AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › St. Louis, MO - HDTV *OLD*
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

St. Louis, MO - HDTV *OLD* - Page 15  

post #421 of 19496
Called Charter last week to set up HD and set an appt for this afternoon. Just got the call of "we are sorry, its not available in your area". I'm so sick of their crap
post #422 of 19496
For those with the motorola box - can you guys tell me if the DVI connection is a DVI-I or not? I have a CRT PJ, and as such require analog RGB.

Thanks.
post #423 of 19496
Does anyone else get Charter Internet without Charter cable? They published a report three months ago that they were doing away with the surcharge for doing it this way - but I got my bill yesterday and it shows a $5 surcharge (34.95 charge instead of 29.99)

Just curious as to others experience in this area.

Chris
post #424 of 19496
Could that be modem rental?
post #425 of 19496
I thought the previous surcharge for Charter Internet w/o Charter Cable was $13 something...
post #426 of 19496
Quote:


Originally posted by STL
Did anyone watch the State of the Union address on FOX's digital feed last night? If so, did you see any lip sync problems?

The last couple shows I recorded on FOX (24 and last night's State of the Union) seemed to have lip sync problems during playback. I know it is not my STB because when I saw the problem with 24 I was using a RCA DTC-100 and when I saw the problem last night I was using a Samsung SIR-TS160. I am thinking it is not the local digital FOX feed because I talked with someone who watched 24 last week (but wasn't using a DVR) and they didn't see it. Somehow the audio is getting ahead of the video. This points the a problem with the ReplayTV unit and its ability to record digital OTA programming. Anyone here recording digital OTA signals with a DVR? Anyone seen anything like this?

Not surprising... Almost every digital program I watch, regardless of station, has lip-syncing problems. It was that way with the Samsung TIR-150 I had 2 years ago, and it's still that way with my Zenith HDV420. Very maddening and frustrating that after all this time digital still can't get it right.
post #427 of 19496
so, January is almost over and no new word from Charter on any new HDTV channels.... we need someone on the 'inside' there....
post #428 of 19496
I'm really hoping that Charter gets CBS in time for the Superbowl for you guys. I'll be watching it courtesy of my trusty channelmaster antenna. It would be nice if the Charter box had a built in OTA tuner like the sat boxes.
post #429 of 19496
Quote:


Originally posted by BradZ
I'm really hoping that Charter gets CBS in time for the Superbowl for you guys. I'll be watching it courtesy of my trusty channelmaster antenna. It would be nice if the Charter box had a built in OTA tuner like the sat boxes.

Im guessing they wont be that pro-active....but I hope I am wrong.
post #430 of 19496
Hi just purchased (ordered) my first hdtv hit51s700. It will be going in my basement in Fenton. The drywall is going on this weekend so I want to make sure I have everyting in the walls I need. I have 3 runs of RG-6 Two for upcoming HDdirect tivo and one for an atenna.

This brings me to my question. I live on a hill looking the Merimac river so there little obstruction an am planning on putting an atenna in my attice (above the second stroy). As far as I can tell the farthest I am away from the digital signals is 12 miles.

Is it overkill to install an attic antenna?

Even if it is (I tend to overkill everything) what atenna would you recommend?
post #431 of 19496
Thread Starter 
Another thread here on AVS relates a customer service conversation regarding some fixed limits on the number of HD channels Charter is capable of carrying in any single market.

Normally I probably wouldn't bother reposting here something that's completely unattributed. But on the other hand, there does seem to be some logical foundation to this.

And as Charter has repeatedly demonstrated that it can't be bothered to COMMUNICATE its plans to its subscribers (Oh, the irony), I figure I might as well let it rip...

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...hreadid=355052
post #432 of 19496
Thread Starter 
post #433 of 19496
Fixed number of HD channels for Charter? Argh...

I gotta get back to Dish - I keep waiting and waiting, hoping Charter will just 'do it', so I dont have to go thru all the hassle of changing, but this is way too irritating.

Thanks for the info Doug
post #434 of 19496
Just talked with charter and they said the hold up for me was the lack of boxes. CSR said they are getting new ones in which are the DCT6200 http://broadband.motorola.com/consum...00/default.asp
She also said the DVI was enabled on the new boxes. All taken with a grain of salt.

Tim
post #435 of 19496
Alright guys, the Direct installer was out today to install my HD package. Just to recap, I got in on the $99 deal (sort of), and also ponied up an extra $50 for the local antenna to be installed. Got home from work and everything was up and running, for the most part. I am not getting the local CBS feed through my roof top antenna. Hmmm, this is the channel the SuperBowl is on, and was one of the driving forces behind all of this.

He installed a Winegaurd antenna, and also received the Samsung 160 HD box. Fox, ABC, NBC, Ch. 9, all come in at 77% according to the digital signal meter. The installer told me that I might have some problems getting CBS in, but thought it would be a non-issue living so close to the antennas (10 - 15 miles).

Please, I'm begging you guys for some help! I'm desparate here. Do I need a different antenna? Amplifier? Re-position the antenna? Anything?
post #436 of 19496
Thread Starter 
DJ -

It's tough to try to remotely troubleshoot something like your problem, but we can at least give it a shot...

Here's some things to consider:

* Try to find out what the model number is for the Winegard antenna. More to the point, you should try to find out if the antenna is VHF/UHF or UHF only. If it's a combo, it probably would help to have a UHF-only instead. That's not a guaranteed fix, but having UHF-only is more likely to pull in all the stations reliably.

* I don't know your exact location, but it sounds like you're pretty close to the cluster of transmission towers in St. Louis. As a result, it may be difficult for you to aim your antenna in such a way as to pick up all of the stations from all of the towers. Understand that I'm speculating here, but if that's true, you might try to see if you can aim more directly at KMOV to pick up that signal, probably at the expense of one (or more) of the stations that are further to the periphery of KMOV. If you find that's the problem, you could consider a second antenna or a rotor as a long-term solution, or just temporarily re-aim the antenna before the Super Bowl to ensure you're going to get a good signal then.

* Does your receiver have multiple antenna inputs (Ant A and Ant B, for example)? If so, you might want to try connecting an indoor antenna to the second antenna input (Silver Sensor) to see if you can pull in just KMOV over that antenna. My DTC-100 allows me to do this, though I haven't actually tried feeding two antennae at the same time. I'm not sure how that would work on the Samsung box, or the unified program guide (the guides are separate on my older STB). Maybe someone else here with more experience with the Samsung STB can chime in whether that's an option or not. Again, I wouldn't normally suggest this sort of kludge, but as you sound very determined to see the game in HD, it might be worth a try. BB sells the SS and they generally have a very liberal return policy, so if it doesn't work out you're not really out of pocket, though of course there is an additional hassle factor.

That's all I can think to suggest at the moment. If another idea occurs, I'll post it here. Hopefully one of these ideas will help you, or maybe someone else can come along with some suggestions that fix your problem.
post #437 of 19496
DJ,

you might also try a multi-directional antenna like the channel master 4 bay bowtie antenna. I'd try tweaking the winegard first- you might find a magic spot.
post #438 of 19496
Quote:


Originally posted by tcfila
Just talked with charter and they said the hold up for me was the lack of boxes. CSR said they are getting new ones in which are the DCT6200 http://broadband.motorola.com/consum...00/default.asp
She also said the DVI was enabled on the new boxes. All taken with a grain of salt.

Tim

Hold the salt....

DVI is enabled on ALL boxes with DVI hardware installed due to 12.18 & 14.18 update.
post #439 of 19496
Quote:


Originally posted by abcward
Fixed number of HD channels for Charter? Argh...

I gotta get back to Dish - I keep waiting and waiting, hoping Charter will just 'do it', so I dont have to go thru all the hassle of changing, but this is way too irritating.

Thanks for the info Doug

There is no "fixed number"....
post #440 of 19496
post #441 of 19496
Thread Starter 
4113,

I would hope that you're correct.

While I've already conceded that there's no substantiation for the idea that Charter is currently limited to eight HD channels, at least I presented a source where this possibility was raised.

Your comment "there is no fixed number" doesn't really add any new information. Is this an opinion, or do you have inside information that might explain why Charter has been foot-dragging on delivery of a credible HD service?
post #442 of 19496
Doug & Brad,

Thanks you very much for the advice. I just came up from watching some of the "new programming" available to me. Wife's already in bed, so I have to stay off the roof until tomorrow, at which point I'll enlist the help of a neighbor (who is coming over to watch the SuperBowl). I just checked Winegard's website, and it looks like he installed the Sensar II GS200A. I'll have to check on the multiple inputs as well. I don't think it does from the brief time I was thumbing through the manual, just your regular satellite feed, a local antenna feed, and a cable feed. I'll keep you all posted. Doug, you're right, I'm pretty damn determined to get CBS rolling in HD before 2/1.
post #443 of 19496
Quote:


Does anyone else get Charter Internet without Charter cable? They published a report three months ago that they were doing away with the surcharge for doing it this way - but I got my bill yesterday and it shows a $5 surcharge (34.95 charge instead of 29.99)

Just curious as to others experience in this area.

Chris

Chris, did you call Charter and see what they had to say? I'm just about ready to take the "cable internet" leap and, I too, thought that there wasn't a surcharge anymore. The surcharge is the reason why I never signed up in the past (and I can't get DSL ). Let me know what you find out, I wan't to sign up for the 2-month free offer that's going on right now.

Thanks
post #444 of 19496
Did some research last night.

1) It is not a cable modem rental charge - I bought my own modem.

2) There is now a disclaimer on their website that states the prices above are for Charter TV and Internet subscribers, Internet only subscribers will pay more.

So basically, there is a surcharge, but its been dropped to $5. SBC has DSL for 26.95, but that is only for 1 year - its 49.95 thereafter. So it looks like I am sticking with Charter, surcharge and all.

With respect to the Charter limitations and their 'all-digital' service - unless there is something specific to post, Charter has lost all credibility here. First they were years overdue with HD service. Second, they still haven't launched Discovery, which they have at least some carriage agreement for. Third, they announced the HD PVR, but have been silent every since. Fourth, this new digital service contradicts the HD PVR, because one of its benefits is cheaper cost on PVRs - so why invest millions in an analog/digital PVR and then invest millions on an all digital TV service which makes your new PVR overpriced? They sound like Dishnetwork - lots of efforts, lots of press releases, but when you get down to it no one is steering the boat and they are dumping money in technologies for the sake of being a 'market leader' - BUT the customers NEVER see the benefit or see it YEARS after it was promised and all the while we are subsidizing these unmanaged efforts.

OK, I'm off my soapbox.

Chris
post #445 of 19496
Thread Starter 
Interesting story on the front page of today's Wall Street Journal:

Playful on the Outside, Paul Allen Tightens Grip on His Fortune

http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB1...age%5Fone%5Fus

It appears that you need to be a subscriber to access the full story.

Not a lot of detail about the future of Charter in this article, though it is one of the focal points. The "wired world venture" concept is attributed directly to Paul Allen and says that he continues to push this "vision" hard, "most notably advanced set-top boxes that will give greater capabilities to channel-surfing cable viewers."

I completely agree with BudShark's observations. While Charter has apparently mastered the puff-piece world of the Businesswire and PR Newswire, it seems to treat the need to deliver on customer needs and expectations as an inconvenient afterthought.

Bring on Comcast and let's be done with these bandits.
post #446 of 19496
I too agree with all the negative comments about Charter's lack of interest in customer satisfaction.

I will however give them credit for a very decent Cable Internet. The speeds are 2x as fast as DSL is and at a very similar price.

Now if we could only get them to realize how important that HD is to us!
post #447 of 19496
I recently listened to the web-stream of Charter's conference in Arizona. HD was a topic of discussion, and I really got the impression that someone made the strategic decision to initially offer just two hd local channels in all their hd markets. That seems to make sense, as it seems all markets have just two local hd channels, if that. (I am counting FOX, even though its not HD). Lots of defections if they don't offer more.
post #448 of 19496
Thread Starter 
What? Haven't these guys heard about the "cable pig" promotion?


The following is from SkyREPORT:
_____________________________

DirecTV Set to Raise Prices, Readies New Offer

DirecTV will increase the prices for its base packages between $1 and $3, depending on the package, beginning March 1, SkyREPORT has learned.

The pricing for the packages with local TV channels are as follows: Total Choice with locals, $39.99 a month, a $1 jump; Total Choice Plus with locals, $42.99 a month, a $3 increase; and Total Choice Premier with locals, $90.99 a month, a $3 jump. Without locals, package prices are: Total Choice, $36.99, a $3 jump; Total Choice Plus, $39.99, a $2 increase; and Total Choice Premier, $87.99, a $2 increase.

Packages with foreign language channels, premium networks and HDTV selections will not change, along with prices for pay-per-view and the DirecTV DVR service.

As for its upcoming national offer, DirecTV will offer new customers its Total Choice with Locals package for $29.99 for the first six months of a subscription, a $60 savings. Customers who purchase new equipment, agree to a one-year commitment and subscribe between March 1 and July 17 will be eligible for the offer. The Spanish-language DirecTV Para Todos package with locals also will be offered at the discount.

_____________________________
post #449 of 19496
KTVI Problems Still
I'm really starting to go crazy with my KTVI reception.

Examples:
> Rams Game : pretty much could watch whole thing with just rare pixellation (pixelization? hee)
> Eagles Game, same time of day but warmer: couldn't get it in at all ! constant dropouts every 3-5 seconds (could anyone west of Clarkson watch this game?)
> '24', last night: couldn't even get it AT ALL !

What in the hell is going on here?

I've tried to email KTVI, based on earlier address, but it keeps coming back saying their mailbox is full. Is there a way to contact them, or does anyone have an idea of what I should do?

Thanks,
Chet

PS. My reception has been hit and miss just this past year. Have OTA in attic with amp.

----
PSS. The Carolina Eagles game came in fairly well for the most part. As I've stated in past, KTVI is in the middle of the other two, which I always get just fine.
post #450 of 19496
Chet,

You must be using a Dish 811 or a Dish 6000 receiver. I haven't discovered what the issue is quite yet but I'm working on it.

I noticed the same thing and I'm only located 9 miles from the KTVI Tower.

In which direction is your antenna pointing (angle/degree) according to antennaweb.org. I wonder if some kind of other type of broadcast interferes with the signal path. It doesn't matter what the temperature is or conditions are on when it works and when it doesn't. It's completely random.

I also wonder if the people at Fox are experimenting with the PSIP and Signal Strength.

P.S. I haven't noticed these severe issues on my other HD receiver (MyHD), the signal just drops by about 10% but everything still works OK. I'm using a 4-bay ChannelMaster 4221 antenna mounted on my roof.

Quote:


Originally posted by ChetP
KTVI Problems Still
I'm really starting to go crazy with my KTVI reception.

Examples:
> Rams Game : pretty much could watch whole thing with just rare pixellation (pixelization? hee)
> Eagles Game, same time of day but warmer: couldn't get it in at all ! constant dropouts every 3-5 seconds (could anyone west of Clarkson watch this game?)
> '24', last night: couldn't even get it AT ALL !

What in the hell is going on here?

I've tried to email KTVI, based on earlier address, but it keeps coming back saying their mailbox is full. Is there a way to contact them, or does anyone have an idea of what I should do?

Thanks,
Chet

PS. My reception has been hit and miss just this past year. Have OTA in attic with amp.

----
PSS. The Carolina Eagles game came in fairly well for the most part. As I've stated in past, KTVI is in the middle of the other two, which I always get just fine.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Local HDTV Info and Reception
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › St. Louis, MO - HDTV *OLD*