Quote:
Originally Posted by WirelessGuru 
Joffer, you have got me curious on this. I know there are certain things that are decided by the authoring process (ie; not allowing you to skip the FBI warning). So are you saying that 99% of current HD-DVD media itself is authored to prevent the decoded bitstream to transfer over HDMI 1.3? I just wanted to get clarification on this. If so... in theory at this point in time, there really is no benefit to having a receiver that can decode the advanced audio codecs... at least on HD-DVD. Can you elaborate?

Joffer, you have got me curious on this. I know there are certain things that are decided by the authoring process (ie; not allowing you to skip the FBI warning). So are you saying that 99% of current HD-DVD media itself is authored to prevent the decoded bitstream to transfer over HDMI 1.3? I just wanted to get clarification on this. If so... in theory at this point in time, there really is no benefit to having a receiver that can decode the advanced audio codecs... at least on HD-DVD. Can you elaborate?
that's the way i understand it. i read some rumors of some HD DVD players in the future giving the option to bypass decoding in the player, thereby throwing away the mixing of menu/interactive sounds, but those are just rumors. i don't know why you'd want to do that anyway.
i was going to wait to by an HDMI 1.3 receiver until i did some research. then i ended up getting a Denon 2807 because i could find no advantage in HDMI 1.3 as far as HD DVD is concerned. i also think that once blue-ray gets the BD Java thing ironed out, those discs will start being authored "advanced' as well.
obviously if you're in the market for a new HDMI receiver, getting the latest and greatest is the way to go, but there's no reason to replace a 1.1 receiver with a 1.3 receiver as far as i can tell.






From page 2...








