AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information - Page 1040

post #31171 of 87357
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post

Anyone else care to weigh in on Fallon's premiere before we start to get all the "pros" with their ponderous thoughts?

I recorded it and will watch this afternoon. If it is worth commenting, then I will...
post #31172 of 87357
Watched the first few mins live then recorded the remainder. Wasn't bad, though he really looked uncomfortable. The 'slow jammin' the news' bit wasn't bad, thought it was a nice take and a keeper. The 'target audience' bit can be improved but he can keep that running if tweaked. Some of the monologue fell flat but he had a few laugh out loud ones in there. Kinda reminded me of his SNL weekend news bit but I'll give him a shot, he'll hit his stride soon enough. Afterall, its only his first show and as others have said, it could have been worse.
post #31173 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Monday’s metered market over night prime-time ratings – along with Media Week Analyst Marc Berman’s view of what they mean -- have been posted at the top of Ratings News -- the second post in this thread.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...&#post10367387
post #31174 of 87357
Thread Starter 
I agree that Fallon's show was just a beginning. I generally don't watch late-night, but I think I'll give Jimmy a month or so to tweak things and then check back in to see how he is doing.
post #31175 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Overnight Nielsen Notes
Jimmy Fallon's jittery 'Late Night' debut scores strong early rating for NBC
By James Hibberd, The Hollywood Reporter senior reporter, in his LiveFeed blog, March 3, 2009

Jimmy Fallon was clearly nervous during his debut performance as host of NBC's "Late Night," but the comedian avoided major stumbles and garnered a strong opening night rating.

Fallon's premiere drew a 2.3 in the metered-market household ratings -- NBC's highest Monday "Late Night" rating in the overnights in more than three years, and up 35% from Conan O'Brien's average in the time period (1.7) this season.

The comedian's debut was also higher rated than Craig Ferguson's debut in 2005 on CBS (1.8) and Jimmy Kimmel's bow in 2003 on ABC (2.0).

Fallon also beat Ferguson head-to-head last night (who had Paris Hilton as his guest) by 35%. Kimmel, whose second half overlaps with "Late Night," pulled an extremely high 2.5 rating thanks to a visit from "The Bachelor" star Jason Mesnick right after the show's heavily watched finale.

Ferguson has typically drawn a 1.6 on Mondays and Kimmel a 1.5. O'Brien's 1993 premiere (which is arguably from a different late-night ratings era) drew a 3.8.

Fallon performed a monologue that EW called "ultra-ordinary -- one liners about President Obama and the deficit that sounded like material Jay Leno's writers had faxed over from L.A," and did a segment called "Lick It For $10," where audience members came onstage to lick objects such as a goldfish bowl.

Robert DeNiro was Fallon's first guest, who played along during a scripted exchange that joked about the actor's reputation as a difficult interview (why would producers book somebody with a reputation as a difficult interview as Fallon's first guest?). Then there was a Fallon's frequent "Saturday Night Live" sketch partner, Justin Timberlake, who performed some impressions.

"Sweaty, tense, uptight, nervous, wound-up, keyed up -- pick an adjective," wrote the Chicago Tribune, but remember: Even Ferguson said not to judge Fallon based on his first night.

Some sample Fallon monologue jokes:

-- "As you know New York City was hit with a huge snow storm. And I woke up this morning and said 'please let it be a snow day.' Not even a delay. Nothing."

-- "I've been getting so much encouragement. Last night, Rush Limbaugh called me up and said he wants me to fail. That's so nice of him. He didn't even have to."

-- "The good news -- President Obama announced that he plans to bring the troops home from Iraq in 18 months. The troops actually responded and said "Thank you, but the economy's better over here.""

-- "In California, a sixteen-year-old boy had sex with his twenty four-year-old teacher. Traumatizing. Doctors are saying it will take years of therapy just to wipe the smile off his face."

-- "Despite the Recession, Microsoft is planning to open new stores to compete with Apple. Microsoft says they'll be just like Apple stores except the staff will freeze when you ask them a question."

Hibberd has posted three clips of the show, a segment called "Slow Jammin' the News", Fallon trying to appeal to blond mothers from Connecticut and one sketch with DeNiro here—

http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/03/jimmy...ings.html#more
post #31176 of 87357
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post



Remembering Paul Harvey,

I'm saddened to hear the news, I listen to his "The Rest of the Story" bit every day for the past months, it aired when I get off work...

Rest in Peace Paul...
post #31177 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Business Notes
Moonves Rules Out CNN/CBS News Merger
CBS Corp. chief says he wants to keep The Oprah Winfrey Show at CBS Domestic Television past 2011
By Claire Atkinson, Broadcasting & Cable, March 3, 2009

CBS Corp. CEO Leslie Moonves ruled out a merger of the company’s news operations with Time Warner’s CNN.

Speaking at the Deutsche Bank media and telecommunications conference, Moonves was asked about a possible merger of CBS News and responded, “We’ve have five different discussions with CNN about doing something together, and it has appeared to be unmanageable.”

He added that Time Warner has also had talks with ABC. “We do look for opportunities to do a deal with CNN, but it’s not in the cards.”

A day earlier, Time Warner chairman and CEO Jeff Bewkes suggested CNN would be open to helping out a broadcast network news department by combining operations.

Moonves was also asked about whether the industry would see consolidation in the broadcast landscape. “The media landscape is made up of six to seven companies. I don’t see any big deals being done for properties.” He also likened NBC to a “cable-type property,” saying that it is programming Monday to Friday from 8pm to 10pm.

It also seems that CBS won’t be giving up its relationship with its syndicated star Oprah Winfrey without a fight. Oprah Winfrey’s contract to air her daily show runs until 2011. The star is also planning to launch her cable network, OWN, in partnership with Discovery Communications.

Moonves said: “The Discovery people got a little ahead of themselves. Oprah hasn’t said she isn’t coming back….She is clearly one of the most influential people in America…She may not be leaving so quickly. We’re going to do everything we can to make sure she stays. Discovery wants her full time. They may not get her full time.”

Moonves gave a little further insight into how the May upfront might play out. He suggested CBS might sell less inventory in the upfront.

“There will be a bit less volume,” he said about the amount of advertising that might be bought in the upfront. We might sell a little bit less in the upfront and play to our strengths. Movies need to buy in the scatter market, other companies will do that…. Autos are not planning as big an upfront budget, is my guess. They’ll eventually have to come out of this.” The scatter market is the quarter-by-quarter approach to buying TV airtime, while the upfront has companies committing their dollars in advance of the fall season.

Boldly, Moonves added, “We expect price increases on a year ago.”

Known as a bullish optimist, Moonves expressed some uncharacteristic feelings of frustration winding up his 7:30 a.m. Q&A session with a Deutsche Bank analyst, saying, “This marketplace beats the heck out of anyone. Some days you just want to knock your head against the wall. This is caused by the economy and it will get better. I’d be more worried if our ratings were down. When the market turns around we’re going to be fine.”

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/art...ews_Merger.php
post #31178 of 87357
Thread Starter 
TV Notes
CBS eyes big renewals for 'Men,' 'Bang'
Network considering ordering multiple seasons of both
By James Hibberd, The Hollywood Reporter, March 3, 2009

CBS is close to giving a major commitment to the highest-rated comedy on television, "Two and a Half Men," and this season's half-hour ratings surprise "The Big Bang Theory."

"Men" is being eyed for three seasons.

"Bang" is near a deal for two seasons -- a terrific show of faith to a comedy considered a slow starter just last year.

At a time when most broadcast shows are struggling, such a heavy commitment is unusual but, in the case of these two hits, not exactly a surprise.

Both are produced by Warner Bros. and co-created by Chuck Lorre, "Bang" airs at 8 p.m. Mondaysand has kept setting new series-high numbers in the ratings this season, with dominant "Men" in the catbird seat of 9 p.m. There's been some discussion about whether the lineup might change in the fall given that a recent pairing of the two resulted in "Bang" retaining an extremely large amount of "Men" viewers.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/...8cb65755356d41
post #31179 of 87357
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

The Business of Television
A Plea to Keep Cameras Rolling in New York

...the film and television industry, one of the few fields generating profits in the throes of this recession,...


....The program,


....expected to generate nearly $2.7 billion in state and local taxes through the end of the 2010 fiscal year, according to a report by Ernst & Young. The program's advocates say it could create and preserve 19,000 jobs and generate $200 million in additional tax revenue for the state in the next 12 to 18 months alone.

Quote:


ABC Gives 'Life on Mars' a Finale
ABC is giving fans of "Life on Mars" some closure
.

ABC is giving fans of "Life on Mars" some closure.

The network has told producers that it won't be ordering any additional episodes beyond the 17 currently in the works for this season.

Mars' is another victim of the incompetent NY State Governor. His failure to recognize that the renewal of the Film Tax Incentive Program (RIGHT NOW!!!) will actually stimulate the economy.
post #31180 of 87357
Thread Starter 
TV Notes
On The Air Tonight
Tuesday Network Prime-Time Programming Options

(Reminder: If you are recording these programs, check your network listings for precise start/end times. For PBS, please double check your local listings.)

ABC
8
Homeland Security USA HD
9 Scrubs (R) HD
9:30 Scrubs (R) HD
10 The Bachelor: After The Final Rose, Part 2

CBS
8
NCIS (R) HD
9 The Mentalist (R) HD
10 Without A Trace (R) HD

NBC
8
The Biggest Loser (two hours)
10 Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (R) HD

Fox
8
American Idol (two hours) HD

PBS
8 Nova: A Walk To Beautiful (R) HD
10 Independent Lens (R) HD

The CW
8
Reaper (season premiere) HD
9 90210 (R) HD

MNT
8 Street Patrol
8:30 Street Patrol
9 Whacked Out Videos
9:30 Whacked Out Videos

MNTV HD Schedule is from jimboy’s http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...0714&highlight
post #31181 of 87357
Yet another snoozer Tuesday, no scripted show is new today (I can't get the CW HD anyhow)
post #31182 of 87357
Thread Starter 
TV Notes
On The Air Tonight
Some Tuesday Cable HD First-Run, Prime-Time Options

Animal Planet
10 Dark Days In Monkey City HD

Big Ten Network
9 Basketball: Ohio State at Iowa HD
11 Big Ten Tonight HD

Bio
10 Shatner’s Raw Nerve: Jenna Jameson HD

Discovery Channel
9 Dirty Jobs: Mike’s Day Off HD
10 Wreckreation Nation with Dave Mordal: Punkin’ Chunkin’ HD

ESPN
7 College Basketball: Michigan State at Indiana HD
9 College Basketball: Auburn at Alabama HD

ESPN 2
9 NBA Coast-To-Coast (two hours) HD

ESPNU
9 College Basketball: Rutgers at Syracuse HD

HBO
8 Taking Chance (movie, 2009, 90 minutes, R) HD

MLB Network
7 MLB Tonight Live (repeated at 10) HD
8 30 Clubs in 30 days: Toronto Blue Jays (repeated at 11:30) HD

Speed
8 Livin’ The Low Life (30 minutes) HD
9 Super Bikes! (30 minutes) HD

The Learning Channel
9 18 Kids and Counting (30 minutes) HD
10 Toddlers and Tiaras HD

TNT
10 Trust Me HD

The Weather Channel
8 Weather Center (three hours) HD

Versus
7:30 NHL: Pittsburgh at Tampa Bay (2 1/2 hours) HD
post #31183 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Nielsen Notes
For our friends at Whedonesque.com
(and everywhere else, too)
By Robert Seidman, TVByTheNumbers.com,

Hi. We’re definitely not out to get Dollhouse, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, or any other show. We’re not out to get the fans of any show either. But when we look at the numbers, we don’t analyze them with what we hope will happen. We analyze them in a way that tries to predict what will actually happen.

I think there may be some confusion about our current views on Dollhouse, where some people are interpreting our take on Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles as the same as our take on Dollhouse.

In the case of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, what the fans of that show hope will happen is that it will get renewed for a third season. What the numbers indicate will happen is very much out of sync with those fans’ hopes. There is no chance Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicle’s gets renewed by FOX.

How well the Terminator: Salvation movie does at the box office after TSCC ends its run will not have any bearing on that. Further, it seems doubtful that TSCC would wind up on any other network. There is no chance with its numbers on FOX that it would wind up on The CW, and there seems very little chance that it would wind up on SciFi. But for those who like to latch on to the tiniest little sliver of hope, little chance is more of a chance than no chance at all. Probably not much more. But definitely more.

We understand we can’t convince anyone who will not accept the numerical analysis that a show will be canceled, and won’t accept it until it’s no longer on the air and to quote Bill Gorman, who I run the site with:

if I have learned anything from the experience on this site, it is that hope does indeed spring eternal. There is no chance TSCC survives, but nothing I can say, and no numbers you will read will convince you of that so I’ll not try.

This is my experience as well and whether it be Jericho, Dirty Sexy Money, or Lipstick Jungle, (canceled, canceled, and canceled) or several other shows, people who don’t want to buy the analysis simply won’t buy it. That’s OK with us.

Our current take on Dollhouse is a different story than Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. The numbers for Dollhouse haven’t been great, the question is, are they good enough? When factoring in the Live+7 DVR viewing numbers, the numbers for the premiere were actually good among 18-49 year olds, at least for a Friday.

I know people want to cling to the increases in live+7 18-49 viewing. But here’s the deal: we saw those sorts of huge increases to Lipstick Jungle’s 18-49 numbers. No, Lipstick Jungle hasn’t been officially canceled. It’s just no longer on the air, no longer in production and two of the lead actresses have signed on with other show pilots. I don’t need the official press release.

While these 18-49 number increases due to DVR viewing can’t hurt any, I’m not optimistic they’ll help much either. They certainly won’t save Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. But, we have a couple of weeks of additional data. Dollhouse dropped from a 2.0 LIVE+SD (live viewing and DVR viewing the same night the show aired) 18-49 rating in its premiere episode to a 1.6 (if that holds up in the final numbers) last Friday. Even if Dollhouse kept all of its DVR viewers, it’s Live+7 rating will still shrink by .4.

I am not tremendously optimistic about Dollhouse’s survival chances for a second season. The trend isn’t good, the question is whether it’s good enough for Fridays. My sense is that Dollhouse will get to air all 13 of its episodes and then be done. But while we’re ready to say there’s no chance that Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles will be renewed, we’re not ready to say the same thing about Dollhouse.

One final note. The rascally rabble rouser who appears in our comments who goes by the moniker of Nick C is not affiliated with TVbytheNumbers. He is a sometimes frequent participant in the comments and we love him because really, love him or hate him, he’s always bound to stir up a discussion. I don’t always agree with Nick, but whenever he’s posted any actual data, the data has been true.

Because he has access to more inside information than we do, he hears things that we don’t hear. My sense is that hearing things we don’t hear is a good news/bad news situation. The good news is he has access to information that we don’t. And when he shares it, we get to hear it too. The bad news is that 18+ months of experience running this site has led me to believe we’re better off just sticking with analyzing the numbers rather than listening to what anyone at the networks may be saying.

I’m sure there will be a case where there’s a benefit to listening to the chatter, and perhaps Dollhouse will be that case. Right now Nick is much more optimistic for Dollhouse season two based on what he hears than I am based on what I see

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/03/02...else-too/13814
post #31184 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Business Notes
Univision Reaches Retransmission-Consent Pact With DirecTV
Comprehensive Deal Follows Earlier Agreement With Top Cable Operator Comcast
By Mike Reynolds, Multichannel News, 3/3/2009

Univision Communications Inc. has reached a multiyear retransmission-consent agreement with leading satellite provider DirecTV.

The deal, terms of which were not disclosed, covers the network feeds of Univision, sister broadcast service TeleFutura and cable network Galavision. In addition, it encompasses Univision owned-and-operated stations, as well affiliated stations owned and run by Entravision Communications Corp., Equity Media Holdings Corp. and Fisher Communications, Inc.

Sources familiar with the deal indicate that Univision 's carriage contract with DirecTV had expired at year-end, but the parties continued to negotiate, culminating with this agreement.

The deal with DirecTV marks Univision's second major retransmission-consent pact. Just after the turn of the year, the leading Spanish-language media holder in the U.S. -- which last week confirmed that it had issued pink slips to about 300 employees in the face of the faltering economy -- announced it had struck a similar accord with the nation's largest distributor, top cable operator Comcast.

In 2007, Univision disclosed that for the first time it would seek retransmission consent, rather, than must carry for its stations. During a press conference following its upfront presentation to advertisers, Univision officials declared that the company would seek license fees of $1 per subscriber for its stations.

While it is unclear what terms were reached, some cable operators have indicated that Univision has lowered its license-fee asking price by half.

"The partnership with DirecTV speaks to the growing influence of the Hispanic consumer in the nation," said Univision Communications Inc. CEO Joe Uva in a statement. "Our distributors understand that a partnership with Univision is an investment in sustained growth."

Noted DirecTV executive vice president, content strategy and development Derek Chang: "We are pleased to continue our long-standing relationship both with Univision and the large base of Hispanic customers who enjoy Univision's programming on DirecTV."

According to marketplace sources, Univision's carriage contract with Time Warner Cable is set to expire at the end of March.

A Univision spokeswoman would only say the parties are in distribution discussions.

http://www.multichannel.com/article/...th_DirecTV.php
post #31185 of 87357
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post

Yes, and I also watched Colin Ferguson, whose show seemed so much better.

He had an inspired bit on a faux TV ad for a country hits collection and a (I find it hard to say this) warm, fun interview with Paris Hilton.

It was a far more funny, comfortable and entertaining hour than Fallon's -- and I had rarely bothered watching Colin previously.

That's Craig Ferguson, Fred.  I'm very sure that Colin Ferguson has never had a talk show, especially not one where Paris Hilton appeared last night opposite Jimmy Fallon after her full evening of promos with Craig Ferguson during CBS's Monday sitcom block.
post #31186 of 87357
NY Times blog

1970s End, Along with Life on Mars'
By Dave Itzkoff

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/20...-life-on-mars/

Some good links within this story.
post #31187 of 87357
Quote:
Originally Posted by clapple View Post

It's spousal abuse! Her poor husband has to be the most sleep deprived character on TV. That woman is justification for separate bedrooms! Or perhaps separate houses.

Amazing, in last night's Medium episode they addressed this.
post #31188 of 87357
Thread Starter 
You are absolutelyright.

Thanks for the correction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dattier View Post

That's Craig Ferguson, Fred. I'm very sure that Colin Ferguson has never had a talk show, especially not one where Paris Hilton appeared last night opposite Jimmy Fallon after her full evening of promos with Craig Ferguson during CBS's Monday sitcom block.
post #31189 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Yesterday’s fast affiliate and metered market overnight prime-time ratings – along with Media Week Analyst Marc Berman’s view of what they mean -- have now been posted at the top of Ratings News -- the second post in this thread.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...&#post10367387
post #31190 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Overnight Nielsens in the 18-49 Demo
Huge finale for ABC's 'The Bachelor'
Network averages a 5.8 in 18-49s for three-hour special
By Toni Fitzgerald,MediaLifeMagazine.com staff writer, March 3, 2009

For once, ABC wasn’t exaggerating when it dubbed last night’s final rose ceremony the most unbelievable “Bachelor” finale yet. And the audience seemed to agree.

“The Bachelor’s” two-hour season-ender and one-hour post-finale wrap-up show, “After the Final Rose,” combined to give ABC a dominant 5.8 adults 18-49 rating and 14 share for the night, according to Nielsen overnights, well ahead of No. 2 CBS at 4.1/10.

“Bachelor” averaged a season-high 5.4 for the finale from 8 to 10 p.m., the show's best finale rating since 2004. In it, bachelor Jason chose Melissa over Molly and even proposed to her in the waning minutes.

But that engagement was shortlived. In the follow-up “Rose” special, in which cast members gathered for a postmortem, Jason shockingly revealed that he was no longer in love with Melissa.

Instead, he’d been pining for runner-up Molly for weeks. Jason dumped Melissa on camera and then asked Molly to give the relationship another try, to which she agreed.

It made for great TV for ABC, which jumped to an all-time high 6.7 for "Rose," but perhaps not-so-great publicity for Jason. One TV critic has already dubbed him “The Bastard.”

As a reminder, all ratings are based on live-plus-same-day DVR playback. Seven-day DVR data won’t be available for several weeks. Twenty-eight percent of Nielsen households have DVRs.

With ABC and CBS well ahead of the competition for the night, Fox snagged third at 3.3/8, NBC followed in fourth at 2.7/6, Univision fifth at 1.6/4 and CW sixth at 0.5/1.

At 8 p.m. ABC was first with a 4.9 for the first hour of “Bachelor,” with CBS second with a 4.1 for “The Big Bang Theory” (3.9) and “How I Met Your Mother” (4.2). Fox was third with a 3.1 for its first hour of “24,” NBC fourth with a 2.4 for “Chuck,” Univision fifth with a 1.8 for “Cuidado con el Angel” and CW sixth with a 0.5 for a “Gossip Girl” rerun.

ABC was first again at 9 p.m. with a 5.9 for more “Bachelor,” while CBS remained second with a 4.4 for “Two and a Half Men” (4.9) and the season premiere of “Rules of Engagement” (3.9). Fox was third with a 3.5 for another hour of “24,” NBC fourth with a 3.2 for “Heroes,” Univision fifth with a 2.0 for “Mañana Es para Siempre” and CW sixth with a 0.5 for a repeat of “One Tree Hill.”

At 10 p.m. ABC led once again with a 6.7 for “The Bachelor: After the Final Rose,” followed by CBS with a 3.8 for “CSI: Miami.” NBC was third with a 2.4 for “Medium” and Univision fourth with a 1.1 for “Cristina.”

ABC also led the night among households with a 10.6 average overnight rating and a 16 share. CBS was second at 7.8/12, Fox third at 6.5/9, NBC fourth at 4.4/7, Univision fifth at 2.0/3 and CW sixth at 0.8/1.

http://www.medialifemagazine.com/art...e_Bachelor.asp
post #31191 of 87357
Thread Starter 
This probably will not interest many of you. And that is OK.
But it is a reminder of a time when genuine, intelligent talk was available on television.

TV Notes
A Last Look at Updike and Cheever
By Dick Cavett, in The New York Times, March 2, 2009

Dear reader, I’ll try to keep this to a reasonable length so you can savor the accompanying video.

I loved reading the outpouring from you (and others) about the Cheever/Updike column. A large number asked, and some begged earnestly, to see the full show from which the clips were taken.

I lobbied on your behalf and The Times has thoughtfully agreed to run the full show. Thus, you will see and hear Cheever on churchgoing (his) and his gracious refusal of my offer that he recite the Apostles’ Creed; Updike on first meeting me in the dark; both on the need to move out of New York City; and more.

There is still a Cheever show of mine to be unearthed. I wish I could remember what’s on it. A worried Johnny Carson once admitted to me that he frequently couldn’t remember what was said on a show he had just finished taping. And, sometimes, who the guests were. It’s a strange thing, and one I haven’t quite figured out.

Johnny all but wiped his brow when I told him it happened to me too, and that a few days earlier I got home and it took me a good 10 minutes to be able to report with whom I had just done 90 minutes. (It was only Lucille Ball!) It’s an oddity peculiar to the live performer’s divided brain that needs exploring. It has to do with the fact that you — and the “you” that performs — are not identical.

Back to Cheever. I’m pretty sure I didn’t bring up sexual ambiguity on any of the shows I did with him, but I may have. On another, solo Cheever show I just reviewed, I did ask him about a remark Updike had made about running into him, plastered, at some ceremony and finding him all but unrecognizable: “I was fairly certain that the John Cheever I knew was in there somewhere.”

Unfazed (seemingly), Cheever quickly answered, “I don’t remember where John made that remark,” and went on to talk toughly about his alcoholism, hitting bottom and saying to himself, “This is not me, nor the life for me, and I enrolled myself in Smithers” — where he kicked the booze after some hard months. I regret not having asked him more about his admiration for certain writers and his detestation of Salinger.

The price exacted by booze, drugs and the wear-and-tear of leading a double (triple?) life of bisexual adultery while maintaining a family and brilliant writing career was writ large on the raffish Cheever face. Looking at the two writers sitting side-by-side in the green room backstage, waiting to go on, Cheever’s somewhat rumpled appearance contrasted noticeably with that of the prim and preppy Updike.

A note on John U. and bad habits: Either before or during one show, someone lit a cigarette, and Updike said, “I could have sworn in court that I am not smoking these days. Then yesterday I edited some pages and, amazed, looked down and there were eleven butts in the ashtray.”

John died of what doctors abbreviate “ca. of the lung.” Maybe docs, especially, like to avoid the dread word.

There is dispute about who gets credit for “Envy no man until he has had a good death.” (Euripides? Shakespeare? Soupy Sales?)

Neither man did. Cheever’s “ca.” was of the bladder (possibly also thanks to the tobacco industry) and it had metastasized. At his last public appearance upon receiving a major literary award at Carnegie Hall, Updike reported, “We acolytes out front were horrified by his gaunt appearance.” He goes on to say, “On that night John announced, ‘Literature is invincible.’” My notes, alas, don’t have Updike’s exact next words, to the effect that “we were all astonished at this optimism.”

Speaking of loss, there was a “Dick Cavett Night” once at that great, historic 40-room mansion on Gramercy Park that is now The National Arts Club. My honoring speakers were (gulp) John Cheever and the great Agnes DeMille. I keep meaning to find out if there is any record of that night.

My memories include my wife’s being charmed and enchanted, getting to sit next to and chat with Cheever — whose works she knew — on the dais.

I remember a huge laugh I got, perhaps somewhat cruelly. In thanking a list of people out front, I came to the name of a gent who had spoken earlier. I recall his last name: Montmorency. His first may have been Rupert. If not, it should have been.

Coming to him on the list, I heard myself say, “And next, Mr. Rupert Montmorency. If, indeed, that is his name.” The laugh was robust to the point of regrettable. Cheever produced tears.

The one sad note of the evening: Out front afterwards, on the dark sidewalk as people were leaving, I thanked and said goodbye to John for the last time He started away and then came back, reached inside his jacket, and handed me his typed copy of the wonderful and witty remarks he had just made about me. As I recall, I tucked them inside my blazer pocket, making a mental note to take good care of that sheet of paper. A cleaner may have been the last to see it.

Damn my sloppiness to deepest hell!

I do have some other cherished items though. Cheever was the master of the terse, witty note of but three or four lines. A favorite had to do with some unflattering remarks made about me that appeared somewhere by the writer Francine du Plessix Gray. Cheever had answered them, defending me. In the mail came:

Dick,
I’m a little worried about my remarks, about Francine du Plexxis [his spelling] Gray. She is a member of the French aristocracy and a crack wing shot. There is no cover on my land.
John


Enjoy the show.

Click here to see the entire 28:30:
http://cavett.blogs.nytimes.com/2009...e-and-cheever/
post #31192 of 87357
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrLar View Post

Yet another snoozer Tuesday, no scripted show is new today (I can't get the CW HD anyhow)

Because Feb sweeps start a month later this year!
post #31193 of 87357
DTV Notes
NAB Asks FCC Not To Have Stations Restart DTV Countdown Clocks March 4
Organization started its own DTV education campaign Monday
By John Eggerton,Broadcasting & Cable 3/2/2009 1:56:40 PM MT

The National Association of Broadcasters has asked the FCC not to instruct stations to restart their DTV countdown clocks March 4--100 days out from the new June 12 hard date, though it has begun its own campaign to educate viewers about that new date.

In meetings with Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein Friday about the FCC's guidelines for compliance with the new date, NAB top regulatory affiars staffers said restarting the clock so soon would "decrease its effectiveness in prompting viewer action."

NAB said the FCC should wait to collect and review all the comments (which aren't due until close of business March 4) to decide the best way to educate viewers.

NAB also suggested that the FCC should not require broadcasters to air station-specific info in DTV instructional programming (NAB has already produced a generic program), arguing that if stations had to edit the half-hour program to add the local material, it would be difficult to caption the programming.

Finally, NAB asked that the commission not require stations who turn off their analog signals before June 12 to air 60 days worth of on-air notifications, saying 30 says should be sufficient and would avoid "over-saturated messaging."

Looking to reshape rather than over-saturate, NAB Monday announced its new, June 12 DTV education push, which began Monday with 200 transit ads on D.C. buses (where 20% of TV households rely on over-the air TV, says NAB). But there is much more, including new DTV TV spots in English and Spanish going to all TV stations, as well as airing in gas stations, on planes, waiting rooms and auto service centers.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/art...ks_March_4.php
post #31194 of 87357
DTV Notes
NTIA: Coupon Waiting List Shrinks, But Only Slightly
Over a million households still on waiting list.
By John Eggerton,Broadcasting & Cable 3/2/2009 7:55:16 AM MT

Over a million households who say they rely on analog television remain on the waiting list for DTV-to-analog converter box coupons, with over 600 TV stations having already pulled the plug on analog.

That's according to the latest figures from the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, which is overseeing the converter box coupon subsidy program. NTIA is still waiting for the Office of Management and Budget to free up $650 million in converter box coupon funding so it can get 2.3 million households off the waiting list.

The good news is that the list is no longer growing. NTIA said Monday that the list shrunk by about 144,000 applications over the past three days.

Once the $650 million allocated for coupons and DTV education in the economic stimulus package is freed up, it will still take two or three weeks to get get those requests off the waiting list. That list was the driving force behind the Obama administration's push to move the DTV hard date from Feb. 17 to June 12.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/art...y_Slightly.php
post #31195 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Technology Notes
Study: DVR users also watch more TV online
And that means they're more like to see the ads
By Kevin Downey, MediaLifeMagazine.com staff writer, Mar 3, 2009

For years television executives have feared the worst of DVRs, now in nearly a third of homes, that more and more viewers would fast-forward through commercials, diminishing the value of the medium.

Those fears turn out to be well-founded. Some 60 percent of DVR users and 90 percent of TiVo users specifically skip through commercials some of the time, according to separate studies by Magna and Starcom, respectively.

But the networks can take some comfort in the advent of online TV. It also turns out that DVR users are far more likely to watch TV content online than the average TV viewer.

A study by Integrated Media Measurement in San Mateo, Calif., found that 35 percent of people who have a DVR and watched primetime programming in the past month watched four or more episodes of online TV programming, and that's not counting content such as user-created videos on YouTube.

By comparison, only 15 percent of people without the use of DVRs who watched primetime programming in the past month watched four or more episodes of online TV programming.

“This makes sense,” says Amanda Welsh, head of research at IMMI. “Fundamentally, the notion of control of TV viewing has been internalized. Now [in addition to DVRs] there is a second mechanism to do that. That doesn’t mean we’ll give up the first mechanism, it just means the universe is expanding.”

Why should networks take comfort in this? Because online commercials typically cannot be fast-forwarded, meaning viewers have to watch the ads in order to get to the content.

This means the networks are reaching many DVR users with commercials that these viewers may otherwise not see.

“It’s a given that there is a different level of ad viewing in DVR viewing than live viewing,” says Welsh. “Online, the ad experience is very different. This is a mechanism that the DVR audience is embracing and, as of right now, doesn’t have a robust ad-avoidance mechanism.”

In conducting its study, IMMI didn’t rely on people remembering what they watched on DVRs and online, as some other studies have, but used specially programmed cell phones that picked up actual media exposure of the 1,400 panelists involved in the study. “We’re looking at actual behavior. There is no survey,” says Welsh.

The downside of these findings, of course, is that at this point in time online TV viewing is miniscule compared to the amount of time people watch TV programming on TV sets. So for that matter is the amount of time people spend watching time-shifted programming on DVRs

That will change over time, of course, but for now DVRs and online TV are having a small impact on TV viewing.

Nielsen found that 285 million people watched TV in their home in fourth quarter last year for an average 151 hours per month. By comparison, 123 million people watched some type of online video for less than three hours, on average, and just under 74 million people watched time-shifted content an average seven hours.

Meanwhile, the primary reason people use DVRs isn’t to fast-forward through commercials, says Bruce Leichtman, president and principal analyst at Leichtman Research Group in Durham, N.H.

“When we ask people what the most important thing is about DVRs, only 12 percent say skipping ads,” he says. “It’s important to them, but it’s not the most important.”

http://www.medialifemagazine.com/art..._TV_online.asp
post #31196 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Weekly Nielsen Notes
A weekly reminder:

Tuesday is the day Nielsen releases last week’s ratings.

So check in throughout the day to see then network and cable ratings as they are made available.
post #31197 of 87357
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa View Post

Technology Notes
Study: DVR users also watch more TV online
And that means they're more like to see the ads
By Kevin Downey, MediaLifeMagazine.com staff writer, Mar 3, 2009

Some 60 percent of DVR users specifically skip through commercials some of the time.

only 60% skip some of the time....i find that hard to believe.
post #31198 of 87357
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrLar View Post

Yet another snoozer Tuesday, no scripted show is new today (I can't get the CW HD anyhow)

Quote:
Originally Posted by foxeng View Post

Because Feb sweeps start a month later this year!

You mean the month we're in right now? I think that's the point DrLar is making: we're in the first Tuesday of a sweeps month (March) and all we're getting across most of the networks is wall-to-wall repeats. What kind of sweeps month is this?
post #31199 of 87357
I'd be curious to see what Craig Ferguson would do with the Jimmy Fallon show budget.

What struck me is that Fallon is aiming at a much younger audience.
post #31200 of 87357
Thread Starter 
Network Nielsen Averages
Prime Time Network Ratings
Week Ending March 1, 2009


(Average rating, share and audience in each category)

ADULTS 18-49

Fox 4.1/11, 5.4 million
CBS 2.5/7, 3.3 million
ABC 2.5/7, 3.3 million
NBC 2.2/6, 2.9 million
UNI 1.5/4, 2.0 million
TEL 0.5/1, 0.7 million
CW 0.5/1, 0.7 million

Each rating point equals 1.32 million viewers

ADULTS 25-54

Fox 4.8/12, 6.0 million
CBS 3.5/9, 4.3 million
ABC 2.9/7, 3.6 million
NBC 2.6/7, 3.3 million
UNI 1.5/4, 1.8 million
CW 0.5/1, 0.6 million
TEL 0.5/1, 0.6 million

Each rating point equals 1.24 million viewers

TOTAL VIEWERS


Fox 3.8/10, 11.2 million
CBS 3.8/10, 11.0 million
ABC 2.5/7, 7.4 million
NBC 2.1/6, 6.2 million
UNI 1.3/3, 3.8 million
CW 0.5/1, 1.4 million
TEL 0.4/1, 1.2 million

Each rating point equals 2.90 million viewers


2008-09 SEASON-TO-DATE AVERAGES
Average rating and audience in each category (share not available)

ADULTS 18-49

Fox 3.4/9, 4.5 million
CBS 3.2/8, 4.2 million
NBC 3.0/8, 4.0 million
ABC 2.9/8, 3.9 million
UNI 1.5/4, 2.0 million
CW 0.9/2, 1.2 million
TEL 0.5/1, 0.7 million

Each rating point equals 1.32 million viewers

ADULTS 25-54

CBS 4.1/10, 5.1 million
Fox 3.9/9 4.8 million
ABC 3.4/8,4.3 million
NBC 3.4/8, 4.3 million
UNI 1.5/4, 1.9 million
CW 0.8/2, 1.0 million
TEL 0.5/1, 0.6 million

Each rating point equals 1.24 million viewers

TOTAL VIEWERS

CBS 4.1/10, 11.8 million
Fox 3.2/8, 9.3 million
ABC 3.1/8, 9.0 million
NBC 2.9/7, 8.4 million
UNI 1.4/3, 4.0 million
CW 0.7/2, 2.0 million
TEL 0.4/1, 1.2 million

Each rating point equals 2.90 million viewers

Source: NBC from Nielsen Media Research data
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information