Quote:
Originally Posted by sebenste 
WLS-DT has applied to keep channel 7 on for 6 more months.
https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS_...um=1&exhcnum=2
They have three phases of construction for getting channel 44 to full power. One, getting 44 on the air at decent power...which is done. #2, going 1 million watts on Hancock, and then step 3...although not filed yet...almost certainly 1 million watts from Sears. To do this, they want to have 7 still operating because the 1 megawatt signal from Hancock might overload nearby viewers (scratches head). Anyway, they are actively getting ready for a new high power UHF transmitter on Sears. The document above is an interesting read; nothing new here for those following the saga, but they speak of their progress.

WLS-DT has applied to keep channel 7 on for 6 more months.
https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS_...um=1&exhcnum=2
They have three phases of construction for getting channel 44 to full power. One, getting 44 on the air at decent power...which is done. #2, going 1 million watts on Hancock, and then step 3...although not filed yet...almost certainly 1 million watts from Sears. To do this, they want to have 7 still operating because the 1 megawatt signal from Hancock might overload nearby viewers (scratches head). Anyway, they are actively getting ready for a new high power UHF transmitter on Sears. The document above is an interesting read; nothing new here for those following the saga, but they speak of their progress.
HUH? Overload nearby viewers? Then why put out that much in the first place? This is dragging out like a bad soap opera. I miss WITI and no dice with that until WCHU moves to 7. Damn.
What other full powered station can run simultaneous transmissions like this? What a waste of bandwidth.


























