AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1) - Page 1776

post #53251 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

So you can use the 'battery test' on a subwoofer then? Darn! I just conceded to Feri! That's a beer you owe me, Feri

Yes, though I just edited my post to correct "I would do this" to what I meant to say ... "I would not do this."

I've never done it, and wouldn't, but it should work. You may need to be watching the speaker as you make contact with the battery.

I once touched the rca with my finger with the amp hot (accidentally) .... it picked up enough ac to scare the h--- out of me. However, my sub amps have fixed gain so are always at max gain.

If I were to do this test, I would start with the sub amp gain quite low and raise it until I could see the cone move.
post #53252 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

Hi Harrison, you are, of course, right about the transient "thump", but I would still not recommend to do a sub driver test this way. By coincidence it can/could do more harm than good (especially for non-engineers) if it is repeatedly done coz the guy couldn't catch the movement of the cone the first time.

I agree fully. The idea scares me as noted above.
post #53253 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

Hi Harrison, you are, of course, right about the transient "thump", but I would still not recommend to do a sub driver test this way. By coincidence it can/could do more harm than good (especially for non-engineers) if it is repeatedly done coz the guy couldn't catch the movement of the cone the first time.

I think you're just trying to get out of buying me that cold Hungarian beer

Just kidding - I have removed my post in case someone tried it and destroyed their speaker and started a Class Action suit against me....

EDIT: Look what I just found when looking for something else on Ask Audyssey!! WARNING: Do not try this at home (go round to a neighbour's).



Those PhD's eh?
post #53254 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by FilmMixer View Post

Fairly off topic, but I'm sure most here will find this article interesting, and a lot to discuss..

Enjoy!

24/192 Music Downloads... and why they make no sense.

And lots of links to other interesting reads...

Then do we really need 24/48 or 24/96 on our Blu-rays?
post #53255 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post


Fabulous!

@pepar: Jeff, scroll down to the header near the bottom of the page "Confirmation Bias, the Placebo Effect and Double Blind". There is some terrific stuff in there that is 100% relevant to the 'debunking' thread you started and which I am subbed to.

Jeff or Keith, do you have a link to the "debunking thread", please?
post #53256 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

Jeff or Keith, do you have a link to the "debunking thread", please?

Sure, AJ. Here it is:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1336902

It's an interesting ride
post #53257 of 62285
Thanks, Keith!
post #53258 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post


Those PhD's eh?

That is wrong information from Chris to poor Fred, but that's not why we like him, eh? He got his PhD in acoustics, not electronics!!
post #53259 of 62285
Electrical Engineering, Feri.
post #53260 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Electrical Engineering, Feri.

Thx.

Since it's Friday allow me a joke related to the subject.

The kamikaze trainer is telling his trainees: "Watch me carefully, coz I will only show you once"!
post #53261 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post


That is wrong information from Chris to poor Fred, but that's not why we like him, eh? He got his PhD in acoustics, not electronics!!

So it would seem!
post #53262 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

That is wrong information from Chris to poor Fred, but that's not why we like him, eh? He got his PhD in acoustics, not electronics!!

Yikes... never thought I'd see the day...




Just joking around, no offense meant.


Max
post #53263 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

The kamikaze trainer is telling his trainees: "Watch me carefully, coz I will only show you once"!

Lol, thx for the laugh.
post #53264 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by djbluemax1 View Post

Yikes... never thought I'd see the day...




Just joking around, no offense meant.


Max

I've been looking for Fred's post in the sub threads - the one beginning "I have this blown sub...."
post #53265 of 62285
Having replaced my Triad Gold LCR's with Gold Monitors, I now appreciate the Music vs Movie option for Audyssey. I've also realised the difference that Dynamic EQ makes for Music is pretty big. I definitely prefer it on for both Movies and Music.

The subtle details that the Gold Monitors are re-producing are absolutely amazing. The Gold LCR's were doing (what I thought) was an amazing job, but the Monitors are seriously detailed and life-like. I really can't wait to get my new Subs and run the Pro calibration - hopefully next week.

I'm off to watch some movies.
post #53266 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjf_uk View Post

Having replaced my Triad Gold LCR's with Gold Monitors, I now appreciate the Music vs Movie option for Audyssey. I've also realised the difference that Dynamic EQ makes for Music is pretty big. I definitely prefer it on for both Movies and Music.

The subtle details that the Gold Monitors are re-producing are absolutely amazing. The Gold LCR's were doing (what I thought) was an amazing job, but the Monitors are seriously detailed and life-like. I really can't wait to get my new Subs and run the Pro calibration - hopefully next week.

I'm off to watch some movies.

Way to go mjf! Glad this worked out for you in the end. I spotted you had sold the Gold LCRs ('sold' here being a euphemism for 'giving them away'). Sounds like a worthwhile improvement though.
post #53267 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Way to go mjf! Glad this worked out for you in the end. I spotted you had sold the Gold LCRs ('sold' here being a euphemism for 'giving them away'). Sounds like a worthwhile improvement though.

Thanks Keith. I was rather worried about selling them for such a low price, especially as I'd never even heard the Monitors - so had no idea what difference I'd actually be paying for. Now that I've re-calibrated and tried some of my usual test material, the difference has definitely been worthwhile.
post #53268 of 62285
HI Audessey experts..
I ran Audyssey with my Onkyo 5508 pre-processor multiple times with the microphone at ear level. Every time Audyssey seem to have cleared up my low end response, but it bumps the HF response which is already high without Odyssey(+8DB). I was expecting it to tame the HF, but it's doing polar opposite. How can I rectify this? The PRO version is out of my budget a this time, but I thought XT32 included with the processor should at least get me in the ballpark. Thanks for your help.
PS - The measurements are taken with REW software with Radio Shack Mic with calibration file.
post #53269 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam1000 View Post

HI Audessey experts..
I ran Audyssey with my Onkyo 5508 pre-processor multiple times with the microphone at ear level. Every time Audyssey seem to have cleared up my low end response, but it bumps the HF response which is already high without Odyssey(+8DB). I was expecting it to tame the HF, but it's doing polar opposite. How can I rectify this? The PRO version is out of my budget a this time, but I thought XT32 included with the processor should at least get me in the ballpark. Thanks for your help.
PS - The measurements are taken with REW software with Radio Shack Mic with calibration file.

I have the exact same issue with my Onkyo 709 with XT. I have run at least a dozen calibrations following Audyssey's guidelines precisely, and no matter how I tweak each calibration, the treble is too hot. It sounds better with Audyssey engaged, but it is too bright...........My fix is to use THX Cinema mode for everything except music, and that has tamed the issue.
post #53270 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam1000 View Post

HI Audessey experts..
I ran Audyssey with my Onkyo 5508 pre-processor multiple times with the microphone at ear level. Every time Audyssey seem to have cleared up my low end response, but it bumps the HF response which is already high without Odyssey(+8DB). I was expecting it to tame the HF, but it's doing polar opposite. How can I rectify this? T

Quote:
Originally Posted by D Bone View Post

I have the exact same issue with my Onkyo 709 with XT. I have run at least a dozen calibrations following Audyssey's guidelines precisely, and no matter how I tweak each calibration, the treble is too hot. It sounds better with Audyssey engaged, but it is too bright...........

It may have to do with the height, aiming and FR of your front tweeters. Are they above, below or at ear level?
post #53271 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by D Bone View Post

I have the exact same issue with my Onkyo 709 with XT. I have run at least a dozen calibrations following Audyssey's guidelines precisely, and no matter how I tweak each calibration, the treble is too hot. It sounds better with Audyssey engaged, but it is too bright...........My fix is to use THX Cinema mode for everything except music, and that has tamed the issue.

I just got following response from Chris since I had posted the question in 'Ask Audyssey'. Well, time to get a new Mic, I guess. On the other hand I'll get a chance to compare AUdyssey with Trinnov in next few days as well.
=====
I'm sorry, but the RS mic is totally inadequate to draw any conclusions from--even with a so-called "calibration" file. If you have followed the Audyssey instructions on where to place the mic then you will get good results:
http://www.audyssey.com/audio-technology/multeq/how-to

If you measure too far off the center line then you will have a peak in the high frequencies because MultEQ will try to overcorrect for the drop off in tweeter response. Also make sure that the speakers are pointed to the listener's ears.
===
post #53272 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal Rubinson View Post

It may have to do with the height, aiming and FR of your front tweeters. Are they above, below or at ear level?

My L/C/R are all mounted above ear level (I like a raised sound stage), but they are all tilted down, and toed into the MLP. I used my laser to aim each speaker. My Yamaha with YPAO sounds much better in the upper ranges, but it's not as enveloping, and the bass is no where as good as the 709 & Audyssey XT.
post #53273 of 62285
My Triad Gold Monitors are all angled up at me, but after some testing I found that the left and right were better if just toed in slightly rather than firing directly at me. I previously worked out where the 'too far' off axis point was with the LCR's, so I'm careful about mic placement.
post #53274 of 62285
My LR tweeters are at the ear level where the microphone was placed as well.
post #53275 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam1000 View Post

If you measure too far off the center line then you will have a peak in the high frequencies because MultEQ will try to overcorrect for the drop off in tweeter response. Also make sure that the speakers are pointed to the listener's ears.
===

Quote:
Originally Posted by D Bone View Post

My L/C/R are all mounted above ear level (I like a raised sound stage), but they are all tilted down, and toed into the MLP. I used my laser to aim each speaker.

But the mic's polar response does not match that of your ears. I would tilt the mic so that it is orthogonal to the radiation axis of the front speakers. The reason for the normal recommendation to point it to the ceiling is to have it orthogonal to the speaker radiation and you should try to approximate that while keeping it at ear height. This might lead to some strange issues with the surrounds but it is worth a try.
post #53276 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal Rubinson View Post

But the mic's polar response does not match that of your ears. I would tilt the mic so that it is orthogonal to the radiation axis of the front speakers. The reason for the normal recommendation to point it to the ceiling is to have it orthogonal to the speaker radiation and you should try to approximate that while keeping it at ear height. This might lead to some strange issues with the surrounds but it is worth a try.

Thanks for the suggestion Kal. I'll try that out in next couple of days. Will it make a difference if my tweeters are ribbon?
post #53277 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam1000 View Post

Thanks for the suggestion Kal. I'll try that out in next couple of days. Will it make a difference if my tweeters are ribbon?

Perhaps. Audyssey assumes that the mic is on and perpendicular to the radiation axis of the tweeter. If the ribbons are tall, there are, often, variations in the vertical plane.
post #53278 of 62285
For the folks with boosted HF response, what are your room sizes? Larger than 2500 cubic feet by chance?
post #53279 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by tandy1000rl View Post

For the folks with boosted HF response, what are your room sizes? Larger than 2500 cubic feet by chance?

My room is very small, but I was experimenting.
post #53280 of 62285
Quote:
Originally Posted by tandy1000rl View Post

For the folks with boosted HF response, what are your room sizes? Larger than 2500 cubic feet by chance?

Is this a known issues in larger rooms? With opening to the dining area, I would say that the room is about 2700 cubic feet..
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)