Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronomy 
I still have the RS1u and love it. But if I were buying new I would consider the RS40. If you don't have the money an RS1 still rocks. Especially with a DVDO Duo or other processor that you can calibrate it with.
Used RS1 with old bulb will have a gray scale that is way off calibration too.
Ron

I still have the RS1u and love it. But if I were buying new I would consider the RS40. If you don't have the money an RS1 still rocks. Especially with a DVDO Duo or other processor that you can calibrate it with.
Used RS1 with old bulb will have a gray scale that is way off calibration too.
Ron
Thanks Ron, I think my biggest hesitation is knowing that an AT screen is going to run me some dollars and if I can "skimp" on projector price I would. The RS1 is in avs classifieds (bulb is at 350 hours) and the RS40 is just under 3x that price. I'm certain that when I finally decide NEITHER will still be available, lol. This is going to be a TV replacement and seating is between 6'-13.5' depending on where the screen will be placed (with the couches in their current layout) this can change (and as my wife's whims dictate...does
).I really have no intention of additional processing but I don't know. We only watch on our 65" and have deemed xbox HD content "good enough" and even Netflix HD streaming "good enough" granted that is only on a 65" screen but in looking at THX calcs and some other calculators most say my screen should at most be a 100"...I (we) went into this thinking of 120" screens so looking at all of these, "you should get a 84" or 92" screen" ugh. So now I guess I'm focused on 100" and 106" screens but it seems in reading a lot of posts here that people have gone much larger than THX recs.
We aren't audiophiles hence the soundbar nor videophiles but we do prefer without question "better than SD quality".
























