AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1) - Page 1753

post #52561 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by giomania View Post

Any other comments on this section or on what Jeff said? Personally, I am a little concerned about recommending all measurements within 3 feet of the MLP, but whatever you all think is best. I decided to remove the strike-through text and just paste it in this time:

F. Most seating configurations can utilize the following microphone placement methodology:

1. The first microphone position (#1) must always be where your head is located (MLP).

2. For the remainder of the measurements, use the approximate pattern in the below diagram to surround your listening area, while ensuring you follow the guidance above.

3. After the first measurement, the order in which you make the subsequent measurements does not matter: The diagram below only serves to ensure each location is measured.

4. The distance between the measurement positions is variable, although all microphone positions should be made within approximately 3 feet from the #1 position. The basic idea is to surround the listening area with the maximum number of microphone measurements allowed by the particular Audyssey version.

5. Audyssey does not require putting the microphone in "every seat".

6. Feel free to experiment with other microphone placement patterns. Just ensure you follow the guidance in sections IV and V. The basic goal is to surround the MLP (#1) with measurements to create an acoustic bubble.

7. If you have additional microphone placement questions, visit the Official Audyssey thread on AVS Forum; please see the link at the beginning of this document.


Thanks.

Mark

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Mark - that is surely not right is it? The mic positions should, according to Audyssey, be two to three feet apart - bit they don't say two/three freet from the No 1 mic position. That would give an extremely tight measuring area and is inconsistent with the diagram on the Audyssey website, as well as with their advice.

I know some have had good results from such a tight pattern but it surely isn't the conventional wisdom is it?

Keith,

I had mentioned that I don't remember who provided the input, but someone did on this thread, IIRC.

I didn't think it was right, either.

So, we should change it back, right?

Thanks.

Mark
post #52562 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Can you extrapolate from the "x" info?

I think the "x" is there because Audyssey never revealed the amount of filters in 2EQ, which was the starting point. I used their diagram from their web site for the "x", "128x", etc.

I don't think Chris will ever tell us the "x" number, but he might tell me the fractional octave numbers I am missing.

Thoughts?

Mark

Edit: I just realized what you meant. Alas, a brilliant mathematician I am not. I looked at that, and tried to figure it out, but fractions were never my strong point.
post #52563 of 62744
Updated - and corrected - FAQ Linky doc.

 

FAQ Links.doc 22.5k . file
post #52564 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by giomania View Post

Keith,

I had mentioned that I don't remember who provided the input, but someone did on this thread, IIRC.

I didn't think it was right, either.

So, we should change it back, right?

Thanks.

Mark

Mark - my two cents says 'yes'.
post #52565 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Updated - and corrected - FAQ Linky doc.

Thanks, Jeff. Appreciated.
post #52566 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Remember the mic might 'hear' things you can't. Try killing the fridge and report back...

OK. Even allowing for manufacturers' specs being sometimes more imaginary than real, 150 Hz seems high then. The pics would be useful.

How does it sound?

I honestly didn't have much time to play with it after the test was run. I only had a short window before everyone was home.

I'm going to have to move a speaker anyway in a week or so, so I'll try to rerun it again at that time.

I post my results again and hopefully you will still be around.
post #52567 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

This is covered fairly comprehensively in the FAQ

D. Mic & Mic Placement Issues (click here)

But for the avoidance of doubt...

First off, Audyssey specifically say not to put the mic on the couch. It is also the advice in the Setup Guide and the FAQ. If the mic is on a tripod and the tripod is on the couch, then the mic is on the couch.

A couch will usually be far more prone to external disturbance than a floor. A couch, by definition, is a big soft thing. A floor isn't. Placing a towel under the tripod gives no isolation at all from the couch to the tripod. In fact, making the coupling between the two even firmer may well cause additional problems rather than solve any.

Vibrations through a solid or concrete floor are pretty much zero.

For a suspended floor, vibrations might be an issue and in this case the use of isolators on the mic stand feet will fix it. It doesn’t matter too much that your floor bounces and squeaks when you walk on it - it is the resonant frequency of the floor that is the issue. If that coincides with any frequency in the Audyssey chirps then you will have a potential problem. Like I say, if that is the case, isolators will be what you need.

It is the advice in all of this huge thread that putting the mic on the couch is a no-no - and it is also the advice of Audyssey. It may not make much difference to the result, or it may make a big difference - it will depend on all sorts of factors - but why take the risk of doing a calibration with methods that go against all of the advice in the thread and of Audyssey themselves? It seems to me much easier to just get an inexpensive boom stand and use that - with isolator pads if needed.

One thing to add regarding floor vibrations: not only is it important to isolate the microphone as Keith indicates above, but it's also a good practice to minimize/prevent such vibrations in the first place by placing satellite speakers on spikes and subwoofers on isolation pads (i.e. Auralex SubDude comes to mind). Always wise to prevent issues at the source vs. dealing with them as symptoms.

Classical subwoofers are supposed to induce air molecule vibration, not create direct structural vibration. If one's floor and walls are shaking when the subwoofer plays, that creates additional (unpleasant) sound not in the original signal. Similar to a cellphone set to vibrate laying on a wooden table vs. laying on a piece of foam. The later sounds like a clean buzz, while the former sounds like a rickety disaster--same source, two very different outcomes.
post #52568 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huffer View Post

I honestly didn't have much time to play with it after the test was run. I only had a short window before everyone was home.

I'm going to have to move a speaker anyway in a week or so, so I'll try to rerun it again at that time.

I post my results again and hopefully you will still be around.

Yes, I'll still be here
post #52569 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by tandy1000rl View Post

Classical subwoofers are supposed to induce air molecule vibration, not create direct structural vibration. If one's floor and walls are shaking when the subwoofer plays, that creates additional (unpleasant) sound not in the original signal. Similar to a cellphone set to vibrate laying on a wooden table vs. laying on a piece of foam. The later sounds like a clean buzz, while the former sounds like a rickety disaster--same source, two very different outcomes.

Amen to that! Don't even *think* about going near the Master List of Bass thread and venturing that opinion though... if their floor ain't shakin' and their roof ain't slippin' and their walls ain't flappin' they are most unhappy bunnies... LOL
post #52570 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post


Amen to that! Don't even *think* about going near the Master List of Bass thread and venturing that opinion though... if their floor ain't shakin' and their roof ain't slippin' and their walls ain't flappin' they are most unhappy bunnies... LOL

Well the goal is to find the resonant frequency of your structure and excite it until sheetrock cracks and nails pop out of the walls, is it not?
post #52571 of 62744
Dang it still getting 120hz...just gonna manually lower it
post #52572 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post


Amen to that! Don't even *think* about going near the Master List of Bass thread and venturing that opinion though... if their floor ain't shakin' and their roof ain't slippin' and their walls ain't flappin' they are most unhappy bunnies... LOL

I agree that some people like to disassemble their home with bass. But really low bass does produce structural vibration in the real world. Try listening to the pedals of a pipe organ with 32' stops in a church! Your feet will tremble.
post #52573 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokekevin View Post

Dang it still getting 120hz...just gonna manually lower it

Why? And to what?
post #52574 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooddoc View Post

Well the goal is to find the resonant frequency of your structure and excite it until sheetrock cracks and nails pop out of the walls, is it not?

It seems to be the goal in that thread. They rate really, really awful movies as 5 star so long as they have infra-bass into single figures. Weird.
post #52575 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbarach View Post

I agree that some people like to disassemble their home with bass. But really low bass does produce structural vibration in the real world. Try listening to the pedals of a pipe organ with 32' stops in a church! Your feet will tremble.

Agreed. But it's a side-effect - not an objective!
post #52576 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Why? And to what?

I'm not sure...replugged in my RC-10s and got a 60hz crossover. Going to lower the 450s to 80hz
post #52577 of 62744
If you lower it then that channel wont be EQ'd...
post #52578 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by lou99 View Post

If you lower it then that channel wont be EQ'd...

Sounds better at 80 than 120. Willing to lose the eq below 120
post #52579 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbarach View Post

I agree that some people like to disassemble their home with bass. But really low bass does produce structural vibration in the real world. Try listening to the pedals of a pipe organ with 32' stops in a church! Your feet will tremble.

Agreed, but that's more likely the result of the resonating pipe causing the air to vibrate which then induces the church itself to vibrate? It's not like the pipe is directly shaking the church floor due to physical contact or poor isolation between the two objects?
post #52580 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokekevin View Post

Sounds better at 80 than 120. Willing to lose the eq below 120

Are you sure it sounds better? The reason why it received a 120Hz crossover is because that's what was measured. If you really want to know, you should measure the 2.1 frequency response. I'll bet moving to 80Hz crossover causes a dip because the mains don't cover the lost frequency range properly.
post #52581 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Are you sure it sounds better? The reason why it received a 120Hz crossover is because that's what was measured. If you really want to know, you should measure the 2.1 frequency response. I'll bet moving to 80Hz crossover causes a dip because the mains don't cover the lost frequency range properly.

Watched the same scene I'm very familiar with and at 120 its sort of lacking. I'm still not sure how other 450 owners are getting audy to set it at 80
post #52582 of 62744
Then your running no eq. Guess you prefer it that way.

The receiver should get 80 if your speakers is capable of it. Otherwise your room may be affecting the output of the speakers.
post #52583 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokekevin View Post

I'm not sure...replugged in my RC-10s and got a 60hz crossover. Going to lower the 450s to 80hz

You realise that if you lower the XO then there will be no Audyssey EQ for that channel below the level from which you adjusted it.

For example, if Audyssey determined the XO to be 150 Hz and you lower it to 80 Hz, then there is no EQ between 80 Hz and 150 Hz any more. You have an un-EQ'd 'hole' in the frequency response from 80 Hz to 150 Hz.

Why do you want to arbitrarily lower the XO?

What is it that you are hearing that makes you want to lower the XO?
post #52584 of 62744
Soundstage seems to be smaller and I'm localizing the sub pretty badly in my room at 110 or 120. Still going to try to figure out how to get audy down to 80. The 10s once again get down to 60 while the rc lcr gets 40...
post #52585 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokekevin View Post

Sounds better at 80 than 120. Willing to lose the eq below 120

In what way does it 'sound better'?
post #52586 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooddoc View Post

I'm curious what the subjective improvements are to get some çorrelation to the graphs?

the change is very noticeable.

Music sounds great, I love it. The tonal balance is much closer to what I get with my Ultrasone headphones.

I am still adjusting to the sound of movies. After all this time with overemphasized bass I find myself wanting to bump sub levels when watching familiar scenes in, say, Tron: Legacy or WOTW.
The phenomenon is well addressed in the FAQs under the "Since I ran Audyssey everything sounds great – but where has my bass gone?" section. As I said before, it feels good to finally be able to relate
I will follow the FAQs recommendations and give it some time to get accustomed to the new sound.
post #52587 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

In what way does it 'sound better'?

Soundstage. Localization at 120
post #52588 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokekevin View Post

Watched the same scene I'm very familiar with and at 120 its sort of lacking. I'm still not sure how other 450 owners are getting audy to set it at 80

Can you try to describe what you are hearing with it set at 80 Hz and with it set at 120 Hz?

With the XO set at 120 Hz everything below that frequency is being sent to your subwoofer, which should handle it really nicely.

With the XO set at 80 Hz, everything down to 80 Hz is being reproduced by the main speaker. Audyssey has determined that the speaker cannot do this, so chances are it can't. If that is the case, then you will be a) missing a lot of the 'oomph' that would normally be in between 120 Hz and 80 Hz and b) you will not be benefiting from Audyssey's EQ, which should make the sound worse, not better. There is no good reason that Audyssey will have got this wrong - it's just a measuring tool that 'listens' to what the speaker is actually doing and reports back to the AVR, which then sets the XO.

I am curious as to what exactly you are hearing.
post #52589 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokekevin View Post

Soundstage seems to be smaller and I'm localizing the sub pretty badly in my room at 110 or 120. Still going to try to figure out how to get audy down to 80. The 10s once again get down to 60 while the rc lcr gets 40...

OK - sub localisation is a potential issue. Could we see some photos of the surround speakers in position in the room?
post #52590 of 62744
Quote:
Originally Posted by zheka View Post

I am still adjusting to the sound of movies. After all this time with overemphasized bass I find myself wanting to bump sub levels when watching familiar scenes in, say, Tron: Legacy or WOTW.
The phenomenon is well addressed in the FAQs under the "Since I ran Audyssey everything sounds great - but where has my bass gone?" section. As I said before, it feels good to finally be able to relate
I will follow the FAQs recommendations and give it some time to get accustomed to the new sound.

Yes - good plan. Give it a week or two and then see how you feel. If you still feel you need more from the sub, then raise the trim level by 2 or 3 dB and see how you like that. Raising the trim level doesn't harm the EQ.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)