AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1) - Page 799

post #23941 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

Eyeballing your AS-EQ1 chart, I see the lowest dip at 40Hz being 76dB and at 60Hz 88dB and that is 12dB variation. The pro seemed to do better at about +-6dB. Doesn't the AS-EQ1 and the Pro have the same 256x filters in that frequency range?

Your eyeball is different than mine.

It clearly looks like 67-68dB and 75dB to me
post #23942 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by goonstopher View Post

Your eyeball is different than mine.

It clearly looks like 67-68dB and 75dB to me

Which chart are you balling? I am looking at the red waterfall.
post #23943 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

Which chart are you balling? I am looking at the red waterfall.

Waterfalls are good for decay time analysis, but I switched to posting FR graphs with 1/3 octave smoothing to look at response.
post #23944 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Waterfalls are good for decay time analysis, but I switched to posting FR graphs with 1/3 octave smoothing to look at response.

Yes, that's the right way to look at it, but at the time I was examining it, for the AS-EQ1, the red waterfall was the one I looked at. Do you have the eqivalent of the red chart in FR? Was it included in the most recent FRs you posted?
post #23945 of 62741
Pepar,

I was not talking about what you said, just the other post talked about the 40hz range and the 80hz range and he was off by a lot.
post #23946 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by goonstopher View Post

Pepar,

I was not talking about what you said, just the other post talked about the 40hz range and the 80hz range and he was off by a lot.

I was looking at the red waterfall chart for the AS-EQ1. Is that the same thing you were looking at when you concluded "he was off".
post #23947 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

I was looking at the red waterfall chart for the AS-EQ1. Is that the same thing you were looking at when you concluded "he was off".

I'm wrong a lot. I am use to it
post #23948 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

Which chart are you balling? I am looking at the red waterfall.

God, you guys really love this stuff. Oh, and don't forget to send your gearfriend a Valentine tomorrow.
post #23949 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by goonstopher View Post

I'm wrong a lot. I am use to it

No problem. My concern is that there maybe something wrong with the measurement methodology and I don't want Pepar to come to wrong conclusions. We were looking at different things.
Pepar, if you get a chance can you use the FL or FR instead of the C. I don't know what is going on with the center channel. I know you are looking at the entire FR for room treatment, but it would be good to validate a smaller data set like the sub 200Hz range. So if you redo it, unplug the FL and FR, Xover them at 200Hz so the high resolution filters take effect more. Then before you generate the waterfall, look at the FR. 1/3 smoothening is fine, but do compare the unsmoothed ones too. If you basic test is off, then everything will be off. So validate that the basic setup is accurate and then go from there. Good luck.
post #23950 of 62741
I posted waterfalls to show the reduction of ringing. I don't think it is valid to show single-seat frequency response measurements of a technology that is designed to improve the sound at all of the listening positions. Waterfalls are showing how the system/room is acting.
post #23951 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

No problem. My concern is that there maybe something wrong with the measurement methodology and I don't want Pepar to come to wrong conclusions. We were looking at different things.
Pepar, if you get a chance can you use the FL or FR instead of the C. I don't know what is going on with the center channel. I know you are looking at the entire FR for room treatment, but it would be good to validate a smaller data set like the sub 200Hz range. So if you redo it, unplug the FL and FR, Xover them at 200Hz so the high resolution filters take effect more. Then before you generate the waterfall, look at the FR. 1/3 smoothening is fine, but do compare the unsmoothed ones too. If you basic test is off, then everything will be off. So validate that the basic setup is accurate and then go from there. Good luck.

Thanks. I got the information I needed about my reverb times and how my room/system is behaving at the low end. Happy to have shared it, too.

Jeff
post #23952 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

This never bothered me before but came across my mind recently. When Audyssey is done calibration, the internal test tones are supposed to be 75dBC for all channels at primary LP. I have a galaxy CM-140 mic. It has new batteries and measurements look consistent on REW, but for test tones it reads only 70dBC. Is my CM-140 off by 5dBC?

Mic calibration consists of two elements: (1) frequency response correction and (2) sensitivity adjustment. Neither of these are possible in the mic itself. The response correction must happen in the electronics or the software and the sensitivity adjustment must happen in the preamp. To do that requires a calibrator that is placed over the mic. So, yes, out of the box pretty much every mic is uncalibrated unless it is combined with specific software correction.
post #23953 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

Hi Bluesky,
Here is an excerpt from my DHC 40.1 manual. There is a RE-EQ for modes other than THX.
Thanks,
-Jai


Re-EQ Function
With the Re-EQ function, you can compensate a soundtrack whose high-frequency content is too harsh, making it
more suitable for home theater viewing.
Re-EQ Off: Re-EQ Function off (default).
On: Re-EQ Function on.
This function can be used with the following listening modes: Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus,
Dolby TrueHD, Multichannel, DTS, DTS-HD High Resolution Audio, DTS-HD Master Audio, DTS Express,
DSD, Dolby EX, Dolby Pro Logic IIz Height, Dolby PLIIx Movie, Neo:6 Cinema, and 5.1-channel source +
Neo:6.
Re-EQ(THX) Off: Re-EQ (THX) Function off.
On: Re-EQ (THX) Function on (default).
This function can be used with the following listening modes: THX Cinema, THX Surround EX, and
THX Ultra2 Cinema.
Note:
Settings for the Re-EQ function are kept in each listening mode. However, in THX listening mode, when the
AV controller is turned off, it will return to On.

ULP! That's an Integra, right? For some reason I thought you had a Denon. Mea Culpa.

My Onkyo is the same way (I don't have DSX, though.). The answer to your original question, however, is most likely "no".
post #23954 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

My analog meter is about 8 years old. I hope Chris will chime in. I don't think it is a meter accuracy issue. Does the distance of the primary listening position from the front stage have any effect on this?
The internal tones must have a reference based on which they are calibrated.

A THX (and all other?) receiver's test tones are -30 dBFS. The trims are adjusted to read 75 dB SPL at the listening position. Just like Audyssey. My internal AVR test tones read 75 dB +/-1 dB as measured by my Rat Shack meter after Audyssey calibration with no other adjustment.
post #23955 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mupi View Post

Hi
My question is mainly regarding the Integra DHC 40.1 but I didnt get an answer when I posted it on the 40.1 thread. So I am asking here.

I like to know if I can use Audyssey Flat (no high freq. roll off) for 2ch music.

I dont see the "stereo" option listed for Re-EQ in the manual.

The manusl does say that when any THX option is selected
Audyssey Flat is used.

I see a THX-Music option so that will let me listen without the high
freq roll off. Now my concern is if my source is a CD player, will the
THX-Music play just 2ch music or do some surround music.

I have already placed an order for 40.1 and waiting. If I cant listen to
2ch music without the high freq. roll off then I would not even bother to
open it. I would just sell it even if I have to take a hit. I cant return it even if I dont open it as the dealer I got this is not a very friendly person to deal with.

I would appreciate any feedback regarding using Audyssey Flat for 2ch music

Thanks

This has been discussed before, but a quick overview is as follows:

Onkyo and Integra THX AVRs behave the same. Anytime a THX mode is selected, they default to Audyssey flat. Selecting THX Music will use Audyssey flat and Re-EQ is turned off. I use DPL IIX THX Music for all two channel music (I do not have a multichannel music source). This gives me 2-channels in and 7.1 channels out with Audyssey Flat and no Re-EQ. I do not know if there is a listening mode that allows you to apply THX music to straight 2-channel stereo. I have never looked. Hope that answers your question.
post #23956 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by goonstopher View Post

I'm wrong a lot. I am use to it

Welcome to the "club".
post #23957 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesky636 View Post

A THX (and all other?) receiver's test tones are -35 dBFS. The trims are adjusted to read 75 dB SPL at the listening position. Just like Audyssey. My internal AVR test tones read 75 dB +/-1 dB as measured by my Rat Shack meter after Audyssey calibration with no other adjustment.

I just started playing around with my radio shack spl and I've noticed the same thing as jmcomp, all of the internal test tones were playing back at 70dB. For some reason my center channel was even lower, more like 68dB.

This is on an onkyo 707, just after a calibration run. Is there any harm in adjusting these levels to get to 75dB? I just want to know that when I'm at 0 on the knob I'm getting the reference levels I'm supposed to be.
post #23958 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

I posted waterfalls to show the reduction of ringing.

Where do you see it as reduced?

In general the decay times look the same to me, in particular in the 20-30 Hz range where it runs off all three of the graphs.
post #23959 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by embit View Post

I just started playing around with my radio shack spl and I've noticed the same thing as jmcomp, all of the internal test tones were playing back at 70dB. For some reason my center channel was even lower, more like 68dB.

This is on an onkyo 707, just after a calibration run. Is there any harm in adjusting these levels to get to 75dB? I just want to know that when I'm at 0 on the knob I'm getting the reference levels I'm supposed to be.

On my Onk 1007 test tones I find that my RS SPL meter registers 68 dB for all speakers after I have run Audyssey. My feeling is that it's best just to leave the trim levels as is, so the Dyn EQ knows what ref level is (i.e., 0).

I am actually able to watch BluRays at ref level (i.e., 0 on the master vol); it is loud, but magnificent! (Fortunately my neighbors are not so close as to be an issue; wouldn't be possible in an apartment.)
post #23960 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by embit View Post

I just started playing around with my radio shack spl and I've noticed the same thing as jmcomp, all of the internal test tones were playing back at 70dB. For some reason my center channel was even lower, more like 68dB.

This is on an onkyo 707, just after a calibration run. Is there any harm in adjusting these levels to get to 75dB? I just want to know that when I'm at 0 on the knob I'm getting the reference levels I'm supposed to be.

The only issue I see with compensating for this by increasing the master volume is that it will affect Dynamic EQ which is relative to master volume. Chris just responded, but I am not sure if his response implies that our meters are off by 5dB. I have to ponder through this.
post #23961 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by audyssey View Post

Mic calibration consists of two elements: (1) frequency response correction and (2) sensitivity adjustment. Neither of these are possible in the mic itself. The response correction must happen in the electronics or the software and the sensitivity adjustment must happen in the preamp. To do that requires a calibrator that is placed over the mic. So, yes, out of the box pretty much every mic is uncalibrated unless it is combined with specific software correction.

Chris,
So does that mean that both my CM-140 and the Rshack meter are off by 5dB?
Thanks,
-Jai
post #23962 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

Chris,
So does that mean that both my CM-140 and the Rshack meter are off by 5dB?
Thanks,
-Jai

I have no way of knowing without measuring them with a calibrator.
post #23963 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by audyssey View Post

I have no way of knowing without measuring them with a calibrator.

Chris,
According to design, after Audyssey calibration; the SPL (if measured accurately with a calibrated mic/spl meter) should be 75dBC at listenining position. Is that right?
Thanks,
-Jai
post #23964 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcomp124 View Post

Chris,
According to design, after Audyssey calibration; the SPL (if measured accurately with a calibrated mic/spl meter) should be 75dBC at listenining position. Is that right?
Thanks,
-Jai

If the test signal used is a properly bandlimited pink noise signal (500 Hz to 2000 Hz with 4th order high and lowpass filters to produce the bandlimiting), and it is at a level of -30 dBFS then a calibrated measurement system will register 75 dB (C-weighted, slow) ± 2 dB (the manufacturing tolerance for sensitivity on the Audyssey mic).
post #23965 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesky636 View Post

This has been discussed before, but a quick overview is as follows:

Onkyo and Integra THX AVRs behave the same. Anytime a THX mode is selected, they default to Audyssey flat. Selecting THX Music will use Audyssey flat and Re-EQ is turned off. I use DPL IIX THX Music for all two channel music (I do not have a multichannel music source). This gives me 2-channels in and 7.1 channels out with Audyssey Flat and no Re-EQ. I do not know if there is a listening mode that allows you to apply THX music to straight 2-channel stereo. I have never looked. Hope that answers your question.

My concern is whether selecting THX Music would just give me 2ch out or force me to listen to 2ch music in 7.1 mode, which would be ridiculous.

I am looking for a listening mode where I can listen to 2ch music with Audyssey Flat in 2ch only or may be 2.1 but no matrixing 2ch to 7.1 out.
post #23966 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by noah katz View Post

Where do you see it as reduced?

In general the decay times look the same to me, in particular in the 20-30 Hz range where it runs off all three of the graphs.

I see it reduced a lot under 22Hz between no correction and the AS-EQ1. "More" seems to appear above 22Hz, and I have no idea what that is all about. Adding MultEQ Pro reduces the 22Hz to 33Hz thingy.

I'd like nothing more than to be able to measure and document the improvement that I *hear*, but I lack the equipment and the knowledge. So this is the best that I can do.
post #23967 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mupi View Post

My concern is whether selecting THX Music would just give me 2ch out or force me to listen to 2ch music in 7.1 mode, which would be ridiculous.

I am looking for a listening mode where I can listen to 2ch music with Audyssey Flat in 2ch only or may be 2.1 but no matrixing 2ch to 7.1 out.

It's called the Audyssey Pro Kit and it allows you to create, save and load customized target curves.
post #23968 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

I see it reduced a lot under 22Hz between no correction and the AS-EQ1.

Looks to me like that's just because the level is lower.

Really, looking at the graphs, I just don't see the CSD being improved.

Which isn't to say it doesn't sound better, I just don't think the graphs as explaining why.
post #23969 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

It's called the Audyssey Pro Kit and it allows you to create, save and load customized target curves.

So are you telling me that I cant use Audyssey Flat to listen to 2ch music
after spending $1000 on the Integra DHC 40.1.
post #23970 of 62741
Quote:
Originally Posted by noah katz View Post

looks to me like that's just because the level is lower.

Really, looking at the graphs, i just don't see the csd being improved.

Which isn't to say it doesn't sound better, i just don't think the graphs as explaining why.

ok.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)