Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaara 
Vishal,
Is the center below the screen angled up, or in back of the screen. I would think if you had an acoustically transparent screen and image height was a problem you could go with one Ref AV instead of the center. I imagine the center disperses well in small rooms and the height isn't a issue, but far away with a projector I could see how it would become one. The AV would sound larger height wise as it is oriented vertically, but would sound smaller in scale left to right, but I imagine it wouldn't be a problem as you were happy with the center fill using a phantom center. Just a thought.
Jared

Vishal,
Is the center below the screen angled up, or in back of the screen. I would think if you had an acoustically transparent screen and image height was a problem you could go with one Ref AV instead of the center. I imagine the center disperses well in small rooms and the height isn't a issue, but far away with a projector I could see how it would become one. The AV would sound larger height wise as it is oriented vertically, but would sound smaller in scale left to right, but I imagine it wouldn't be a problem as you were happy with the center fill using a phantom center. Just a thought.
Jared
Jared -
The center is below the screen since it is not acoustically transparent. A regular Ref AV might work better, but the vertical orientation would not work for my room. If it did, bushbison and I would split another pair of Ref 3.1s




















If you are able and could do a quick experiment for a fellow audio neurotic, could you try your new center at the same height as the tweeters in your 3.1's? I have the room to do that, and am wondering if the image height is still "off", when placed as such.













