AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › MISSION owners thread.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

MISSION owners thread. - Page 3

post #61 of 457
Glad your'e enjoying them and they meet your expectations. Whatever happens if you do bi-wire them, don't tell anyone if you hear any improvement. And don't bother breaking them in either. Just let them play quietly for a little before you sit down for a critical listening session. Joking aside, looking forward to your more detailed comments.
post #62 of 457
Thread Starter 
. i thought about bi-wiring but seems to be such a chore. can you just biwire with regular speaker wires? i looked online at bi-wire sets and they are more than my speakers . this is my first set of bi-wirables so i'm still a little confused on the configuration if i decide to do it. as usual the mission owners manual was not much help. however i did do somecritical listening after 48 hours and here are my results. try to keep them brief.

m31 - center channel inegration with the mc1i- ok i thought the m70 and the mc1i paired well, and they DO. however the m31 and the mc1i pair SEAMLESSLY- it is totally amazing. sounds almost as if it is one big speaker. if you werent looking or didnt know better you would think it was one big speaker until the sound moves of screen to the right or left. they pair fantastically with the m7ds and my rear m70's too. in the m31 manual they show another set of bipoles- the m3ds- don't even get me started on them if i could find them i would grab them too .

5.1 audio- i popped david bowies - ziggy stardust in dts 5.1 into my oppo 970. the sound integration was immaculate. then i turn on the rears (m70) and the sound was even sweeter. the m31 blend very well with the m70. the total exapnsiveness of all 8 channels was mesmorizing.

stereo- LPM you should know this one- nick cave and the bad seeds- my favorite artist! i chose the album "no more shall we part". turned off all simulation and just went straight stereo through the m31. AMAZING! i heard things i have been missing all this time and i have owned this album since the day it was released. sitting in the sweet spot between the mains they pulsed as one unit. i was fascinated to hear the speakers work the sound so well that they almost sounded like one speaker at times- almost as if the sound was coming directly out of my disabled center channel. the imaging and detail is perfect and warm. then at times the cd would sound all around me as if the surround speakers were playing.

very warm, highly detailed, very nice imaging and clarity and soundstage, VERY nice bass extension with or without the sub on.

build quality and appearance. this is where it leaves my beloved m70 in the dust. i guess the best way to describe the m31 look is CLASS. the finish in graphite black is beautiful showing just subtle hints of woodgrain underneath. i chose to take the grills off and they look amazing. they are a little taller and wider than the m70 but 2 whole inches deeper.

to sum it up i am extremely pleased with these speakers, and it has cemented me even further into my loyalty and love for mission. i can only imagine how some of the higher end $1000 per pair missions such as the elegantes sound and hopefully one day in the not too far future i will own some.

if you currently have the m70 and are considering upgrading and are in the U.S. i would go NOW to tsto and get these- at $200 shipped per pair- they are an amazing value and unbeatable in the price range and probably unbeatable at 2x the price.

this weekend a fellow member who lives near me and who is narrowing down his choices on speakers will be bringing over some velodyne CHT front rows which we will compare with the m70. and some nicer ascends which will go head to head with the m31. i'll post results.
post #63 of 457
I must admit I'm enjoying reading peoples pleasant experiences on this thread.

Adamanteus, personally, I would never spend money on expensive bi-wire cables but then I only use plain but good quality, heavy gauge speaker wire anyway. I have tried bi-wiring myself by using double runs of plain wire (very cheap and can't hurt). If it made any difference it was pretty small but it certainly didn't make things worse. If you want to try it out of curiosity, I recommend sticking to cheap plain wire.

Re the m3ds, just like the other 7 versus 3 models it is essentially the same speaker as the m7ds with just a slightly different driver. I doubt if the later model improvements make enough of a difference sonically to make it worth upgrading.

As to your impressions, I can only agree about the seamless soundstage and the speakers disappearing. That has been a characteristic of my Missions in stereo since day 1, and in surround since I upgraded to the m7c2i centre. I have Vandersteens in my separate stereo room and whilst they are better in this regard, they were far harder to get positioned just right. One of my friends has a HT setup where you can localise every speaker and boy it is distracting. As I said in an earlier post, I have zero desire to change my HT setup at present as it still makes me smile at just how satisfying and enveloping the Missions sound is each time I crank up the system.
post #64 of 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by lpm View Post

Adamanteus, personally, I would never spend money on expensive bi-wire cables but then I only use plain but good quality, heavy gauge speaker wire anyway. I have tried bi-wiring myself by using double runs of plain wire (very cheap and can't hurt). If it made any difference it was pretty small but it certainly didn't make things worse. If you want to try it out of curiosity, I recommend sticking to cheap plain wire.

If you just can't resist trying biwire cables, there is some very reasonably priced cable out there made from Canare 4S11 cable. You're not taking much of a gamble at the price, and it will satisfy your curiousity.
My verdict: no discernible improvement, but no worse.
post #65 of 457
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlankton View Post

If you just can't resist trying biwire cables, there is some very reasonably priced cable out there made from Canare 4S11 cable. You're not taking much of a gamble at the price, and it will satisfy your curiousity.
My verdict: no discernible improvement, but no worse.

hey thanks. not sure if i WILL biwire them, but at this price i may as well give it a shot. i need to replace the speaker wire up front anyway. and since it can't hurt...
post #66 of 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamanteus View Post

hey thanks. not sure if i WILL biwire them, but at this price i may as well give it a shot. i need to replace the speaker wire up front anyway. and since it can't hurt...

I just read this in one of the reviews;

"On the test system comprising Marantz 63KI on Orbit Custom Magic Platform, Alphacore Micro Purl Silver interconnects, Audiolab 8000A amp and Audioquest GBC single-biwire cables, the speakers sounded polished and gave much bang for the buck. Biwiring made the bass go lower and tighter, with more texture. This is certainly one pair of speakers that benefits remarkably from biwiring."
post #67 of 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vidmaven View Post

I just read this in one of the reviews;

"On the test system comprising Marantz 63KI on Orbit Custom Magic Platform, Alphacore Micro Purl Silver interconnects, Audiolab 8000A amp and Audioquest GBC single-biwire cables, the speakers sounded polished and gave much bang for the buck. Biwiring made the bass go lower and tighter, with more texture. This is certainly one pair of speakers that benefits remarkably from biwiring."

This made me laugh. This is one of those reviews that makes it sound like you need $1000 cables and special "cable lifters" to keep your cable off the floor in order to make speakers sound good.

I call BS.
post #68 of 457
Thread Starter 
yeah who knows. i just figure if the speakers are designed with 4 binding post i may as well at least try it out. i'm not expecting to hear anything different.
post #69 of 457
I have been a fan of Mission loudspeakers since the 1980s. I've admired their loudspeakers so much that I built a few back in the 1990s with the woofer above the tweeter using Vifa drivers and professionally built cabinets from a fellow in Horsehead, NY.

I have bought a few mission loudspeakers in the last 6 years but the Volare V60s are the best that I own. They have what the pros call a "liquid" midrange which I use to have a hard time wrapping my mind around until I heard it in my own livingroom. I'm running a pair on a Parasound HCA-800II power amp with a Sony DVD player. Straightwire without any EQ.

Anyway, Missions are a favorite of mine.

Sterankoman
post #70 of 457
Thread Starter 
you know i was going to mention one of the things i too love about them is the tweeter below the woofer. it allows me to place them on higher stands and the tweeter still be at ear level when seated. i love it.
post #71 of 457
Jsut found this thread.

I have Mission 773e fronts, M77ds rears and the M77C center. Together with a Marantz Sr7000 receiver, this has been the heart of my HT for 7 years. I have been very pleased
particularly given the price I paid for the package.

Mission speakers used to be very easy to find in Canada, but I am not sure that this is still the case as all of the local dealers in my area have stopped carrying them.

I looked at the prices at tsto. The are certainly lower than I would have expected.
post #72 of 457
Thread Starter 
a fellow member here stopped by earlier today. he is in the process of choosing what he wants for his HT. so he brought some speakers over so we could a/b them. he had already bought the velodyne front row set and wanted to compare them before he returns them. it was great meeting a fellow member and getting to compare some speakers to my missions.

here's what we found briefly. in comparison to the velodyne set the mission m70 set totally annihalated it. the velodyne center sounds hollow and muted in comparison to the mc1i- which is loud clear and precise- very theater like- we both heard this and had the same feelings about it. the m70 bookshelves (of which now one pair is used for my PC sound and the other pair is used for my rears in 7.1. with the m31's holding down my main positions) make the velodynes sound like low end boombox speakers- again we both described it the same way- so it wasnt prejudice on my part. the difference in these sets is night and day furthermore proving that the mission m70 5 speaker set HAS TO BE one if not THE best bangs for the buck out there.

of course my m31 mains looked and sounded even better . but, we knew that going in.

in short any hesitations he had regarding NOT sending the velodyne back are now gone. they are going back... this was a total beating. no offense to any velodyne owners. ths was done for our curiousity. we are 2 different guys with 2 totally different lifestyles and we both had almost the exact same description for the comparison.

the most interesting comparison we made was between the mc1i center and an $300 ascend center speaker he has out on demo from ascend (forgot the model number). the ascend is a rather LARGE speaker in comparison to the mc1i. we were both expecting this to be the point where we saw a big difference in quality. surprisingly though there wasn't THAT much of a difference. the mission held it's own with the ascend. we both felt the ascend got the nod on richness in sound with a little more bottom end. which should be expected at 3 times the cost and 3 size the cabinet depth. but, other than that they were AMAZINGLY close. we also agreed that if the ascend was mounted and eq'd correctly into a setup- the difference may be even less noticable. at $99 (MSRP of $200) the mc1i holds it own with the higher priced models of 3 times the cost.

in short it cemented my belief in the fact that mission just plain rocks. and it made a mission believer out of him too. most of all i got to meet a fellow member, who was a great guy, check out some speakers and have a little fun.

i can't wait for the day i can get my hands on those elegantes...

EDIT- the ascend center was the ascend 340.
post #73 of 457
Has anyone heard the E series from Mission that TSO is selling. TSO has the E80, E82 & E83 for sale. The styling looks like it came from an Alien movie (futuristic).
Even the larger E83 has multiple small woofers, maybe 4, 5 or 6 in each cabinet.
post #74 of 457
Thread Starter 
no but i wish i could... i also heard they are supposed to be coming out w/ an e5 series here soon.
post #75 of 457
I have 2 pairs of M70s brand new in the box if anyone is interested.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=824653
post #76 of 457
Quote:


Has anyone heard the E series from Mission that TSO is selling

Briefly, but only the E82 model at my dealer where I bought my other Missions while I was hunting for stereo only speakers. The E82s are really well finished and good looking (I think) but those that prefer more conventional looks have the Volare (or even the 3 series) models. The E82s were hooked up with a sub at the time so I can't really comment on their base extension or full range performance but my impression was open, spacious, clean, refined and tight. They were really musical and natural to my ears. Didn't compare them directly to any other speakers at the time however and very limited time so only an impression.

The dealer was/is very enthusiastic about the E83 as stand alone stereo speakers, but I haven't heard them yet. Both models were simply out of my price range at the time unfortunately but at least I still have my 7 series for HT and occasional stereo duties.

As I understand it, the E82s have a 25mm (1in) dome tweeter and 5x110mm (4.5in) drivers, 1 of which acts as a midrange and the other 4 combine for base. The E83 has the same tweeter, 2x165mm (6.5in) mid/base drivers and 2 or 3 (I think 3) auxiliary base radiators but not sure of the size.
post #77 of 457
This is a great thread. I noticed ad's posts about the missions and tsto and I was kind of afraid he worked for them :^)

I'm strongly considering these mission M31s paired with their center and maybe M70s as the surrounds to replace my current setup

Pioneer Elite 55txi
JBL N38 mains
JBL N26 surrounds
JBL N-Center
HSU 2.3 sub (on order, replacing a long dead JBL PB-12)

3600 cu ft room (living room opens to kitchen)

So I want to go to something smaller for aesthetic reasons, but I just can't talk myself into satellites. The M31's seem like the best deal going on bookshelves the more I read around here. My problem is, and this is a terrible noob question....the elite is rated at a supposedly full 100W x 7. The M31's recommended amp is a max of 75W. Is that a big deal? I've read varying opinions on this.
post #78 of 457
Thread Starter 
LOL. i WISH i worked for them . maybe i would get a discount then again, i'd probably spend every penny i made there...

seriously the shop is in PA. and i'm in calfornia. only reason i mention them is because they ARE the only mission dealer i can find here in the U.S. so if anyone asks for a recommendation i recommend mission and tsto.

as for your questions:

i have an elite also (81). the m31's work great. you will probably never even approach their max potential in volume. IMO it is always better to have a little more amp power for your speakers for cleaner power. vs speaker power on a lower powered amp. for instance it's better to have a 75w speaker and a 100w per channel receiver. vs a 100w speaker with a 50w amp. with a little more headroom in your receiver you can drive the m31 very nicely.as a matter of fact you and i have almost the same exact room dimensions and mine is living room that opens into a small kitchen as well .

for the surrounds are you running 5.1 or 7.1? if you're running 7.1 i would recommend the m70 in the rear and the m7ds in the side position. if just 5.1 just the m7ds.

the m70 will work in the side position i had mine there for a while and they sound great - BUT, they are rather deep so they will really jut out on your side walls. even more if you use a standard (sanus, etc) wall mount. you're talking about a total of 1 foot out from the wall. you can use the mission mounts at tsto but they will still stick out about 10". i ordered the mission mounts to mount my m70 in the rear and they are fine there. then i have the m7ds on the sides.

the m7ds are really nice looking speakers and they mount flush agains the wall. very "cinema- like" in appearance. they really sound nice and the multi driver really bounce the sounds all around you. so with them at the sides and a direct speaker (like the m70) in the rear, you get a really nice enveloping soundfield back there.

so in short if you are going 7.1 - i would recommend (as far as what we can get here in the U.S.) :

m31- mains
mc1i- center
m7ds- sides
m70 - rear

5.1-

m31- main
mc1i- center
m7ds- sides or rears.


as far as a sub i had ordered a 2.3 too from HSU (are you my doppleganger? ) as they are local to me but, canceled it as i changed my mind to a 25-31 pci cylinder sub from svs. they are much easier to move around take up less floor space and aesthetically i like the look. will have it in a couple weeks and i'll post my impressions on how it blends in.

good luck.
post #79 of 457
THanks for the detailed reply. It is weird how close our situations are. Kind of perfect for me, honestly. Not so much for you since you did all of the legwork :^)

My listening position is to a wall, with a wall on my right and the kitchen to my left, so side surrounds are out. I wonder if 3 of the m7ds's would be nice so I could have a rear back channel. Probably not worth it. I'm pretty happy with 5.1.

I too thought about the cylinder subs at SVS, but footprint isn't that big of a concern because of how many empty corners I have in the nearfield position. I have a lot of space to waste there that I will happily fill with subwoofer. I also liked the $469 price for 18hz!
post #80 of 457
Thread Starter 
yeah you want your sides on the sides or rears at the rear. not all 3 (or 4) on the back wall. uness you have a little wall space above that opening just go 5.1. if you do have a little wall space- you can mount the m7ds high and point it upside down.

if you go mission then i would either just put 2 m7ds on the back wall. or you may prefer the sound of a direct speaker. in which case i would go with 2 m70 in the back- but you mentioned aesthetics. with the mission m70 wall mount they will stick out like mentioned about 10" angled down slightly. m31 will not really work in the rear on the wall as they are meant for stands- unless you want stands back there. which may work for you.
post #81 of 457
i've just got a set of M-Cube 5.1 after tested them out at a av-store, i was very impressed by the definition and clarity from the 9cm x 9cm cubes as well as the 8" sub.
post #82 of 457
Thread Starter 
i will hopefully be getting a black m7c2 center channel that i found. i'm hoping if the price is right i can get it. i'm also adding an SVS cylinder sub (25-31pci) in about 10 days. after that i will be done purchasing for quite awhile. am hoping i can get the m7c2 center though. this would really round it all out for me.
post #83 of 457
Thread Starter 
looks like i WILL be getting the m7c2 after all .

anyhow if this all goes as planned i will probably have my m7c1i for sale. only 3 months old in brand new condition. still have the box and manuals and wrapping for it as well. i should be getting the m7c2 around next weekend-ish so if you are interested let me know via PM. brand new it is $115 shipped i figured i would sell it for $90 shipped. it's only a couple months old. only caveat is that i will not be letting it go until the m7c2 arrives. so if you have any interest PM me and we can talk about it.
post #84 of 457
On EBay recently I watched a pair of used, but immaculate M73's sell for $17.69 in England. Those lucky bas***ds can pick up used and new Missions at great prices.

The M73 is a decent speaker. Sure, it does not have the midrange or bass quality of the Volare series or the M6 series, but it is still a fine loudspeaker for the price that they used to sell for here in the states. $230/ pair plus shipping.
post #85 of 457
Thread Starter 
yeah i've seen them on ebay as well. alot of those guys WILL ship to the U.S. but the shipping charges are pretty high. i've also found a site in England - http://www.stoneaudio.co.uk/


which will ship here but, with the conversion rate and around $75 shipping a single mission m7c2 center was around $400. i paid $150-ish for mine used including shipping on audiogon. which btw- audiogon seems to have used missions on there for sale fairly often.

looks to me that even a new middle of the road model mission speaker retails for much higher in the U.K. than here. which may be one of the reasons they don't really export here-there just isn't any profit for them here. unless they sell a higher end line like the elegantes.
post #86 of 457
Seriously considering the Mission surround setup from tsto. Just wish I could hear them first. Very tempting.
post #87 of 457
I recently was on the wrong end of a great m73i deal. When I replaced my Missions with a new Tannoy set up I hoped to get a little money back from my Missions on ebay. Two pair of immaculate, less than a year old m73i's and an m7c2 center, $118. Someone got a great deal at my expense.
post #88 of 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlankton View Post

I recently was on the wrong end of a great m73i deal. When I replaced my Missions with a new Tannoy set up I hoped to get a little money back from my Missions on ebay. Two pair of immaculate, less than a year old m73i's and an m7c2 center, $118. Someone got a great deal at my expense.

So were the new Tannoys an improvement? What model did you buy?
post #89 of 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamanteus View Post

yeah i've seen them on ebay as well. alot of those guys WILL ship to the U.S. but the shipping charges are pretty high. i've also found a site in England - http://www.stoneaudio.co.uk/


which will ship here but, with the conversion rate and around $75 shipping a single mission m7c2 center was around $400. i paid $150-ish for mine used including shipping on audiogon. which btw- audiogon seems to have used missions on there for sale fairly often.

looks to me that even a new middle of the road model mission speaker retails for much higher in the U.K. than here. which may be one of the reasons they don't really export here-there just isn't any profit for them here. unless they sell a higher end line like the elegantes.

I don't agree with your conclusion. Mission speakers ordered from a U.K. store end up costing so much because the dollar is very weak against the British Pound - currently two Pounds to the dollar. This exchange rate results in very high prices at retail from an overseas store - not to mention shipping.

The economics would be different if Mission exported the speakers for sale in the US. There are many British Speakers for sale in the US - B&W, Monitor Audio, KEF, Tannoy, Acoustic Energy, etc.

-Eric
post #90 of 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterankoman View Post

So were the new Tannoys an improvement? What model did you buy?

Like going from a KIA to a Mercedes. Eyris series. I'm not bashing the Missions, it's just that the Tannoys are in a different league. The Missions were an amazing speaker at their price point.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › MISSION owners thread.