AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information - Page 507

post #15181 of 87878
Strange use of the term "imported" -- what they're calling imports are really reruns, so the article should have said, "Scratch those RERUNS of cable shows"... we haven't seen any real imports yet.
post #15182 of 87878
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetRangerIII View Post

I'm not as surprised as most about the lower ratings for Jericho. I don't know why the network (or anyone else) would be surprised either, since they did not exactly return the show that was canceled.

LOL ... well at least we still have a long way to go before reaching "Galactic 1980" depths.
post #15183 of 87878
Thread Starter 
TV Notes
Falco moves to Showtime
'Sopranos' star set for half-hour comedy
By Josef Adalian, Variety Feb 21, 2008

First, Showtime stole the buzz from HBO. Now it's going after its stars.

Edie Falco, best known for her long run on HBO's "The Sopranos," will topline a half-hour single camera comedy for Showtime and Lionsgate Television.

Cabler has put the project on a fast-track, with pre-production beginning immediately and lensing expected to begin in Gotham later this year.

Thesp will play an iron-willed Gotham nurse balancing the challenges of an urban hospital and a difficult personal life. Deal comes in the wake of Falco's well-reviewed comic guest stint opposite Alec Baldwin on NBC's "30 Rock."

Falco "sits firmly in the pantheon of the great actresses of our day, and to have found a show and a great role that meets her standards after six seasons of 'The Sopranos' is our distinct pleasure and great fortune," Showtime entertainment prexy Robert Greenblatt said. "Bada bing is all I can think of to say!"

Falco added that, post- "Sopranos," she had been looking to find "something else that would excite me. This character and the writing are truly thrilling."

Pilot was written by Evan Dunsky, with Linda Wallem ("That '70s Show") and Liz Brixius set to exec produce and showrun. Caryn Mandabach will also exec produce, while Richie Jackson is on board as co-exec producer.

Showtime and Lionsgate are comparing the as-yet untitled project to the cabler's signature laffer, "Weeds." In addition to focusing on the personal life of Falco's character, skein will offer "a darkly comedic view of a health care system gone awry," cabler said.

Falco isn't the first HBO thesp to jump to Showtime.

Michael C. Hall, who broke through on HBO's "Six Feet Under," now stars in Showtime's "Dexter." And Tracey Ullman, who's had a decades-long relationship with HBO, begins a new Showtime sketch skein next month.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117981250.html
post #15184 of 87878
[quote=fredfa;13179853] The Business of Television
CBS Offering Classic Shows Online
Star Trek, The Twilight Zone, Macgyver, Hawaii Five-O, and Melrose Place to Be Offered
By Alex Weprin, Broadcasting & Cable, 2/21/2008

The networks put a lot of their corporate value in their libraries on paper. However, I remember Johnny Carson being irritable over when he discovered that NBC had destroyed most of the tonight show's libraries over the year when was host.

It's many years latter and new technology is demanding content and yet the networks seem to pull out just a fraction of what you would think would accumulate over fifty years of broadcasting.

These broadcast libraries should contain the countries popular culture's' history, but there is no evidence of it.

I propose the idea that these libraries have been mostly destroyed by the same short-minded decisions that destroyed the Tonight Show library with Johnny Carson.

Am I wrong?
post #15185 of 87878
[quote=Joe3;13182396]
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post

The Business of Television
CBS Offering Classic Shows Online
Star Trek, The Twilight Zone, Macgyver, Hawaii Five-O, and Melrose Place to Be Offered
By Alex Weprin, Broadcasting & Cable, 2/21/2008

The networks put a lot of their corporate value in their libraries on paper. However, I remember Johnny Carson being irritable over when he discovered that NBC had destroyed most of the tonight show's libraries over the year when was host.

It's many years latter and new technology is demanding content and yet the networks seem to pull out just a fraction of what you would think would accumulate over fifty years of broadcasting.

These broadcast libraries should contain the countries popular culture's' history, but there is no evidence of it.

I propose the idea that these libraries have been mostly destroyed by the same short-minded decisions that destroyed the Tonight Show library with Johnny Carson.

Am I wrong?

and also Super Bowl I.
post #15186 of 87878
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post

The Business of Television
CBS Offering Classic Shows Online
Star Trek, The Twilight Zone, Macgyver, Hawaii Five-O, and Melrose Place to Be Offered
By Alex Weprin, Broadcasting & Cable, 2/21/2008

Just one day after NBC announced its decision to stream classic shows on its Web sites, CBS announced that it will do the same, making a number of titles from its library available on CBS.com and across the CBS Audience Network.

"CBS' commitment and ability to move quickly and aggressively to monetize and distribute content online is awesome," CBS Interactive president Quincy Smith said in a statement. "With offerings in entertainment, news and sports, this is about solving for what the user wants and staying focused around CBS content. Furthermore, meshing this content with the interactivity of the Web allows for more comprehensive experiences around each show -- not simply a broadcast model."

The initial lineup will include ad-supported full episodes of Star Trek, The Twilight Zone, Macgyver, Hawaii Five-O and Melrose Place.

Additional seasons and shows will be added depending on the success of the model.

In addition to streaming on CBS.com, the shows will be available to the CBS Audience Network -- a network of Web sites and partners that include AOL, Microsoft, Comcast, CNET Networks and Sling Media -- as well as CBS station Web sites.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/ind...leID=CA6534209

Those classic shows being streamed online would hold more intrigue for me if they also included the commercials of the same era. Not that I am some sort of advertising junkie...lol but, they tend to reveal or remind me of the pop culture that was of the same era.
post #15187 of 87878
SNL plans a post-strike comedy assault

By DAVID BAUDER
Associated Press
Feb. 20, 2008, 6:43PM

NEW YORK — Saturday Night Live has been gone for so long that you'll never know who its Mitt Romney impersonator was going to be.

The writers strike-imposed absence of the NBC institution ends this weekend with the first of four straight weeks of new shows, the first time that breakneck schedule has been tried since 1976.

. . .

For the complete Associated Press story on the Houston Chronicle web site, click on the following link:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ent/tv/5557286.html
post #15188 of 87878
TELEVISION
HGTV star has built a nice career
Over Your Head's Eric Stromer says he can now afford to play favorites

By LISA CREGAN
Chicago Tribune
Feb. 20, 2008, 6:41PM

Eric Stromer, the star of HGTV's Over Your Head, can quickly sum up the arc of his professional career — "I went from a drooling idiot football player to Elvis with a chain saw."

And to think it all began in Evanston, Ill. Stromer says his high school football coach got a call from a talent scout who asked the coach to send over "the dumbest-looking kids on the team." Adds Stromer, laughing: "I got the part" — a football player in a Kit Kat commercial.

But after moving to Los Angeles where, most notably, he lost the Bosom Buddies role to Tom Hanks, his career fizzled. The end came when he was bumped from the cast of the NBC soap Santa Barbara. "Killed by a Styrofoam ball avalanche," Stromer recalls ruefully.

He spent the next 15 years working as a building contractor until a producer saw him and cast him for HGTV.

Other opportunities followed, and in 2006 Stromer found himself named one of People magazine's Sexiest Men Alive. "When People magazine called, I felt sexy for about nine seconds. Then my wife told me to change a diaper," says the father of three.

Soon after, he was tapped for Over Your Head, where he rescues homeowners from their renovation nightmares. It's HGTV's highest-rated show, and no wonder — on a recent episode Stromer actually dressed as Elvis to demonstrate how to use a chain saw.


Eric Stromer's 10 favorite things

• 1. Vaughan 19-ounce framing hammer: My framing hammer of choice.

• 2. Oliver Peoples sunglasses: They keep me from squinting and look good.

• 3. Noguchi lamps: Beautiful design and the best ambient light of all time.

• 4. GoPed ESR 750 electric scooter: Combines all the best feelings of skateboarding, snowboarding and surfing — with no emissions.

• 5. Farrow & Ball paints: By far the most beautiful color palette available.

• 6. Pears: Harry & David pears are like opium to me.

• 7. Dorsey LED headlight: Great for hands-free lighting while working.

• 8. Birkenstocks: I'm willing to take the heat from fashionistas because of extreme comfort. I used to do construction in them!

• 9. Lattes at Peet's Coffee in Evanston: Somehow their baristas know how to work the foam like nobody's business.

• 10. Taylor Guitars: Warm precise tone. Makes even me sound good.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ent/tv/5557288.html
post #15189 of 87878
Thread Starter 
The Business of Television
”Variety”, other trade publications to be sold
By Georg Szalai, The Hollywood Reporter, Feb. 21, 2008

Reed Elsevier said Thursday that it plans to sell its business-to-business magazine division, which includes such media and entertainment industry titles as Variety, Broadcasting and Cable, and Multichannel News.

The Anglo-Dutch company said the move is designed to reduce its exposure to the volatile advertising market as it rejiggers its holdings to focus on databases and other businesses.

The news came as Reed Elsevier -- which in many areas competes with the Nielsen Co., the corporate parent of The Hollywood Reporter -- unveiled a $4.1 billion acquisition of ChoicePoint, a provider of information services for the insurance industry, which is seen as fitting in with Reed's LexisNexis property.

While the credit markets' difficulties have held back private-equity deals in recent months, business-to-business publishers have reduced costs and have pushed into the digital space, making this a potentially good time to explore a sale, industry analysts say.

During a conference call, CEO Crispin Davis said no timetable for the start of sales talks has been set. Strategic buyers as well as private-equity groups are expected to take a look at Reed Business Information; estimates peg the division's worth in the neighborhood of $2 billion-$2.6 billion).

"We value the unit at $2.6 billion, and private-equity funding for this size deal is still available," UBS analyst Polo Tang said.

Several PE firms and Nielsen declined comment on possible interest in all or part of RBI.

Davis said he wants to hold on to the exhibition business that Reed runs with the RBI publications, given strong growth in this area.

Reed Elsevier said the planned sale of RBI is aimed toward "reducing exposure to advertising markets and cyclicality" as it concentrates instead on subscription-based information and other offerings. It follows the recent sale of its education division.

"RBI is a well-managed high-quality business as evidenced by the success of its online growth and the control of costs," Davis said. "Its advertising revenue model and the inherent cyclicality fit less well, however, with the subscription-based information and work-flow solutions focus of Reed Elsevier's strategy."

On sale are various trade brands in the U.S., U.K. and other parts of the world covering such sectors as media, agriculture, banking, health care and science.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/...60fb840fd146d5
post #15190 of 87878
Thread Starter 
A favorite reporter has jumped from Television Week (where he kept ahead of the HD story the past few years) to -- presumably -- fancier digs at The Hollywood Reporter. Good luck to James Hibberd.....

Nielsen Notes
'Idol' has best Wednesday since January
By James Hibberd, The Hollywood Reporter, Feb. 21, 2008

Fox's "American Idol" had its best Wednesday night performance in the Nielsen ratings since its January premiere week and handily bested all competitors.

While over on The CW, the 10th cycle premiere of "America's Next Top Model" tied CBS's "Big Brother" for the 8 p.m. hour, yet was the lowest-rated debut for the series since the third round aired in 2004.

"Idol" (11.1 preliminary rating among adults 18 to 49 and a 27 share) showcased the top 12 female competitors' performances last night. The show was about even with Tuesday's episode and up 13% compared to last Wednesday. This is usually about the time during the "Idol" run when rating tend to sag, so an uptick at this point in the game is likely encouraging for Fox. The network also placed first in total viewers, with "Idol" being seen by 29 million.

Second-place NBC aired "Deal or No Deal" (2.1/5), which hit a season low for a Wednesday original last night after Monday's season high. Why the sharp drop? "Deal" faced a pure original reality lineup at 8 p.m., with heavy "Idol" leading the way. Also, Monday's strong ratings prompted the network to push the next edition of its highly rated "Million Dollar Mission" stunt to Monday, swapping in a regular episode at the last minute.

NBC also aired "Law & Order: Criminal Intent" (1.9/4), which hit a season low, and "Law & Order" (3.1/8).

In third, ABC aired "Wife Swap" (2.1/5), "Supernanny" (2.3/6) and a season-low season finale -- and likely series finale, though no decision has been announced -- of "Cashmere Mafia" (1.6/4).

CBS was fourth with "Big Brother" (1.9/5), which was about on par with last Wednesday's episode, and repeats of "Criminal Minds" (1.9/5) and "CSI: NY" (2.0/5).

The CW had "Top Model" (1.9/5) and a repeat of "Pussycat Dolls Presents" (0.8/2) the latter of which continued the "Dolls" tradition of rating higher in post-"Top Model" repeats than in original airings. Among the network's target demographic of adults 18 to 34, "Model" was still down significantly from last fall and spring (2.5).

For the night: Fox was on top (averaging an 11.1 rating and 28.6 million viewers), followed by NBC (2.4/9.2 million), ABC (2.0/5.5 million), CBS (1.9/6.7 million) and CW (1.4/2.8 million).

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/...8678bba11e18ea
post #15191 of 87878
Thread Starter 
The Business of Television
ABC Pays NYPD Blue Fine, Appeals Decision in Federal Court
Network Pays $1,237,500 in Fines for Its Two Owned Stations, 43 Other Affiliates Cited
By John Eggerton, Broadcasting & Cable Washington Bureau Chief, 2/21/2008

ABC appealed the Federal Communications Commission's proposed $1 million-plus NYPD Blue fine to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit -- the same court that said the FCC's fleeting profanity policy was arbitrary and capricious. But first it paid $1,237,500 in fines for its two owned stations and the 43 other affiliates cited.

ABC said it needed to pay before it could appeal the decision to the court.

The FCC issued its forfeiture order earlier this week for a 2003 airing of a naked behind in NYPD Blue and gave the stations until Thursday to pay the fine.

The commission initially proposed fining 52 stations, but it took back the fines against seven of them because the statute of limitations expired on two of them and complaints against the other five had not come from someone in their markets.

"ABC today filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit challenging an order by the Federal Communications Commission, which found that a 2003 episode of the award-winning drama NYPD Blue violated the FCC’s indecency rules," the network said in a statement announcing the move.

"ABC contends that the FCC order is arbitrary and capricious, contrary to the commission’s own standards and past decisions and in violation of the indecency statute and the First Amendment,” ABC added. “In its order, issued Tuesday, the commission assessed a total of $1,237,500 in fines against 45 stations that carried the program, including two ABC-owned stations (WLS Chicago and KTRK Houston) and 43 other ABC affiliates.”

The company concluded, "While strongly opposed to the fines, ABC today paid them in their entirety in order the make the FCC decision appealable. The ABC Television Affiliates Association also opposed the FCC’s NYPD Blue indecency decision and says it intends to support ABC’s appeal."

The FCC is fighting a court battle on at least three indecency fronts. It is also pushing the Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit's smackdown of its profanity decision against Fox and awaiting a Third Circuit decision on CBS' appeal of the Janet Jackson fine.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/ind...leID=CA6534368
post #15192 of 87878
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post

A favorite reporter has jumped from Television Week (where he kept ahead of the HD story the past few years) to -- presumably -- fancier digs at The Hollywood Reporter. Good luck to James Hibberd.....

Good deal, wish him well in his new home.
post #15193 of 87878
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post

The Business of Television
ABC Pays NYPD Blue Fine, Appeals Decision in Federal Court

The FCC is fighting a court battle on at least three indecency fronts.

Does that mean if they lose it's 3 strikes and they're out???
post #15194 of 87878
TVGuide is reporting that NBC has decided not to renew Las Vegas for a 6th season.
post #15195 of 87878
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleDAZ View Post

TVGuide is reporting that NBC has decided not to renew Las Vegas for a 6th season.

That's a bummer, I enjoy that show, it's silly, frivolous entertainment and provides a break from the more serious stuff like Dexter, The Wire, etc.
post #15196 of 87878
^^^ And given the ratings all shows generate on Friday night it's no surprise "Las Vegas" could/would get canned (I'm glad "Law & Order" got out of that night just in time). Yet another step into an all-reality, all-repeat and/or all-newsmagazine Friday night line-up across all TV networks. This is the only way the networks can keep primetime programming running as first-run, or Friday will become the new Saturday (all repeats/low-rated movies/cheap first-run prorams).
post #15197 of 87878
Thread Starter 
And after the networks cede Fridays, what day is next?

Too bad about Las Vegas, I guess Reveille has a new reality show to take its place
post #15198 of 87878
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post

And after the networks cede Fridays, what day is next?

Each network will probably abandon particular time slots/nights in which they've invested heavily without anything to show for it over the years. I wouldn't be surprised to see CBS abandon Tuesday nights at 10PM (everything they put there dies against "L&O: SVU"), The CW pulling out from Sunday nights altogether, NBC settling for a mediocre-rated 10PM Monday (nothing after "Heroes" seems to stick), etc. And by 'abandon' I don't mean show color bars or a repeat (there's precious few of those to go around) but putting a cheap reality show or a repurposed cable show in a time slot that's not worth sinking an expensive scripted show on.

Quote:


Too bad about Las Vegas, I guess Reveille has a new reality show to take its place.

There are only so many shows Silverman can pull from his production company. NBC wouldn't be thinking of going into a year-round schedule if it weren't planning to pull repurposed repeats from the likes of "Psych," "Monk," "Battlestar Galactica" and one or two Bravo reality shows (for when the Reveille stuff isn't ready ) to replace a few "Deal or No Deal" airings.
post #15199 of 87878
Thread Starter 
Nielsen Notes
Wednesday's Final Overnight Nielsen Ratings
(Original Episodes Only)
(Posted by Travis Yanan in Marc Berman's Programming Insider blog)

Code:
 Show                HH Rtg/Share   A18-49   Viewers     A18-34
   
  WIFE SWAP                 3.6/5    2.0/5   5,422,000
  SUPERNANNY                4.0/6    2.3/5   5,882,000
  CASHMERE MAFIA            3.5/6    1.6/4   4,778,000
   
  BIG BROTHER               3.4/5    1.9/5   5,224,000
   
  DEAL OR NO DEAL           5.9/9    2.1/5   9,033,000
  LAW AND ORDER: CI         5.1/8    1.8/4   7,707,000
  LAW AND ORDER            7.3/12    3.1/8  10,858,000
   
  AMERICAN IDOL           16.1/24  11.2/27  28,885,000
   
  AMERICA'S NEXT TOP MODEL  2.4/4    1.9/5   3,814,000   2.5/7
   
  PROJECT RUNWAY (reunion)  2.0/3    1.6/4   2,916,000
Source: Nielsen Media Research data

http://pifeedback.com/eve/forums/a/t...123108401/p/11
post #15200 of 87878
Thread Starter 
TV Notes
Strike News: Criminal Minds' First Back On Set
By Brian Stelter, The New York Times, in the TV Decoder blog

The CBS drama Criminal Minds will become the first television drama to resume production today, only eight days after the writers' strike ended, the network confirmed today.

The executive producer Ed Bernero wrote the episode in one week (he's also directing), The New York Post reports.

Criminal Minds, about a group of FBI profilers, has averaged 14 million viewers on Wednesdays this season. The show is expected to return on April 2 with seven new episodes, CBS said last week, although the timing is subject to change. The show was also renewed for another season last week.

The CBS comedy Two and a Half Men is also starting to shoot new episodes this week, a network spokeswoman said.

http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/
post #15201 of 87878
Thread Starter 
The Business of Television
Reilly: TV biz hasn't changed much
By Andrew Wallenstein, The Hollywood Reporter, Feb 22, 2008

Kevin Reilly isn't ready to rewrite the rules of the broadcast business just yet.

The president of Fox Entertainment urged caution to those already coming to conclusions about the dawning digital media world during a panel discussion Thursday at the Jack Myers Future of Media Breakfast at the Paley Center for Media. He was joined by Sony Pictures Television president Steve Mosko and Albert Cheng, executive vp digital at Disney-ABC Television Group.

In what might have been a veiled poke at recent moves made by his former boss, NBC Universal CEO Jeff Zucker, Reilly added, "Right now in the television season, if you are going to proclaim, 'This is the way it's been, and those days are over,' I don't think you know what you're talking about."

Much of the panel discussion centered on broadcast's changing position in the traditional windowing scheme in which TV programs are exploited. Citing the growing importance of ancillary revenue streams, Mosko said aftermarket considerations are examined much earlier on.

"Now all of these things have to line up very early on in the food chain but not drive the creative," he said.

Reilly noted that broadcasters now often are pressured to be patient with underperforming programs rather than undermine their potential in DVD or syndication windows. But he expressed frustration with the fact that even within News Corp., Fox can't participate in the success of a show in other divisions that maintain separate profit-and-loss statements.

Singling out Hulu, the online distribution platform News Corp. has launched with NBC Uni, Reilly noted, "I'm all for Hulu succeeding and want them to, but ultimately if we don't develop and launch good product, Hulu won't have much to put on."

That said, Reilly also sees the Internet as a place that could aid in program development, referencing plans in the works to test, online first, comedy and animation fare meant for TV.

The panelists also focused on how the industry has changed in the wake of the writers strike, which might have been a blessing in disguise for broadcasters. "If anything, the strike has helped us take a little bit of a breather," Cheng said.

Reilly noted the creative community's renewed interest in generating content for the Internet in the strike's aftermath. But he cautioned that writers might be in for a rude awakening when they examine the comparative financial rewards of the broadcast model.

"What I think they don't realize is they're not going to get the same $2 million guarantee and $50,000 per episode," Reilly said.

Also on the panel was Yvette Alberdingk Thijm, executive vp content strategy and acquisitions at Joost.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/...3647a0605c28b1
post #15202 of 87878
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleDAZ View Post

TVGuide is reporting that NBC has decided not to renew Las Vegas for a 6th season.

I found it to be watchable but not a favorite of mine. Some good I hope will come from the cancellation would be Tom Selleck bringing us a few more Jesse Stone TV movies -- heck, maybe a regular series.
post #15203 of 87878
Thread Starter 
I think the Stone movies would be pretty expensive, but they certainly did well in the ratings for CBS and I could see them as a nice Sunday night feature maybe six times a year (twice in each sweep).
post #15204 of 87878
Thread Starter 
The TV Column
Networks All Back in Gear for a Sprint to the Finish
By Lisa de Moraes Washington Post Friday, February 22, 2008

ABC -- the last of the broadcast networks to announce its strike-recovery program -- will bring back "Grey's Anatomy" on the first night of the May ratings sweeps: April 24, which is the same night it's bringing back "Ugly Betty" at 8 and moving "Lost" to the 10 p.m. berth, in hopes a "Grey's" lead-in gooses its numbers.

But CBS will be the quickest to bring back scripted series. Not surprisingly, its Monday multi-camera sitcoms, "The Big Bang Theory," "How I Met Your Mother" and "Two and a Half Men," will return to the air with originals on March 17.

Multi-cam comedies usually are easier to get up and running than are single-camera comedies (think "My Name Is Earl") and dramas -- writing is quicker, editing easier, no real special effects, blah, blah, blah. Single-camera comedies and dramas take longer to produce.

"I'm thrilled with what our producers were able to put together for us," CBS program planning chief Kelly Kahl told The TV Column about that network's original-episode game plan.

"We're getting six and even seven episodes of dramas -- that's fantastic. We're trying to get back on the air for our producers as fast as possible. There's no question we've tried [viewers'] patience during the strike and we're trying to win back their trust and love."

Kahl speculates producers are motivated to try to squeeze in as many episodes as possible before the end of the season for the sake of their crews.

"A lot of people lost a lot of money" in the strike, Kahl explained. "So, if you don't shoot 23 or 24 [episodes] but you get to do 19 episodes, maybe the hurt is a little less."

All those news reports about series possibly broadcasting original episodes into the summer have turned out to be empty headlines.

"It looks to me like the mission for everyone is to get whole for the fall," Kahl said. "We would have thought more about it, had we not been able to deliver a substantial number of episodes now.

"If we're doing a run of nine [new comedy] episodes, that's hopefully enough to say 'we're back' as opposed to running deeper in the summer."

Once the networks are back it remains to be seen whether viewers will be back as well. Expectations of audiences flocking to rare instances of original programming during the months-long strike proved incorrect. This year's Grammy Awards broadcast, after receiving a waiver from the Writers Guild of America, went on as usual in the teeth of the strike but got one of its smallest audiences on record. Likewise, there was much speculation "American Idol" would do its biggest numbers ever, based entirely on the fact there would be so few viewing alternatives. Instead, while far and away the most watched show on television this season, "Idol" is down this year from last.

"The real interesting thing when we get back up is what [viewing] levels are going to be at," Kahl said. "Are viewers going to come back, or will there be a strike hangover here?"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...102801_pf.html
post #15205 of 87878
COMMENTARY
TV execs rarely react to the public's outcry

By PETER AMES CARLIN
Newhouse News Service
Feb. 21, 2008, 5:43PM

Sometimes you can save your show.

Hardly ever, though. ... Closer to never, really. But every so often a good public outcry can actually get a network exec's attention.

Which is why the Jericho characters are feasting on peanuts.

Also why ABC's execs are getting bags of human hair in the mail. And why I had to adjust my spam filter to guard against the words "Kim" and "Possible."

Fans can get so overheated. This is exactly the response a TV exec hopes his programs have the power to incite. These fans will not only watch a show when it's first on the air, but also buy individual episodes on iTunes, spend time chasing down Internet-only extras on the official Web sites, then buy the box sets of the complete seasons, just to see the deleted scenes.

A show that generates that kind of excitement and cash flow can weather all kinds of mediocre ratings. Which is why Family Guy is back on Fox after being canceled not just once but on two separate occasions. We're talking truly breathtaking DVD sales, people. And count on this: When the cash flies in Hollywood, someone will be there with a big basket to catch it.

Sometimes cash flows for unlikely reasons. NBC's Friday Night Lights can barely draw a crowd (in network terms), but the people who do show up tend to be precisely the sort of wealthy, well-educated types who don't visit most other shows. Advertisers will pay to reach them, so while NBC may have lost its patience, word from Web site TV Land has two other networks/cable channels sniffing around the show with an eye toward taking it on for a junior year.

Fans of ABC's nowhere-near-as-bad-as-people-think-but-still-not-great freshman sitcom Cavemen are trying to drum up similar interest in their clearly endangered show. Thus the campaign to send bags of human hair to the network, Ã* la the hirsute characters they hope to propel into a second season. But can you really motivate people to do your bidding when you're actively grossing them out?

I'm not sure.

But I can say this for sure: The absurdly aggressive e-mail campaign by fans of a Disney Channel cartoon called Kim Possible has turned me into a fire-breathing partisan. My new purpose in life? Wipe Kim Possible off the face of the Earth, as soon as possible.

Got that, Kim Possible fans? I won't help you save your show. In fact, if it were up to me I'd cancel the show immediately and urge federal legislation to have it banned from these shores. Let's put Kim Possible on the no-fly list. Kim Possible is why Gitmo was built in the first place, and the heck with your habeas and your cartoon corpus.

Speaking of nuts: When the first season of Jericho came to its climax, the villainous leader of the militia from the next town demanded that Skeet Ulrich and the rest of Jericho's forces capitulate to its rule. Would they surrender? Ulrich had a simple answer: "Nuts!"

At which point a bloody battle, and then a fan campaign, were launched. In both cases the forces of darkness were overcome. Or so it seemed.

The second season premiered last week, complete with an unsubtle peanut shout-out near the top of the hour.

Ah, yes. Victory was theirs! The Jericho adventure continues! Only with one problem.

It's just not a very good show.

For one thing, virtually everything Jericho tries to do is already being done, only with more imagination and depth, on ABC's Lost. What hasn't been cribbed from that show echoes elements from 24 and a litany of B movies from the Cold War era.

But don't listen to me. The real judge, as CBS has made more than clear, is the prime-time audience. Which is to say, the ratings.

And in this case the news is nuclear, indeed. Because even after the hype, Jericho launched its second season with significantly fewer viewers than its pilot attracted in the fall of 2006. Worse, CBS did better in the same slot last year with a repeat — a repeat! — of Without a Trace.

Nuts, indeed.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ent/tv/5560432.html
post #15206 of 87878
TV FEATURE
A kinder, gentler game show
Dennis Miller forgets his sarcastic side for Amne$ia

By KATE O'HARE
Zap2it.com
Feb. 21, 2008, 5:52PM

Most people have had that moment when, asked about an incident or person from their past, they froze like a deer in the headlights.

Now, just imagine doing that on network television.

. . .

RESOURCES
AMNE$IA

• When: premieres at 8 PM CT tonight
• Where: NBC

For the complete Zap2it story at the Houston Chronicle web site, click on the following link:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ent/tv/5560498.html
post #15207 of 87878
Thread Starter 
The Wall Street Journal reports in Friday's edition that the three Republican members of the FCC have approved the swap of News Corp's controlling interest in DirecTV to John Malone's Liberty Media.

The formal announcement, however, must wait until the two Democratic members of the Commission cast their votes.
post #15208 of 87878
The "hits" just keep coming from NBC don't they?
post #15209 of 87878
Front page

TV switch to have big local impact
Houston among cities with high percentage of analog-only sets

By BRAD HEM
Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle
Feb. 21, 2008, 11:29PM

Houston's high percentage of analog television viewers means the city will be one of the most affected when television broadcasters switch their signals to digital on Feb. 17, 2009.

Of 2 million Houston households with TVs, about 467,000 — or nearly 23 percent — are analog-only, meaning they get their programming over the air through an antenna on the roof or rabbit ears on their sets, according to Consumers Union and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights. Dallas-Fort Worth, Austin, San Antonio and the Rio Grande Valley also stand to be more affected than most cities in other parts of the country.

Because low-income and minority residents tend to rely more on over-the-air analog signals for their TVs, they will be affected at greater rates, the groups said.

Also, some Spanish speakers and other foreign-language speakers watch low-power broadcast television stations that aren't required to switch to digital next year. Those viewers have limited options for digital converter boxes and need to pay special attention before buying one, said Joel Kelsey, a policy advocate at Consumers Union, the parent of Consumer Reports.

"To a large extent, this is an economics issue," said Mark Lloyd, an official at the civil rights group. "Our focus is not only on minorities. It's also on the elderly and people with disabilities."

With less than a year until the digital conversion, government and industry groups recently have increased their advertising and public service announcements to make consumers aware the switch is coming, but Kelsey said millions remain confused about what they need to do, if anything.

Some think they need to buy expensive high-definition TVs. Some think their analog TVs need to be replaced with digital models. Some think they need to subscribe to cable or some other pay-TV service.

None of those steps is necessary.

"All of these things could cost consumers a significant amount of money if they walk into a retailer without better information," Kelsey said.

First, the "DTV conversion" refers to "digital television." That refers the type of signal transmitted to the TV and is different from HDTV, the expensive newer models that provide better picture and sound.

Consumers don't need to subscribe to Comcast cable, AT&T's U-verse or satellite to be ready for the switch. However, pay-TV subscribers won't have to worry regardless of whether they have an analog or digital TV, or whether the signal comes from a set-top box or directly into a cable-ready set. They'll be fine.

The only people who will have to act are those in households that watch over-the-air TV on analog sets. Replacing an analog set with a new digital TV — remember, not necessarily an HDTV — would solve the problem, but the cheaper alternative is to buy a digital converter box. They're available at major retailers.

One key point: Even if you buy a converter box, you'll still need your antenna to keep getting programs.

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration is giving away $40 coupons to limit the cost to consumers. More information and links to request coupons are at www.dtv2009.gov. Each household can receive up to two coupons.

As of Wednesday, 263,000 households in Texas had requested coupons, according the agency.

A $40 coupon may not cover the cost of a converter box because prices vary, and Lloyd criticized Congress over the money allocated for coupons.

But consumers also bear some responsibility for knowing what kind of boxes they need. There are 42 different models certified by the agency. Just four of those are capable of continuing to pass old-fashioned analog signals through to the TV set.

That will be important for consumers who want to continue watching low-power foreign-language programming, who will need those special boxes but might not know it, Lloyd said.

"Most people have no idea whether they're watching full-power or low-power," he said.

Houston-based LAT TV, which operates low-power analog programming in Houston on Channel 30 (KCVH) as well as in San Antonio, Dallas, Austin and Phoenix, has been running digital conversion commercials 10 times a day to make sure viewers are aware, said Patricia Torres-Burd, the company's executive vice president of programming and branding.

While she said the switch can be confusing, Torres-Burd said she thinks people will figure it out in time. Her biggest concern is consumers who wait until the last minute to request coupons and then can't get them quickly.

"I've already ordered mine," she said.

RESOURCES

CHANGING CHANNELS


What's this DTV switch?

On Feb. 17, 2009, television broadcasters will stop sending analog signals and switch to digital signals.


Do I need to do anything?

That depends. You don't have to do anything if you have cable or another pay-TV service, or already have a digital TV, whether or not it's high-definition.

But if you are one of the more than 467,000 Houston households that gets programming over-the-air through an antenna and on an analog TV, you'll at least need to buy a digital converter box. You also could buy a digital TV or subscribe to a pay service, but those options will cost more.

For more details, check www.dtv.gov .


Are the boxes expensive?

Most cost less than $100, and many are closer to half that. The federal government is giving away $40 coupons — up to two per household, but only one can be used per box — to help defray the cost. To request a coupon, call 1-888-388-2009 or go to www.dtv2009.gov .

Source: National Telecommunications and Information Administration

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5561142.html
post #15210 of 87878
Dennis Miller NOT sarcastic? What's the point?

Glad I missed it.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information