Quote:
Originally Posted by
jjeff 
Criggs,
1. Panasonic is the only current recorder that will record much over 2hrs(up to 4hrs) and still retain full D1 resolution...Since Panasonic jumps from 2hrs(SP) to 4hrs(LP) in it's canned speeds, you must use FR for inbetween speeds. FR isn't as handy as a canned speed for DVDs with multiple titles but with a little figuring it can be done quite easily.
Well, I gotta say I'm starting to get a tad frustrated.
After combing through online reviews I had found the CNet Panasonic EA18k review compelling and reassuring. I can't get one in my local brick-and-mortar store (I prefer buying items like this in person to online), but there are plenty of stores which sell the one just above that with the tuner, the EZ28K.
But then I read all the user reviews. --
-- and their take is TOTALLY DIFFERENT. Again and again they excoriate this line of Panasonics as unreliable, slow-operating, junk. Again and again, it seems, they treat us to the same horror story where these Panasonic units are concerned: beautiful picture, and the unit dies 1 to 6 months after purchase. And this is all so DESPITE the fact that there is universal agreement that the Panasonic LP speed blows away the competition, hands down.
So I'm back to the drawing board. I guess what I now want to know is what is the SECOND-BEST LP speed available on the market, since the Panasonics are apparently made of extraordinarily high-grade and dramatically superior tissue paper.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jjeff 
2. The Lenkeng converter does not have passthru for component but this other one from Ambery seems to, although at $209 it's much more expensive(and looks better made) than the others. It seems like the Ambrey converter will do everything you want, although it's the most expensive. If you could get by without the component passthru I'd give the Lenkeng from MP a try.
The component pass-through strikes me as an expensive bell-and-whistle, one I don't really need. One of the nice things about the Verizon Motorola is that it feeds simultaneously out of the HDMI and the component outputs. So what I'm thinking of doing is leaving the HDMI connected to my HDTV, connecting the component out to my converter, connecting the S-Video out of the converter to my DVD recorder, and then connecting the HD component out of the recorder to the component in of my HDTV
Yes, my component input on my HDTV will then NOT be true HD, since the DVD recorder only records in SD. But who cares? I can always switch to the HDMI input for that.
Which is why I went with the Video Converter from Sewell, for $50 (is that the same as the Lenkeng?). The cheapness makes me nervous, but if it turns out to be a lemon at least I'm only out $50 rather than $150. By the way, some of these HD component to S-Video converters also helpfully constrain the video in the 4:3 space, which is obviously what I DON'T want. I called the manufacturers of ALL SEVEN CURRENTLY AVAILABLE HD COMPONENT TO S-VIDEO CONVERTERS, and discovered some do force into 4:3, others don't. Sewell insists theirs doesn't, and so does SVIDEO about their Apple TV Converter. Another nice thing about SVIDEO is that they now have a Converter that accepts HD component. So, if the Sewell unit doesn't work out, I'm figuring on going with the Apple. And no one answered the phone at Ambery, in spite of repeated calls during business hours.
Speaking of which, how's this for a question. If I succeed in making all my recordings in widescreen, what difference does it make if I watch my recordings using the S-Video input on my HDTV or the component input on my HDTV? Since it's all SD anyway, and since the S-Video output is already widescreen, will there still be a discernible difference in quality? In fact, might it not be superior, considering the fact that the HD component out might have artifacts resulting from the "upconvert"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jjeff 
What this means is if you record wide screen material to DVD and then play that DVD back on a old 4:3 TV the picture won't be letterboxed but rather everyone will look tall and skinny(the whole 16:9 image will be inside a 4:3 frame. If you only have 16:9 TVs(like I do) this won't be a issue and you'll get nice 16:9 recordings.
This is EXACTLY my situation. The only TV I have is HD 16:9. So are you saying this means that I will NEVER have to worry about making any sort of adjustment on the DVD recorder, or tweaking or toggling ANY of its parameters? That as long as I succeed in feeding it widescreen SD I'm good to go no matter what? And that it will never make any difference whether I use DVD-R or DVD+R or DVR-RW of DVR+RW or DVD-RAM?
And, as along as we're talking about DVD formats, in what flavors are Dual Layer available?
I also understand that using VR mode minimizes the likelihood of falling afoul of copy protection. Is it possible to record in VR mode on a Dual Layer DVD? Are there any DVD formats where it is IMPOSSIBLE to record in VR mode?
Also, I've read a few remarks about how sometimes, after finalizing, the Panasonic will play back a widescreen SD recording in anamorphic, squeezed, SD rather than full 16:9 SD. If that's the case with other units as well, can I get away with NEVER finalizing a disc?
Also, what's this I hear about NO WIDESCREEN RECORDING being possible if the speed is less than SP?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jjeff 
Some people use a computer and program to set the bit after the recording.
In your case you could get buy with the cheaper line input EA-18 or easier to find EZ-28 with tuner both from Panasonic.
If you wanted to go with a
international Panasonic w/HDD (from $250(floor model)and up)), they would set the WS bit and also make FR recordings much easier.
I want to get the cheapest DVD recorder possible that 1) is reasonably long-lasting, durable and reliable and 2) gives decent quality at LP. I don't care if it doesn't have a hard drive, and I frankly don't care about the onboard tuner either, since I'm keeping my Verizon DVR, and can always feed that direct to the recorder. That's why the 18 was my original first choice over the 28, and the reason I briefly flirted with the 28 was only because it was available from the big reliable stores in New York (J&R, Best Buy, and so on).
Of course, now that I know that the Panasonics have the lifespan of a mayfly, I guess I'm back to square 1.