AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information - Page 2587

post #77581 of 87311
TV Notes
NBC announces new summer shows, return of 'Love in the Wild'
By Lynette Rice, EW.com's 'Inside TV' Blog - Mar. 15, 2012

NBC announced start dates for new and returning shows for its summer schedule, including new seasons of Love in the Wild and American Ninja Warrior.

Warrior will begin May 21 while Wild with host Jenny McCarthy returns June 7. In addition, a new medical drama called Saving Hope will also start June 7. It stars Erica Durance (Smallville), Michael Shanks (Stargate Atlantis) and Daniel Gillies (The Vampire Diaries) and is about a charismatic chief of surgery who ends up in a coma and leaves his hospital in chaos. He ends up exploring the place in spirit form, not knowing if he's a ghost or a figment of his own imagination.

http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/03/15/nb...e-in-the-wild/

* * * *

TV Notes
Katie Couric talk show announces start date

Katie Couric's new syndicated talk show, which has officially been dubbed Katie, will premiere on Monday, Sept. 10.

The hour-long talk show executive produced by former NBC honcho (and Couric's ex-boss on NBC's Today) Jeff Zucker has been cleared in 94% of the country and will originate from ABC's Manhattan headquarters. There will be a live studio audience.

The show was picked up in 55 of the country's top 60 markets, including Minneapolis, Cleveland, St. Louis, Portland, San Antonio and Nashville, and slotted in early fringe timeslots (after 4 but before 7:30 p.m.).

http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/03/15/ka...es-start-date/
post #77582 of 87311
TV Notes
'Community' stars hope fans show up for their return
By Yvonne Villareal, Los Angeles Times' 'Show Tracker' Blog - Mar. 15, 2012

The human beings of Greendale Community College have returned from their winter break.

Community is back in its Thursday time slot (8 p.m. on NBC) and the stars of the series know it's a little unhip to watch things in real time (commercials are so 2009), but they'd really, really like it if you would.

It's great to be back and I just pray our fans show up with us tonight, said Yvette Nicole Brown, who plays Shirley "Foosball queen" Bennett.

The show, which centers on a group of misfit students who form a study group at a quirky community college, has struggled to bring in big numbers for NBC. With its core audience more keen on DVR viewing to speed through commercials or watching things online, viewership hovers at a low 4 million viewers, according to the Nielsen measurement system so heavily relied on by networks.

Jim Rash, who plays Dean Pelton (the college administrator with a disturbing affinity for Dalmatian costumes), wishes networks would keep up with the times, but until they do, he suggests fans compromise.

The message to everyone to networks, I think is that we have to reinvent ourselves, said Rash, who hasn't let his Oscar win (he won in the screenwriting category for The Descendants) go to his bald head. In a perfect world, fans would do what I did when I would have to watch 'Seinfeld' and I couldn't get my VCR to record it. I would have to sit there and wait and watch it live. Guys, pretend we're Seinfeld'!

When the network benched the series in December to make room for the return of 30 Rock, fans took it as a sign that it was headed to cancellation-ville. And they responded, starting Internet campaigns and getting hashtag crazy on Twitter.

But Gillian Jacobs is confident Community's disciples won't pull a Britta on the show now.

I think because there is lower awareness of our show than other shows, our fans feel a sense of ownership of it, said Jacobs, who plays self-righteous Britta Perry. It's their show. And they feel protective of it. And I think that's why they felt so strongly to us being pulled. They feel like it's in their hands to save our show. And I think they've see in the past like with 'Arrested Development' and Firefly' they've seen what can happen to a show that gets roughly our numbers and they don't want that to happen again.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/show...ir-return.html
post #77583 of 87311
Critic's Notes
Some thoughts on the 'Luck' cancellation
Equine tragedy got in the way of David Milch's dream project about horse racing
By Alan Sepinwall, HitFix.com - Mar. 14, 2012

I've known David Milch for almost 16 years, and I have never seen him more animated or excited than the day we met, when at the tail end of an interview about "NYPD Blue," he smiled and said, "You should come to the track with me." I was a 22-year-old newspaper intern; he was the Emmy-winning creator of my favorite TV show. I went to the track. And over the course of an afternoon, Milch regaled me and "NYPD" writer David Mills with stories about a lifetime of watching horse racing. He even offered to cut us in on his winnings if a horse he had bet on came in; I was still new at the newspaper thing and trying to figure out the ethical implications when the horse did me a favor and finished out of the money. Mills and I occasionally talked about that day in the years that followed, and Mills was convinced that one day, when Milch had amassed enough credit in the TV business, he was going to spend it by combining his two passions to make a drama about life at the track.

So "Luck" as an idea has been in my consciousness for a very long time, which is why I'm having trouble processing the news that HBO has canceled the series after a third horse died during filming, early in production of the second season.

An HBO statement said that, "Safety is always of paramount concern. We maintained the highest safety standards throughout production, higher in fact than any protocols existing in horseracing anywhere with many fewer incidents than occur in racing or than befall horses normally in barns at night or pastures. While we maintained the highest safety standards possible, accidents unfortunately happen and it is impossible to guarantee they won't in the future. Accordingly, we have reached this difficult decision."

Milch and director/producer Michael Mann added, "The two of us loved this series, loved the cast, crew and writers. This has been a tremendous collaboration and one that we plan to continue in the future."

The show was in the middle of filming the second episode of season two when the cancellation decision was made. There are no plans at present to show the footage from that or the season two premiere. I've seen the first season finale, which will air on March 25, and it brings the season to a close well enough. "Luck" has, in general, not been a very plot-driven series, but more about the atmosphere and characters lurking around the Santa Anita track. There is no conclusion to the revenge plot involving Dustin Hoffman's character, paroled wiseguy Ace Bernstein, but it at least reaches a natural stopping point, while the arcs for a number of the other characters particularly the four degenerate gamblers (played by Jason Gedrick, Kevin Dunn, Ritchie Coster and Ian Hart) who have turned into the heart of the series feel like they've concluded well enough.

This is the third series in a row Milch has done for HBO, and the third to end more abruptly than he had planned. "Deadwood" was canceled after the third season (out of a planned four) for financial reasons, with Milch playing the good soldier and playing along with the story that he was really eager to move on to the metaphysical surfing drama "John from Cincinnati." (Though I continue to argue to this day that the final "Deadwood" episode actually works better as a series finale than planned, or than it works as a finale to the third season. Milch wrote an ending without realizing it.) "John" was a mess, creatively and financially, and HBO pulled the plug after only one season.

"Luck," though, seemed in better shape. The ratings had been poor (averaging about 500,000 viewers for each Sunday premiere), despite a big marketing campaign and the presence of Hoffman and Nick Nolte in the cast, but many of the reviews (my own included) were strong, HBO had already renewed it for that second season, and Milch and Mann's working arrangement (where Mann was the final authority and Milch didn't get to do his usual last-second rewrites) made it a more under-control production than "Deadwood" or "John" had been. Even with the low ratings, it was easy to see "Luck" running a while, particularly if Hoffman and/or Nolte started picking up Emmys.

Then one horse died. And another. And then another. And given that this project was being made by people with a deep, deep passion for horses, at a certain point, they had to say that their art simply wasn't worth the cost of these animals' lives.

I've already seen some suggestions on Twitter that HBO wouldn't have canceled the show if its ratings were bigger that if a show with an audience the size of "True Blood" saw three animals die during production, they'd have found an excuse to keep going. I'd like to think the moral calculus wouldn't be that cynical, but we don't know. All we know is what happened here, and while I'm sad Milch won't get to keep telling this story(*), I can't object to the decision that was made.

(*) When I interviewed Milch and Mann before the season, I asked Milch one question at the end about where season two might go, one that I kept out of the published interview transcript, but that I'll try to include in my review of what's now the series finale.

Milch is an improviser by nature. On his other series, he would come up with new dialogue right up until the cameras were ready to roll (and sometimes after). When HBO rejected his pitch to do a show about a couple of cops in ancient Rome because they already had a Rome show in development, he reconfigured it into "Deadwood." He's fond of repeating the old saying that, "If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans."

It feels like Milch had been planning his whole life to do this show. And he got to do it for a season.

Then God laughed.

http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/whats-al...k-cancellation
post #77584 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

Then God laughed.

http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/whats-al...k-cancellation

"He's a prankster."

What movie is that from ??
(jeopardy theme--bing bing bing bing bing bing bing)
post #77585 of 87311
post #77586 of 87311
Black Cloud Dave, 3 strikes in a row.
post #77587 of 87311
TV Notes
TBS Greenlights King Of The Nerds' Reality Series With Bob Carradine, Curtis Armstrong
By Nellie Andreeva, Deadline.com - Mar. 15, 2012

TBS picked up King of the Nerds, an eight-episode reality competition series hosted and executive produced by two of the stars of the hit movie Revenge of the Nerds, Robert Carradine and Curtis Armstrong. On the show, competitors come together to face challenges that will test their intellect, ingenuity, skills and pop-culture prowess. The nerds will first compete as teams before moving on to individual challenges, all with the goal of being named the quintessential master of all things nerdy.

Executive producing the series are Carradine, Armstrong, Electus' Ben Silverman and Jimmy Fox and 5X5 Media's Rick Ringbakk, Tod Mesirow and Craig Armstrong. King Of The Nerds, packaged by Buchwald/Fortitude, is slated to premiere on TBS in early 2013. Electus International will distribute the series internationally.

http://www.deadline.com/2012/03/tbs-...eality-series/
post #77588 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

Tech/Business Notes
Cisco to acquire NDS Group
By Dawn C. Chmielewski, Los Angeles Times' 'Company Town' Blog - Mar. 15, 2012

Cisco Systems plans to acquire video-software specialist NDS Group for about $5 billion in a deal that would advance the computer networking giant's move into next-generation video services.

NDS makes the software used by cable and satellite companies to deliver video securely to television set-top boxes. Its customers include DirecTV and British Sky Broadcasting, the largest pay television operator in Britain. Cisco said the acquisition would complement its Videoscape technology for delivering entertainment in the home.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/ente...nds-group.html

Future news from a year from now:

Massive Security Breach Leaves Several Cable and Satellite Providers Vulnerable Content Breaches

Just 12 short months after Cisco's aquisition of NDS Group, a security flaw in the latest encryption software allowed hackers to breach content protection on several of the largest cable and satellite services...
post #77589 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrLar View Post

Humans die on racing tracks, I don't see F1, Nascar, etc, being cancelled soon..

Don't agree with the cancellation, but human racers don't die to the tune of over 300/yr in California alone. I think those who say it was a way to cut their loses are right.
post #77590 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVChallenged View Post

How many animals have to die to satisfy one's appetite for entertainment?

Using that logic, horse racing in general should be banned. How many horses die, or are put down, because of accidents every year?
post #77591 of 87311
Horse racing should be banned.
post #77592 of 87311
^^^ I hope that you are not serious. You do know that banning horse racing will result in many livelyhoods ceasing to exist, which will ultimately result in many, and I mean many, horses being put down because the owners would not have the funds to feed them.
post #77593 of 87311
TV Notes
'Gossip Girl' Likely to Be Renewed for Shortened 6th Season
By Brent Lang, TheWrap.com - Mar. 15, 2012

"Gossip Girl" will likely be renewed for a shortened sixth and final season, according to an individual close to the production.

The CW drama is expected to return for a reduced number of episodes like fellow CW drama "One Tree Hill" did for its final season, the individual said.

A spokesman for the network said that CW has not yet made a decision about picking up any of its scripted shows for next year.

Given its low ratings, the show is seen as perpetually on the bubble. "Gossip Girl" averaged 1.7 million viewers, and a 1.9 rating in the women 18-34 demo, this year. That's a far cry from the 2.35 million viewers the show averaged in its debut season.

But renewal could be more palatable to the network because all of the show's stars, including Blake Lively, Ed Westwick, Chace Crawford, and Leighton Meester, are under contract for another season. That will spare CW the potentially costly ordeal of re-negotiating salaries.

Also read: 'Gossip Girl' Actress Leighton Meester Sues -- And Is Sued By -- Her Mother

"Gossip Girl" centers on the romances, trysts and social rivalries of a group of privileged young adults living in the Upper East Side of Manhattan.

The series celebrated its 100th episode in January. At the time, the show's producers expressed optimism that "Gossip Girl" would be back with more rivalries and bed-hopping.

"We're not writing a series finale this year," Executive Producer Stephanie Savage told zap2it.

http://www.thewrap.com/tv/column-pos...h-season-36281
post #77594 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcowboy7 View Post

"He's a prankster."

What movie is that from ??
(jeopardy theme--bing bing bing bing bing bing bing)

"He's an absentee landlord!" I love this movie!
post #77595 of 87311
TV Notes
'Frozen Planet' explores last frontier
By Rob Owen, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - Mar. 15, 2012

Spring has sprung for much of the country, but viewers who miss winter weather (anyone?) can find plenty of cold, icy scenes in "Frozen Planet," Discovery Channel's natural science documentary debuting Sunday. Filled with spectacular visuals captured by members of the team that worked on the previous Discovery-BBC co-production "Planet Earth," the seven-hour "Frozen Planet" will air over the next five weeks.

This weekend's premiere opens with "The Ends of the Earth" (8 p.m.), which introduces viewers to the harsh, frozen environment through narration by "30 Rock" star Alec Baldwin.

"Over one-third of the Earth is frozen, but the icy worlds of the Arctic and Antarctica are as alien to us as the surface of another planet," Mr. Baldwin says. "This is our planet's last true wilderness, one that is changing just as we are beginning to understand it."

From there "Frozen Planet" follows mating polar bears (viewer discretion is advised?), running wolves and hungry sea lions.

Additional episodes include "Spring" (9 p.m. Sunday), "Summer" (8 p.m. March 25), "Winter" (8 p.m. April 1), "Frozen Planet: Making Of" (8 p.m. April 8), "On Thin Ice" (7 p.m. April 15) and "Life in the Freezer" (8 p.m. April 15).

Photographer Chadden Hunter, who previously worked on "Planet Earth," said producers went into "Frozen Planet" hoping to capture certain events, but there also were surprises.

"We really wanted to portray the ultimate portrait of the polar regions, and sometimes that means telling the polar bear story from start to finish in as much depth as possible," he said in January at a Discovery Channel press conference. "One of the joyous things for us in filming this is that you do go out into the field and come across stories you have not only not gone out planning to film, but you never even heard of."

Producers also raced to record some images as polar ice melts.

"They're the fastest-changing habitats on the planet," Mr. Hunter said. "Within 'Frozen Planet,' we very much talk about our experiences of climate change and what we saw."

He described meeting with the Inuit in Northern Canada who were accustomed to hunting on sea ice on a certain date annually but found waves lapping at their feet instead.

"Our job as scientists and filmmakers really is to document as opposed to give an agenda to it, but there's no doubt that the people we're working with there are experiencing very dramatic changes that they're witnessing over decades," Mr. Hunter said.

There have been advances in production technology since "Planet Earth" that made filming in the harsh "Frozen Planet" environments possible, including a motion-controlled, winterized camera system that allowed the filmmakers to show an entire season change in one shot. Other techniques used during production were strictly old school.

"Filming 'Frozen Planet' really took our equipment and people to extremes that we never experienced while filming 'Planet Earth,' " Mr. Hunter said. "Cold would freeze plastic. Batteries wouldn't work. We had to heat cameras with bits of coal that we lit and wrapped in blankets, real turn-of-the-century technology. ... With all these fantastic high-definition cameras and technology, there are some conditions, especially some of the extreme cold, that an old-fashioned film camera was the one thing that gave us that rugged reliability."

A DVD release of "Frozen Planet," slated for April 17 ($39.98 DVD and $54.98 Blu-ray, BBC Home Video), will feature narration from the original British production by Sir David Attenborough in place of Mr. Baldwin and a bounty of extras.

HBO cancels 'Luck'

After the death of a third horse during production of HBO's racetrack drama "Luck," HBO pulled the plug on the whole show, canceling it as production on the second season was ongoing.

HBO executives released this statement: "Safety is always of paramount concern. We maintained the highest safety standards throughout production, higher in fact than any protocols existing in horse racing anywhere with many fewer incidents than occur in racing or that befall horses normally in barns at night or pastures. While we maintained the highest safety standards possible, accidents unfortunately happen and it is impossible to guarantee they won't in the future. Accordingly, we have reached this difficult decision."

Low ratings for "Luck" may have made the decision a bit easier. HBO renewed "Luck" shortly after its premiere, but viewers drifted away from the show, which routinely drew far fewer than 1 million viewers in Sunday night episode premieres. The show's most recent airing at 9 p.m. Sunday drew 474,000 viewers, according to Variety.

Mister Rogers' birthday

What would have been Fred Rogers' 84th birthday Tuesday will be celebrated with several local events, including:

The Children's Museum of Pittsburgh will collect sweater donations Tuesday, and the museum will offer free admission to all, 10 a.m.-5 p.m., with a Mr. McFeely (David Newell) visit 11 a.m.-1 p.m. In addition, a screening of the film "Mister Rogers & Me," which had its Pittsburgh premiere last fall, will be held 5-6:30 p.m. Tuesday for museum members. Reservations required (call 412-322-5058, ext. 202, to RSVP) and children ages 5 and older are welcome.

"Mister Rogers & Me" will be released on DVD ($24.99) Tuesday by PBS Distribution. Made by MTV producer Benjamin Wagner and chronicling his journey after meeting Fred Rogers before Mr. Rogers' death from stomach cancer in 2003, the 80-minute film follows Mr. Wagner as he seeks to learn more about Mr. Rogers' appreciation of the "deep and simple" over the shallow and complex. Special features on the DVD include a Q&A with Mr. Newell and Angela Santomero, executive producer of the upcoming "Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood."

"Speedy Delivery," the film about "Mister Rogers' Neighborhood" mailman, played by Mr. Newell, will screen at the Hollywood Theater in Dormont at 7 p.m. March 23. Attendees who donate a sweater will receive a free small popcorn. Tickets: $10 available in advance at showclix.com.

Local troupe in the mix

Pittsburgh-based comedy troupe Hustlebot (www.hustlebot.com) -- made up of David Fedor, Joe Wichryk II, Larry Phillis, John Feightner -- made "Stoners With a Time Machine," which was selected as one of 25 finalists in Comedy Central's first short pilot competition. The winner, expected to be announced in late April, will receive $7,500 and a development deal with Comedy Central.

Finalists that don't win will have the opportunity to pitch their project to six additional networks at the 2012 New York Television Festival in October.

Channel surfing

CBS announced renewals for 18 series this week and "preliminary discussions" on bringing back "Two and a Half Men" (new star Ashton Kutcher signed only a one-year contract but has expressed interest in continuing so now it's a negotiation). It's safe to assume if you're interested in a CBS show it has been renewed with the following exceptions: "A Gifted Man," "Rob," "Rules of Engagement," "CSI: Miami," "CSI: NY" and "Unforgettable." ... Reruns of NBC's just returned "Community" will air on Comedy Central in fall 2013 while reruns of ABC's "The Middle" will play in fall 2014 on Hallmark Channel, which is also developing its first original scripted prime-time series, making movies of "Cedar Cove" (small town-set drama) and "When Calls the Heart" (period drama about a wealthy young East Coast woman who moves west) as backdoor pilots that will air during the 2012-13 TV season. ... TNT's "Dallas" continuation will debut June 13 with "The Closer" back July 9 and spinoff "Major Crimes" premiering Aug. 13. ... Showtime's "Homeland" and "Dexter" will return with new seasons on Sept. 30. ... Lifetime ordered an additional 20 episodes of "America's Most Wanted." ... HBO's "Game Change" movie about the 2008 McCain-Palin campaign drew 2.1 million viewers in its premiere Saturday, the best ratings for an HBO original movie since "Something the Lord Made" in 2004, according to Variety. ... This week cable network Disney Jr. named Drew Davidson, director of the Entertainment Technology Center at Carnegie Mellon University, one of 10 advisory board members to the network. He'll consult on digital game development and design trends. ... PCN will air "The Future of Social Security and Medicare," a live town hall meeting broadcast from Pittsburgh's Sheraton Station Square Hotel, 7-8:30 p.m. Tuesday. The event is free and open to the public. ... Pittsburgh neurosurgeon Joseph Maroon will debut "Secrets of Longevity," a 90-minute PBS pledge special, on WQED-TV at 8 p.m. Wednesday prior to distribution on PBS stations nationwide.

http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/...er-359392/?p=0
post #77596 of 87311
TV Notes
On The Air Tonight
FRIDAY Network Primetime/Late Night Options
(All shows are in HD unless noted; start times are ET. Network late night shows are preceded by late local news)

ABC:
8PM - Shark Tank
9PM - Primetime: What Would You Do?
10PM - 20/20
* * * *
11:35PM - Nightline (LIVE)
Midnight - Jimmy Kimmel Live! (Dr. Phil McGraw; "The Bachelor" runner-up Lindzi Cox; Keane performs)
(R - Mar. 12)

CBS:
7PM - 2012 NCAA Basketball Tournament: Lehigh vs. Duke (LIVE)
9:30PM - 2012 NCAA Basketball Tournament: Xavier vs. Notre Dame (LIVE)
* * * *
12:35AM - Late Show with David Letterman (Reese Witherspoon; Michael Weatherly; 10 of the 2012 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition models, including cover model Kate Upton, present the Top Ten List; Kasabian performs)
(R - Feb. 13)
1:37AM - Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson (Poppy Montgomery; author Charlie Higson; Lauren Graham as the voice of Geoff)
(R - Nov. 14)

NBC:
8PM - Who Do You Think You Are? (Martin Sheen)
(R - Feb. 3)
9PM - Grimm
(R - Dec. 6)
10PM - Dateline NBC
* * * *
11:35PM - The Tonight Show with Jay Leno (Jimmy Fallon; 8-Year-Old author H.L. McCullough; Toby Keith performs)
12:37AM - Late Night with Jimmy Fallon (Rapper Snoop Dogg; former NBA player Shaquille O'Neal; Fitz & the Tantrums perform; guest announcer Bob Costas)
(R - Feb. 3)
1:36AM - Last Call with Carson Daly (Glenn Howerton, director Michael Olmos, director Youssef Delara; We Were Promised Jetpacks perform) SD
(R - Feb. 1)

FOX:
8PM - Kitchen Nightmares (120 min.)
(R - Oct. 14)

PBS:
(check your local listing for starting time/programming)
8PM - Washington Week In Review
8:30PM - Need to Know
9PM - Great Performances: Sondheim! The Birthday Concert (120 min.)
(R - Nov. 24, 2010)

UNIVISION:
8PM - Una Familia Con Suerte
9PM - Abismo de Pasión
10PM - La Que No PodÃ*a Amar

THE CW:
8PM - Nikita
9PM - Supernatural

TELEMUNDO:
8PM - Una Maid en Manhattan
9PM - Corazón Valiente
10PM - Relaciones Peligrosas

HBO:
10PM - Real Time with Bill Maher (LIVE - Mayor Mick Cornett (R-Okla.); journalist Amy Holmes; TV host Dylan Ratigan; Ed Helms; filmmaker Alexandra Pelosi)

E!:
11PM - Chelsea Lately (Jennifer Westfeldt; comic Jeff Wild; comic Natasha Leggero; comic Bobby Lee)
(R - Mar. 8)
post #77597 of 87311
Technology Notes
Digital cloud devours our books, CDs, DVDs, photos
By Marco R. della Cava, USA Today - Mar. 16, 2012

Quick, take a look around. Your stuff is disappearing.

Not long ago, homes would greet you with physical manifestations of personality stately books, shiny CDs, classic movies on DVD, glossy photo albums. But all those touchstones, and more, are quickly changing from atoms to bits and taking up residence in the cloud, that shared virtual warehouse-in-the-sky being built out by Google, Amazon, Apple and others, where they await retrieval via our phones, tablets and computers.

The digitization of our lives is exploding: Last year, music downloads surpassed CD sales for the first time; e-books went from novelties to a billion-dollar market in a flash; and streaming is becoming the preferred way to take in films and TV shows.

So does that signal the death of materialism, of possessing, of collecting? The answer is as complicated as the technology.

"Anyone who has ever picked up a shell on a beach has the collector gene," says Silicon Valley futurist Paul Saffo. "There's little difference between someone who saves old Kodachrome prints in a garage and the person who stores digital photos online. If anything, the collector gene will be unleashed by the cloud."

Spencer Haley, 33, who works at fabled Powell's Books in Portland, Ore., once proudly displayed 3,000 hardcovers in his home. But since a Kindle joined the family, he and his wife are down to a few hundred. "As long as the content hits my visual cortex, it doesn't matter what form it comes in," he says.

For Haley, collecting still means adding to those prized first-editions on his shelves. But it also refers to the list of e-books on his tablet, the book reviews he has amassed online and the friends who follow his recommendations via social networking.

"I missed flipping pages for about a day," Haley says. "I don't have CD or DVD racks anymore. Having things stored in the cloud just fits my lifestyle."

But for others, the black-hole nature of the cloud only heightens the old-fashioned need to embrace something solid. Denver high school senior Ethan Hill is no stranger to gadgets and streaming subscriptions, but he adores collecting music on vinyl.

"There's nothing like going into a record store and coming home with something in my hand," says Hill, 17. "It's a possession I'm proud of. I double-click on iTunes all the time, but it's not the same."

Collecting as socializing

This tech-driven shift is seismic; even the vaunted Encyclopedia Britannica soon will cease to exist in physical form. But the cloud is giving the concept of possession broader meaning.

Where it once meant "holding on to something in your room, now it's about engaging with others online around a social object," says Harvard tech culture researcher David Weinberger, author of Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren't the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room.

"Everything is heading into the social cloud," he says. "Books on shelves used to serve that function, but to a very small group that usually already knew you. It's the difference between fetishizing objects or celebrating them online, where at least you can make friends."

Given that actual ownership isn't required to form connections online around areas of mutual interest, the line between owning and renting is blurring. In a PricewaterhouseCoopers survey on attitudes toward the cloud released in February, 90% of respondents were "somewhat" to "very interested" in the concept of storing and accessing content from a personal digital library. Most were specifically interested in the cloud as a rental hub.

"Two things happened in the past years: Technology improved, and the economy got worse," says Theodore Garcia, managing director of PwC's entertainment, media and communications practice.

"You remember when people had 500-disc DVD changers? Well, that's when DVDs were impulse buys. Today, the value a consumer places on a physical disc is far less. It's not about owning. They want to view the content and move on."

Netflix knows that all too well. Its subscribers streamed 2 billion hours of movies and TV shows in the fourth quarter of 2011, a massive move away from the DVD rental model on which the pioneering company was founded.

"It's the skinnying down of America and the whole world," says Steve Swasey, a spokesman for Netflix. "It's great to buy a book or DVD, but in truth, how many times will you read or watch it? Technology has always been a catalyst for consumer shifts. Look at young people today; their whole life is in a phone or a tablet. They seem to want to do with less, to be unencumbered."

Other major cloud-computing players agree that for many consumers, less can be far more.

"I collected books and albums like everyone, but in the old days, you'd quickly run out of space in your house and risk renting a storage locker just to keep your stuff," says Eddy Cue, Apple's senior vice president of Internet software and services, overseeing the company's varied content stores as well as its iCloud service.

He notes that iTunes' Cover Flow feature, which lets users scroll through titles, is the modern-day version of flipping through albums. "Streaming (music) is great, because it's about discovering new music. But eventually, if it's something that's meaningful to you, you want to own it."

Mitch Singer, the chief digital strategy officer for Sony Pictures, says "we all have collecting in our DNA." Singer also serves as president of UltraViolet, Hollywood's foray into the cloud, which allows you to stash movies purchased from a variety of sources in a digital locker.

On Tuesday, Wal-Mart announced a "disc-to-digital" service through UltraViolet that lets customers bring in their standard- and high-definition DVDs and for $2 and $5 respectively buy full digital access to that content. "Owning is fundamentally about sharing," Singer says. "If you can't share, you won't collect."

Going beyond the object

Sometimes it's not even about sharing an object of obsession. In the past, displaying a worn copy of Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon or Hermann Hesse's Siddhartha might have earned you hip credentials, but today it's as much about what you have to say about those masterpieces.

"We don't view the Kindle as a device but as a service that helps define you to others," says Russ Grandinetti, vice president of content for Amazon's e-reader. "In the past, you'd walk into someone's house and see books on shelves. Now, you share all that virtually, along with your notes on a book and suggestions for other books."

Grandinetti says the upside of the cloud revolution often is overlooked by those who lament the cultural demotion of objects.

"Maybe the record or CD collection is gone in physical form, but people listen to more music than ever," he says. "What you must remember is that digital representations don't necessarily totally replace the real thing. The physical object in some cases becomes an art object."

Architect Mark Demerly says today's homes are being designed to reflect both the cloud and physical collections as entertainment equipment shrinks and display areas grow to accommodate prized possessions.

"You're talking about very sophisticated folks who are fully connected to the Web, but they still want to see these things that mean so much to them, whether that's books or Civil War memorabilia," says Demerly, an architect in Indianapolis who is chairman of the American Institute of Architects' custom residential committee. "It's about telling people who you are."

That is something the Web does masterfully. And perhaps to a fault, says Wired magazine writer Steven Levy, author of In the Plex: How Google Thinks, Works and Shapes Our Lives.

"The digital age has such a strong component of broadcasting and sharing that it's almost like you're doing it for self-promotion," he says. "But there's a difference between what I buy and showcase for myself at home and what I list online to say, 'Here's who I want you to think I am.' "

Levy used to collect vintage lunchboxes until the joy of the hunt was killed by the ease of eBay. Though he says younger generations seem to care less about physical objects, he predicts a growing "retro mystique" around collecting. "Fundamentally, collecting is a commitment to something, and that's powerful," he says.

The album-cover blues

Eileen Gittins remembers those days. The fiftysomething CEO of Blurb, an online self-publishing site that caters to photographers and authors, says she recently was hit by a wave of sadness when she realized she had no idea what musician was streaming through her home's speakers.

"You used to have this moment when you bonded with the artist through the actual album, but now there's nothing to see, and it bugs me," Gittins says. "Our company caters to people who want to have a physically beautiful object, either to hold onto themselves or to give as a gift."

Gittins is no Luddite, and she happily embraces the trend of sharing photos through a range of cloud-based social networking sites. But precisely because it's so easy to share photos on Facebook, images we elect to print out are imbued with greater importance.

"You come back from Thailand, and maybe you want to preserve that memory in a book of photos and not a link to Flickr," she says. "By bringing something into the physical world, you're saying it matters to you."

In fact, what mattered to many Boomers physical objects created by others is different from what has meaning for the next generation, says Jyri Engestrom, an Internet entrepreneur and founder of Ditto, a social networking site.

"My children aren't interested in physical representations of media, they are far more intrigued by objects they create themselves," Engestrom says, noting that he is an investor in a 3-D printing company called Tinkercad, which lets two-dimensional designs come to life.

"The sheer force of the utility of the cloud will cause us to let go of books and CDs and DVDs," he says. "What we want to consume, we'll stream. What we'll collect, we might not even use."

The cloud is here to stay. But for many, that doesn't mean the advent of a stuff-less society.

Denver high-schooler Hill says trolling old record shops for music made by '80s power pop bands such Nikki and the Corvettes isn't about bucking the latest tech trend. It's a pastime that helps shape who he is.

"I applaud people who can get rid of material objects," Hill says. "But I like to have things around that connect me to moments and memories in my life.

"And I think I always will."

http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifesty...uds/53555458/1
post #77598 of 87311
WARNING: Spoilers for the first season of AMC's "The Killing" in this story.

TV Notes
Can ‘The Killing’ Make a Comeback?
By Adam Sternbergh, The New York Times Sunday Magazine - Mar. 18, 2012

In an ideal world — or, at least, in Veena Sud’s ideal world — we would be talking about her history as a Hemingway-loving women’s-studies major at Columbia, or the time she took a master class with Spike Lee at N.Y.U. film school, or her years as a gloomy loner growing up in Cincinnati, reading “Helter Skelter” and wearing a Jennifer Beals perm — anything, basically, other than the ending of the first season of the show she created for AMC, “The Killing,” and why so many people hated it so much.

When “The Killing” had its premiere last spring, it seemed, at first glance, like a slick and intriguing spin on the cop procedural: a moody murder mystery set in rainy Seattle, based on “Forbrydelsen,” a moody murder mystery set in Denmark. The show’s tagline, in a self-conscious echo of “Twin Peaks,” was “Who Killed Rosie Larsen?” And most of the show’s loyal viewers, after sticking it out through an up-and-down first season, assumed the season finale would answer that question.

It didn’t. Instead, the finale offered a last-second switcheroo that was intended to prod viewers toward Season 2, but that instead prodded them toward their computers, where they howled in rage.

Here is Maureen Ryan, TV critic for The Huffington Post: “YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME.” Here is Alan Sepinwall, influential critic for Hitfix.com: “This will be the last review I write of ‘The Killing,’ because this will be the last time I watch ‘The Killing.’ ” Here is James Poniewozik, TV critic at Time: “I no longer counsel patience with ‘The Killing’! You may unlock the toolshed and get the pitchforks!”

And those are the professionals. The amateurs were somewhat less kind.

So that’s how we found ourselves, Veena Sud and I, having dinner on Valentine’s Day in a hotel in Vancouver, where she was working on an episode for “The Killing,” Season 2. A publicist from AMC was also seated at our table, giving the proceedings the air of a slightly hostile Senate subcommittee hearing. And, sure enough, Sud reacted to questions about the finale of “The Killing” with the defensive mien of a politician hoping to weather a stubborn scandal. “We set out from the very beginning to do something different,” she said. “Sometimes that worked. Sometimes things about it didn’t work.”

This is a variation on the response that Sud and AMC have stuck to since last season, when AMC found itself in the awkward position of having to mollify furious fans while not explicitly admitting to any wrongdoing. As Charlie Collier, the president of AMC, said in a kind of pseudo-apology to angry viewers a week after the finale: “If I could do anything differently, it would be to manage expectations.”

As Joel Stillerman, head of original programming for AMC, told the Television Critics Association gathering in Los Angeles in July: “If we had to do anything differently, I think we would certainly have taken a different approach with respect to managing the expectations of what was going to happen within that season.”

As Sud said to me in Vancouver: “I was definitely surprised by the level of expectation of closure. I didn’t expect the expectation.”

The real problem for AMC, though, is not that it angered its audience. Audience-angering has happened before. (The finales of “Seinfeld,” “Lost” and “The Sopranos” were all met with degrees of bewilderment and displeasure — no doubt there was some furious faction somewhere when “Bewitched” swapped out Dick York for Dick Sargent.) The real problem for AMC is that “The Killing” has aggrieved exactly the kind of viewers that it most wants to entice.

Not long ago, TV was a relatively simple three-legged stool: you had creators, you had critics and you had viewers, i.e. the passive, Nielsen-monitored masses. But the Internet, and specifically social media sites, has served as a kind of electrocharged amniotic fluid for the gestation of a powerful fourth entity: what I’ll call the superviewer. These people are engaged, passionate and vocal, an online jumble of professional critics and opinionated amateurs who gather together to watch and discuss and dissect their favorite shows. Early fan forums like Television Without Pity gave these viewers a voice; now sites like Twitter have given them a megaphone.

Superviewers can’t make or break a show — if they could, “Community” would be the highest-rated TV show in the history of ever. But they do influence programming, particularly on cable, where intangibles like buzz can be as crucial as overall viewer numbers. HBO, for example, recently canceled several series — “Bored to Death,” “How to Make It in America” and “Hung” — while sparing another one, “Enlightened,” despite it’s being the lowest-rated of the bunch. This was in part because those other shows had not generated the kind of significant fan engagement or critical support that can lead to award consideration. They had not, in short, earned the passion of the superviewers.

For AMC, the calculus is slightly altered — unlike HBO, AMC sells ads against its shows, so it values ratings in a different way. Still, its hits, like “Mad Men,” “Breaking Bad” and “The Walking Dead,” are among the most superviewer-friendly on TV. Thanks to the communal nature of social media and “its ability to metastasize, you have to take that stuff seriously,” Stillerman told me. “You want those early responses to be positive — and help guide the rest of the responses.” At first, “The Killing” offered that kind of viral potential, sparking a mini-phenomenon of live-tweeting and parlor-game guessing. Then the superviewers turned on the show. It didn’t help that, in interviews after the finale, Sud suggested that her show was a “holistic journey” and that disgruntled fans might be happier watching something not quite so sophisticated. “The irony is that these are exactly the kind of viewers networks are trying to engage,” Maureen Ryan told me. “And that’s great. Go after them. Just know that, if you disappoint them, that’s the worst thing that can happen to your show.”

In advance of the second season, AMC has tried to court back these fans, or at least placate them. “We had an interesting case study on ‘The Killing,’ ” Stillerman said, “where we had a very vocal group of people telling us something that, frankly, we listened to. We’ve even gone so far, in one of the more surreal moments in television programming history, as to literally let our audience know when they’re going to find out who the killer is.” (NONSPOILER ALERT: The final episode of Season 2.)

But will the superviewers come back? “I’ll take a look at a couple of episodes,” says Sepinwall, who publicly swore off the show. “Sometimes shows learn, and sometimes they don’t.” The premiere, on April 1, should reveal whether “The Killing” can stagger back to life after being gang-stomped by the Internet. Either way, though, the moral for TV creators is clear. Expect the expectation.

Adam Sternbergh is the culture editor of the magazine.
Editor: Greg Veis


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/18/ma...ref=television
post #77599 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvideo View Post

Using that logic, horse racing in general should be banned.

Bingo. I said as much in my one and only post in the "Luck" thread.

In fairness, I should say that the I was once ambivalent toward the "sport." At one point, I might even have been ok with some of the ethical/moral equivocation applied around here, but then "Barbaro" happened followed rapidly by "Eight Belles" ... this crap doesn't need to happen period ... it certainly doesn't need to happen for the purposes of "entertainment" or wagering ... If you want to throw your money away, do it at a casino. If you want/need the adrenaline rush, try base or bungee jumping instead.

PS: The above are *not* popular viewpoints where I live.
post #77600 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvideo View Post

^^^ I hope that you are not serious. You do know that banning horse racing will result in many livelyhoods ceasing to exist, which will ultimately result in many, and I mean many, horses being put down because the owners would not have the funds to feed them.

I don't care. If your livelyhood relies upon cruelty to animals then I have no sympathy when you lose your job.

Find a new livelyhood.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HDTVChallenged View Post

PS: The above are *not* popular viewpoints where I live.

Ahh, yes. You must have the misfortune of living in one of the "car on the lawn" states. I feel for you.
post #77601 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvideo View Post


Using that logic, horse racing in general should be banned. How many horses die, or are put down, because of accidents every year?

That was my point earlier. Horse racing is the issue . Not a show that has horse racing in it. Canceling it makes zero sense.
post #77602 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad1153 View Post

On The Air Tonight
THURSDAY Network Primetime/Late Night Options
1:36AM - Last Call with Carson Daly (Gina Carano; director Dee Rees; Milow performs) SD (R - Feb. 9)

Why is this listed as SD? I recorded the show (love Gina) and it was definitely in HD. A little Internet research shows that's the show's been full HD for some time (6 months?)
post #77603 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRM4 View Post

How do you upgrade standard DVDs to HD when they aren't in HD? Upconverted digital copies?

Do you really think they're uploading/upconverting anything? More likely, they're just authorizing access to an existing BD rip.
post #77604 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetworkTV View Post

Future news from a year from now:

Massive Security Breach Leaves Several Cable and Satellite Providers Vulnerable Content Breaches

Just 12 short months after Cisco's aquisition of NDS Group, a security flaw in the latest encryption software allowed hackers to breach content protection on several of the largest cable and satellite services...

Not surprised News Corp is getting out of this. They only bought in when they owned D* and used NDS for their encryption for D* and their encoder technology. Back in the late 90's when my station was an O&O, we had some NDS engineers come over from England (which was where the R&D was based at the time) to try and understand how American broadcasting differed from European broadcasting.

We had a Sony Beta Cart automation that played back commercials only (we were still a manually switched house at the time) and they just couldn't understand why we used all four playback decks on ONE station! They had a hard time grasping the concept that in the US we used single macro transmitters (one station) for coverage instead of the European micro cell type multi transmitters (multiple channels) for coverage. That was an interesting two days. Not sure who got the most out of that visit. Them, on how we did things; or us, on how they did things! Great times.
post #77605 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronwt View Post

That was my point earlier. Horse racing is the issue . Not a show that has horse racing in it. Canceling it makes zero sense.

PETA. That is reason enough.
post #77606 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxeng View Post

PETA. That is reason enough.

sounds like you're making an of topic political statement.
post #77607 of 87311
Tech/Business Notes
CW switches to next-day streams for episodes of prime-time series
By Meg James, Los Angeles Times' 'Company Town' Blog - Mar. 15, 2012

After studying the viewing behavior of its young audience, the CW television network has switched strategies and is no longer delaying the online release of such popular shows as "Gossip Girl" and "The Vampire Diaries."

CW -- a joint venture of CBS Corp. and Warner Bros. -- said Thursday that it would begin making episodes of its prime-time series available several hours after their initial television broadcast. The move is significant because it illustrates how television companies are moving quickly to adapt to rapid changes in technology in an effort to protect important revenue streams.

"Consumers have been telling us that they want the ability to watch their shows whenever and where ever they are," said Rick Haskins, CW executive vice president of marketing and digital programs. "If we don't listen to them, we will be missing an opportunity."

In recent years the CW has made dramatic changes in its online strategy as the network has figured out how to better monetize digital views of its programs.

Early on, the network hesitated to put its shows on the Web at all. But since September 2010 the CW has been delaying the online release of its episodes until three days after airing.

The three-day blackout was designed to boost the TV ratings, and thus protect the important TV advertising revenue. Advertisers pay premiums to reach viewers who watch shows on TV or within three days of their original airing, if the program has been digitally recorded.

CW executives were betting that viewers would be so eager to watch fresh episodes of their most popular shows, including "The Vampire Diaries," "One Tree Hill," and "90210," that they would watch them on TV rather than wait to see them on their laptops.

Viewers were eager to see the latest episode, all right. Research by the Warner Bros. anti-piracy group discovered that nearly a third of online viewers of CW's most popular shows were so motivated that they watched them on a pirate website.

"And 50% of that consumption was done during the first three days after the television run," Haskins said. "That's a lot of money out of our pockets."

By releasing its shows just a few hours after their TV broadcast (at 3 a.m. Pacific time), the CW hopes to reach viewers who otherwise would have pirated them. New technologies also allow the CW to measure the number of online viewers and determine whether they watch the commercials, providing another source of reliable audience data to share with advertisers.

The CW also has been at the forefront of advocating heavier "commercial loads," so the online streams contain as many ads as would be seen in a TV broadcast.

That is a departure from conventional wisdom among most online video distributors. Many believed that online viewers would lack the patience to sit through too many commercials. Sites such as Hulu offer episodes with about half the number of ads that would run on TV.

"We have found that viewers were indeed willing to watch a full commercial load," Haskins said.

CW also announced Thursday that it was introducing its first mobile application for iPad, iPhone and Android platforms. The app enables full-episode streaming of the network's prime-time series and provides a feature for fans to alert their friends on Facebook and Twitter that they are watching a particular episode.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/ente...-episodes.html
post #77608 of 87311
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxeng View Post

PETA. That is reason enough.

PETA had nothing to do with it. Three thoroughbred deaths in 11 filmed episodes meant the bad publicity was going to cross over into the general public's awareness and hurt the brand regardless of anything any animal rights organization said. HBO had no choice but to shut it down after the third horse died. And they bear all the responsibility because of the choices they apparently made to save money in production.

I take no pleasure in that, despite the astonishing amount of equine carnage in the racing industry which we're just learning about due to this situation, because I was really learning to appreciate how good 'Luck' actually was. A "Milch-less" television world is a less interesting one, IMO. But blaming PETA, a crowd-favorite whipping boy, is a little like blaming the messenger in this case.
post #77609 of 87311
Tech/Business Notes
Blow Up NBC’s Thursday Comedy Block, and Four Other TV Scheduling Suggestions for Next Season
By Josef Adalian, New York Magazine's 'Vulture' Blog - Mar. 16, 2012

Most of TV land right now is occupied with readying next season's batch of new shows, with producers and execs racing to finish work on over 100 pilots aiming to land prime-time slots for the 2012-13 season. But something almost as important is also going on at the nets: The scheduling gurus and research wonks charged with figuring out how to turn a mess of sitcoms, dramas, and reality shows into a coherent lineup are beginning to think deeply about how their respective schedules might look come fall. Bold moves can often make a big difference: CBS began its march to Nielsen dominance when it decided to take a promising young Friday drama called CSI and move it to Thursdays, and that worked out pretty well. So what big shifts might be in store for next season?

First, a caveat: For the most part, networks can't really decide anything until they at least get a glance at all the new series they've developed for fall. You've got to know your building blocks, after all. And this season, there's also the added challenge of seeing how many late-season newcomers (Touch, Awake) perform. With that in mind, Vulture studied our scheduling grids, double-checked our Nielsen data, and talked to a number of knowledgeable industry insiders to come up with five scheduling suggestions and predictions that could end up having a big impact on the season to come.

Move Glee to January to make room for a two-hour comedy block.

Live action, half-hour comedy hits are a rarity for Fox: Before New Girl, you have to go all the way back to 2006 to find any traditional sitcoms on the network that ran more than 100 episodes (That 70s Show and Malcolm in the Middle). It's too soon to tell if Girl will have legs, but right now, it's the most promising half-hour Fox has had in years. So, you may ask, what in the Sue Sylvester does that have to do Glee?

Well, for the last two years, the hourlong Glee has been the closest thing Fox has had to a live-action comedy launching pad. It provided a great lead-in for New Girl, but the past two weeks, with Glee on hiatus, Zooey Deschanel's adorkability has done just fine without all that singing and dancing preceding it (though the switch to Daylight Savings Time did take a bit of a bite out of the show this week). It's possible Fox will play things safe and just keep Glee and New Girl right where they are. But with Raising Hope not collapsing upon its move to 8 p.m. last week, we suspect Fox might consider going with a traditional two-hour block of four comedies on Tuesdays next fall. And this would mean changes for Glee. If we had a vote, we'd simply announce that Glee should copy the strategy ABC used with NYPD Blue (and which Fox perfected with 24): Keep those Lima dreamers off the schedule until January.

The biggest advantage of this move is that it would allow Glee to basically air uninterrupted for five months, giving the show time to build story-line momentum and help slow this year's audience decline. (This assumes viewers would remain more engaged if the show were a consistent, weekly habit; it is possible they would grow bored more quickly by 22 consecutive weeks of Glee-ish storytelling.) What's more, should the producers decide to make radical changes to the show in light of several seniors graduating (we're noodling here, as Ryan Murphy has not shared his plans for season five yet), a mid-season debut would give Fox's marketing mavens time and space to create a reboot campaign for January, when things are slightly less crowded in terms of TV premieres.

With Glee off in the fall, Fox would be able to continue experimenting with a four-comedy schedule on Tuesdays, as it is doing this spring. It's too soon to say if the entertaining Hope will remain strong enough to serve as an 8 p.m. anchor, but it wouldn't be the most radical thing in the world if Fox put two new comedies on between 8 and 10 p.m., with Hope remaining at 9:30 p.m. or shifting to 8:30 p.m. As we noted in the intro, much will depend on how Fox's comedy development turns out. (We're hoping that Mindy Kaling's project at the network ends up as good as it is on the page and that Kaling becomes Deschanel's schedule-mate come fall.) Fox execs also have to worry that New Girl is too young to air without a strong, established show like Glee as its lead-in: "Do you really want to make it tougher for New Girl to build an audience in season two?" one industry wag asks. This is a good point, but the flip side is that if the comedies at 8:00 bomb, Fox could quickly bring back Glee as soon as November.

Shift Revenge to Sundays.

This season ABC positioned GCB as the successor to the departing Desperate Housewives. The show's actually done okay in the 10 p.m. Sunday time slot behind DH, but it's hardly caught fire, and buzz on the show is just so-so. It's hard to see much upside in shifting GCB to 9 p.m., where it's unlikely to get much of a boost from ABC's red-hot Once Upon a Time. We'd like to suggest a somewhat riskier move, but one with a much bigger upside: Relocate Revenge from Wednesdays to Sundays at 9 p.m. Yes, this would mess up what's currently a near-perfect Wednesday night on ABC. But here's the dirty little secret of Revenge: Its ratings don't match its massive buzz and good reviews. The show is doing fine, finishing either first or second in its 10 p.m. time slot, but in overnight ratings, it rarely does above a mid-2 rating among adults under 50. The 10 p.m. time slot has become a tough place for any network drama to thrive these days, so we think there's a good chance Revenge could soar Sundays at 9 p.m. It's a perfect fit with all the young females watching Once and it would be great counter-programming to the male-skewing football on NBC and cartoons on Fox. (Assuming The Good Wife stays put, we don't think it would pose much of a threat to the newer, buzzier Revenge.) Moving shows so soon in their lives is always risky — we're sure CBS execs popped a few Xanax before relocating CSI to Thursdays — but sometimes it's the best way to turn a promising newcomer into a massive hit.

Give The Good Wife a Stronger Lead-In.

Fans can relax: The show's been renewed for next season. What's still unclear is whether CBS will shift the show from its 9 p.m. Sunday perch just one year after putting it there. We think there's a good chance. While Good Wife wins its time slot each week with more than 10 million total viewers, among folks under 50 it loses a big chunk of its lead-in from The Amazing Race. And with Desperate Housewives vacating ABC's 9 p.m. slot, CBS might want to try something more proven, with a better chance of attracting audiences. "The Good Wife really is one of the few soft spots on CBS's schedule," one industry insider notes. "I don't think its ratings merit staying in that time slot." The most radical move would have Good Wife shift to Friday nights, where its loyal, older audience would almost certainly follow (although some younger viewers would likely make it a DVR show). But CBS is not a network that makes big changes unless it needs to, and putting any show on three different nights in three seasons just isn't the CBS Way. Plus, Good Wife actually fetches a premium for its huge base of upscale (read: rich) viewers, and there's a good chance that premium would evaporate if it seemed as if CBS were burying it on Friday.

More likely? Good Wife slides an hour to 10 p.m., while CBS moves the established Thursday hit The Mentalist into the slot. The latter series seems destined to shift off of Thursdays next fall if CBS expands to four comedies that night. The Eye tested Mentalist out on Friday night last week, and it did pretty well. But we're betting CBS considers Mentalist too young to bury on Friday.

Give Up on Making Thursday NBC's "Smart Comedy" Night.

NBC boss Bob Greenblatt has been vocal in his complaints that the Peacock's comedies draw critical raves but not a lot of viewers. This is why Whitney sullied Thursday night for several weeks this fall, and why Are You There, Chelsea? continues to stink up Wednesday. But Greenblatt does have a point: His current roster of comedies, as beloved as they may be to some of us, are almost certainly never going to grow into the big hits NBC needs. And with all of the networks expected to go crazy trying out new laughers next season, the Peacock can't simply sit back while its rivals experiment (and, in the case of CBS, potentially challenge NBC's decades-long claim to comedy supremacy on Thursdays). "There's just no chance for real growth with what NBC has there now," one industry pundit tells us.

One scenario has NBC doing a Soviet-style purge, dumping everything that's not The Office and possibly shrinking 30 Rock to thirteen episodes for use sometime next season. It would then start the fall with a virtually all-new Thursday, and hope that new shows boasting Roseanne Barr, Sarah Silverman, Matthew Perry, Dane Cook, Minnie Driver, and other big names will allow it to reinvent itself. Our beloveds from Greendale and Pawnee would simply fade away.

Because this thought is too horrendous to imagine, we'd like to suggest a compromise: Reboot Thursday, but shift the best of the night elsewhere in the week — most logically Wednesday, but maybe even Fridays. Our theory is that the 4 to 5 million folks who now watch Community, Parks and Recreation, and 30 Rock do so religiously and will likely follow (or DVR) the shows whenever they air. If The Office moved with these other shows, it could serve as an anchor on the new night, while also underlining NBC's explosive message to audiences: This is not your hipster neighbor's Thursday night anymore. (Or, as one rival snarked to us, "It'd be 'NBC Thursday: Now 90 percent less highfalutin'.") If The Office didn't shift, it would leave NBC with a security blanket on Thursday, but signal that NBC was giving up on its other veteran comedies. Still, we'd rather take 13 or 22 more episodes of Community and Parks than none at all. (What's more, the extra episodes would help both shows get the minimum 80-90 episodes needed for successful syndication to local TV stations.) Greenblatt's desire to broaden NBC's comedy brand is completely understandable, especially right now, when there's something of a sitcom land grab going on as networks seek to take full advantage of viewers once again embracing the genre. But with so many holes to fill on NBC's prime-time lineup, we hope NBC will find a way to keep both baby and bath water.

CBS Will Make Thursday Their Sitcom Bitch.

Almost certainly, yes, they will. We (and most anyone who studies network scheduling grids) have seen this move coming since last fall, when the success of 2 Broke Girls and the continued growth of The Big Bang Theory suggested CBS might have the firepower to finally make a two-hour comedy play on Thursday. The only thing preventing this move from happening is a weak comedy development season at CBS. But even that might not be enough to stop what seems inevitable: Big Bang paired with another existing CBS hit — either 2 Broke or, perhaps How I Met Your Mother — would leave two slots to fill on Thursday. One of those will probably go to Rob or Rules of Engagement. Neither is sexy, but both have a core audience and don't need to be promoted much. All the Eye needs is one really good comedy for Thursday and a solid show to add to Mondays, and its transformation to two full nights of comedy is complete.

As for which Monday show moves, some have noted that CBS will soon test out an episode of 2 Broke on Thursdays, making that show the favorite to shift. Perhaps, but as one industry expert notes, "CBS hates to move freshman shows to new nights after just one season." It might be safer to make 2 Broke the Eye's new Monday night anchor, while letting HIMYM carry some water on Thursdays. Yes, the show is aging, but it's proven extraordinarily resilient the past two seasons, with some speculation it might have two more seasons in it (rather than the one additional season for which CBS has contracted). Long shots for a shift to Thursday are Two and a Half Men or Mike and Molly. It may be far too late in the former show's run to risk a move, while the latter has only done so-so on Mondays, at least relative to its lead-in.

http://www.vulture.com/2012/03/tv-sc...good-wife.html
post #77610 of 87311
THURSDAY's fast affiliate overnight prime-time ratings -and what they mean- have been posted on Analyst Marc Berman's Media INsight's Blog
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Hot Off The Press: The Latest TV News and Information