AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information - Page 1053

post #31561 of 87348
Critic's Review
'The Chopping Block' (NBC)
NBC reality show, hosted by Marco Pierre White, is the latest in a sometimes-moving feast of cooking-centric contests
By Robert Lloyd, Los Angeles Times - March 11, 2009

I don't know whether it's still the American dream to own a restaurant -- it may now be just to hang on to that horrible job you had hoped to quit soon -- but there are at least 16 people who still dream it, and they are contestants on The Chopping Block. Premiering tonight on NBC, this latest in a lengthening line of food-themed reality shows shares a title (and creators) with an Australian food-themed reality show, has much in common with another Australian food-themed reality show ("My Restaurant Rules") and the BBC food-themed reality show "The Restaurant," and boasts the same host as the UK version of the food-themed reality show "Hell's Kitchen," Marco Pierre White.

White, who retired from cooking a decade ago but remains an influential restaurateur, is known among other things as the Man Who Made Gordon Ramsay Cry when Ramsay was working under him in London a couple of decades back. (Ramsay, who preceded White as a host of the British "Hell's Kitchen" and continues to host the American version, quit White -- ironically, you'd have to say -- because of "the rages and the bullying and violence." They don't talk now, nor do White and former assistant Mario Batali, who doesn't talk to Ramsay either.) In the hierarchy of Michelin-starred abusive English chefs turned TV stars, this feat would seem to give White the edge, but he tends to play himself as the nicer, better-intentioned of the two.

As to the show's 16 aspiring Marco Pierre Whites, they come in the form of eight couples -- brothers, sisters, cousins, friends, exes, mother and daughter, significant others -- each comprising a cook and a server. The group is divided into two teams, each of which is given a New York City storefront to turn into a restaurant faster than you can say, "Turn this New York City storefront into a restaurant."

Every episode will end with a dinner service, attended incognito by a restaurant critic -- incognito, that is, if no one recognizes him, which does happen in the second episode -- who will choose a winning team; White will choose a couple from the losing team to eliminate, but not before he invites the losers to throw one another under the bus, in the official reality-show parlance. The last ones standing get $250,000 to "open their own restaurant," although I suppose they are free to blow it on the horses if they prefer.

It's tough to see how they're going to carry on running these restaurants as their ranks thin across the weeks, but the producers no doubt have a plan for that. And the point is, after all, to make it hard, so that crazy things will happen and rude things be said. This is less a show about food than about management and keeping cool under pressure while working alongside people whose opinions and interests ultimately run counter to your own. It's the broth that too many cooks spoil and the waiters have trouble serving hot.

And so it's a relief when White drops by the opposing kitchens to demonstrate how much better a chef he is than any of them. ("It's like he invented food, almost," says contestant Kelsey Henderson, who is from California and has "cooked for Madonna.") Their own displays of incompetence, ignorance or poor judgment don't make him loud and angry so much as quietly, bitterly sad. (He is offended not only on behalf of the customers but of the food itself.)

Slumped regally in a chair, hair unruly, legs crossed at an angle that gives you a good view of his naked ankle, he speaks in aphorisms, severe, paternal, even spiritual, like a sort of culinary Obi-Wan Kenobi -- just imagine him saying "Luke" at the end of these sentences:

"To reach great heights, you have to find great depths within yourself."

"All complication does is create confusion; confusion creates inconsistency; inconsistency creates failure."

"When you're playing with a person's dreams, you have to be fair."

There is a kind of baseline entertainment value to all such contests -- we're a species that will watch turtles race -- and while I'd make no great claims for "The Chopping Block," it's watchable enough. Its biggest problem, rooted in the fact that much of it is produced and cut like a trailer for the less frantic show you expect to start any minute, is that it's difficult to get much of a sense of the contestants -- who they are and where they come from and how good they are at what they do.

A pinch of biography and a dash of human interest (a sainted mother here, children to provide for there, a few fingertips lost in a food processor . . . somewhere) don't add much. Not for refined palates, then, but filling enough.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment...0,665728.story
post #31562 of 87348
Quote:


a few fingertips lost in a food processor . . . somewhere

Oooh! Oooh! Oooh! (doing my BEST impersonation of whoever that big goofy actor is who used to say that) I WANNA SEE THAT!!!
post #31563 of 87348
Here is some great news for FNL

http://tv.ign.com/articles/960/960827p1.html

Sorry did not see earlier post
post #31564 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebkell View Post

And at the start of the season we had Sarah Connor with the same start time, I always thought that glut of shows killed them all, once you lose viewers they don't tend to come back, except CBS, they can put anything on and draw an audience(I like BBT, it just seems like CBS has many loyal viewers no matter what the show)

That's because they don't know how to change the channel and their grandchildren are too busy to come over and do it for them.
post #31565 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrouchoDude View Post

That's because they don't know how to change the channel and their grandchildren are too busy to come over and do it for them.

CBS got me as a fan because of their rollout of HD programing. The only reason I started watching their shows was because of the fact they were in HD and now I have been a CBS fan since.
post #31566 of 87348
TV Notes
On The Air Tonight
Wednesday Network Prime-Time Programming Options

(Reminder: If you are recording these programs, check your network listings for precise start/end times. For PBS, please double check your local listings.)

ABC:
8:00pm Scrubs (R) HD
8:30pm Scrubs (R) HD
9:00pm Lost (R) HD
10:02pm Life on Mars HD

CBS:
8:00pm The New Adventures of Old Christine HD
8:00pm Gary Unmarried HD
9:00pm Criminal Minds HD
10:00pm CSI: NY HD

NBC:
8:00pm Chopping Block (Series Premiere)
9:00pm Life HD
10:00pm Law & Order HD

Fox:
8:00pm Lie To Me HD
9:00pm American Idol HD

The CW:
8:00pm America's Next Top Model
9:00pm 90210 (R) HD

MNT:
8:00pm World's Funniest Moments
9:00pm The Tony Rock Project
9:30pm The Tony Rock Project (R)

Comedy Central:
10:00pm South Park (13th Season Premiere) HD

http://pifeedback.com/eve/forums/a/t...62/m/658104491
post #31567 of 87348
The Business of Television
The Upfront Season This Time Won’t Be Too Upbeat
By Brian Stelter, The New York Times - March 11, 2009

As cable channels have made inroads on the broadcast networks, their share of the upfront advertising market has steadily grown. But this year’s upfront, which starts this month, looks to be a protracted and potentially painful one.

The deepening recession is forcing advertisers to act more selectively, media buyers and sales executives say. The channels with the strongest brands and broadest reach may see more business, while niche channels may struggle to sign deals.

During the upfront season for television, media buyers make advance commitments to secure certain placements for advertisements. Last year, dozens of cable channels collectively sold about $8 billion in advance ad time to advertisers, up 7 to 8 percent over the previous year. Broadcasters sold about $9 billion in ad time, up about 1 percentage point, meaning that cable gained some share of the available advertising dollars.

Shelley Watson, a senior vice president and the director of entertainment at the advertising and marketing agency RPA, said the coming upfronts are “not going to be as robust as last year.” She foresees a marketplace where supply is slightly up and demand is slightly down. “I think it’s at best flat,” she said.



As the trade publication Media Life Magazine put it last month in an assessment of the advertising climate, “flat is the new booming.”

Both buyers and sellers have characterized the market as cautious. “Safety is going to matter in this marketplace. Certainty is going to matter,” said Ed Erhardt, the president of customer marketing and sales for ESPN.

Carolyn Everson, the executive vice president and chief operating officer for MTV Networks’ advertising sales, said advertisers were in the process of gathering budgets. “We know this year will be a tough market,” she said.

The broadcast networks hold festive presentations of new programming for advertisers in New York each May. In part to enjoy their own days in the spotlight, many ad-supported cable channels hold their own upfront presentations before the broadcasters do.

Already, companies like MTV Networks, a division of Viacom, and Turner Broadcasting, a division of Time Warner, are in discussions with advertisers about new programming and marketing opportunities. On Thursday, Nickelodeon will be the host for media buyers at an upfront event; next Monday, Sci Fi will make upfront announcements; and the next week the Hallmark Channel will make a presentation.

With its smaller audiences, cable usually sells time at a discount to broadcast time. Jeff Gaspin, the president of the Universal Television Group, calls it a “great value” for advertisers, especially given the quality of many of the scripted dramas and comedies on cable. Mr. Gaspin said that the season finale of “Burn Notice,” a USA series about spies, was one of the highest-rated dramas on any network last Thursday among 18- to 49-year-olds.

“When you have statistics like that, you’re no longer talking about a reach in cable that doesn’t compare to broadcast,” he said. “In some cases cable’s better, because it’s somewhat targeted.”

Although individual broadcasters still draw the biggest audiences, viewers continue to move gradually to cable. For the first half of the 2008-9 TV season, the six broadcast networks averaged 40 million viewers, and the 76 ad-supported cable networks that are measured by Nielsen averaged 56 million viewers in prime time. During the same time period in the 2007-8 season, broadcast averaged 43 million viewers and cable averaged 51 million, according to RPA.

To stand out, some cable channels coin new names for their target audiences. Last year MTV introduced the name “Generation P” for its young viewers, referencing a demographic that produces and programs their own media. This year IFC and the Sundance Channel, two film channels owned by Cablevision, are using the term “indienomics” to describe the spending habits of their affluent viewers.

Other niche channels, meanwhile, are rebranding themselves in advance of the upfront season. Fine Living Network, a branch of Scripps, now calls itself FLN, for instance. And the Travel Channel recently introduced a campaign called “Travel Bug” that taps into viewers’ desires to get away.

Niche cable channels may face a stiffer challenge this year, though. “A lot of the advertisers I’m speaking to are going to look to do business with fewer networks,” said Steve Mandala, the executive vice president for cable ad sales for NBC Universal. “What they’re looking for is networks that deliver scale as well as quality.”

Mr. Erhardt agreed that the list of networks is “going to be shorter. I think it’s reflective of what’s happening across all media,” he said.

For the second year Turner, which owns TNT and TBS, plans to hold its upfront presentation in May, the same week as most of the broadcast networks.



A higher than usual number of advertisers have canceled some their upfront cable purchases this winter, taking advantage of the options they negotiate with sellers.

Turner reported a 10 percent cancellation rate in the second quarter of the year, higher than the usual 6 percent rate.

David Levy, the president of sales for Turner Broadcasting, said that was “higher than in years past, but certainly not as high as it could have been.”

Ms. Watson said companies were buying ad time in the year-round scatter market (a name for the unsold inventory after the upfront market ends) close to the broadcast dates. “Clients want to make sure the money is really there,” she said.

MTV Networks, which includes Comedy Central, VH1 and others, drew attention last year for its emphasis on brand integration and new advertising formats. (Remember Stephen Colbert’s enthusiastic endorsements of Doritos snack chips on Comedy Central?) Ms. Everson said the company was working on several large partnerships to create programming with advertisers.

“The line between programming time and commercial time is evaporating,” she said. “When we do our job right, it doesn’t exist. Content that connects is content that connects.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/bu..._r=1&ref=media
post #31568 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

On The Air Tonight

Lost is a repeat? Why? There seem to be a lot of repeats this week, even though we're now in the sweeps period. What's up with that?
post #31569 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnesia View Post

Lost is a repeat? Why? There seem to be a lot of repeats this week, even though we're now in the sweeps period. What's up with that?

Yeah, they said it last week, "Lost in 2 weeks", I thought there was something special going on today like Obama giving some speech or something, but no...

And FOX doing them the nasty and moving Idol to the Lost hour slot... good luck next Wednesday getting decent ratings...

I still can't understand why people view Idol's result shows, only the last 5 minutes of those shows are worth anything.. LOL
post #31570 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrLar View Post

And FOX doing them the nasty and moving Idol to the Lost hour slot... good luck next Wednesday getting decent ratings...

I still can't understand why people view Idol's result shows, only the last 5 minutes of those shows are worth anything.. LOL

Couple of points about this: 1. This wasn't an all of a sudden decision on Fox's part to move the Idol results show back an hour, they do it every year, and it was announced months ago. 2. Why would Fox competing with Lost be "nasty?" It's business, of course they want to challenge the competitor's bigger shows. That said, I agree with your point about the Idol results shows being a waste of time, in fact, I'm pretty much out of Idol completely this season, and I love Lost.
post #31571 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockyF View Post

That said, I agree with your point about the Idol results shows being a waste of time, in fact, I'm pretty much out of Idol completely this season, and I love Lost.

Oh, were there only about 10 million more of folks who think like that.
post #31572 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by chitchatjf View Post

I would say screw this. I'm putting it on NFL Network!

that would be a problem being NFLN doesnt start their games until November.
post #31573 of 87348
Nielsen Overnights (18-49)
'Idol' voting special sweeps the night
Two-hour Fox reality show averages a 9.2 in 18-49s
By Toni Fitzgerald, Media Life Magazine - March 11, 2009

The first performance show by American Idol's 13 finalists gave Fox an easy and overwhelming victory Tuesday night.

The expanded two-hour show, the first of the season in which viewers got to vote, averaged a 9.2 adults 18-49 rating and 24 share, according to Nielsen overnights.

Fox more than doubled the No. 2 network on the night, NBC, which averaged a 3.7/10. That included The Biggest Loser's best-ever performance against a two-hour Idol, with the NBC reality show averaging a 3.8 from 8 to 10.

Fox also bettered the combined nightly average for the other Big Five networks, who totaled an 8.3, though CBS, ABC and the CW all aired at least one rerun.

As a reminder, all ratings are based on live-plus-same-day DVR playback. Seven-day DVR data won't be available for several weeks. Twenty-eight percent of Nielsen households have DVRs.

CBS placed third for the night at 2.5/7, Univision fourth at 1.6/4, ABC fifth at 1.5/4 and CW sixth at 0.6/2.

At 8 p.m. Fox led with an 8.5 for the first hour of Idol, with NBC second with a 3.4 for Loser. CBS was third with a 2.7 for a repeat of NCIS, Univision fourth with a 1.8 for Cuidado con el Angel, ABC fifth with a 1.4 for Homeland Security and CW sixth with a 0.8 for Reaper.

Fox was first again at 9 p.m. with a 9.9 for more Idol, while NBC remained second with a 4.1 for another hour of Loser. CBS was third with a 2.8 for a repeat of The Mentalist, Univision fourth with a 1.8 for Mañana Es para Siempre, ABC fifth with a 1.1 for an hour of Scrubs and CW sixth with a 0.4 for a repeat of 90210.

At 10 p.m. NBC moved to first place with a 3.6 for Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, followed by CBS with a 2.1 for a Without a Trace rerun. ABC was third with a 1.9 for Primetime and Univision fourth with a 1.2 for Aqui y Ahora.

Fox also finished first for the night among households with a 14.5 average overnight rating and a 22 share. CBS was second at 8.0/13, NBC third at 6.2/10, ABC fourth at 3.0/5, Univision fifth at 2.1/3 and CW sixth at 1.0/2.

http://www.medialifemagazine.com/art..._the_night.asp
post #31574 of 87348
Critic's Notes
Interactive TV? How about focus on the plot?
By Tim Goodman, San Francisco Chronicle - March 11, 2009

It's hard to ignore something called the TV of Tomorrow Show, especially when it comes to San Francisco for two days. See the future - now. I'm very interested in the TV of Tomorrow, partly because the TV of Today is so bad. Maybe they have some answers, these people.

So I made a pledge to at least pop in and out of sessions held Tuesday and today at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts. But first I wanted to check out what they'd be talking about in the sessions - a more efficient way to kill off "According to Jim," perhaps?

As it turns out, much of the discussion planned was about targeted advertising - or how to use "multiplatforms" to get the word out. That word being someone's slogan, is my guess. There's an element of data mining at play here that is bound to prick up the ears of certain people who already don't trust Comcast, or TiVo or Google or any set-top box they can't quite figure out. If interactivity is the core of the future - and this convention was sponsored by InteractiveTV Today - part of the process is bound to involve finding out about those people on the other end taking polls and voting on things they see on their television.

Now, I'm wary of data sharing or mining or peeking or whatever you want to call it, but not to the point of being paranoid. I understand that if a company is going to hone its advertising to specific target audiences it needs to know a little about them. Besides, I'm not naive enough to think that TiVo doesn't already know what I'm wearing to work.

And yet, I'm a content guy. Two days of chatter about "the ecosystem of screens" - meaning my TV, my Internet, my iPhone, etc. - needs to have some element on how to make Fox sitcoms funnier or a way to digitally erase the entire management structure of NBC. Anything short of that and I'm bored.

Then I hit on a trend at the TV of Tomorrow Show that just might impact content. And even if you consider yourself a Luddite, this may ultimately affect you as well. All television viewers are coming into or going out of "the demo" - different age demographics, such as 18-34, 18-49, 25-54, etc. You can sell advertising at a higher rate if you pull a better number in the coveted 18-34 demo, which is precisely the audience that is using social networking and interactive tools the most.

One of the TV of Tomorrow ideas is that new technology will vastly increase what is being touted as "social TV" - the ability to chat with other viewers through your television as a show airs, to click on elements of the show as it plays (buy what the cast is wearing, vote on whether you like a character, get a menu for the meal being cooked, etc.).

The technology is here. How to apply it or how content providers like the networks and cable channels will allow it to be applied are the issues in play.

Now, I see that and I think, "television just got dumber." Storytellers - from Aaron Sorkin to David Simon to Tina Fey - must be cringing. Or assuming a defensive crouch. If people aren't following the narrative flow, you've lost them. You've lost the ability to tell complicated stories. Your perfectly written - and paced - jokes may fall flat. Why?

Because people are multitasking. Remember when television was derided as a passive experience? Well, that might have been a negative when it came to vapid sitcoms and rote dramas. But anyone who watched "The Wire" or listened to the banter on "The West Wing" had to be alert. Those shows didn't pander. There's no pandering on "30 Rock," just as there wasn't on "Arrested Development."

Now, anyone who has dealt with a high school or college student knows that they multitask while watching television all the time.

A Nielsen study found that 31 percent of people watch TV while they're also surfing the Web. That number is probably 90 percent in college. Now, this idea of social TV may not force HBO or Showtime to dumb down their content, but what happens when a really great network drama or a sophisticated comedy proves too - wait for it - demanding to watch? The buzz dies. People flip the channel. The shows go away and the networks stop making series that actually demand your attention.

I don't see the upside there.

Now, an argument could be made that TV series such as "Lost," which have both intense fan loyalty and a con-joined life online (so many clues on the show are deciphered and discussed there), might actually benefit from increased interactivity. To which I say - um, have you tried to follow the plot on "Lost" lately? If you've got time to diddle online while it airs, and still understand the quantum physics and magical realism, then you're too smart for the room.

I don't know what the TV of Tomorrow Show will ultimately say about the future. The killer app may be a better way to sell soap. But if technology ends up dumbing down television - giving us a diversion from our escapism - then some higher power (or bookstore) better save us.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...DDS916C3R0.DTL
post #31575 of 87348
The Business of Television
Former NBC exec to join Chernin?
By Dawn Chemielewski, Los Angeles Times - March 11, 2009

Katherine Pope, the former head of Universal Media Studios, is talking with Peter Chernin about joining the outgoing News Corp. executive when he launches his new production company.

Pope, who as head of NBC's television studio helped shephard such shows as "Heroes" and "30 Rock," was one of three top programming executives who were outsted last year following a rocky fall season for the broadcast network.

Industry sources say Pope has been in discussions with Chernin, who announced that he would leave News Corp. when his contract ends in June, concluding more than a dozen years as the entertainment giant's chief operating officer.

Chernin's contract guarantees him a six-year motion picture and television production deal, under which Fox is obligated to green-light at least two movies a year -- at his discretion.

Chernin did not respond to an e-mail request for information. Pope could not be reached for comment.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/ente...-nbc-univ.html
post #31576 of 87348
DTV Notes
McDowell in Texas Pushing Digital Awareness Campaign

By John Eggerton, Broadcasting & Cable 3/11/2009 9:21:37 AM MT

FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell is in Texas to help boost awareness of the digital transition.

McDowell was scheduled to be in McCallen and Laredo, both Texas, March 10 and 12 as part of the FCC's effort to reach out to DTV at-risk markets, particularly those with at least 100,000 households who rely on over-the-air analog TV reception.

McDowell spoke at the University of Texas Tuesday and was slated to speak at Laredo City Hall Wednesday.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/art...s_Campaign.php
post #31577 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

The Business of Television
Former NBC exec to join Chernin?
By Dawn Chemielewski, Los Angeles Times - March 11, 2009

Katherine Pope, the former head of Universal Media Studios, is talking with Peter Chernin about joining the outgoing News Corp. executive when he launches his new production company.

Pope, who as head of NBC's television studio helped shephard such shows as "Heroes" and "30 Rock," was one of three top programming executives who were outsted last year following a rocky fall season for the broadcast network.

Industry sources say Pope has been in discussions with Chernin, who announced that he would leave News Corp. when his contract ends in June, concluding more than a dozen years as the entertainment giant's chief operating officer.

Chernin's contract guarantees him a six-year motion picture and television production deal, under which Fox is obligated to green-light at least two movies a year -- at his discretion.

Chernin did not respond to an e-mail request for information. Pope could not be reached for comment.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/ente...-nbc-univ.html

Wow. What a sweet-heart deal.
post #31578 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockyF View Post

Couple of points about this: 1. This wasn't an all of a sudden decision on Fox's part to move the Idol results show back an hour, they do it every year, and it was announced months ago. 2. Why would Fox competing with Lost be "nasty?" It's business, of course they want to challenge the competitor's bigger shows. That said, I agree with your point about the Idol results shows being a waste of time, in fact, I'm pretty much out of Idol completely this season, and I love Lost.

Easy fix to the AI quandry in my house. I could give a crap if the show was cancelled tomorrow, but the missus & the kids like the singing.

1- We never watch the show until the final 12 - now 13 - are performing for votes. Have zero interest in the "mocking the mentally ill" audition process episodes or the Hollywood elimination rounds - which reek the most of "reality TV".

2 - DVR all the way. By FF-ing past ads, fake "after the break" drama, "personal moments" and anytime a judge NOT named Simon Cowell is giving their opinion - well, an hour long AI just got dumped down to about 10-15 minutes...max! And all the meat is still present. Wife then will spend the next 30 minutes or so speed redialing for her fave that week. And all of this occurs the same night of broadcast, of course.

3 - Skip results shows entirely. Here on the west coast, AI results are up online @ several news outlets by 7:00pm PST.
post #31579 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahard View Post

Wow. What a sweet-heart deal.

Fox seems to always be the beneficiary of Ben Silverman's presence at NBC. First Kevin Reilly gets the boot (winds up co-running Fox) and now Pope gets to run Chernin's new production company (which benefits Fox if they turn out any hits).
post #31580 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by steverobertson View Post

Here is some great news for FNL

http://tv.ign.com/articles/960/960827p1.html

Sorry did not see earlier post

Thanks Steve. Has a huge fan, I sure hope they can come to some sort of agreement. There is plenty more good storytelling to tell in Dillon, TX.
post #31581 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maestro J View Post

Thanks Steve. Has a huge fan, I sure hope they can come to some sort of agreement. There is plenty more good storytelling to tell in Dillon, TX.

Did you watch on D* or are you now watching on NBC? I have seen the whole season and thought it was the best so far.
post #31582 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

TV Notes
Exclusive: 'Friday Night Lights' close to scoring a renewal?
By Michael Ausiello, EW.com - March 10, 2009

It's not quite a touchdown yet, but at least they're near the end zone.

Sources confirm to me exclusively that NBC is engaged in active talks with DirecTV to extend their unique shared-window experiment with Friday Night Lights. But there's a catch -- and it's a good one. According to an insider close to the negotiations, DTV and NBC might only seal the deal if they can get - holy Connie Britton Taylor! -- a two-season pickup.


See that name in the byline? That means this is gossip and speculation, not fact. Don't get your hopes up until he names actual people involved in making these claims.

"Sources confirm to me?" "According to an insider?"
For all anyone knows Ausiello heard this from the brother of a guy who knows someone who works in the green room on NBC who overheard someone on the phone talking about how he just picked up two seasons of FNL on DVD.
post #31583 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisionOn View Post

See that name in the byline? That means this is gossip and speculation, not fact. Don't get your hopes up until he names actual people involved in making these claims.

"Sources confirm to me?" "According to an insider?"
For all anyone knows Ausiello heard this from the brother of a guy who knows someone who works in the green room on NBC who overheard someone on the phone talking about how he just picked up two seasons of FNL on DVD.

Connie is a no brainer 2 more years of her would be just fine by me
post #31584 of 87348
TV Notes
Exclusive: 'Trace,' 'Case' knocking at death's door?
By Michael Ausiello, EW.com - March 10, 2009

It's time to update your bubble show scorecard.

Multiple sources confirm that cost-conscious CBS has informed the producers of Without a Trace and Cold Case that the long-running procedurals are facing possible cancellation come May.

"They no longer have the type of ratings that justify the massive overhead," points out an Eye source, who adds that the Trace and Case bean counters at Warner Bros. are looking for ways to trim costs and avoid getting the axe. That includes convincing the casts of both shows to take salary cuts -- or at the very least forfeit their annual raises. (As I reported last month, CBS is implementing a similar salary freeze at most of its in-house dramas.)

But even if new figures can be negotiated, the insider stresses that "it's not a given that either show will be back." Reps for CBS and Warner Bros. declined to comment for this story.

On the bright side, at least we don't have to worry about perennial bubble candidate-turned-hit How I Met Your Mother this year! At least I don't think we do. We better not.

http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/03/...ive-witho.html
post #31585 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

TV Notes
Exclusive: 'Trace,' 'Case' knocking at death's door?
By Michael Ausiello, EW.com - March 10, 2009

It's time to update your bubble show scorecard.

Multiple sources confirm that cost-conscious CBS has informed the producers of Without a Trace and Cold Case that the long-running procedurals are facing possible cancellation come May.

"They no longer have the type of ratings that justify the massive overhead," points out an Eye source, who adds that the Trace and Case bean counters at Warner Bros. are looking for ways to trim costs and avoid getting the axe. That includes convincing the casts of both shows to take salary cuts -- or at the very least forfeit their annual raises. (As I reported last month, CBS is implementing a similar salary freeze at most of its in-house dramas.)

But even if new figures can be negotiated, the insider stresses that "it's not a given that either show will be back." Reps for CBS and Warner Bros. declined to comment for this story.

On the bright side, at least we don't have to worry about perennial bubble candidate-turned-hit How I Met Your Mother this year! At least I don't think we do. We better not.

http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/03/...ive-witho.html

This is not good news I really like both shows and hope they can work things out.
post #31586 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by steverobertson View Post

This is not good news I really like both shows and hope they can work things out.

I still enjoy Cold Case although I usually only get to it after several days of sitting on the DVR. With Trace, I've dozed off while watching it, plus, it doesn't seem to be on with any regularity anymore, I couldn't even tell you what night of the week it's on.
post #31587 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisionOn View Post

See that name in the byline? That means this is gossip and speculation, not fact. Don't get your hopes up until he names actual people involved in making these claims.

"Sources confirm to me?" "According to an insider?"
For all anyone knows Ausiello heard this from the brother of a guy who knows someone who works in the green room on NBC who overheard someone on the phone talking about how he just picked up two seasons of FNL on DVD.

I think Fred has trained us "HOTP" readers well about being at least cynical about the gossip that Ausiello passes on as 'exclusives' VisionON. Ditto for Nikki Finke. That said even a broken clock is right twice a day, and to his credit Ausiello has broken a few stories that turned out to be accurate. I just post them here and let each of us judge whether there's any validity to the 'exclusive' until its either confirmed or denies.
post #31588 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

That said even a broken clock is right twice a day

what about when we changed the clocks this past weekend....if a clock was broke at 2:18 it was only right once on sunday as there was no 2:18am only a 2:18pm.

EDIT: also, 6 months from now it would be right 3 x in 1 day.
post #31589 of 87348
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan View Post

I still enjoy Cold Case although I usually only get to it after several days of sitting on the DVR. With Trace, I've dozed off while watching it, plus, it doesn't seem to be on with any regularity anymore, I couldn't even tell you what night of the week it's on.

I do the same with Cold Case and as i am watching I say to myself I really enjoy it why do I wait. Without a Trace I really like and if this it I will miss Poppy and Miss Sanchez. I loveed the little kiss they laid on each other a couple of years ago
post #31590 of 87348
CHANGES COMING AT FOX NFL

ESPN isn't the only network that has parted ways with a certain member of its NFL contingency for next season.

We're hearing that FOX is engaged in a relatively significant shuffling of its pro football television production, with changes coming among the ranks of play-by-play announcers, analysts, and producers.

Apparently, the moves arise more from a desire to shake things up than from considerations of the economy.

If FOX really wants to shake things up, they'll consider hiring a certain former ESPN employee.

It just might be the best way to debacle the competition.

http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/...coming-at-fox/
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information