Originally Posted by zoyd
I don't have any empirical evidence to recommend one over the other although Krasmusik recommends Lu*v* as more appropriate for emissive technologies whereas Lab is more important for reflective (print) technologies. My guess is that at the level of accuracy of the standard probes either will do the job..
Alright, I'm going to have to slow you down a little bit. By emissive, do you mean things such as plasma, LCD... and other displays that emit light from behind screen. Would reflective (print) mean things like the screen from a FP, or a photograph?
yes, minimize deltaE to get as close to reference standards as your display allows.
I will probably pick one and try to minimize the deltaE.
btw, HCFR 2.0 will calculate the Lu*v* version so we won't have to use the spreadsheets in the (hopefully) near future.
Man, I can't wait for that!