AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information - Page 2563

post #76861 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

it's called Ultraviolet you can have both. Doesn't help with older stuff you own though.

Except to have both you still need to buy a disc and the digital version still has the same potential to fail.

Possibly even more so, given how studios can't get their act together. In two years it might be called Cloudvision or Digidiscy or Streamvid or Fluffyview etc. and they may change the parameters once again. Rendering UV a dead service.

You only have to look at BD-Live to see how well studio co-operation works out. This far in to the life cycle of BD and you still need multiple accounts, passwords and user names to go online for the more interesting features. They should have figured that out long ago to give every user one account to remember but instead we are left with a messy service that's just too much work for the majority to use.

I forgot my account details for various BD's years ago and I cannot be bothered to try and figure them all out now. So much for that next-gen feature.
post #76862 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisionOn View Post

You only have to look at BD-Live to see how well studio co-operation works out. This far in to the life cycle of BD and you still need multiple accounts, passwords and user names to go online for the more interesting features. They should have figured that out long ago to give every user one account to remember but instead we are left with a messy service that's just too much work for the majority to use.

I forgot my account details for various BD's years ago and I cannot be bothered to try and figure them all out now. So much for that next-gen feature.

My experience as well. BD-live, ugh. Not worth it.
post #76863 of 87161
THURSDAY's fast affiliate overnight prime-time ratings -and what they mean- have been posted on Analyst Marc Berman's Media INsight's Blog.
post #76864 of 87161
Nielsen Overnights (18-49)
CBS ties Fox for first on final Thursday of sweeps
Networks average a 3.2 apiece in adults 18-49
By Toni Fitzgerald, Media Life Magazine - Feb. 24, 2012

CBS tied the usually victorious Fox on the final Thursday of the February sweeps as the hit show "American Idol" fell to a season low and its lowest-rated episode in years.

"Idol" averaged a 4.4 adults 18-49 rating at 8 p.m., according to Nielsen, down 12 percent from a 5.0 overnight rating last week.

"Idol" averaged just a 4.0 in its first half hour, 1.2 behind CBS's competing "The Big Bang Theory," the night's top show. The Fox program jumped to a 4.9 in its second half, but that wasn't enough to lift the network above its rival for the night.

Fox had won the previous three sweeps Thursdays.

CBS got another solid outing from drama "Person of Interest," which averaged a 3.1, up 11 percent from last week, when a number of programs took big ratings hits.

NBC's "The Office" also rebounded from last week's season low, rising from a 2.3 to a 2.6. ABC's "Grey's Anatomy" matched last week with a 3.1, tying with "Person" as the evening's top drama.

CBS and Fox each averaged a 3.2 overnight rating and a 9 share for the night. ABC was third at 2.3/6, NBC fourth at 1.6/4, Univision fifth at 1.3/4, Telemundo sixth at 0.5/1 and CW seventh at 0.4/1.

As a reminder, all ratings are based on live-plus-same-day DVR playback, which includes shows replayed before 3 a.m. the night before. Seven-day DVR data won't be available for several weeks. Forty-three percent of Nielsen households have DVRs.

Fox started the night in the lead with a 4.4 at 8 p.m. for "Idol," followed by CBS with a 4.1 for "Bang" (5.2) and "Rob" (3.0). NBC was third with a 1.6 for "30 Rock" (1.5) and "Parks and Recreation" (1.7), ABC fourth with a 1.5 for "Wipeout," Univision fifth with a 1.4 for "Una Familia con Suerte," Telemundo sixth with a 0.6 for "Una Maid en Manhattan" and CW seventh with a 0.5 for a repeat of "The Vampire Diaries."

At 9 p.m. ABC and CBS tied for the lead at 3.1, ABC for "Grey's" and CBS for "Interest." NBC was third with a 2.2 for "Office" (2.6) and "Up All Night" (1.8), Fox fourth with a 2.0 for "The Finder," Univision fifth with a 1.2 for "El Talisman," Telemundo sixth with a 0.5 for "Flor Salvaje" and CW seventh with a 0.3 for a "Supernatural" rerun.

CBS was first at 10 p.m. with a 2.5 for "The Mentalist," with ABC second with a 2.2 for "Private Practice." Univision was third with a 1.4 for "La Que No Podia Amar," NBC fourth with a 0.9 for a repeat of "Grimm" and Telemundo fifth with a 0.4 for "Relaciones Peligrosas."

CBS led the night among households with an 8.3 average overnight rating and a 13 share. Fox was second at 6.5/10, ABC third at 4.5/7, NBC fourth at 2.1/3, Univision fifth at 1.8/3, and CW and Telemundo tied for sixth at 0.7/1.

http://www.medialifemagazine.com/art...-of-sweeps.asp
post #76865 of 87161
TV Notes
Animated Comedy Good Vibes' Cancelled By MTV After One Season
By Nellie Andreeva, Deadline.com - Feb. 24, 2012

EXCLUSIVE: We've seen the last of MTV's animated comedy Good Vibes as the cable network has opted not to pickup a second season of the series created by David Gordon Green. The decision came after weeks of conversations between MTV and Good Vibes producers about ways to keep the show alive. One potential scenario discussed involved pairing the animated comedy with MTV's breakout live-action comedy Awkward for extra sampling.

For its freshman run, Good Vibes aired in a block with Beavis And Butt-Head despite being far more female-skewing than the revival of Mike Judge's 1990s animated staple. In the end, despite their faith in the Good Vibess creative direction and its auspices, MTV brass felt that the series didn't attract a broad enough audience to justify another season. Beavis & Butt-Head and Good Vibes premiered against Game 6 of the World Series in October, drawing 3.3 million and 1.6 million viewers, respectively.

It is a bitter-sweet ending for Good Vibes, which still ran a season longer than anyone expected. The project, developed at Warner Bros. TV through Tom Werner's studio-based Good Humor TV production company, was first given a pilot presentation order by Fox in 2008, with Adam Brody, Alan Tudyk, Danny McBride, Debi Mazar, Jake Busey, Josh Gad and Olivia Thirlby as the voice cast. Fox ultimately passed, which should've been the end of the road but Good Vibes producers didn't give up, and in 2010 the animated comedy received a series order at MTV. Even the entire voice cast came back.

As for Good Vibes companion Beavis & Butt-head, conversations about its future are still ongoing.

http://www.deadline.com/2012/02/anim...er-one-season/
post #76866 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastslappy View Post

What's a Dallas Cowboy ?

An ex-con.
post #76867 of 87161
TV Notes
‘Fringe’ producers hope for a future, but plan a finale in case the end is near
By David Hinckley, New York Daily News - Feb. 24, 2012

The producers of Fox’s cult favorite “Fringe” (9 p.m. Fridays) which is ratings-challenged in two universes, say they’re still hoping the show will score a fourth season.

If it doesn’t, though, executive producer J.H. Wyman said Thursday, the show will end in a way that leaves fans “sad but satiated.”

“We want to take care of the fans. We want them to see where it would have gone, but we also know the show has been a commitment and we want everyone to be satisfied with it.”

“We don’t want anyone to go away thinking they wasted their time,” said fellow executive producer Jeff Pinkner.

The viewership for “Fringe” has declined in its Friday night slot this year, and while Wyman said he thinks many fans are time-shifting to watch it on other nights, he and Pinkner acknowledged the show’s fate is up in the air.

“We get this every year,” said Wyman. “And you have no control over it. So we can only do what we do, which is make the show we love and hope for the best.”

Fox Entertainment President Kevin Reilly said last month that while Fox considers “Fringe” an asset on Friday nights, the show’s relatively high budget is an issue.

“For ‘Fringe’ to come back, we’d have to structure the cost in a way that makes sense,” said Reilly.

“Fringe” has a new episode Friday night, then a three-week break, followed by eight more episodes this season.

The finale will work whether it ends the season or the series, said Pinkner.

“We haven’t written it yet,” he said. “But we know what it is. We’ve known since the beginning of the season.”

If it turns out to end the show, he said, “I’d feel sad because I know how much more story we have left to tell.

“But you know what, we’d still feel it’s a success. It’s a sci-fi show on network television and the fact it’s continued for several years is amazing in itself.”

TV’s reluctance to embrace sci-fi is ironic, Wyman said: “In the movies, everyone goes to sci-fi. On TV, no one will touch it with a barge pole.”

Even “Lost,” he suggested, snuck in the back door, posing as a drama and getting viewers hooked before they realized it was really sci-fi.

But after “Lost” and “Fringe,” he said, “perhaps people will realize the consistency of quality for sci-fi; it’s not just for geeks. Maybe it will open their minds a little.”

Unfortunately, he mused, that may not happen until the shows themselves are gone.

Meanwhile, Pinkner said Friday night’s “Fringe” episode will be “a game changer” in which “the characters learn a lot more” about the larger arc of the season and what’s going on with, for instance,

It has both elements, says Wyman, “that make a great ‘Fringe’ episode - it’s terrifying, but it also has a great love story.”

Pinkner said this episode, like others, may be controversial among fans.

“We often write stories to spark debate,” he admitted. “But we always want to give the answer at the end.”

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...icle-1.1027676
post #76868 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastslappy View Post

What does ultraviolet cost? , I can't seem to get to the pricing without giving out personal info 1st & i'm not gonna give out that info just to check prices

nothing it's part of the DVD or blu-ray you buy. it will say ultraviolet on the box.
post #76869 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisionOn View Post

Except to have both you still need to buy a disc and the digital version still has the same potential to fail.

No you don't. If you buy the disc the digital version is free. UV isn't perfect but it's better than what they had before. I suggest people educate themselves on what UV actually is before making incorrect statements. No offense.

http://www.uvvu.com/faqs.php
post #76870 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

TV Notes
Fringe' producers hope for a future, but plan a finale in case the end is near
By David Hinckley, New York Daily News - Feb. 24, 2012

The producers of Fox's cult favorite Fringe (9 p.m. Fridays) which is ratings-challenged in two universes, say they're still hoping the show will score a fourth season.

...

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...icle-1.1027676

Sigh. It would be a fifth season. This is the fourth season.
post #76871 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

nothing it's part of the DVD or blu-ray you buy. it will say ultraviolet on the box.

Ok I think I get what they mean now , & I've seen the logo on the Blu-Rays .
Thanx
post #76872 of 87161
Hard to say whether it is free or not though as the cost of UV implementation is likely built-in to the retail cost of the physical disc(s).
post #76873 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

No you don't. If you buy the disc the digital version is free. UV isn't perfect but it's better than what they had before. I suggest people educate themselves on what UV actually is before making incorrect statements. No offense.

http://www.uvvu.com/faqs.php

I never said UV wasn't free with a disc. What I said was that you can't have a physical copy without buying a disc. They don't give it away free with a digital version and if you want redundancy to avoid cloudbursts you need to buy the disc.

End result: You have a physical copy. So Ultraviolet doesn't make cloud-based media any more reliable than owning a non-UV disc. Either way you have an optical disc.
post #76874 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisionOn View Post

You don't get that problem with a disc you own and have in your hand.

Kind of like the old joke in information technology: "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of DLTs."
post #76875 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

TV Notes
Fringe' producers hope for a future, but plan a finale in case the end is near
By David Hinckley, New York Daily News - Feb. 24, 2012

Fringe has a new episode Friday night, then a three-week break, followed by eight more episodes this season.

So that gives me a month to get another eSATA disk drive enabled on my DVR. Hey! Have hard drive prices come back down yet?
post #76876 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

Do they hyperbole much? Except 40% of the customers at the time had the streaming only plan( like me ) which got a ZERO% increase. Another 10% had the $10 plan but never used streaming for a variety of reasons so they got a 20% DECREASE. That's 50% that didn't get this "60% increase" those on 2 or more DVDs at a time got increases that were well under 60%. The actualy number of Netflix customers that got the "60% increase" was maybe 20%-25% at most. But why bother with facts?

For those that did get the 60% increase boo hoo. Sorry that you think you're were entitled to rent 6-7 DVDs a month for $2. If you can come up with a business plan where a companies can rent out 7 DVDs a month for $2 and still make a profit THEN you can complain.

The most angry customers were likely people like me who had a DVD plan and used streaming occasionally as a bonus, not the other way around. I didn't have a streaming plan to get DVDs. That meant I would have to pay full freight for streaming I seldom used.

The beef I have is no provision for a combined discount. I'd be happy to pay part of the cost of the full streaming price to add it to my DVD service, but I watch mostly DVDs and BD's, not streaming video. I don't want to pay for an unlimited plan when I'll only use it for a few hours a month.

With most business models, buying multiple items results in a discount for them combined. If Netflix did that, I'd buy both and likely use less of each than most people with one or the other. They'd get more money from me at likely no more cost to them.

Further, I was willing to simply delete streaming after the price changes - then the whole Quickster thing happened and it basically told me "you are not a customer we want at Netflix if you want discs". For that, I dumped the service to one disc at a time and opened a Blockbuster account.

The only unfortunate thing is I may have to go back since Blockbuster has never sucked more than they have before. Their mail service is terrible and they just closed my nearby store, meaning I'm lucky to get more than 3 discs a week on a 3 out plan. I have yet to have a new release mailed to me and now I can't get them from the store like I used to. I'm now down to a 2 out plan and have removed total access from the account. I'll likely drop it down to one and add a disc or two back to Netflix.

Red Box is no solution either. There are far more movies I want to see than the few dozen in the box. Besides, if I wanted to wait 28 days for a new release, I can continue to do that with Netflix - and I've never failed to get it the week they have it available. That's still faster than never for BB.
post #76877 of 87161
Despite Dish buying them, Blocksbuster will be gone completely before you know it. They are closing 500 of the 1500 stores they had left in this quarter alone.
post #76878 of 87161
TV Notes
Sacha Baron Cohen takes his Oscars war to the media
By Patrick Kevin Day, Los Angeles Times - Feb. 24, 2012

Sacha Baron Cohen's plan to show up at Sunday's Oscar ceremony in character as Adm. Gen. Shabazz Aladeen, the focus of his upcoming movie "The Dictator," may have been scuttled by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, but Cohen (or at least his character) isn't taking the slight quietly. He's taking the fight to the media.

Cohen called into NBC's "Today" show on Friday morning, in character as Aladeen, upset about being banned from the Oscars red carpet. (Cohen is still welcome to attend, but only as himself.)

Playing along, hosts Ann Curry and Carl Quintanilla asked the dictator about the red carpet ban. Aladeen responded that he had issued an ultimatum to the academy, "They have until midday on Sunday to give me my tickets back. If they do not, they will see and face unforeseen and unimaginable consequences."

When asked what those unimaginable consequences might be, Aladeen responded, "Let's just say oil prices might be raised."

On Wednesday, academy President Tom Sherak told The Times that he had warned Paramount Pictures, the studio distributing "The Dictator," that Cohen showing up in character was "a bad thing to do."

Curry made some effort to get Cohen to break character, asking Aladeen what he thought of Cohen's performance in the Oscar-nominated film "Hugo," but Aladeen wouldn't bite, responding that he hadn't heard of "Hugo" and that the only films shown in his country were those written by and starring himself. "Hugo" was also distributed by Paramount.

He also tried to keep the anchors off-balance by throwing out questions such as "How is your eunuch, Al Roker?"

The joking ultimatum against the academy was repeated from a short video Cohen released to Deadline.com in which Aladeen addressed the academy as the "Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Zionists."

It's still unclear whether or not Cohen will show up at the Oscars on Sunday at all, or if he really intends to retaliate in some way against the academy. But as a way of drumming up interest in his upcoming movie in May, he's got the wheels of the promotion machine cranking in high gear already.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/show...-dictator.html
post #76879 of 87161
Technology/Critic's Notes
Is the PlayStation Vita Really Better Than an iPhone?
By Ryan Kuo, Wall Street Journal - Feb. 24, 2012

In the past week I caught two telling images of Sony’s brand-new mobile gaming device, the PlayStation Vita.

The first was a man leaning face-first into the carpeted corner of a GameStop, his back turned darkly to the actual store like a Blair Witch victim, transfixed by something just out of sight. The figure of abject desire, he held a Vita attached to the wall by what looked like an aluminum trachea. The second was my face in the New York subway hovering atop my own Vita’s black widescreen, my eyes downturned in focus and my hands gripping the left and right sides of the device in the wishful claw that is rapidly becoming an outmoded gesture—the clammy grip that gamers have, since the first home console, tightened around plastic controllers to cast lightning bolts, fire submachine guns, throw hadoukens, and save princesses.

This gamer grip, still invoked by the fat curves of the Xbox 360 gamepad and the black prods of the DualShock 3, is a sign of identification with the hardcore, another quaint idea that I assume will soon join the ranks of cyberpunk and the Information Superhighway. This is the idea that to play games is to be swallowed whole in a lifelong pursuit of playing games better (Vita is Latin for “life”). David Cronenberg brought the term to its risqué endpoint in his 1999 film “eXistenZ,” in which futuristic gamers play by plugging big fleshy gamepads straight into their spinal cords. Unlike most films about virtual reality, the point of interest here isn’t the sharp part that penetrates the skin, but the naked part that is caressed by the hands, which undulates with a horrible muscular sensuality.

Recently at Kill Screen, Jason Johnson wrote about the many images conjured by the term “gamer,” from slackers to escapists to losers to criminals and crazy people. United primarily by their grip, these gamer archetypes are otherwise at odds with each other. But the image cast by the Vita is unambiguous. It’s how Johnson characterizes those gamers who “live life in the fast lane,” the “self-destructive bad boys” who are the technologically enabled cousins of bikers and unapologetic drug users. Less flatteringly, it’s every commercial photograph that depicts you, the device owner, as a casual Friday male with spiked hair who teeters on the edge of his couch, threatening to be yanked straight into the racing game on the television so long as his hands grip the controller. His face is frozen in shock, though we can distinctly apprehend a smile buried within his gaping mouth. In the horror movie The Ring, people die of fright from watching an unimaginable videotape. Turn their twisted death masks upside-down and you have the face of this gamer.

This is clearly not a selling point, but a cultural stance that emerges from holding and playing with the Vita. It is partly a response to Apple’s iPhone and iPad, which challenge Sony in two areas close to its heart: hardware and gaming. An iOS game like Cut the Rope, Temple Run, or UFO on Tape, which can be conquered with the tip of one index finger, or a simple turn of the wrist, embodies Apple spiritual guide Dieter Rams’ mandate to produce “as little design as possible” in order “to leave room for the user’s self-expression.” The designer, concerned by the world’s “impenetrable confusion of forms, colors and noises,” would probably be repulsed by the Vita’s directional pad, two joysticks, four face buttons, two shoulder buttons, front touchscreen and rear touchpad, gyroscope and accelerometer, twin cameras, and 3G connection, as well as its digital and physical library of apps that range from Uncharted to Facebook. And its size and heft and inability to be understood fully in less than half an hour, or mistaken for something functional and not hardcore.

The Vita’s argument is that playing videogames is an inherently complicated act, that a surplus of control is needed to achieve some kind of gaming fidelity. It’s rather convincing. Giving the device the subway test, I find not only my hands, but my whole body wrapped around the Vita as if it were a cello. Pressing one button twice, to bring a tiny golfer to swing her golf club, uncovers a healthy resilience like thick overgrown grass. I suddenly wonder why I had thought the iPhone’s inscrutable touchscreen to be enough. (For what?) That device’s single Home button, with the smarmy square-fitting-inside-a-circle, is unmasked as a vulgar necessity, Apple’s admission that apart from not doing unneeded things with buttons, we also deeply need to be able to press a button. That other, “smarter” grip, holding the device with one hand while scratching distractedly at its face with the thumb, stinks of bourgeois idleness. Meanwhile the Vita indulges me in the power of operations, its horizontal rectangle a formless antidote to the iPhone’s vertical monument to form. On the screen is Super Stardust Delta, a game in which I jam the two joysticks into my thumbs to shoot glitter and sparks and whip out what is best described on a family site as a hot-pink flaming lasso. The drum & bass soundtrack clocks in at 170 beats per minute. I imagine my hair growing and sharpening into a golden mohawk worthy of Goku and Super Sonic. This is what the Vita does to you.

I am so rapt in my game that I miss my stop. In fact, I missed it while watching the futuristic racing game WipEout 2048 load the next race track, crawling in single digits from zero to 100 percent, the distance between New York University and Union Square. I suddenly realize that no one in transit has time for a loading screen. And while there is a nihilistic pleasure in being able to do literally nothing but play games, there is also an awkward insistence to the act. “Are you sitting down,” the Vita asks, because you won’t have any hands free to hold on to the pole when the conductor rams the brakes or Nathan Drake almost trips on a South American rope bridge. Just as awkward are some of its cultural reference points, which recall the false hipness of “The Matrix” in 1999 when it was already an establishment take on more provocative texts. Wipeout in 1995 coasted on the electronica wave; by 2012 that’s aged into overdriven pomposity. Lumines Electronic Symphony, a flashy puzzle game that includes a second-rate Chemical Brothers song and purports to elicit synesthesia, is equivalent to an Astoria cafe bar in which no surface is not lit from beneath by a pink or purple lightbulb. Forget the mirrorshades. Where’s the tanning bed?

By far the best game in the Vita’s early life is FIFA Soccer, a game about playing soccer with buttons. The technological flash is mostly reserved for FIFA’s sliding menu animations, and the game that proceeds is soccer on a screen, as seen by a distant sports camera while heard from the field. Held at a fixed length from the players, each a centimeter tall, I am transfixed by the clarity of the game rules, which recede as individual positions, players, and people take their place between my hands. The graphical and gaming fidelity of the Vita, in other words, is not flaunted but merely sufficient—a medium on which games may exist without emphasis. This is vital. Games must be allowed to be the dumb facts of virtual soccer and televised basketball and BrickBreaker on the Blackberry and Hangman on the Kindle, and no more. That is when we can remember our naive fantasy was not to be trapped in 960 x 544 resolution but to have a controller with a screen on it.

Ryan Kuo is the executive editor at Kill Screen.

http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2012/...sEnt_Speakeasy
post #76880 of 87161
Critic's Notes
5 Ways to Fix Oprah Winfrey's OWN Network
By Tim Goodman, The Hollywood Reporter - Feb. 24, 2012

Who would have thought it would come to this: Oprah Winfrey begging for viewers? The former queen of daytime syndication recently sent a tweet to her nearly 9 million followers, begging the ones with Nielsen boxes to watch her channel. The original tweet (since deleted) read thusly: "Every 1 who can please turn to OWN especially if u have a Neilsen [sic] box."

She deleted the message, apologized via The New York Times and will have ratings for that night listed with an asterisk that indicates coercion or bias has occurred. But what does the tweet say about Winfrey and OWN after 13 long months trying to launch a new channel?

That this is less a numbers story than the implosion of a cult of personality -- perhaps the biggest and most surprising ego check in recent entertainment history. Maybe that's why, not long after pleading for her Twitter followers to watch OWN -- and they didn't -- Winfrey popped up in entertainment news saying she might get back into acting. That's a great idea, as long as the movie isn't shown on OWN.

The problem here isn't just that Discovery and Winfrey seriously miscalculated how difficult it is to launch a new channel. And it's not just that it needs better shows than I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant, America's Money Class With Suze Orman or Unfaithful: Stories of Betrayal. It's that even in the brutal cable TV world of narrowcasting -- all sports, all food, all weather, etc. -- the market for a channel that's all Oprah just doesn't exist.

Oprah's Next Chapter is OWN's biggest hit (with about 900,000 viewers), but it pales in comparison to her glory years on The Oprah Winfrey Show, where she dominated the airwaves for a quarter-century. At its peak, Oprah pulled in roughly 13 million viewers a day, and even toward the end she was still attracting nearly 8 million.

OWN is supposedly available in 78 million U.S. households, which makes that 900,000 figure for Next Chapter even more depressing. Despite the power of Discovery and the ubiquity of Winfrey, not one OWN series is in the top 40 of cable's rankings, where the lowest-ranked show, a repeat of NCIS on USA, pulls in 3 million viewers. OWN doesn't come anywhere close to the weekly averages of the top 35 cable channels -- meaning it's getting trounced by TruTV, Travel Channel, Spike and many others.

In an earnings conference call Feb. 16, Discovery Communications president and CEO David Zaslav said, "We are excited to grow this network in 2012." Well, good luck with that. Despite upper-management deck-chair shuffling and the creation of Rosie O'Donnell's fun talk show, almost nothing has worked to give OWN an identity.

Here are a few proposals for the network:

Develop a string of reality/unscripted shows that are more than some kind of Oprah-esque feel-good mantra stretched out for an hour, culminating in hugs.

Part of the problem at OWN is that all the shows feel similar, like a self-help chat. OWN needs to hire someone who can either help shape that direction or buy up ideas from the outside. It needs someone who can take Oprah's message and apply it to a concept that's entertaining, not just a lecture on being your best self. MTV got Jersey Shore. Bravo got The Real Housewives. Discovery got Deadliest Catch. History got Ice Road Truckers. The list goes on. And what it means is that niche channels broadened their horizons with reality fare.

Instead of this master class nonsense of talking to celebrities, Oprah should get some of those big names to make series for her.

Tap someone who hasn't yet sold material to Fox or Bravo, and sell OWN as a rare opportunity: a lab for unscripted series to find purchase.

Branch out the Oprah's Book Club idea.

Make this a cultural gem, a PBS-like effort (with the requisite Oprah bonding element, of course). Make it a weekly series.

Right now, OWN feels like a bunch of random programs wrapped around talk shows.

It needs a five-days-a-week series, something that gives Winfrey's audience a reason to tune in every night. But it can't be yet another yawn-inducing talk show. What OWN needs is what ESPN with SportsCenter and Comedy Central with The Daily Show and The Colbert Report already have: a must-watch daily information show. There's no reason it can't be done Oprah-style on OWN. You're welcome. Send me a check

Barring those, start a music competition series.

Everybody else has.

♦♦♦♦♦

OPRAH'S OSCAR SPECIAL SUFFERS, TOO

Hollywood's annual kudos-fest offers a telling barometer of Oprah Winfrey's declining reach. Winfrey, an Oscar nominee for 1985's The Color Purple, this year moved her primetime special from ABC to OWN. Airing Feb. 15, Oprah's Oscar Special drew just 282,000 viewers. Her last Oscar special on ABC in 2010 pulled in 4.3 million, more than 15 times as many as the one on OWN, and was third in the time slot behind CSI: NY (12.4 million) and Law & Order: SVU (9 million). In fact, the post-Oscar Monday episodes of The Oprah Winfrey Show, which she hosted from the Kodak Theatre, were a perennial audience favorite. Her final Oprah's Ultimate After-Oscar Party in 2011, featuring best actor winner Colin Firth, powered her show to 6.4 million viewers for the week. In a bid to retain exposure to millions of Nielsen families, Winfrey will appear on a post-Oscar talk show, but it won't be her own. She's headlining Jimmy Kimmel Live: After the Academy Awards. – Marisa Guthrie

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...rey-fix-294823
post #76881 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

I doubt it. There will still be programming on shiny disks. And it will still be the best way to watch TV. The Internet infrastucture will have to be massively upgraded to allow for a vast increase in streaming at any kind of decent quality.

There is already plenty of infrastructure to allow for a vast increase in streaming quality.

I already get a solid 150 Mbps from European file sharing sites - why in the hell can't Netflix deliver anything to me higher than 4 Mbps? They could be streaming me Blu-ray quality video right now and my Verizon FiOS connection wouldn't break a sweat. Blu-ray spec's maximum bitrate is 40 Mbps; I could stream four full Blu-rays simultaneously. Yet no legal option will provide me with such quality. They only use 3% of my connection's capacity currently. Pathetic. PATHETIC.

It's not that the infrastructure isn't there, it's that all the Internet video companies are too afraid to use it. Instead of providing something those of us with reasonable connections can take advantage of (and there are millions of us), they'd rather ensure their video looks like crap so grandma who lives out in the forest can watch it on her slow ass DSL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

Critic's Notes
5 Ways to Fix Oprah Winfrey's OWN Network

This should be titled "5 Ways to turn the Oprah Winfrey Network into another piece of ****, dumbed down reality TV network with zero appeal to anyone who has more than a single brain cell."

Want to know how you can tell a network is worth watching? When it's not at the top of the cable TV ratings.

H2, Smithsonian, PBS - they're not exactly at the top of the ratings. That's because there's actually some intelligence left on those networks.
post #76882 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by rich3fan View Post

So that gives me a month to get another eSATA disk drive enabled on my DVR. Hey! Have hard drive prices come back down yet?

Not to where they were - but I just picked up two 2TB drives for $110.

However they are 'green' drives - not what I would recommend for DVR eSATA...

xnappo
post #76883 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by xnappo View Post

Not to where they were - but I just picked up two 2TB drives for $110.

However they are 'green' drives - not what I would recommend for DVR eSATA...

xnappo

Green drives have always worked fine in the past with my TiVos.
post #76884 of 87161
FiOS DVR: Motorola QIP 7232 FYI. The internal is only about 1/2 full, and I don't generally keep TV shows, but I have the past three Fringe episodes saved, and will probably keep the next 9 too.
post #76885 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpiontail60 View Post

This should be titled "5 Ways to turn the Oprah Winfrey Network into another piece of ****, dumbed down reality TV network with zero appeal to anyone who has more than a single brain cell."

+1

And how about spending a little bit of that bazillion dollars you have on some advertising. Honestly, the only time I ever hear about anything on OWN is when there's some news item about it or she opts to turn up on some other talk show. "Pawn Stars," "Deadliest Catch" "Swamp People" ...we're beating those shows up on a weekly basis. By "we," I mean radio/TV/outdoor in general.

Ask any random person what's on OWN or even where it is. They don't know. C'mon, O. Buy some ads.
post #76886 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by VisionOn View Post

I never said UV wasn't free with a disc. What I said was that you can't have a physical copy without buying a disc. They don't give it away free with a digital version and if you want redundancy to avoid cloudbursts you need to buy the disc.

End result: You have a physical copy. So Ultraviolet doesn't make cloud-based media any more reliable than owning a non-UV disc. Either way you have an optical disc.

So what if you have to buy the disc. Go cherck the prices. A DVD and a SD digitla copy of a movie are the same price a blu-ray disc and a HD digital copy are the same. In fact you can often get the discs cheaper than digital copy. So I'm not getting your point.
post #76887 of 87161
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetworkTV View Post

The most angry customers were likely people like me who had a DVD plan and used streaming occasionally as a bonus, not the other way around. I didn't have a streaming plan to get DVDs. That meant I would have to pay full freight for streaming I seldom used.

You shuld be happy you were paying $10 now it's $8 a 20% discount. Since you weren't using streaming much anyways.

Quote:
The beef I have is no provision for a combined discount. I'd be happy to pay part of the cost of the full streaming price to add it to my DVD service, but I watch mostly DVDs and BD's, not streaming video. I don't want to pay for an unlimited plan when I'll only use it for a few hours a month.

Actually Netflix has a plan wher you can rent 1 DVD a time and 2 hours of streaming per month for $5.

Quote:
With most business models, buying multiple items results in a discount for them combined. If Netflix did that, I'd buy both and likely use less of each than most people with one or the other. They'd get more money from me at likely no more cost to them.

Oh well. It's not up to you to decide if you get a discount for bundling. Netflix did the math and determined they could make a profit if people getting DVDs and streaming paid $16 a month.

Quote:
Further, I was willing to simply delete streaming after the price changes - then the whole Quickster thing happened and it basically told me "you are not a customer we want at Netflix if you want discs". For that, I dumped the service to one disc at a time and opened a Blockbuster account.

Streaming is the future. Seperating them was actually a good idea. That way eat service could adjust pricing tiers accordingly without peole getting their panties in a wad. DVDs eat up a ton of money. Streaming is more profitable.

Quote:
Red Box is no solution either. There are far more movies I want to see than the few dozen in the box. Besides, if I wanted to wait 28 days for a new release, I can continue to do that with Netflix - and I've never failed to get it the week they have it available. That's still faster than never for BB.

What does that have to do with Netflix?
post #76888 of 87161
TV Notes
On The Air Tonight
SATURDAY Network Primetime/Late Night Options
(All shows are in HD unless noted; start times are EDT. Late night shows are preceded by late local news)

ABC:
8PM - Winter Wipeout
(R - Jan. 5)
9PM - Movie: The Devil Wears Prada (2006)

CBS:
8PM - Rules of Engagement
(R - Mar. 10)
8PM - Two and a Half Men
(R - Nov. 14)
9PM - The Mentalist
(R - Oct. 28, 2010)
10PM - 48 Hours Mystery

NBC:
8PM - Smash
(R - Feb. 20)
9PM - The Firm
10PM - Law & Order: Special Victims Unit
(R - Jan. 18)
* * * *
11:29PM - Saturday Night Live (Charlie Day performs; Maroon 5 performs) (94 min.)
(R - Nov. 5)

FOX:
8PM - COPS
8:30PM - COPS
9PM - The Finder
(R - Jan. 19)
* * * *
11PM - Alcatraz
(R - Feb. 13)
12AM - New Girl
(R - Feb. 14)

PBS:
(check your local listing for starting time/programming)
8PM - Austin City Limits: Robert Earl Keen; Hayes Carll (R - Oct. 30, 2010)

UNIVISION:
8PM - Sábado Gigante (3 hrs.)

TELEMUNDO:
7PM - Movie: 2 Fast 2 Furious (2003)
9PM - Movie: Four Brothers (2005)
post #76889 of 87161
TV Notes
Saturday's Highlights: "Ali 70 From Las Vegas on ABC and ESPN2
By Los Angeles Times' 'Show Tracker' Blog - Feb. 24, 2012

[ALL TIMES LISTED ARE PACIFIC TIME]

THE GREATEST, Muhammad Ali, with trainer Angelo Dundee, celebrates his 70th birthday on Ali 70 From Las Vegas at 2 p.m. on ABC, 7 p.m. on ESPN2.

SERIES

Being Human:
The British show that inspired the Syfy series starts a new season tonight with Russell Tovey, Aidan Turner and Lenora Crichlow starring as a werewolf, a vampire and a ghost (6 and 9 p.m. BBC America).

The Firm: Mitch (Josh Lucas) is cleared as a suspect in Martin Moxon's death and goes to work on a case against a large drug company. He visits Sarah Holt (Alex Paxton-Beesley) in jail, but she won't talk to him in this new episode (9 p.m. NBC).

48 Hours Mystery: A former reality-TV producer accused of brutally murdering his wife discusses the case from a Mexican prison in this new episode (10 p.m. CBS).

Live From Daryl's House: Toots and the Maytals perform in this new episode (11 p.m. KTLA).

SPECIALS

2012 Spirit Awards:
Seth Rogan hosts from Santa Monica beach (10 p.m. IFC).

MOVIES

The Grapes of Wrath:
Henry Fonda stars as the bloody-but-unbowed Tom Joad in director John Ford's 1940 classic, based on John Steinbeck's novel. With Jane Darwell (5 p.m. TCM).

Black Forest: Ben Cross and Tinsel Korey star in this original film about a group of tourists who find themselves fending off fearsome fairy-tale creatures in a magical forest (7 p.m. Syfy).

Witchslayer Gretl: All grown up 20 years after his encounter with a witch in a haunted forest, Hansel returns to the scene of his abduction in search of revenge. But a surprise is waiting for him: His sister, Gretl, whom he'd taken for dead, is now the witch's protegee. Shannen Doherty, Sarain Boylan and Jefferson Brown star in this new fantasy (9 and 11 p.m. Syfy).

SPORTS

College basketball:
Vanderbilt at Kentucky (9 a.m. CBS); Virginia Tech at Duke (9 a.m. MyNet); UCLA at Arizona (11 a.m. CBS); Missouri at Kansas (1 p.m. CBS); North Carolina at Virginia (1 p.m. ESPN); USC at Arizona State (5 p.m. FSN2); Syracuse at Connecticut (6 p.m. ESPN); Cal State Northridge at UC Irvine (7:30 p.m. FSN2); Santa Clara at Loyola Marymount (8 p.m. FSN).

Hockey: The Chicago Blackhawks visit the Kings (5 p.m. FSN).


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/show...and-espn2.html
post #76890 of 87161
TV Notes
Sacha Baron Cohen Coming To Oscars As ‘The Dictator’ After Ban Lifted: “Academy Have Surrendered”; Set-Up?
By Nikki Finke, Deadline.com - Feb. 24, 2012

I can confirm that the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences has reversed course and now invited Sacha Baron Cohen to stage his movie publicity stunt on the Red Carpet and then attend the Oscars show. “Does Sacha need a changing room?” the Academy in a conciliatory tone asked one of the actor’s reps today.

Baron Cohen had planned to walk the Red Carpet in character as Middle Eastern General Alladeen and then change into a tuxedo to attend the awards show as himself as part of Paramount’s contingent for Best Picture contender Hugo. (Baron Cohen has a showy role in it.) Paramount, the studio behind The Dictator, tells me that Baron Cohen has not yet decided to go. Others like Oscars telecast producer Brian Grazer and Academy President Tom Sherak are telling media that the comedian is attending and even part of the show. Which begs the question whether the Academy helped orchestrate this publicity stunt with Baron Cohen and Paramount all along. After all, Sherak is a paid marketing consultant for — you guessed it — Paramount.

The studio today denied this was a set-up and claimed to me that the Academy “relented because of all the bad publicity you generated for them to lighten up”. Also Sherak at one point called to “threaten” Baron Cohen’s agency WME, according to an insider who said, “He said this was bad for the Academy and we had to stop Sacha from doing this.” And Baron Cohen’s publicist Matt Labov just explained to me: “The Academy caught wind of our idea and pulled his tickets. They went to war with us, made threats, got embarrassed, panicked, and reversed their position only after the press backlash portrayed them as stodgy. Plain and simple, that’s how it happened.”

But that doesn’t jive with, for days now, Academy Awards insiders have been saying privately that not only is Baron Cohen coming to the show but also will be featured. Tom Sherak told Good Day LA on Thursday morning that Baron Cohen will be at the Oscars. And Grazer told USA Today: “He’s coming. In fact, he’s even part of the, there’s a piece — he’s part of the show… as himself.” (“He’s in a few of the clip packages for Hugo,” an insider tells me. “I think that’s what Grazer is referencing.” Others tell me Baron Cohen is also one of telecast’s vignettes directed by Moneyball‘s Bennett Miller featuring actors and filmmakers talking about their love of movies.)

This publicity stunt for Baron Cohen’s movie and presumably also Oscars show ratings may backfire on the Academy. Because Sacha in character publicly described, no matter how humorously, the Academy of Motion Picture ”Arts & Zionists”. Not only is this a Muslim-Jew issue. But Baron Cohen also fired up the hot button issue of Hollywood and Jews. Let me just say that, because of this, Deadline Hollywood received many anti-Semitic comments about showbiz. (We deleted these comments on the grounds they were disgusting.)

Baron Cohen was banned from attending the Oscars even though he is an Academy member and one of the stars from Hugo, Paramount’s 11-nominated movie and Best Picture contender. “Unless they’re assured that nothing entertaining is going to happen on the Red Carpet, the Academy is not admitting Sacha Baron Cohen to the show,” Paramount told me at the time. The Academy’s Managing Director Of Membership Kimberly Rouch phoned Paramont’s awards staff to say that Baron Cohen’s tickets had been pulled unless he gives the Academy assurances ahead of time promising not to show up on the Red Carpet in costume and not to promote the movie on the Red Carpet. The Academy made it clear that, without those assurances, it would not issue him the tickets. Of course, the next best thing to that publicity stunt is all the media coverage which this ban generated for Baron Cohen’s film.

The Academy looked like uptight wankers with this treatment of one of the globe’s funniest comedians. The Academy merely had to say no when that proposal was presented to it. Hollywood considers the Oscars its most prestigious event and apparently wanted another overly long, ridiculously reverential show about movies no one bothered to see where the best thing will be the comeback of Billy Crystal at age 63.

The Dictator is a spoof about the “heroic story of a Middle Eastern dictator who risks his life to ensure that democracy never comes to the country he so lovingly oppressed”. Whether the fact that the 84th Academy Awards will be beamed into 200 countries, including the Middle East, had anything to do with this ban is unclear. But it is highly unusual for the Academy to pull a member’s tickets. An Oscars spokesperson acknowledged to Deadline at the time: ”We would hope that every studio knows that this is a bad idea. The Red Carpet is not about stunting.” Oh really? Then why did Trey Parker and Matt Stone of South Park crossdress down the Red Carpet as J-Lo and Gwyneth Paltrow in evening gowns in 2000? Or Ben Stiller appear as an Oscar presenter in full blue Avatar makeup and hair in 2010?

Baron Cohen wasn’t scheduled to present an award, but he was arriving at the Kodak Theatre as part of the Paramount contingent for Best Picture nominee Hugo in which Baron Cohen plays the train station inspector of the movie about an orphan in 1930s Paris.

At the 2007 Oscars, Baron Cohen was asked to be a presenter and said he would do it only if he could be in character as Borat. And Oscars’ Powers That Be said, “No way.” He didn’t attend. But this is the first time he has been officially banned from the show.

Purists feel that the Oscars is no place for such in your face promotion. The Academy hasn’t even allowed movies to be advertised during the Oscarcast, until this year. Then again, these Oscars have very little suspense because it’s a forgone conclusion that many of the winners of the marquee categories are already known and The Artist will win Best Picture. The prospect of Baron Cohen’s Red Carpet walk was the closest thing to drama.

This would not have been Baron Cohen’s first time upstaging an awards show. To promote Bruno, he flew through the air at the MTV Movie Awards and landed with his crotch in the face of Eminem, who later admitted the stunt was rehearsed. And a trailer for The Dictator certainly was one of the raciest ever allowed by the MPAA during the Super Bowl, where Baron Cohen’s character was hilariously depicted running a competitive race while and leg-shooting rivals with a starter pistol as they got close to him.

UPDATE 3:30 PM: Here is how Sacha Baron Cohen, in character as The Dictator, just responded to the Red Carpet and Oscars invite from the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences which earlier this week had banned him the 84th Academy Awards:

“VICTORY IS OURS! Today the Mighty Nation of Wadiya triumphed over the Zionist snakes of Hollywood. Evil and all those who made Satan their protector were vanquished and driven into the Pacific Sea. What I am trying to say here is that the Academy have surrendered and sent over two tickets and a parking pass! TODAY OSCAR, TOMORROW OBAMA!”

UPDATE, 4:30 PM: I have just confirmed with Sacha Baron Cohen’s publicist that the comedian will walk on the Red Carpet in character as The Dictator and then attend the Oscars show. He’ll do it with the full approval of the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences which initially pulled his tickets and banned him from the 84th Academy Awards being held on Sunday evening.

http://www.deadline.com/2012/02/sach...cademy-blinks/
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information