AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › HDTV Software Media Discussion › Industry Insiders Master Q&A thread III: ONLY Questions to Insiders
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Industry Insiders Master Q&A thread III: ONLY Questions to Insiders - Page 117  

post #3481 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winn View Post

I thought all P/DW talk was banned from the thread?

They caught me jetlagged in Japan and are taking advantage of me .

Seriously, let's go a few more posts and then stop if nothing constructive comes out of it.
post #3482 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdjam View Post

Is it possible that the BD people would like to have these reports linking MS' nameto this so that they can get the EU investigative bodies interested?

I don't think so. There is super high risk to them in such a strategy.


Quote:
Do you think it would be smart for MS to "head this off at the pass" by going directly to those bodies and disproving it before they start being sent all the clippings? If feel this may be an intentional effort on their part, due to MS not being the EU poster child sometimes.

No I don't. If they want to go to EU or any other regulatory organization, no one would be happier than I given where the facts sit.

Quote:
Sorry if this sounds conspiratorial - but it just seems *too* much like the pot calling salt shaker black, and it is clear already that MS had no part in it.

It just seems that it would help them distract the EU bodies from their close investigation of the Bluray gang's exclsuive arrangements...

As I said it is really simple. Make the other guys look bad and as a result, attempt to diminish the importance of Paramount trying BD format, and rejecting it now as a viable strategy for them. They had no other news to counter this so they cooked up something on an assumption which is proving wrong. Now they have to figure out how to backtrack....
post #3483 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by irfoton View Post

Insiders:
Wouldn't it violate fair trade laws to pay another company to not display or sell your competitors products? I'm sure you can give incentives to organizations to better display your product but anything beyond that and you could be in trouble, correct?


Nope. "Exclusive's" are part of the business world. Most of the time it is done around "promotional dollars". For example:

Company A agrees to provide Retailer B with said product. Retailer B must give exclusivity to this product for a term of 180 days, in exchange Company A will provide $xxx in promotional money to offset advertising and promotional costs.
post #3484 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Vaughn View Post

Nope. "Exclusive's" are part of the business world. Most of the time it is done around "promotional dollars". For example:

Company A agrees to provide Retailer B with said product. Retailer B must give exclusivity to this product for a term of 180 days, in exchange Company A will provide $xxx in promotional money to offset advertising and promotional costs.

Is this what happened with Target, for example?
post #3485 of 3651
Quote:


Citing sales trends, Blockbuster recently expanded Blu-ray titles exclusively in hundreds of its stores. Spokesman Randy Hargrove said the chain is not reversing this rollout but will be closely watching customer behavior. Blockbuster does offer HD DVD and Blu-ray in 250 stores and online through Total Access.

“Our announcement with Blu-ray was not a format endorsement,” said Hargrove. “We’re going to follow the demands of our customers, and if in the future that means adding more HD DVD titles in our stores, then we’ll do so.”

http://www.videobusiness.com/article/CA6471424.html

Mike

Quote:


Netflix says demand for HD discs are evenly split28 August 2007

Netflix, the US' largest online DVD rental service has said that its demand for HD discs, HD DVD and Blu-ray, are just about equal but also reiterated what most knowledgeable consumers know already, that the sales and rentals were tiny as compared to standard definition DVDs.

CEO Reed Hastings said that the company was still seeing low demand for HD discs but that demand was equal for both rivals.

Its odd that the demands of Netflix's customers (the largest online dvd rental service) shows an equal amount of demand for both formats when Blockbuster publicly states there members only demand Blu-ray.

With this in mind I have a few related questions that I would like to hear what insiders from both sides think about the subject.

01) What is you opinion(s) on why the countries 2 largest DVD rental retailers are reporting differing consumer demand?

02) Netflix reports an equal amount of software demand for both formats. Are any companies or studios viewing this as a problem that HD DVD has equal or near equal demand compared to BR with so much more players already on the market?

03) Are any BR or HD exclusive studios under commitment to not release titles for there competing format?
post #3486 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomsHT View Post

Its odd that the demands of Netflix's customers (the largest online dvd rental service) shows an equal amount of demand for both formats when Blockbuster publicly states there members only demand Blu-ray.

With this in mind I have a few related questions that I would like to hear what insiders from both sides think about the subject.

01) What is you opinion(s) on why the countries 2 largest DVD rental retailers are reporting differing consumer demand?

02) Netflix reports an equal amount of software demand for both formats. Are any companies or studios viewing this as a problem that HD DVD has equal or near equal demand compared to BR with so much more players already on the market?

03) Are any BR or HD exclusive studios under commitment to not release titles for there competing format?

Since this netflix info is coming after BB reports, can't common sense tell us that all HD DVD renters are renting from netflix where has a BD renters are renting from both BB and NF. Therefore rentels would be lower for both?
post #3487 of 3651
Quote:


Nope. "Exclusive's" are part of the business world. Most of the time it is done around "promotional dollars". For example:

Company A agrees to provide Retailer B with said product. Retailer B must give exclusivity to this product for a term of 180 days, in exchange Company A will provide $xxx in promotional money to offset advertising and promotional costs.

Wow. I would have expected that the contracts are written more cleverly than that and not mention "exclusivity" at all. Something like we will provide you with so many Product As and it's such a large amount that it consumes all the shelf space allotted to that type of product. If the word exclusive is actually in the promotional contract, why isn't that considered a fair trade violation?
post #3488 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomsHT View Post

Its odd that the demands of Netflix's customers (the largest online dvd rental service) shows an equal amount of demand for both formats when Blockbuster publicly states there members only demand Blu-ray.

You can read more from Reed himself here: http://reedhastings.blogspot.com/

Fair notice: Reed is on the board of Microsoft. But sadly, I have yet to meet him and brainwash him about all things HD DVD .

Quote:


01) What is you opinion(s) on why the countries 2 largest DVD rental retailers are reporting differing consumer demand?

I don't have exact reasons of course. But it could be merchandizing. Netflix can afford to promote both formats equally and provide inventory for both the same. Harder to do in typical store.

Also, demographics might be different. But I am just guessing here. I think it is important to look at what both are saying that is the same. That is, neither wants or thinks is able to predict the outcome of the war. And that the overall volume is tiny.

Quote:


02) Netflix reports an equal amount of software demand for both formats. Are any companies or studios viewing this as a problem that HD DVD has equal or near equal demand compared to BR with so much more players already on the market?

In general, studios don't like rental outfits. So if you are asking their opinion, then I don't think they care one way or other what these guys are doing.
post #3489 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick99 View Post

Does this mean that you have not seen the text of any contract that exists relating to this action by Paramount and Dreamworks?

Give it a rest.
post #3490 of 3651
To the Microsoft guys,

What were the general goals for HDi, specific to the end user experience?

Were other Microsoft groups involved? Such as Media Center folks, since HDi would presumably be a 10 foot gui. Or Internet Explorer devs, since the content of HDi is/could be dynamic. WMP devs, for active content? etc.

How about non-skippable items, such as FBI/Interpol warning or advertisments? Mandatory content? Restricted content (i.e. something HDi specifically will not ever do)
post #3491 of 3651
...oh, yeah, and above (again reading behind the lines) you talk about combo player manufacturers that are developing their own HDi. Now, as far as I know, the only CE for combo players are LG and Samsung. LG hasn't done HDi yet with the current player, but the next one is supposed to be fully HD DVD/BD spec as far as I know. Did they develop their own HDi implementation? How about Samsung? If not, who -is- doing their own thing, and why, who is using MS's solution, and why, and can you drop a hint about who else maybe doing combos (brand names, or cheap-o Chinese units?)

yeah, basically I'm looking for some bean spilling...
post #3492 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by irfoton View Post

Wow. I would have expected that the contracts are written more cleverly than that and not mention "exclusivity" at all. Something like we will provide you with so many Product As and it's such a large amount that it consumes all the shelf space allotted to that type of product. If the word exclusive is actually in the promotional contract, why isn't that considered a fair trade violation?


My example is very rudimentary and wasn't anything that I would use in my line of work, but was for example purpose only.

My day job is a Business Develpment Manager for a large manufacturer (outside the electronics business) and we make these type of promotional agreements with select retailers on occasion. Each agreement must be signed off by our legal department (which is very conservative in their approvals), and thus far, everyone that I have been privy to has passed muster.

It wouldn't surprise me if Toshiba approached Target and tried to buy an end-cap as well, but Target couldn't do it due to financial considerations from Sony. In fact, I believe that getting Circuit City to stock Toshiba HD DVD players was paid for by the HD DVD Promotional Group, which again, is good business on their part to get another retailer offering their product.
post #3493 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by paidgeek View Post

BD already has a spec for hybrid discs with both data layers readable from the same side.

I am glad you said "spec" and not product. Because last I heard, a Sony executive declared them finally as non-manufacturable late last year. This, after two years of hyping them by BDA.

Basic problem is that once you put a DVD layer underneath BD, it throws your tolerances in you know what .
post #3494 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr1394 View Post

I believe it is relevant, since you're comparing HD-DVD players with an SoC and a Pentium CPU with graphics subsystem against Blu-Ray players with just the single CPU core Sigma chip.

Which is irrelevant, since none of the services provided by the extra chips are required in a BD 1.1 player. I'm not comparing them at all, I'm just saying that SOC designs supporting the features required in BD 1.1 have been available for some time now. But anyway, you're welcome to believe what you want.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr1394 View Post

From Toshiba. It was probably a year ago, but at that time, they indicated that they thought the performance requirement of HDi was their greatest challenge moving forward.

As for the single-core BCM7440A, I don't know what that is. On the BRCM site, they only list the dual-core BCM7440. Did you have direct involvement with the MIPS port? Is it possible that HDi takes up a whole core with the rest of the player functions running on the other core? That would be my guess, putting the current optimized version of HDi at 333 MIPS (unless it requires more than one core).

The 7440 has two flavors, the 7440A, which is a single core design, and the 7440B, which is the final design, with two cores. Our code was running the entire player on a single core SOC, running Windows CE. It means that our performance is adequate for most of the SOC designs coming out (The 7440B I believe is a 400MHz chip), which is the only real test of suitability.

I was not directly involved in the CES player code, since I was on vacation at the time, but I can assure you it was all running on a single core.
post #3495 of 3651
I asked that the discussion about the Paramount deal be kept to the Paramount threads. Now I'm going to have to demand it.

Sorry, but it's cluttering up the thread and it's starting to sound like a bunch of reporters at a press conference trying to catch someone in a lie.

There are a lot of members who would like to ask honest questions of our insiders without sounding like a Matt Drudge wannabe.

Doc
post #3496 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by paidgeek View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninjanki View Post

3) Is there any provision from the DVD forum that would disalow BDA studios to release flippers with DVD on one side and BD on the other?(TotalHD from Warner seemed to do something similar, with HD-DVD instead of DVD...)

BD already has a spec for hybrid discs with both data layers readable from the same side.

That's very interesting.

Given that HD DVD layers are at the same position as regular DVD layers, does that mean it's possible to create single sided BD/HD DVD hybrid discs as well?
post #3497 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by amirm View Post

I am glad you said "spec" and not product. Because last I heard, a Sony executive declared them finally as non-manufacturable late last year. This, after two years of hyping them by BDA.

Basic problem is that once you put a DVD layer underneath BD, it throws your tolerances in you know what .

Amir,

Most of the recent cost and yield comparisons have been comparing HD30 to BD50.

Since the majority of new HD-DVD releases seem to be on HD30/DVD9 combo discs, can you give us the number of replicators that are producing these HD30/DVD9 discs, the costs and yields?

After all, there have been many arguments that 300 did not sell as well on HD DVD, despite the advantage in interactivity, due to the $5 cost differential.

If these discs were more cost efficient with better yields wouldn't it have been prudent to cost them the same? If not, does that indicate that there are consumers that feel that combo discs and interactivity are not worth $5?

Mike
post #3498 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeDV View Post

Amir,

Most of the recent cost and yield comparisons have been comparing HD30 to BD50.

As they should be. Apples and Apples. Dual layer versus dual layer.

Quote:


Since the majority of new HD-DVD releases seem to be on HD30/DVD9 combo discs, can you give us the number of replicators that are producing these HD30/DVD9 discs, the costs and yields?

Don't have either to offer. But can say that relative to BD50, hybrids are way easier to make. After all, DVD-18 has been in production for a long time. But folks could not even manufacture one BD-50 disc when the format was launched last year.

Mind you, they are more expensive than HD DVD-30 because of the additional steps. But nowhere near BD-50 because there is no new science. And of course, those lines can make normal DVDs which you cannot do with BD.

Quote:


After all, there have been many arguments that 300 did not sell as well on HD DVD, despite the advantage in interactivity, due to the $5 cost differential.

I checked earlier on Amazon and 300 rank for BD is #7 whereas it is #2 for HD DVD. Quite an accomplishment given the fact that as you say, the HD DVD is retailing for $27.95 verus $24.95 for BD version. So it seems at least on Amazon, the HD DVD is selling much better, despite higher retail price.

Quote:


If these discs were more cost efficient with better yields wouldn't it have been prudent to cost them the same? If not, does that indicate that there are consumers that feel that combo discs and interactivity are not worth $5?

Mike

No, both of your conclusions are incorrect. First, the studios are pricing these titles "to market." Every time I complain to an HD DVD studio about high retail price of combos, they tell me about Fox pricing for BD titles. Besides, you don't know that the studios are paying market price for BD-50. I believe Talk confirmed that subsidy is involved. If so, then all bets are off until those contracts run out.

Second, 300 arguably had a better fit to PS3 demographics than typical HD DVD owner which is more of a movie buff.

But per above, to sell as well as it has despite higher retail price, and better than BD version on Amazon if my read of the stats are right, shows the remarkable power of HD DVD brand and desirability of the extras in the HD DVD version.

There, you spin things your way, and I show you how it is done in reverse.
post #3499 of 3651
Amir,

Any comment on this press release for a Venturer HD-DVD player made by Alco?

http://www.alcoelectronics.com/news-details.aspx?id=15

Will it/does it use the Microsoft/Broadcom created hardware/software platform>?
post #3500 of 3651
Quote:


There, you spin things your way, and I show you how it is done in reverse.

I bow to the master!

A question to any Intel/Broadcom insiders: Any word yet on the PCIe or PCI card that offloads VC1/h264 decoding on the PC?
post #3501 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by markrubin View Post

added Dave Vaughn to Insider's list

David Vaughn

DVD Editor
Home Theater Spot
Contributing Writer
Ultimate AV

Belated, but welcome, Dave. It's nice to have another member of the press around.

Chase
post #3502 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by amirm View Post

After all, DVD-18 has been in production for a long time. But folks could not even manufacture one BD-50 disc when the format was launched last year.

Haven't DVD-18 mostly been abandoned due to various issues?

Quote:
Originally Posted by amirm View Post

I checked earlier on Amazon and 300 rank for BD is #7 whereas it is #2 for HD DVD. Quite an accomplishment given the fact that as you say, the HD DVD is retailing for $27.95 verus $24.95 for BD version. So it seems at least on Amazon, the HD DVD is selling much better, despite higher retail price.

Second, 300 arguably had a better fit to PS3 demographics than typical HD DVD owner which is more of a movie buff.

But per above, to sell as well as it has despite higher retail price, and better than BD version on Amazon if my read of the stats are right, shows the remarkable power of HD DVD brand and desirability of the extras in the HD DVD version.

There, you spin things your way, and I show you how it is done in reverse.

Or, it could just be the 3 free HD DVD/BD deal that Amazon is running. For the last couple of weeks (I think) 300 has been selling better on BD than HD DVD, but, admittedly, not by much.
post #3503 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by home_theatre_man View Post

Belated, but welcome, Dave. It's nice to have another member of the press around.

Chase


Thanks Chase.
post #3504 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by amirm View Post

Don't have either to offer. But can say that relative to BD50, hybrids are way easier to make.

Could you give any quantification or personal guestimate, perhaps? Do you think it's just 1 replicator or 5 or perhaps 10 or even more who are doing combos? Can just any HDDVD line do combos or do they need special equipment for gluing them together or some such? How about Twin Disc?

Quote:
Originally Posted by amirm View Post

I checked earlier on Amazon and 300 rank for BD is #7 whereas it is #2 for HD DVD. Quite an accomplishment given the fact that as you say, the HD DVD is retailing for $27.95 verus $24.95 for BD version. So it seems at least on Amazon, the HD DVD is selling much better, despite higher retail price.

Yet we know there have been at least a hundred thousand more discs sold on by the Blu-ray version, and that of movies released in both formats that the Blu-ray's show a bigger "tail" in it's sales spread after release, would seem to indicate that Amazon's sales rankings are relative and not really a useful barometric, no?

The MSRP difference at Amazon, however, is far less than we've seen at B&Ms... (the HDDVD of 300, for example, being some $10 more than the Blu-ray at Target). Do the studio guys you're talking to realize how much bigger the disparity is for most people who don't shop at Amazon?
post #3505 of 3651
IMO, the marketing department is getting involved in the Combo releases in that their internal research shows that consumers will spend $5 more for the added value of having the DVD version on the disc. Which I personally don't think is the case. $1 more, maybe???

Then again, PS3 sales projections with a pricepoint of $499 and $599 we said to be 6 million in the US and they are around 1.5 million. Projections have a way of being wrong!
post #3506 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by amirm View Post

I checked earlier on Amazon and 300 rank for BD is #7 whereas it is #2 for HD DVD. Quite an accomplishment given the fact that as you say, the HD DVD is retailing for $27.95 verus $24.95 for BD version. So it seems at least on Amazon, the HD DVD is selling much better, despite higher retail price.

Unfortunately this is a wrong observation. Usually the BD sells better. Right now the HD DVD is selling better because (probably) there is a special buy 2 get one for free deal. The people are using this special deal to (finally) get the heavily overpriced combo HD DVDs. The more you buy the more you save. Combo street prices are evil. Evil. And I say this as a pretty vicious HD DVD supporter. Oh god, oh god, I hope I do not get banned for saying this...
post #3507 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z View Post

Talk or Paid, can you shed some light on why early Blu-ray releases were packaged with an insert advertising a "Blu-Wizard" feature that was not actually present on the discs? Since Blu-Wizard was later implemented on subsequent titles such as Black Hawk Down, it doesn't seem like a hardware limitation was at play there, but rather a BD-J limitation.

Was Blu-Wizard originally planned to be a standard feature on all Blu-ray releases? If so, why did that not happen? Why has it still not happened?

Thanks.


I was not in the loop on every discussion, but SPHE marketing may have decided to hold back this feature on some titles.
post #3508 of 3651
Thread Starter 
please welcome our latest Insider:


Mulholland
(name and company withheld by request)
Software Development Engineer in Post-Production House
managing transcodes to MPEG-2,AVC,VC1 and digital packaging
post #3509 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by George Montemayor View Post

Ooh now I'm terribly curious. This question is to Paid, Talk, and other Sony representatives: Do you deny Sony having paid Blockbuster for the in-store BD exclusivity, and if not, how much did Sony pay BB?


Much of the noise in this thread comes from members making assumptions about things they don't have much factual information about. I don't know to what extent Microsoft was involved in the Paramount announcement and I don't know if SPHE or other BD companies gave incentives to BB.
post #3510 of 3651
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDon View Post

I asked that the discussion about the Paramount deal be kept to the Paramount threads. Now I'm going to have to demand it.

Sorry, but it's cluttering up the thread and it's starting to sound like a bunch of reporters at a press conference trying to catch someone in a lie.

There are a lot of members who would like to ask honest questions of our insiders without sounding like a Matt Drudge wannabe.

Doc


Thank you!
-t
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Software Media Discussion
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › HDTV Software Media Discussion › Industry Insiders Master Q&A thread III: ONLY Questions to Insiders