to turn it up. Then there are those movies like, The Dark Knight and Ironman, where I can watch it at -12 and hear no chuffing/popping on my sub at all. I guess TIH just has that much more potent bass than TDK or Ironman.

Still, "9" seems to have the heaviest bass of all because I heard popping in multiple scenes and had to watch it at -20 to eliminate them. But then again, I was watching "9" with Dynamic EQ on, which SVS told me to turn off today. Unfortunately I mailed "9" back to Netflix already so I don't have it to test out.

Does anyone know more about when or why or IF Audyssey does apply a boost to some movies, or whether it's only below a certain frequency that it applies a boost? Do you think "9" was getting a boost applied? Or does it just have that much more powerful and lower LFE?

Thanks for all of your feedback! I'd appreciate any more help. But for now, I'll just enjoy the movies that I can at -12, and decrease the volume for the small amount of movies that make my sub pop at -12.
post #23036 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal33 View Post

Well I got home and played the cannon scene from TIH and set my volume at -20 and I heard the pops. I then looked on the screen of my AVR and noticed that it read "Audyssey Dynamic EQ." I then turned Dynamic EQ off and played the scene again. This time I was able to listen at -15 WITHOUT any popping. For some reason Dynamic EQ was on, but I thought I turned it off when I first calibrated my system.

I then watched the end battle scene at -15 and I heard a quick noise on my sub (which is corner loaded). It came in the beginning of the final fight when the Hulk uses the police car as brass knuckles and hits the bad guy multiple times. He then gets on the bad guy and punches him more. There's one bass burst right as the Hulk lifts his arm that caused a chuffing sound. It was less of a pop and more of a chuff this time.

I then changed the subsonic filter to 20Hz while leaving it tuned at 15Hz. (This is OK to do, based on the manual.) I replayed the same scene and I still heard the chuff, but it was softer and more brief. So it seemed that changing the SF to 20Hz DID help a bit. I even changed my sub trim level from -4.5 to -5.0 and turned down my gain by a hair, but I still heard a brief chuff on that part. I then went back to the cannon scene and was able to listen to it at -13 without any pop from the sub. I didn't go louder than -13.

So it seems now that the only part from TIH that causes my sub to make a funny noise is the end battle scene described above. The noise happens so quick that if you weren't listening for it, you probably wouldn't notice it.

My conclusion is that setting the SF to 20Hz did give me a tad more headroom, therefore I will leave it at that. Thanks for the suggestion. Also, I realized that for TIH, listening to it at -15 is not bad at all. I usually watch movies at -12 and so that has become my magical number to set all movies to. But even at -15, I was happy with the sound of TIH. Perhaps other movies will not provide the same level of sound at -15 and so I'll have to turn it up. Then there are those movies like, The Dark Knight and Ironman, where I can watch it at -12 and hear no chuffing/popping on my sub at all. I guess TIH just has that much more potent bass than TDK or Ironman.

Still, "9" seems to have the heaviest bass of all because I heard popping in multiple scenes and had to watch it at -20 to eliminate them. But then again, I was watching "9" with Dynamic EQ on, which SVS told me to turn off today. Unfortunately I mailed "9" back to Netflix already so I don't have it to test out.

Does anyone know more about when or why or IF Audyssey does apply a boost to some movies, or whether it's only below a certain frequency that it applies a boost? Do you think "9" was getting a boost applied? Or does it just have that much more powerful and lower LFE?

Thanks for all of your feedback! I'd appreciate any more help. But for now, I'll just enjoy the movies that I can at -12, and decrease the volume for the small amount of movies that make my sub pop at -12.

Glad to hear things have improved. If you get some time, I have another suggestion. With sub tuned at 15Hz (one port blocked) and the subsonic filter at 20Hz, which is your current configuration. Turn up the volume/gain on the subwoofer from 11 O clock to 1 O clock. Rerun Audyssey and try to ensure there is no background noise. Let us know what the result is.
Good luck,
-Jai
post #23037 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

Gary,
In your case if
7.1 w/ wides > 7.1 w/ surround back speakers holds true, then
5.1 ~= 7.1

In English, if 7.1 w/wides is better than 7.1 w/ surround back speakers is true, then 5.1 should be about the same as 7.1 with 7.1 not adding better rear imaging than 5.1 in your setup. I am not saying this cannot be true, but it maybe just your setup and preferences.

I have to say going from 5.1 to 7.1 in my case also does not give a huge improvement, but there is a noticeable difference. Many a times during movies I hear sounds directly from behind with the 7.1. With 5.1, it is there but not as good as 7.1. If I find that 5.1 Audyssey Wide makes a night and day difference between the current 7.1 setup in front and side imaging, I may compromise on the rear imaging. Something I need to explore when time permits.

I finally got a chance to try Audyssey DSX with front wide. I moved my surround back speakers to front wide position, calibrated with Audyssey and did some listening. The result....
"I love it"
To conform to the Audyssey recommendation, now my seating position is closer to the front speakers due to my room configuration. This took a little getting used to as it felt near-field. In short, I am not going back to the traditional 7.1. Chris was absolutely right! The front stage sounds big. Both for Music and Movies, the DSX wide is clearly better than the traditional 7.1 for my setup. One thing I did notice about the surround rear is that now I hear more overhead sounds. I tried the star wars Pod race and gladiator. The rear stage is different and I think I like it better because there is more presence overhead and I seem to enjoy that more than behind the head. Anyone who has the option to try DSX and has not tried it yet, I strongly recommend giving it a try. It may change your opinions. It did mine!
Thanks,
-Jai
post #23038 of 62235
Hi Chris,
Now that you have me captivated by DSX, I am wondering about adding heights sometime soon. It is going to be a big investment as I have to upgrade from the Integra 40.1 to the 80.1, buy two more of the VR-1s and an amplifier and then there is the wiring. But I think it may be worth it. I can imagine that the big wide stage will get high and bigger! The DSX positioning is simply incredible. My wife who is not big into this stuff, is a piano player, loves music and the first time she heard DSX, she was amazed too! So here is a DSX height question. My room has 9 ft ceiling like most HT rooms in the ground floor (which are mostly 8' or 9'). You recommend 45 degree elevation for the heights. I did my best to conform to the angles for the front L, R and front wides. This 45 degree angle puts some constraints. Most listening positions are 8 ft or greater (front speakers to listening position). tan (45 degrees) is 1. Which means, the speakers would have to be 8 ft or higher. Meaning, they will almost always end up on the ceiling or hang off the side walls very close to the ceiling. Am I on the right track in following your recommendation? Finding ceiling mounts for bookshelfs again is tricky. Wiring gets tricky too as it is very hard to hide them unless they are wired internally. Were the heights meant to be on the ceiling? How about reflections off the ceiling?
Thanks,
-Jai
post #23039 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal33 View Post

Last night I watched "9" on blu ray and it caused my sub to bottom out in multiple scenes. I usually watch movies at -12, but I had to watch it at -20 last night in order for my Ultra PB-13 not to bottom out.

I am new to HT, so I am not sure what a sub bottoming out would sound like, but I think I may have heard it last night. I was watching Casino Royale and in a scene with very intense LFE, I could feel the rumbling in my chest followed by something which sounded like a 4x4 being shot out of a compressed air canon and hitting a solid concrete wall. The first thought that came to my mind was that the voice coil had shot out the back of my sub.

I assume this is not a good thing, but how do I know whether this was part of the LF effects or an abberation I need to worry about?
post #23040 of 62235
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal33 View Post

Well I got home and played the cannon scene from TIH and set my volume at -20 and I heard the pops. I then looked on the screen of my AVR and noticed that it read "Audyssey Dynamic EQ." I then turned Dynamic EQ off and played the scene again. This time I was able to listen at -15 WITHOUT any popping. For some reason Dynamic EQ was on, but I thought I turned it off when I first calibrated my system.

I then watched the end battle scene at -15 and I heard a quick noise on my sub (which is corner loaded). It came in the beginning of the final fight when the Hulk uses the police car as brass knuckles and hits the bad guy multiple times. He then gets on the bad guy and punches him more. There's one bass burst right as the Hulk lifts his arm that caused a chuffing sound. It was less of a pop and more of a chuff this time.

I then changed the subsonic filter to 20Hz while leaving it tuned at 15Hz. (This is OK to do, based on the manual.) I replayed the same scene and I still heard the chuff, but it was softer and more brief. So it seemed that changing the SF to 20Hz DID help a bit. I even changed my sub trim level from -4.5 to -5.0 and turned down my gain by a hair, but I still heard a brief chuff on that part. I then went back to the cannon scene and was able to listen to it at -13 without any pop from the sub. I didn't go louder than -13.

So it seems now that the only part from TIH that causes my sub to make a funny noise is the end battle scene described above. The noise happens so quick that if you weren't listening for it, you probably wouldn't notice it.

My conclusion is that setting the SF to 20Hz did give me a tad more headroom, therefore I will leave it at that. Thanks for the suggestion. Also, I realized that for TIH, listening to it at -15 is not bad at all. I usually watch movies at -12 and so that has become my magical number to set all movies to. But even at -15, I was happy with the sound of TIH. Perhaps other movies will not provide the same level of sound at -15 and so I'll have to turn it up. Then there are those movies like, The Dark Knight and Ironman, where I can watch it at -12 and hear no chuffing/popping on my sub at all. I guess TIH just has that much more potent bass than TDK or Ironman.

Still, "9" seems to have the heaviest bass of all because I heard popping in multiple scenes and had to watch it at -20 to eliminate them. But then again, I was watching "9" with Dynamic EQ on, which SVS told me to turn off today. Unfortunately I mailed "9" back to Netflix already so I don't have it to test out.

Does anyone know more about when or why or IF Audyssey does apply a boost to some movies, or whether it's only below a certain frequency that it applies a boost? Do you think "9" was getting a boost applied? Or does it just have that much more powerful and lower LFE?

Thanks for all of your feedback! I'd appreciate any more help. But for now, I'll just enjoy the movies that I can at -12, and decrease the volume for the small amount of movies that make my sub pop at -12.

One more thing...
Before you go through the trouble of redoing Audyssey what I suggested, can you try 20Hz tuning (all ports open) and 20Hz subsonic filter setting. I also have a suspicion about port chuffing. The higher velocity wind through those pipes (2 for 15hz) maybe a chuffing source. If it is, then the 20Hz tuning with 3 pipes (all ports open) may reduce chuffing. SVS should have designed the subs to avoid such chuffing but with the kind of material you are listening to, you maybe reaching the limits.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)