I'm trying to decide between the HL-T and Sony's A3000. Has anyone confirmed that
(a) the frame rate on these sets is, in fact, 120 FULL frames per second, as opposed to 120 wobulated, half-frames per second, and, if so, that
(b) these sets do 24*5 = 120 judder-free frames per second, when displaying 24fps sources, in lieu of 3:2 pulldown?
The Sony's treatment of 24fps sources seems clear. I've searched this forum heavily on this issue, and am still not sure about these Sammies. Even the results of an empirical test, from someone who has an HL-T and understands what I'm asking, would be welcome.
Also: has anyone learned anything about the longevity of the DLP technology, in these Samsungs, compared to that of the SXRD technology in the Sonys? I've read that DLP longevity is good, but nobody seems to have a clue about SXRD longevity (I already know about the "green blobs").
(a) the frame rate on these sets is, in fact, 120 FULL frames per second, as opposed to 120 wobulated, half-frames per second, and, if so, that
(b) these sets do 24*5 = 120 judder-free frames per second, when displaying 24fps sources, in lieu of 3:2 pulldown?
The Sony's treatment of 24fps sources seems clear. I've searched this forum heavily on this issue, and am still not sure about these Sammies. Even the results of an empirical test, from someone who has an HL-T and understands what I'm asking, would be welcome.
Also: has anyone learned anything about the longevity of the DLP technology, in these Samsungs, compared to that of the SXRD technology in the Sonys? I've read that DLP longevity is good, but nobody seems to have a clue about SXRD longevity (I already know about the "green blobs").




























