I'm in the midst of a major upgrade to my HT and was set on the Klipsch THX Ultra 2 system. Now that I've been able to audition the Klipsch as well as the Atlantic 8200s, I'm torn. These two systems are dead even on price. I need these to perform well for both movies AND music. My HT room is 17' W x 27' L x 9' H, plus a vaulted ceiling, around 4600 cubic square feet.
The Klipsch sounded pretty incredible with movies; the bass is ridiculous, maybe even too much for my taste. Music sounded decent, nothing spectacular though. In fact, they weren't much improvement from my current Mirages.
The Atlantic Techs were also quite impressive, even though they were set up in a conference room (!!). They really excelled at music. Vocals were superb: realistic and clear. The detail and clarity really shined on all my test tracks, particularly opera and classical. They feel more accurate and transparent than the Klipsches. Their less showy character also makes them seem outclassed by the Klipsch for movies. This might have been due to the smaller PedWoofers on the Atlantics. A larger, separate sub like the 642 might have made the systems more comparable for movie soundtracks. It appears that AT has done away with the PedWoofers with the new 8200e: http://www.atlantictechnology.com/de...asp?NodeId=127
The 642 is now standard.
I realize that these were both set up in less than ideal conditions, in different rooms, and connected to different equipment (Sherwood separates for the Klipsch, Krell for the Atlantic).
One thing I noticed, and I don't know if this is a problem or not, is that the Klipsches are made in China while the Atlantics are USA. I always feel better buying American, having seen factories and sweatshops in China firsthand.
Can anyone who has experience with either of these systems chime in?
Also, if you have any particular receiver or separates recommendations, that would be much appreciated. (I'm currently looking at the B&K AVR507 and the B&K Ref 50 S2 + 200.7 combo)
The Klipsch sounded pretty incredible with movies; the bass is ridiculous, maybe even too much for my taste. Music sounded decent, nothing spectacular though. In fact, they weren't much improvement from my current Mirages.
The Atlantic Techs were also quite impressive, even though they were set up in a conference room (!!). They really excelled at music. Vocals were superb: realistic and clear. The detail and clarity really shined on all my test tracks, particularly opera and classical. They feel more accurate and transparent than the Klipsches. Their less showy character also makes them seem outclassed by the Klipsch for movies. This might have been due to the smaller PedWoofers on the Atlantics. A larger, separate sub like the 642 might have made the systems more comparable for movie soundtracks. It appears that AT has done away with the PedWoofers with the new 8200e: http://www.atlantictechnology.com/de...asp?NodeId=127
The 642 is now standard.
I realize that these were both set up in less than ideal conditions, in different rooms, and connected to different equipment (Sherwood separates for the Klipsch, Krell for the Atlantic).
One thing I noticed, and I don't know if this is a problem or not, is that the Klipsches are made in China while the Atlantics are USA. I always feel better buying American, having seen factories and sweatshops in China firsthand.
Can anyone who has experience with either of these systems chime in?
Also, if you have any particular receiver or separates recommendations, that would be much appreciated. (I'm currently looking at the B&K AVR507 and the B&K Ref 50 S2 + 200.7 combo)
















