AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1) - Page 1807

post #54181 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Good idea. Any suggestions from anyone on a list of 'don'ts' would be welcome.

#1. "Don't tilt the mic!" Hah!
post #54182 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

#1. "Don't tilt the mic!" Hah!

post #54183 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by wingnut4772 View Post

... However, the AVS forum wouldn't be what it is without obsession (or is it passion?) :-). ...

OCD
post #54184 of 62249
[quote=asere;22067314]Here is a pic of my mains. You cannot see the center because of fan. The mains are crossed at 150 and center at 80. Anything I can do to have Audyssey calibrate it to 80 like center?[/QUOTE

The other day I went up to the attic and placed insullation over the surrounds and I got a response of 60 hz with Audysseys first measurement. I need to rent a blower to place insullation over the L,R because crawling in the attic to reach them was imposible. If that does not work then I will need to just replace the L,R with two like the one I am using as Center. I get 80hz on Center speaker.
post #54185 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post


Thanks for sharing that reply from Chris. I think his reply points to something I have suspected for a long time - that we tend to overthink things here on the thread I spend a silly amount of time, for example, when I do a calibration to make sure that the mic is exactly vertical in all planes. I am sure that it makes no real difference if it is slightly off (and Chris seems to confirm that) but I can't help but do it. I suspect a lot of the other 'lore' is similarly overthought - mic positions for example measured to the inch and so on. But as Chris says, where would the thread be without our obsession passion!

While I agree with you completely that slight variations likely don't affect the calibration very much, I still firmly believe that precision results in repeatability. I continue to make sure the mic stays at ear-level, is pointed at the ceiling, and that the measurement points that I use are the same for each calibration (using a tape measure). I am rewarded for this diligence with repeatable, and excellent, results. OCD is not necessarily bad.
post #54186 of 62249
My last word on the topic: either grazing angle is important or it's not; in addition, tweeters should either be pointed at the microphone or not. Many are trying to have it both ways (which was the point of raising the topic in the first place). Great results can be had either way, but by definition the mic must be calibrated to a single optimal setup which implies the best results must adhere to that paradigm. There are no self-tuning or learning microphones of which i'm aware, and Audyssey has no user inputs on these matters. If the system is tuned for monopole surrounds at 90 degrees, then using any other type of loudspeaker at any other height is sub-optimal compared to the ideal, yes? There are infinite "really greats" but only one optimum.

How similar Audyssey can make "really great" sound "optimal" is a testament to its engineering, but if I can get optimal laboratory results using any grazing angle that coincides with how I've setup my speakers, then there really is no need for direction on this topic because it clearly wouldn't matter. I think it does matter, as I've seen with my own eyes and heard with my own ears how HF changes with grazing angle, plus the finding coincides with the incessant direction to point the mic at the ceiling, aim speakers at MLP, etc.

To see folks now dismissing the importance of grazing angle when it comes to real world setups is quite odd. Especially tomorrow when they proclaim tilting the mic is bad because it's calibrated for a certain grazing angle. Oh my.
post #54187 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by tandy1000rl View Post

My last word on the topic: either grazing angle is important or it's not; in addition, tweeters should either be pointed at the microphone or not. Many are trying to have it both ways (which was the point of raising the topic in the first place). Great results can be had either way, but by definition the mic must be calibrated to a single optimal setup which implies the best results must adhere to that paradigm. There are no self-tuning or learning microphones of which i'm aware, and Audyssey has no user inputs on these matters. If the system is tuned for monopole surrounds at 90 degrees, then using any other type of loudspeaker at any other height is sub-optimal compared to the ideal, yes? There are infinite "really greats" but only one optimum.

How similar Audyssey can make "really great" sound "optimal" is a testament to its engineering, but if I can get optimal laboratory results using any grazing angle that coincides with how I've setup my speakers, then there really is no need for direction on this topic because it clearly wouldn't matter. I think it does matter, as I've seen with my own eyes and heard with my own ears how HF changes with grazing angle, plus the finding coincides with the incessant direction to point the mic at the ceiling, aim speakers at MLP, etc.

To see folks now dismissing the importance of grazing angle when it comes to real world setups is quite odd. Especially tomorrow when they proclaim tilting the mic is bad because it's calibrated for a certain grazing angle. Oh my.

In a nutshell what your saying it is ok to tilt the mic?
post #54188 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by asere View Post

In a nutshell what your saying it is ok to tilt the mic?

If I had ceiling speakers, I would try re-orienting the mic for them ... "try" ... and do some listening. You will either hear a degradation, no change or an improvement. For the first two, I would abandon the adjustments while the latter would cause me to incorporate it into my routine. I wouldn't tell Feri though.

Jeff
post #54189 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by tandy1000rl View Post

oh my.

+1
post #54190 of 62249
Here is a response I got from Chris to my question about mic calibration and ceiling speakers a couple of years ago:

"Since your speakers are in the ceiling it can be beneficial to tilt the mic back slightly so that sound from the speakers hits the mic at a grazing angle."

This is what I have done - just a couple of degrees off of vertical - and can attest that it does sound better than having calibrated Audyssey with the mic at true vertical.
post #54191 of 62249
Thanks. With all the previous admonishments about pointing it at the ceiling, and understanding that it really has everything to do with the mics being calibrated at 90 degrees, I don't understand why that would now be minimized for in-ceiling speakers. Unless they now have more data ... or the re-orientation was causing other calibration problems ...

Jeff
post #54192 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by geodon005 View Post

Here is a response I got from Chris to my question about mic calibration and ceiling speakers a couple of years ago:

"Since your speakers are in the ceiling it can be beneficial to tilt the mic back slightly so that sound from the speakers hits the mic at a grazing angle."

This is what I have done - just a couple of degrees off of vertical - and can attest that it does sound better than having calibrated Audyssey with the mic at true vertical.

Though changing from normal fronts to ceiling surrounds in any reproducible manner is very hard.
post #54193 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by geodon005 View Post

Here is a response I got from Chris to my question about mic calibration and ceiling speakers a couple of years ago:

"Since your speakers are in the ceiling it can be beneficial to tilt the mic back slightly so that sound from the speakers hits the mic at a grazing angle."

This is what I have done - just a couple of degrees off of vertical - and can attest that it does sound better than having calibrated Audyssey with the mic at true vertical.

The mic has to be tilted enough to point right at the speaker right?
post #54194 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by asere View Post

The mic has to be tilted enough to point right at the speaker right?

"Grazing" is 90 degrees. Pointing it at the speaker would be 0 degrees.
post #54195 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by asere View Post

The mic has to be tilted enough to point right at the speaker right?

As per Chris's reply, I tilted my mic a couple of degrees back (as in AWAY) from the speaker.
post #54196 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by geodon005 View Post

As per Chris's reply, I tilted my mic a couple of degrees back (as in AWAY) from the speaker.

Hi geodon, belive it or not, but just a couple of degrees really doesn't count much.

Here's an example of the calibration sheet of a Behringer ECM-8000 microphone. Many use it with REW.

As you can see:

1. The difference in FR can only be seen at around and above 10-12 kHz, the rest of the band is identically flat.

2. The spec sheet shows the difference between 0 degree and 90 degree angles of incidence, so a difference of just a couple of degrees tilting IMHO would not only not make an audible difference, but even measurements would not reveal them.

BTW, if I still remember well, asere is having issues in the bass department with his ceiling speakers that he is trying to fix through the attic!!
post #54197 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

If I had ceiling speakers, I would try re-orienting the mic for them ... "try" ... and do some listening. You will either hear a degradation, no change or an improvement. For the first two, I would abandon the adjustments while the latter would cause me to incorporate it into my routine. I wouldn't tell Feri though.

Jeff

Grazing Police is watching!
post #54198 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post


Hi geodon, belive it or not, but just a couple of degrees really doesn't count much.

Here's an example of the calibration sheet of a Behringer ECM-8000 microphone. Many use it with REW.

As you can see:

1. The difference in FR can only be seen at around and above 10-12 kHz, the rest of the band is identically flat.

2. The spec sheet shows the difference between 0 degree and 90 degree angles of incidence, so a difference of just a couple of degrees tilting IMHO would not only not make an audible difference, but even measurements would not reveal them.

BTW, if I still remember well, asere is having issues in the bass department with his ceiling speakers that he is trying to fix through the attic!!

Thanks for posting this. I'll just proceed as normal.
post #54199 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

Grazing Police is watching!

Don't you ever sleep?
post #54200 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by mogorf View Post

Grazing Police is watching!

Hide your sheep!
post #54201 of 62249
I just reran audyssey and got 120 for left, right, 90 for the surrounds and 80 for center. Are the numbers really bad?
post #54202 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by asere View Post

I just reran audyssey and got 120 for left, right, 90 for the surrounds and 80 for center. Are the numbers really bad?

Assuming you have a sub to handle the low frequencies, your results are probably as good as you are going to get without significant modifications to your ceiling-mounted front speakers. I think you should spend some time listening to your system and assessing whether it sounds good to you. If yes, then no need to worry. If no, try and categorize what you are not pleased with, and report back to this forum for additional advice.
post #54203 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

Assuming you have a sub to handle the low frequencies, your results are probably as good as you are going to get without significant modifications to your ceiling-mounted front speakers. I think you should spend some time listening to your system and assessing whether it sounds good to you. If yes, then no need to worry. If no, try and categorize what you are not pleased with, and report back to this forum for additional advice.

Hi asere, fully agree with the advice of Jerry, take your time to get accoustomed to the SQ (Sound Quality) of your current setup. Sweat no more on issues, you've been working very hard in the last couple of days, so time to take a break! Grab remote in one hand, a cold beer or a glass of Chardonnay in the other one and enjoy your system! You deserve it!!!
post #54204 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post

Assuming you have a sub to handle the low frequencies, your results are probably as good as you are going to get without significant modifications to your ceiling-mounted front speakers. I think you should spend some time listening to your system and assessing whether it sounds good to you. If yes, then no need to worry. If no, try and categorize what you are not pleased with, and report back to this forum for additional advice.

Yes I actually have a Hsu vtf3 mk4. I'll listen closely and relax. Thanks everyone!
post #54205 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by asere View Post

I just reran audyssey and got 120 for left, right, 90 for the surrounds and 80 for center. Are the numbers really bad?

Getting low frequencies out of your attic is probably good thing . Shaking your roof does not lead to a great sound and might not be great for your shingles.
post #54206 of 62249
Ok. I'm gonna skip the SMS1 and see how I like the straight XT32. I have 4 subs. Which two subs should be on the 'Sub 1' output and which two should be on the 'Sub 2'? The rear two subs are closer to the seating area. Here's a pic.

My thought is to put the front subs on Sub 1 and the rears on Sub 2. Does that sound right?
LL
post #54207 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by wingnut4772 View Post

Ok. I'm gonna skip the SMS1 and see how I like the straight XT32. I have 4 subs. Which two subs should be on the 'Sub 1' output and which two should be on the 'Sub 2'? The rear two subs are closer to the seating area. Here's a pic.

My thought is to put the front subs on Sub 1 and the rears on Sub 2. Does that sound right?

My installation is somewhat similar, with two subs up front like yours, but only one sub in the back. Since Audyssey sets the distances for the sub's, I have always thought that if two subs are combined on one sub out connection, they should be equidistant. Looking at your picture, it looks like the two front subs might be the same distance to the MLP, and the two rears equidistant as well. I would try the two fronts on one sub out, and the two rears on the other, as you suggest.

One the calibration has completed, and if you have measuring software like REW or OmniMic, you could experiment with adjusting the sub distances to achieve the flattest response at the crossover point. Several of us have reported smoother bass response by using this technique.

Nice setup, by the way!
post #54208 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinJerry View Post


My installation is somewhat similar, with two subs up front like yours, but only one sub in the back. Since Audyssey sets the distances for the sub's, I have always thought that if two subs are combined on one sub out connection, they should be equidistant. Looking at your picture, it looks like the two front subs might be the same distance to the MLP, and the two rears equidistant as well. I would try the two fronts on one sub out, and the two rears on the other, as you suggest.

One the calibration has completed, and if you have measuring software like REW or OmniMic, you could experiment with adjusting the sub distances to achieve the flattest response at the crossover point. Several of us have reported smoother bass response by using this technique.

Nice setup, by the way!

Thanks. I will try that. They aren't perfectly equidistant but probably close enough.
post #54209 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by wingnut4772 View Post


Thanks. I will try that. They aren't perfectly equidistant but probably close enough.

Should sound nice! I am jealous of that setup for sure!
post #54210 of 62249
Quote:
Originally Posted by EndersShadow View Post


Should sound nice! I am jealous of that setup for sure!

Thanks. I did the best I could considering the room. All the components are in a closet around the corner.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "Official" Audyssey thread (FAQ in post #1)