(Note: This is my opinion, take it for what it's worth.)
I'm a Panny Plasma owner and no expert, just your average consumer, though I follow the forums (which are invaluable). Feel free to disagree with my comments.
I've noticed lots of discussion about the pros and cons of each TV technology and come to some conclusions that may help some.
1) Plasma produces superior black levels;
LCD's, DLP's, etc have all improved, but I don't believe anyone is saying that they have surpassed plasma for detailed black levels. Some plasma brands and models are certainly better than others, but all have improved in the last couple of years. Some would say white level reproduction is more accurate too.
2) Plasma produces more "depth";
Boy, that's a subjective claim, but I've seen many posts here from those who have switched from LCD's and DLP's saying just that. More like "looking out a window". Perhaps not as sharp an image as LCD, but perhaps not as artificially sharp either.
3) Superior reproduction of SD material;
Even more subjective, but again voiced by many forum posters. It may not even matter in a few more years, but we aren't there yet. This has alot to do with guts of the set, maybe more than the display from what I've read, so you'll get what you pay for. For me, my Panny does an excellent job with SD broadcast and DVD. YMMV.
4) Superior off-angle viewing;
No contest here, 160+ degrees horizontal and vertical. LCD's are closing the gap, DLP's forget about it.
5) Superior fast action reproduction?
Maybe or maybe not, some swear by plasma, some by LCD. From what I've gathered, there was a time when LCD's with slower refresh rates had problems, not so much these days. You're choice.
6) Superior gaming platform?
Again, there are two camps swearing by their technology. Depends on what you want, some game platforms work better with one or the other, generally if you want near-neon, in your face brightness, stick with LCD. You decide.
7) What about Plasma burn-in?;
This has been covered here, there and everywhere ad-nausium. Despite all the concern about it, I still haven't come across any posts where someone has said they had permanent burn-in on a 2005-2007 plasma. Some have mentioned image retention issues with gaming that seems to go away after a few hours of normal viewing. The paranoia is probably here to stay though.
8) What about break-in?;
Some do, some don't, some use break-in discs. What ever makes you happy seems to work these days. I get the feeling that a lot of us are so addicted to this HD stuff that we aren't happy unless we have something to tweak, adjust, calibrate, break-in or mull over in our minds most of the time. I find myself constantly re-evaluating my TV and home theater and drooling over the Next Big Thing, even though all of my equipment is working fine, looking and sounding great!
9) What about 1080P?
People that know a lot more than I do say studies show 99 percent of us can't see the difference between a 50" 720P set and a 50" 1080P set at nine feet or more. That's what they call "spatial" resolution, without accounting for "temporal" resolution ---- see articles on the subject at Sound and Vision and CNet for more.
Then there are the issues with HD broadcast quality (fps) and DVD media quality (bitrate) that can help or hurt any image on any TV. Whether the set you choose has to down-convert or up-convert signals to match the native resolution of your display and how well it does it may be a problem with either.
So does it look better (1080P)?
Maybe, I know it looks nice playing on a Blu-Ray demo disc at the video store. Hard to tell whether it will look better at home. It shouldn't look any worse, but should I pay for it if I can't SEE it? Regardless, 1080P is here. LCD's, DLP's and a few plasmas with more to come. And it ain't cheap!
Is it worth it (1080P)?
Only you can say. If you NEED a 58" or bigger panel and you NEED to watch it from 10 feet or less then go for it. I personally won't sit in the first few rows at the movie theater, it's just too much image in my face! But do what works for you.
Finally,
I hope this helps newbies out with your decision. I also hope the Pros here will point out the flaws in my thinking so we can all benefit. The GOOD NEWS is, if you take home a brand name plasma most of you will be thrilled with your choice. I am!
Jim
I'm a Panny Plasma owner and no expert, just your average consumer, though I follow the forums (which are invaluable). Feel free to disagree with my comments.
I've noticed lots of discussion about the pros and cons of each TV technology and come to some conclusions that may help some.
1) Plasma produces superior black levels;
LCD's, DLP's, etc have all improved, but I don't believe anyone is saying that they have surpassed plasma for detailed black levels. Some plasma brands and models are certainly better than others, but all have improved in the last couple of years. Some would say white level reproduction is more accurate too.
2) Plasma produces more "depth";
Boy, that's a subjective claim, but I've seen many posts here from those who have switched from LCD's and DLP's saying just that. More like "looking out a window". Perhaps not as sharp an image as LCD, but perhaps not as artificially sharp either.
3) Superior reproduction of SD material;
Even more subjective, but again voiced by many forum posters. It may not even matter in a few more years, but we aren't there yet. This has alot to do with guts of the set, maybe more than the display from what I've read, so you'll get what you pay for. For me, my Panny does an excellent job with SD broadcast and DVD. YMMV.
4) Superior off-angle viewing;
No contest here, 160+ degrees horizontal and vertical. LCD's are closing the gap, DLP's forget about it.
5) Superior fast action reproduction?
Maybe or maybe not, some swear by plasma, some by LCD. From what I've gathered, there was a time when LCD's with slower refresh rates had problems, not so much these days. You're choice.
6) Superior gaming platform?
Again, there are two camps swearing by their technology. Depends on what you want, some game platforms work better with one or the other, generally if you want near-neon, in your face brightness, stick with LCD. You decide.
7) What about Plasma burn-in?;
This has been covered here, there and everywhere ad-nausium. Despite all the concern about it, I still haven't come across any posts where someone has said they had permanent burn-in on a 2005-2007 plasma. Some have mentioned image retention issues with gaming that seems to go away after a few hours of normal viewing. The paranoia is probably here to stay though.
8) What about break-in?;
Some do, some don't, some use break-in discs. What ever makes you happy seems to work these days. I get the feeling that a lot of us are so addicted to this HD stuff that we aren't happy unless we have something to tweak, adjust, calibrate, break-in or mull over in our minds most of the time. I find myself constantly re-evaluating my TV and home theater and drooling over the Next Big Thing, even though all of my equipment is working fine, looking and sounding great!
9) What about 1080P?
People that know a lot more than I do say studies show 99 percent of us can't see the difference between a 50" 720P set and a 50" 1080P set at nine feet or more. That's what they call "spatial" resolution, without accounting for "temporal" resolution ---- see articles on the subject at Sound and Vision and CNet for more.
Then there are the issues with HD broadcast quality (fps) and DVD media quality (bitrate) that can help or hurt any image on any TV. Whether the set you choose has to down-convert or up-convert signals to match the native resolution of your display and how well it does it may be a problem with either.
So does it look better (1080P)?
Maybe, I know it looks nice playing on a Blu-Ray demo disc at the video store. Hard to tell whether it will look better at home. It shouldn't look any worse, but should I pay for it if I can't SEE it? Regardless, 1080P is here. LCD's, DLP's and a few plasmas with more to come. And it ain't cheap!
Is it worth it (1080P)?
Only you can say. If you NEED a 58" or bigger panel and you NEED to watch it from 10 feet or less then go for it. I personally won't sit in the first few rows at the movie theater, it's just too much image in my face! But do what works for you.
Finally,
I hope this helps newbies out with your decision. I also hope the Pros here will point out the flaws in my thinking so we can all benefit. The GOOD NEWS is, if you take home a brand name plasma most of you will be thrilled with your choice. I am!
Jim
















I could trade for another SXRD but the one I have now has the green tinge in faces,beards and hair and a very uneven black screen in between scenes so I'm really looking at a something else. I'm not a DLP fan and a quality LCD is to expensive. I've never looked at plasma very hard but I'll check a few more out this weekend. The 50A2000 gets boxed up tonight and back to CC.



