AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information - Page 998

post #29911 of 87866
DirecTV Hikes Rates
Satellite Television Price Increase Effective March 4
Multichannel News, 02/09/2009


DirecTV will raise monthly rates on programming packages an average of 4% effective March 4, and while the increases are in line with other video providers one Wall Street analyst said the satellite leader could be more vulnerable to "recession-related downgrades" than cable competitors.

DirecTV's Select package, for example, will increase to $48.99 per month, up 6.5% from $45.99 previously. The Plus HD-DVR tier is being hiked to $75.99 per month, up 4.8% from $72.99.

The Basic tier will be $12.99 per month, a 30% increase $9.99 previously, while the Family package will remain unchanged at $29.99 per month.

According to DirecTV spokesman Robert Mercer, the new pricing reflects the increasing cost of programming as well as the "significant investments we've made to enhance our customers' viewing experience."

As examples, he cited DirecTV's recent launch of more than 20 new channels, including MLB Network, Cartoon Network West and Fox Business Network, and an HD lineup that now tops 130 channels.

Sanford Bernstein senior analyst Craig Moffett, in a research note Monday, said DirecTV's price hikes come on the heels of similar increases at Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cablevision Systems, AT&T and Dish Network.

"[T]he magnitude of DirecTV's price increase is in-line with its historical price increases, despite the troubled economy, and suggests that -- despite fears -- price competition in the video industry does not seem to be escalating," he wrote.

However, DirecTV is more reliant on video than cable operators are for per-subscriber growth, Moffett said.

"Weighing on the pay TV stocks has been a generalized fear that investors will downgrade their service packages," he said. "On this score, DirecTV may, over the long run, be more vulnerable to recession-related service downgrades than its competitors given DirecTV's more significant reliance on 'discretionary' services."

Discretionary items comprised nearly 32% of DirecTV's third quarter 2008 average revenue per unit, compared with only about 21% of Comcast's video ARPU for the same period, according to Moffett.

In addition, Moffett also pointed out, DirecTV is raising pricing on many of its premium add-on services, including movie channels (e.g., an additional 99 cents per month for a single premium selection) and Distant Network Service (an additional $0.51 for one or two network feeds).

DirecTV is scheduled to report fourth quarter and full-year 2008 results on Tuesday, Feb. 10.

http://mobile.multichannel.com/artic...9&source=title
post #29912 of 87866
NTIA's Web Site Giving Mixed Message About DTV Transition Date
'Tell me more' area says Feb 17, whiile 'coupon program update' section has June 12
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 2/9/2009 3:58:27 PM MT

The National Telecommunications & Information Administration at press time was sending a mixed message about the DTV transition.

It continued to tell Web surfers under the "Tell me more about the digital TV transition" heading on its dtv2009.gov Web site home page that "at midnight on Feb. 17, all full-power TV stations in the United States will stop broadcasting in analog and switch to 100% digital broadcasting."


That comes five days after Congress voted to move the DTV transition hard date and will be news to the hundreds of stations that, on the advice of the government, aren't pulling the plug on analog as they had planned.

Elsewhere on the site, under the "coupon program update" section, it points out that the date is postponed to June 12.

The NTIA site provides information on NTIA's DTV-to-analog converter box coupon program, whose distribution problems helped prompt the decision to move the date in the first place.

Although at press time President Barack Obama had not signed the date-change bill, the FCC finessed the wording of its implementation order on the bill so that it could proceed with collecting information from broadcasters, including how many were, in fact, pulling the plug on analog Feb. 17.

An NTIA spokesperson was not available to comment on why the message had not been changed to point out that many stations won't be ending analog on that date.

By contrast, the same day the bill passed the National Association of Broadcasters' DTVanswers.com site had modified its message to point out that Congress had moved the hard date to June 12, though it encouraged viewers not to put off making their own transition to the digital signals being broadcast by virtually every station.

The FCC's DTV site has also changed its DTV transition message, perhaps best reflecting the degree to which the hard date has softened to a range of "may's" "sometime's" and "expected's."

"On Feb. 17, some full-power broadcast television stations in the United States may stop broadcasting on analog airwaves and begin broadcasting only in digital," the FCC said. "The remaining stations may stop broadcasting analog sometime between March 14 and June 12. June 12 is the final deadline for terminating analog broadcasts under legislation passed by Congress and expected to be signed by President Obama."

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/art...ition_Date.php
post #29913 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetworkTV View Post

Not true (sort of).

You can use the speed. It's the total amount of data transfer that's limited. It's like being sold a car that can go 200MPH, but you're only allowed 5 gallons of gas each fill up. The car really will go 200MPH, but not very far.

Of course, in way, what you said is true, but only in the sense that I don't know anyone who ever actually hits their maximum speed more than once in a blue moon. In most cases, you're lucky to run at half the speed.

It's that "up to" qualifier that will get you every time...

There's the thing with broadband (using Comcast) for me....the more people that are online, the lower my speed is. I can tell a big speed difference in the early morning hours versus "peak periods".

I'm certainly not opposed to switching technologies----I dropped laserdisc when DVDs came along, DVDs when Blu-ray was introduced, etc. What I do need is a replacement technology that is better than what it is replacing. Would I care that a full bitrate HD program with 5.1 surround was coming into my LCD via a broadband connection versus a satellite or cable? No more so than the fact that my phone line is doing that now via Comcast Digital Phone.

However, by the time the ISPs invest the amount needed to create the right high capacity infrastructure that doesn't cap my limits and delivers full speed all the time, I doubt broadband will be that much of a bargain anymore.
post #29914 of 87866
I can't believe how many good shows are on Monday. Its like every station packs its best running shows on Monday. Heck, even discovery puts one of its best rated shows, American Chopper on Mondays. I really wish they would move some things around. I only have a DVR that record 2 shows at once. So I usually miss something and have to watch it on the web later.
post #29915 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetworkTV View Post

Not true (sort of).

You can use the speed. It's the total amount of data transfer that's limited. It's like being sold a car that can go 200MPH, but you're only allowed 5 gallons of gas each fill up. The car really will go 200MPH, but not very far.

Of course, in way, what you said is true, but only in the sense that I don't know anyone who ever actually hits their maximum speed more than once in a blue moon. In most cases, you're lucky to run at half the speed.

It's that "up to" qualifier that will get you every time...

This is a symptom of the ISP not keeping up it's infrastructure to meet demand. Not that long ago Comcast ads for their broadband product used to tout "unlimited" usage, not anymore.

The pay as you play works for me, but as far as I know, Comcast has no such system, when you get to 250GBs you start to get warnings from them to limit your usage and eventually they'll just suspend your account.
post #29916 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamR View Post

I can't believe how many good shows are on Monday. Its like every station packs its best running shows on Monday. Heck, even discovery puts one of its best rated shows, American Chopper on Mondays. I really wish they would move some things around. I only have a DVR that record 2 shows at once. So I usually miss something and have to watch it on the web later.

Prime time Monday nights for me have
NBC - Chuck, Heroes, Medium
FOX - House, 24
CBS - Big Bang Theory, HIMYM, 2.5 Men
TNT - Closer, Trust Me
CW (for my daughter) - Gossip Girl, One Tree Hill

Luckily the TNT shows are also shown later in the night and further in the week, so I can record them later in the night if there is still DVR space or later in the week. The 8 PM CBS hour of comedies goes on VCR for me. My daughter watches her shows live. Last week I watched Chuck, 24, and Medium live while everything else was being recorded. It is quite the busy night.
post #29917 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisionOn View Post

20GB a month is nothing. That's not a heavy user. That's just a user..................So now at long last the studios are finally getting it right with both technology and advertising.

And it's instantly broken by ISPs who make accessing that same content a problem.

One step forward. Two steps back.

I agree and the 60GB limit with Cox is not much either. I'm not saying it's right, just that I understand the dynamics involved. If they lose business to the internet, it stands to reason they will find ways to make up that revenue. From a certain perspective, it makes no sense to charge business customers more either, but they do. Until there is true competiton all over from FIOS, etc., not much is going to change, so some folks had better get used to paying.
post #29918 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by petergaryr View Post

There's the thing with broadband (using Comcast) for me....the more people that are online, the lower my speed is. I can tell a big speed difference in the early morning hours versus "peak periods".

I'm certainly not opposed to switching technologies----I dropped laserdisc when DVDs came along, DVDs when Blu-ray was introduced, etc. What I do need is a replacement technology that is better than what it is replacing. Would I care that a full bitrate HD program with 5.1 surround was coming into my LCD via a broadband connection versus a satellite or cable? No more so than the fact that my phone line is doing that now via Comcast Digital Phone.

However, by the time the ISPs invest the amount needed to create the right high capacity infrastructure that doesn't cap my limits and delivers full speed all the time, I doubt broadband will be that much of a bargain anymore.

Here you go, 20mb/s down - 20mb/s up 24/7 for less than $50, you just have to live in the Fremont, CA area.

http://www.paxio.net/home.php?link=Internet
post #29919 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicker1 View Post

And that makes all the difference in the world. Customers do not have some God-given right to demand service and impose their own price. The way the mass-market works is that the supplier defines the service and its price, and then the customer can either accept or decline. Both sides must agree, or the sale doesn't happen; the supplier doesn't get revenue, and the customer doesn't get service. The reticence by some to recognize this reality, by claiming they have no choice but to accept, that they are incapable of declining and doing without service, is really a symptom of a rather big entitlement problem in our society.

I knew that was coming and, of course, you are right. But, it's not much choice to pay or do without. Just like with cell phones, we pay based on usuage. If we use a lot, we look for a plan with unlimited everything, but we are paying more for that service. This is just something new for cable/internet and we tend to balk at change, in many cases before we even know if it's going to affect us or not. I suspect I won't be affected, but I don't track my usage. What does one use to track usage anyway?
post #29920 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleDAZ View Post

I knew that was coming and, of course, you are right.

I'm nothing if not consistent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleDAZ View Post

But, it's not much choice to pay or do without.

Absolutely. No one would ever prefer being a mass-market consumer. Practically everyone would prefer to be sufficiently affluent so they can have "people" or custom-made systems to handle all the details, so that everything, about the things they care about, is "just right".
post #29921 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamR View Post

I can't believe how many good shows are on Monday. Its like every station packs its best running shows on Monday. Heck, even discovery puts one of its best rated shows, American Chopper on Mondays. I really wish they would move some things around. I only have a DVR that record 2 shows at once. So I usually miss something and have to watch it on the web later.

Exactly my thoughts. So many good shows at the same time....that I am forced to miss some shows. The only good thing is Cable channels repeat the shows later on so DVR put schedule for later on automatically...but broadcast channels dont repeat & I dont like to watch on PC
post #29922 of 87866
Thread Starter 
TV Notes
On The Air Tonight
Tuesday's Network Prime-Time Programming Options

(Reminder: If you are recording these programs, check your network listings for precise start/end times. For PBS, please double check your local listings.)

ABC
8
Be My Valentine, Charlie Brown
9 Scrubs HD
9:30 Scrubs HD
10 True Beauty

CBS
8
NCIS HD
9 The Mentalist HD
10 Without a Trace HD

NBC
8
The Biggest Loser (2 hours)
10 Dateline NBC

Fox
8
American Idol HD
9:01 Fringe HD

PBS
8 Nova Judgmnent Day: Intelligent Design on Trial (two hours) HD
10 Independent Lens: Tulia, Texas

The CW
8
90210 HD
9 Privileged HD

MNT
8 Street Patrol
8:30 Street Patrol
9 Vice Squad HD
9:30 Vice Squad HD

MNTV HD Schedule is from jimboy's
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...0714&highlight
post #29923 of 87866
Thread Starter 
Monday’s metered market over night prime-time ratings – along with Media Week Analyst Marc Berman’s view of what they mean -- have been posted at the top of Ratings News -- the second post in this thread.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=10367387&&#post10367387
post #29924 of 87866
Thread Starter 
TV Notes
On The Air Tonight
Some Tuesday Basic Cable HD First-Run, Prime-Time Options

A & E
10
Manhunters: Fugitive Task Force HD

Animal Planet
10
Lost Tapes: Skinwalker/Mothman HD

Bio
10
Shatner's Raw Nerve (30 minutes) HD

Discovery Channel
9
Dirty Jobs: Spider Farm HD
10
Wreckreation Nation with Dave Mordal HD

ESPN
8
College Basketball: Michigan State at Michigann HD
8
College Basketball: Florida at Kentucky HD

National Geographic
9
Darwin's Secret Notebooks HD
10
Explorer: Monster Fish of the Congo HD

SciFi
8
Lost , the pilot (R) HD

Speed
9
Super Bikes (30 minutes) HD

The Learning Channel
10
Toddlers & Tiaras HD

TNT
10
Leverage HD

USA
8
Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show final night (three hours) HD

Versus
7
NHL: San Jose Sharks at Boston Bruins (2 1/2 hours) HD
post #29925 of 87866
Thread Starter 
TV Notes
Behavior: TV Time Linked to Depression in Future
By Nicholas Bakalar, The New York Times, February 10, 2009

Lengthy television viewing in adolescence may raise the risk for depression in young adulthood, according to a new report.

The study, published in the February issue of The Archives of General Psychiatry, found a rising risk of depressive symptoms with increasing hours spent watching television.

There was no association of depression with exposure to computer games, videocassettes or radio.

Researchers used data from a larger analysis of 4,142 adolescents who were not depressed at the start of the study. After seven years of follow-up, more than 7 percent had symptoms of depression.

But while about 6 percent of those who watched less than three hours a day were depressed, more than 17 percent of those who watched more than nine hours a day had depressive symptoms.

The association was stronger in boys than in girls, and it held after adjusting for age, race, socioeconomic status and educational level.

We really don't know what it was specifically about TV exposure that was associated with depression, whether it was a particular kind of programming or some contextual factor such as watching alone or with other people, said Dr. Brian Primack, the lead author and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh.

Therefore, I would be uneasy to make any blanket recommendations based on this one study.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/he...gewanted=print
post #29926 of 87866
Thread Starter 
The Business of Television
DirecTV Adds 301,000 Subs In Q4
Best quarterly subscriber growth in three years
By Todd Spangler, MultiChannel News, February 10, 2009

DirecTV delivered its best quarterly subscriber growth in three years, adding 301,000 net U.S. subscribers in the last three months of 2008, while net income for the quarter dropped 5%.

Revenue for the quarter ended Dec. 31 was $5.31 billion, up 9% year over year, and earnings per share increased 7% to $0.32 compared with the same period last year.

The satellite operator's 301,000 net adds in the U.S. -- giving it 17.621 million subs at the close of 2008 -- blew past analyst expectations; Sanford Bernstein had projected 214,600 net subscriber additions for the quarter. Analyst consensus estimates were earnings of 33 cents per share, according to First Call, though quarterly revenue was in line with expectations.

DirecTV "continues to defy gravity," Sanford Bernstein senior analyst Craig Moffett wrote in a note.

"The word 'impervious' comes to mind," he said. "Indeed, one could make a case that DirecTV has, at least so far, been as little impacted by the recession as any company in America."

For the full year 2008, DirecTV reported a 76% increase in free cash flow, to about $1.68 billion, which the company attributed higher operating profit before depreciation and amortization, a decline in capex driven by lower set-top box costs and an increase in the use of refurbished set-top boxes.

"Clearly DirecTV's strong brand and message of offering the best television experience in America is resonating with consumers," DirecTV president and CEO Chase Carey said in a statement. "Despite the more challenging economic and competitive landscape, we remained sharply focused on attaining higher-quality subscribers" with its highest gross additions in three years at 3.9 million subscribers for 2008 and the lowest monthly churn level (1.47%) in 9 years.

Carey said revenue and operating income "were impacted by greater promotional activity for both new and existing customers, as well as an increase in the number of customers signing up for advanced services resulting in higher equipment and installation costs."

DirecTV last week told customers it would raise rates, effective March 4, by an average of 4%.

http://www.multichannel.com/article/...Subs_In_Q4.php
post #29927 of 87866
Thread Starter 
TV Notes
ABC Family renews 'Secret Life'
Drama's second season eyed for summer premiere
By Nellie Andreeva, The Hollywood Reporter, February 10, 2009

ABC Family has finalized a deal to renew hit drama "The Secret Life of the American Teenager" for a second season.

The series by Brenda Hampton has been given an order for 24 episodes, one more than the 23 episodes that comprised "Teenager's" two-part first season. The show's sophomore season premiere is tentatively slated for the summer.

"Teenager," which launched last summer and will wrap the second portion of its first season March 23, is the highest-rated original series in ABC Family's history and ranks as the top cable series in the Monday 8 p.m hour and the top series on any network in females 12-34.

" 'The Secret Life of the American Teenager' has really struck a chord not just with our Millennial audience, but with viewers across the board," ABC exec vp Kate Juergens said.

"Teenager" stars Shailene Woodley, Molly Ringwald, Mark Derwin, India Eisley, Ken Baumann, Daren Kagasoff, Francia Raisa, Megan Park and Greg Finley.

It joins recently renewed ABC Family series "Greek" and "Lincoln Heights" and newly picked-up comedies "Ruby and the Rockits" and "10 Things I Hate About You" and drama "Perfect 10." All received 10-episode orders.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/...9c92de8ce81c55
post #29928 of 87866
Thread Starter 
Critic's Notes
Networks should ignore economy and pick quality
By James Hibberd, The Hollywood Reporter, in his Live Feed blog, February 10, 2009

Viewers, we're told, want to escape.

"People need to escape," NBC co-chair Marc Graboff said when the financial markets began to collapse last year. "(NBC's) programming strategy is to find some shows where people can tune in and then mentally tune out."

CW entertainment president Dawn Ostroff concurred. "A lot of times, when the country goes through times like these, having entertainment be escapist is what our viewers look for," she said.

"Comfort food," CBS' Les Moonves said when asked why his network's shows were performing relatively well compared with his competitors' this season.

Producers on current shows are being told to keep their subject matter light, as if writers should use the Dow to calculate each episode's pathos-to-comedy ratio. One need only glance at next season's TV drama pilots to see that networks are banking on traditional closed-ended procedural dramas that have the potential to provide satisfying happy endings on a weekly basis.

Even this year's Super Bowl telecast was elevated to something akin to national public therapy when NBC Universal sports chairman Dick Ebersol declared that the NFL (and, by extension, NBC) "should feel a great sense of pride in providing a day of enjoyment to American families, especially those who are struggling in these difficult times," as if the game were a shining beacon of hope in viewers' dim lives and its producers were not wealthy entertainers but rather humble missionaries healing a scarred country.

Network leaders should stop psychoanalyzing the viewing public and justifying content decisions as somehow protecting their wounded psyche.

Programers forget that the content trend toward darker and serialized shows -- the one now ebbing out of style -- wasn't born out of the stock market peak of 2007. It came after 9/11 and the bursting of the Internet bubble, during the previous period of stock-market lows.

Fox's "24," FX's "The Shield," ABC's "Lost" and Sci Fi's "Battlestar Galactica" helped usher in an era of dark, complex, groundbreaking, critically acclaimed and conspiratorial action dramas that were major hits for their networks.

During the same period, Fox's ultra-sunny "American Idol" took off, as did ABC's fairly chipper "Desperate Housewives."

The point isn't that dark times produce more gritty, realistic hits. The point is that recession-era successes are just as likely to reflect the mood of the country as to act as a lighthearted tonic. Truly escapist TV is any show that's so compelling viewers forget they're on the couch.

The "Americans want escapism and happy endings" mantra is wishful thinking. With the broadcast ratings woes, it's TV executives who want to escape. Light and frivolous fare arguably is easier to create and cheaper to produce, promote and sell to advertisers. A "back to basics" mantra is very To Do List-friendly for networks because "the basics" are known qualities, but true progression requires creativity and risk.

Networks instead should move forward and search for ways to advance the game, if not by leaps and bounds then at least with subtle steps. You don't need to call Shawn Ryan and ask him to reinvent the Western (though it would be rather cool if you did). And you don't need to be HBO, which is piloting "Game of Thrones," the first high-fantasy drama produced by a major network in years.

But ABC entertainment president Steve McPherson was correct when he said last month at the TV critics press tour that the programs that have benefited his network most have been those that took bold "swings at the plate" creatively.

Of course, in addition to some potentially unique shows, ABC bought a Jerry Bruckheimer crime drama pilot about amateur detectives and another drama about an 11-year-old who helps his older brother solve crimes.

There's certainly nothing wrong with covering your bets when such new procedurals as CBS' "The Mentalist" and Fox's "Fringe" are performing so well. But in the fall, networks might find it tough to get a hit by standing where lightning just struck.

http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/02/netwo...hows.html#more
post #29929 of 87866
Thread Starter 
The Business of Television
Local TV Stations Face a Fuzzy Future
By Sam Schechner and Rebecca Dana, The Wall Street Journal, Feb 10, 2009

LAS VEGAS -- Lisa Howfield, general manager of KVBC, the NBC affiliate here, watched last year as the broadcast-television business began to shrink. She started cutting. She combined departments. She made do with old equipment, and did away with luxuries like yearly sales getaways.

In December and January, she laid off 15 employees, or 6% of her staff. After the weatherman left last month, one of the morning news anchors took on both jobs. "It's like a bad roller-coaster ride," says Ms. Howfield. Her station's full-day viewership is down 7.7% this TV season from the same period last year, according to Nielsen Co., and Ms. Howfield expects her ad revenue in 2009 will be down 30% from 2008.

Local television stations like Ms. Howfield's dominated the TV business for more than half a century. They inspired the term "network": a web of Channel 7s and 11s that delivered shows from ABC, CBS, NBC -- and later, Fox -- plus local news, syndicated reruns and talk shows. Because the stations owned the licenses to the airwaves that broadcast TV signals, big networks couldn't distribute content without them. In turn, local stations became the vehicles for the greatest mass-market advertising blitz in history.

Now, with their viewership in decline and ad revenue on a downward spiral, many local TV stations face the prospect of being cut out of the picture. Executives at some major networks are beginning to talk about an option that once would have been unthinkable: eventually taking shows straight to cable, where networks can take in a steady stream of subscriber fees even in an advertising slump.

In December, CBS Corp.'s chief executive, Leslie Moonves, told an investor conference that moving the CBS network to cable would be "a very interesting proposition." Two days earlier, Jeff Zucker, chief executive of General Electric Co.'s NBC Universal, warned more broadly that the entire broadcast-TV model must change. "Otherwise it will be like the newspaper business or the car business," he told investors.

Many local stations -- once treated like royalty by broadcast networks -- are scaling back their original programming, cutting down on weekend news shows and trimming staff. Nationwide, 2009 TV-station ad revenue is projected to fall 20% to 30%, according to Bernstein Research.

Last week, Walt Disney Co. reported a 60% slide in operating income in its broadcast segment, including ABC and 10 ABC-owned stations, for the quarter ended Dec. 31, in part because of a 15% drop in revenue at its TV stations. Ad revenue at local stations is "significantly behind" last year's pace, Tom Staggs, Disney's chief financial officer, said in an earnings call. News Corp., which owns Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal, reported last week that its local TV stations, including 17 Fox stations, will undergo "major" cost-cutting in the coming 12 months. The stations are looking at a 30% decline in advertising revenue for the second half of the fiscal year ending June 30.

The weakness in the local-TV market could hammer the big broadcast networks, says Randy Falco, former president and chief operating officer of the NBC Universal Television Group and now CEO of Time Warner Inc.'s AOL. Cable operators, he says, may lure networks away from some ailing stations with the promise of steady subscriber fees: "Ultimately one of [the networks] will make a break. One of them will try to make a go as a cable network."

Local TV stations won't vanish overnight. Networks' parent companies still own some of the largest stations, giving them a possible incentive to preserve that slice of the business.

And while their profits are down, the vast majority of stations are making money: Local, regional and national businesses, like car dealers and retailers, spent more than $20 billion on local TV-station ads in 2008, according to some estimates. Lucrative licensing deals between the networks and sports leagues still require noncable broadcasts of big events such as the Super Bowl. These won't expire for another few years, and already, there's political pressure to keep NFL games on broadcast networks. In some markets, local stations have recently tapped a new revenue stream: charging cable operators to carry the stations' signals.

Any jump to cable would be five or 10 years away, according to CBS's Mr. Moonves. In an emailed statement, a spokeswoman for NBC Universal, where local media revenue declined 25% in the fourth quarter of 2008, said the company believes TV stations are still "the best way to reach the broadest possible audience."

Back in the 1960s and 1970s, local TV stations often had profit margins over 50%, and there was a lively business in selling them to new buyers at a premium. Networks competed to sign up local stations as "affiliates" and paid them huge fees to broadcast their shows. The networks also owned a handful of TV stations in the biggest markets, like New York and Los Angeles, from which they drew enough revenue to fund the expensive business of making prime-time shows, running farflung news divisions and buying rights to sports events.

Then came cable, and the balance of power between stations and broadcast networks began to shift. Some early battles were over programming. Stations were so crucial to the networks in the 1980s, and generated so much money for them, that studios would agree not to sell reruns of their shows to cable while the stations were still airing new episodes. But by 1993, cable had made headway. That year, NBC affiliates watched helplessly as their airport-sitcom hit "Wings" was sold by the studio in reruns to cable network USA. The once-orderly and profitable system in which TV stations held all the cards had started to crumble.

Networks' parent companies started buying or launching cable networks of their own beginning in the 1980s. ABC bought a controlling stake in ESPN. NBC launched CNBC and, later, a cable network that eventually became MSNBC. Fox started the FX network and Fox News.

"The stations were being abandoned by their erstwhile partners," says TV historian Tim Brooks. "Year by year, their clout eroded."

By the time the softening economy hurt local advertising in late 2007, local TV stations were already a much smaller part of the TV ecosystem. In 2007, stations attracted 26% of English-language TV-ad revenue in the U.S., down from 34% in 2000, according to TNS Media Intelligence. Fees from the big networks had dropped in many cases to nearly nothing -- and in some instances stations were paying networks for certain programs, like blue-chip sports broadcasts.

This year, stations also face the transition to digital over-the-air TV signals, which Congress last week voted to push back until June. More than 5% of TV households are still unprepared for digital signals, according to Nielsen, which could further squeeze viewership.

As station owners look to slash costs, many are cutting budgets for syndicated series, the shows that fill many of the hours outside prime time. These include mainstays like "The Oprah Winfrey Show" and "Wheel of Fortune," and reruns like "Seinfeld" and "Two and a Half Men." For years, these shows delivered big ratings and fed viewers into local newscasts. But as daytime ratings decline, stations are increasingly reluctant to spend as much on those slots, according to syndication executives.

Local newscasts are also feeling the pinch. Stations have pulled the plug entirely on some news shows in Lexington, Ky., and Yakima, Wash. In November, some stations owned by News Corp. and NBC Universal said they would begin pooling their newsgathering resources.

Station owners say even with these cuts, there are more local newscasts than the market can bear. "Over time, there will be fewer players," says Dunia Shive, chief executive of Belo Corp., which owns 20 local stations covering 14% of the U.S. market. On Thursday, Belo reported that its TV-ad revenue declined 11% in the fourth quarter from the year-earlier period, even with a windfall of spending on election-related ads.

Stations could ultimately be forced to consolidate, says Rick Feldman, a former TV-station executive and now CEO of the National Association of Television Program Executives. "At a certain point in time, there just may be too many players and the economics don't support it," he says.

Stations are scrambling to find new revenue streams. Some are testing out technology that will send their signals to cellphones and mobile devices, and beefing up their Web sites to boost online advertising. Others say rather than shrinking local news coverage, they're expanding it, since it's the only original content they still have.

Chicago-based Weigel Broadcasting Co., which owns stations in Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana, has collaborated with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. to create a content provider called "This TV" offering mostly old movies from the MGM library. Nexstar Broadcasting Group Inc., a Texas-based company that owns or manages 51 stations around the country, launched highly local "community" Web sites. Stations owned by NBC Universal are piping content and ads to TV screens in supermarkets, taxi cabs and their own Web sites.

"These tough times really force you to look at everything," says John Wallace, president of NBC Local Media, the cadre of stations owned by NBC. "It remains to be seen how this is going to evolve, but I do believe there will be a market for local television well into the future."

A potentially more lucrative move stations are trying is charging cable operators to pay to carry them. Federal law requires cable and satellite operators to get the consent of TV stations to transmit their station signals -- and gives stations the right to withhold their consent. That means owners of bigger groups of stations, whose network affiliates air popular programs like "CSI" and "American Idol," have significant leverage.

In 2007, Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. temporarily blacked out 23 of its stations from cable operator Mediacom Communications Corp., in a bid to get Mediacom to pay them for their signals. That instantly stripped 700,000 of Mediacom's households of a major broadcast network. Mediacom agreed to pay Sinclair. Sinclair has since signed deals with other operators, and estimated it took in $72 million in so-called retransmission revenue in 2008.

The national networks are examining this revenue stream, and some are asking their local affiliates to hand over some of the money they're getting from cable operators. CBS's Mr. Moonves recently told an investor conference he expects his affiliates to pay CBS a percentage of their retransmissions fees. "We feel we deserve a piece of it since we provide them with the NFL" and other pricey programs, he said.

At another conference, Mr. Moonves said cable operators have offered to pay the network these fees directly, cutting out the local stations altogether. Mr. Moonves didn't name specific operators and a spokesman for CBS declined to elaborate. "Down the road that's something that very well could happen, but I think it's five or 10 years away," Mr. Moonves said, citing long-term agreements with CBS affiliates, and calling CBS's relationship with those stations "a good one." In the third quarter of 2008, CBS' TV segment, including its CBS network and local stations, saw advertising revenue fall 14%.

The endgame could come sooner for stations where affiliation agreements with networks are due for renewal in the next three or four years. Over-the-air broadcast deals between NBC, CBS and Fox and the NFL, for example, expire after the 2011 season. Some sports events -- like college football's Bowl Championship Series -- have already signed more lucrative deals with cable networks. And as local earnings plunge and media companies take massive write-downs on the value of their broadcast licenses, the networks have fewer incentives to hang on to the stations they own and operate.

In Las Vegas, Ms. Howfield is optimistic her station will survive. She says KVBC is looking for ways to develop new categories of advertisers and to survive on less: "We better operate like there's no tomorrow."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1234...=WSJ_TimesEMEA
post #29930 of 87866
Thread Starter 
The Business of Television
Inside dish on WPIX's 'Dining' spot
By Richard Huff, New York Daily News TV Editor, Feb 10, 2009

Every Thursday, WPIX/Ch. 11's "Pix Morning News" features a local restaurant chef whipping up a meal and often an anchor talking about a chance for viewers to purchase discounted coupons to the restaurant.

What's not said, however, is that some of those appearances are part of a marketing agreement in which the restaurant gives the station 100 $100 gift certificates and gets a guarantee of on-air time during the "Pix Morning News."

The coupons, worth $10,000 altogether, are sold on WPIX/Ch. 11's Web site for half their face value, with the revenue going to Ch. 11 and a corporation that handles the coupon distribution.

One marketing plan obtained by the Daily News clearly stated to the restaurant being pitched that in exchange for the coupons, the customer got on-air time - not a commercial - during the weekly "Dining Pix" segment. There was also mention of a $5,000 payment, but a source said that although initially there was talk of a cash component to the program, no client ever paid it.

The on-air segments are not labeled commercials, but rather pitched as something the restaurants are doing to give diners a discount on food in hard times.

But since Ch. 11 keeps some of the money from the coupon sales, in a way, the ad-sales department is selling part of the program to a client.

"What we participated in was a promotional package," said Shelley Clark, a spokeswoman for Tavern on the Green, which was featured in a cooking segment.

Clark said no cash changed hands, just the gift certificates.

As with every other participant, there was no mention of the deal when a Tavern on the Green chef was on to talk about a recipe for viewers.

In each case, the restaurant trades something of value for space on the news, not around it.

"This is a step beyond selling a logo on the weather map," said Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism. "This is selling part of a newscast."

The key, Rosenstiel said, is how the segments are framed. Newspapers, he noted, have special sections, usually labeled as "advertorials," to tell readers they are different from the main news section.

"If money is changing hands, that should be acknowledged," he said. "You need to level with your audience."

There's also concern that these deals could break FCC rules about commercial clients within news programs.

WPIX officials did not return repeated calls for comment yesterday.

The WPIX package, while not a huge windfall, comes at a time when all stations are trying to deal with a massive decline in local advertising. Station executives say the local market was down 15% in 2008, representing upward of $250 million in lost ad revenue.

To combat the losses, stations have sold spots once unheard of. For example, WNBC/Ch. 4 has Verizon FiOS as an on-air sponsor for its sportscasts by placing the Verizon logo on the screen.

While that's the most blatant example, others have let some on-air staffers do commercials. WCBS/Ch. 2 has let food correspondent Tony Tantillo, who is a subcontractor and not a staffer per se, do commercials for Buick that air next to newscasts.

"They spend a lot of money to promote and build the trust of local anchors in local TV," Rosenstiel said of Ch. 11. "You shouldn't destroy that trust for a few shekels in a cooking segment."

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...ning_spot.html
post #29931 of 87866
Thread Starter 
SAG Negotiation Notes
SAG ready to resume talks with AMPTP
Negotiations likely to start up again Feb. 17
By Carl DiOrio, The Hollywood Reporter, Feb 103, 2009

Representatives of SAG and the Alliance of Motion Picture & Television Producers are expected Tuesday to announce the resumption of their film and TV contract talks, most likely on Feb. 17.

On Monday, a group of below-the-line workers staged a rally outside SAG headquarters in Los Angeles.

Several dozen members of a group called Let's Get Back to Work urged the guild to resume stalled film and TV contract talks and called for a speedy resolution of the negotiations impasse. They were joined for a while by SAG members connected to the MembershipFirst group, carrying placards demanding a fair deal from the AMPTP.

SAG members have been without a contract since June 30, and the possibility of an actors strike has slowed film production. SAG and AMPTP negotiators haven't met since November.

The parties had tried to restart the stalled talks Feb. 3, but a legal action by SAG president Alan Rosenberg caused the bargaining session to be canceled. Rosenberg failed in a bid to obtain a temporary restraining order nixing the Jan. 26 ouster of SAG exec director Doug Allen. One-time SAG general counsel David White has been named as Allen's interim replacement, and SAG senior adviser John McGuire will replace Allen as the guild's chief negotiator for the talks with the AMPTP.

On Feb. 23, SAG is scheduled to begin negotiations with advertising-industry representatives on a new commercials contract, bargaining jointly with sister actors union AFTRA. So the guild would need to bang out a film and TV deal quickly with the AMPTP or postpone the start date on its commercials talks.

Labor-side insiders suggest it's unlikely that the commercials negotiations will be delayed, with SAG and AFTRA members already working under a contract extension. So the question is whether the new SAG leadership will seal a deal in a matter of days or simply gain some renewed traction on film and TV bargaining before going breaking for the commercials negotiations.

Also Monday, an "open letter" purported to be written by Allen circulated on one or more entertainment blogs, with the former exec director defending SAG's embattled president against critics.

"Alan Rosenberg has been called to task in recent weeks by some of the press and bloggers for being a 'hard-line' negotiator and for his comments regarding the state of the Screen Actors Guild and its negotiations with the AMPTP for a new contract with the studios and networks," Allen wrote. "Alan may wear his heart on his sleeve, but his heart is in exactly the right place.

In the rest of the letter, Allen criticized AMPTP contract proposals.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/...b7f9acb71a0fa4
post #29932 of 87866
Thread Starter 
TV Sports
Super Bowl Replay

For the dozen or so people who missed the Super Bowl broadcast last Sunday on NBC, NFL Network will present an encore presentation of the big game - including the pregame and halftime shows - this Thursday at 8 p.m. Eastern
post #29933 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleDAZ View Post

And so are those anti-American world views IMHO. Therefore, you make my point. I wasn't limiting my sources to American only, just that others are more difficult to come by for the majority of people and still don't present a complete picture. So, I stand by my statement, I still don't trust any single source, American or otherwise.

Umm. I wasn't disagreeing with your point in the first place.

However, now I feel obliged to point out that non-American is not the same as anti-American. Canadian news, for instance, would hardly be considered anti-American by most standards, yet it does offer a slightly different perspective, a different emphasis, if you will, on what's important and what's not.

BBC is generally not what I would call anti-American -- though I suppose some might disagree -- but it definitely has a different perspective. A few years back, for instance, they lead their news with the terrorist attack that killed 25 people in Turkey, on a day when every North American outlet was obsessing over the Michael Jackson trial.

CCTV (Chinese Central TV) offers a very different perspective on Tibet, which is neither anti-American nor pro-American, because it has nothing to do with America at all. It is, of course, a very biased perspective, but it still makes an interesting counterpoint to unanimous chorus of western press coverage, and I think many Americans might benefit from at least hearing that along with the steady diet of rants from Christian Bale or Alec Baldwin, or the latest police encounters of Britney or Paris.

This is not to say that there isn't anti-American stuff out there. Russia Today, the English language service that is rebroadcast in DC by MHz Networks, has become decidedly anti-American since the Georgia invasion. But still, they offer an interesting counterpoint at times. Of all the Obama inauguration coverage I saw from around the world, theirs had the most amusing lower-third tag line: AUDACITY OF HYPE. I would have had more respect for them if they had had the guts to actually air his whole speech live instead of repeatedly cutting in and out, but I did like that word play.
post #29934 of 87866
Thread Starter 
Weekly Nielsen Notes
CBS wins week with a little help from Grammys;
Fox with "American Idol" is tops among young adults
By Hal Boedeker, Orlando Sentinel Television Critic, in his TV Guy blog, February 10, 2009

Two networks could claim victories last week: CBS had the most viewers, and Fox had the most young adults.

CBS averaged 11.5 million total viewers in prime time last week. Fox had nearly 10.8 million.

Here's how other networks fared: ABC with 7.8 million, NBC with nearly 7 million, The CW with 1.8 million and MyNetworkTV with 1.7 million.

CBS placed second to Fox in the 18-to-49 age group. ABC was third.
Here are the week's most-watched programs:

1. "American Idol" Tuesday, Fox, 26.6 million
2. "American Idol" Wednesday, Fox, 26.4 million
3. Grammy Awards, CBS, 19.1 million
4. "60 Minutes," CBS, 16.7 million
5. "Two and a Half Men," CBS, 16.6 million
6. "CSI: Miami," CBS, 16.1 million
7. "Grey's Anatomy," ABC, 15.3 million
8. "House," Fox, 14.9 million
9. "The Mentalist," CBS, 14.4 million
10. "NCIS," CBS, 13.9 million

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/ent...lts-.html#more
post #29935 of 87866
Thread Starter 
Monday's fast affiliate and metered market overnight prime-time ratings - along with Media Week Analyst Marc Berman's view of what they mean -- have now been posted at the top of Ratings News -- the second post in this thread.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...&#post10367387
post #29936 of 87866
TV Notes
Cannon to replace Springer on 'Got Talent'
From James Hibberd's Hollywood Reporter 'Live Feed' Blog

Actor/singer Nick Cannon has signed a deal with NBC that includes hosting its summer reality show "America's got Talent."

On the series' upcoming fourth season, Cannon will succeed Jerry Springer, who bowed out last week.

Cannon is the third host for "Talent," which launched in 2006 with Regis Philbin as emcee.

"Nick exemplifies the spirit of 'America's Got Talent' with his talent, originality and an infectious love of performing and creating," NBC's head of alternative programming Paul Telegdy said. "His popularity and appeal are sure to take the series to a new level of success."

Cannon also negotiated an agreement with NBC that involves unspecified future projects.

“This is just the first of multiple projects we are looking to do with Nick at NBC,” said NBC co-chair Ben Silverman. “He’s a true triple threat, a multi-talented producer, actor and musician."

Cannon brings a younger face to "Got Talent," whose celebrity judges are Sharon Osbourne, Piers Morgan and David Hasselhoff. Though "Talent" is the most-watched show in the summer among total viewers, NBC wouldn't mind boosting its 18-49 demographic.

That NBC had a replacement ready this soon to step in for Springer shows that the talk show host's departure announcement last week was no surprise to the network.

Nellie Andreeva contributed to this report.

http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/02/canno...ot-talent.html
post #29937 of 87866
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post

TV Notes
ABC Family renews 'Secret Life'
Drama's second season eyed for summer premiere
By Nellie Andreeva, The Hollywood Reporter, February 10, 2009

ABC Family has finalized a deal to renew hit drama "The Secret Life of the American Teenager" for a second season.

so basically she went from getting "knocked up" to getting "picked up".
post #29938 of 87866
NTIA Explains Web Site Confusion Over DTV Hard Date
Spokesman: Deadline of June 12 is not public law until Obama signs bill
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 2/10/2009 10:43:05 AM MT

Related Content: NTIA's Web Site Giving Mixed Messages

A spokesman for the National Telecommunications & Information Administration says that the reason its Web site talks both about the move of the DTV hard date to June 12 and the hard date still being Feb. 17 is that the president has still not signed the bill that moves the date.

Currently, the section updating the DTV-to-analog coupon box program on NTIA's DTV transition Web site says that Congress has voted to move the date. The section on the DTV transition still talks about all analog shutting off on Feb. 17.

"The deadline is of June 12 is not public law until the president signs the bill," said NTIA spokesman Bart Forbes. "At that point we will update all references to the DTV deadline on the Web site."

While the president at press time had still not signed the bill-a White House spokesperson had not responded to an inquiry into why that had not happened yet-the FCC is operating as though the date has been moved, requiring TV stations by midnight Monday to tell the FCC whether they were planning to still go Feb. 17, which would now be early.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/art..._Hard_Date.php
post #29939 of 87866
Thread Starter 
Weekly Nielsen Notes
Cable Program Viewers
Week ending: February 8, 2009

(in thousands)

1. MONK USA Fri 9 P 5,677
2. WWE ENTERTAINMENT USA Mon 10P 5,471
3. CLOSER, THE TNT Mon 9P 5,369
4. BURN NOTICE USA Thu 10P 5,271
5. ICARLY NICK Sat 8 P 5,230
6. WWE ENTERTAINMENT USA Mon 9P 5,151
7. NCIS USA Mon 7P 4,468
8. PSYCH USA Fri 10P 4,460
9. NCIS USA Thu 7P 4,316
10. LAKERS/CELTICS TNT Thu 8:16P 4,311
11. GIFTED HANDS: BEN CARSON TNT Sat 8P 4,237
12. NCIS USA Tue 7P 4,172
13. ICARLY NICK Tue 6P 4,141
14. SONNY WITH A CHANCE DSNY Sun 8P 4,093
15. THE OREILLY FACTOR FOXN Thu 8P 4,076
16. ICARLY NICK Sat 7:30P 4,074
17. ICARLY NICK Tue 6:30P 4,008
18. SONNY WITH A CHANCE DSNY Sun 8:30P 3,970
19. TRUE JACKSON, VP NICK Sat 8:30P 3,953
20. SPONGEBOB NICK Mon 7:30P 3,932

Source: Nielsen Media Research data
post #29940 of 87866
Thread Starter 
Total Day Cable Average Viewers (Live+SD)
Week ending: February 8, 2009
(in thousands)

1. NICK 1,684
2. NICK AT NITE 1,253
3. USA 1,219
4. DISNEY 1,146
5. FOX NEWS 1,074
6. TNT 1,014
7. ADSM 894
8. TOON 816
9. TBS 799
10. LIFETIME 691
11. A&E 678
12. HISTORY 673
13. SPIKE 632
14. CNN 612
15. ESPN 593
16. DISCOVERY 591
17. TRU 586
18. HALLMARK 569
19. FX 569
20. HGTV 550
21. FOOD 531
22. AMC 509
23. TVLAND 487
24. FAM 477
25. CMDY 446
26. MTV 419
27. SCIFI 409
28. MSNBC 383
29. TLC 378
30. VH1 373

Source: Nielsen Media Research data
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information