AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › Measuring Amplifiers
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Measuring Amplifiers - Page 57

post #1681 of 1913
Thanks, I might have to try this amp with my new waveguides. I might even try the DSP version.

Although, Im looking for an extremely low noise floor because those 105dB horns make a 60dB hiss with my current amps. I doubt these have anything other then a standard noise floor.
post #1682 of 1913
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

btw, did you ever get your Active XO built?

Yes, here they are! 4 way programmable active and balanced.



These are before I mounted the power switch and summing switch. Obviously it is before I had the panels silkscreened. It works very well.

Chuck
post #1683 of 1913
Those look very nice Chuck.
post #1684 of 1913
Those look awesome and probably make your system sound even better. I wish I had the skills to build them myself and move beyond the DCX.
post #1685 of 1913
Chuck,
I may have missed this.....how does the Peavey do when its bridged? Were you able to test it iin brideged mode?
post #1686 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasw98 View Post

It doesn't really correlate to 'real full range usage' because it is an effect of my older test gear measuring this particuar piece of equipment. If I had the burst testing Audio Precisoin test gear with the active filter, this would not have shown up as much as it did. What you might find interesting is that the 8 ohm tests showed the 20 KHz measurement as higher than 20 Hz & 1 KHz measurement. But we are only talking about 1 to 2 volts. In the 4 ohm measurements there was a 2.5 volt swing in the other direction.

I could probably have come up with 10 different sets of figures on a single day and maybe showed a trend, but it is hard to say using 'hook up a load, steady state sine wave testing' method as opposed to computer controlled bursting.

To me it is a conundrum. Should the way you test a piece of equipment to get specifications matter? If Peavey chose to manufacture this amplifier and present its specifications using numbers obtained from steady state sine wave testing, would not as good a specification do the amp justice and then the amp would look unfavorable compared to the competition that did not use that method. And now you are back at the beginning wondering why or if there can ever be a common standard for measuring amplifiers? Wait till the next generation of technology is developed and the bursting method in current use does not apply, what next? How will you measure the wattage of a true digital amplifier that only puts out zero's and one's instead of analog waveforms but claims to have 100 watts per channel?

Sorry for the long windedness (sp).

Chuck

Thanks Chuck, I absolutely enjoy this discussion and the points that you make. Doesn't this circle around burst vs rms discussion then? Are the digitals a lot better at applying burst of watts? Most sources don't run sine waves but it seems like you would almost have to hook the amp up to a subwoofer in a controlled environment to see if there would be a change in SPL when you send a signal through it, there shouldn't be.
post #1687 of 1913
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by robseyes View Post

Chuck,
I may have missed this.....how does the Peavey do when its bridged? Were you able to test it iin brideged mode?

You didn't miss it at all. When I asked the folks at Peavey about a 'bridged mono' setting, I was told this. (And this is why it is a unique amplifier!)

"Peavey does not advertise or list bridge specs. The amplifier can be externally bridged. This is because the B channel is already inverted on the output (and again on the input). That in effect puts the amp in bridge mode when it is in stereo mode. To externally bridge, all that is required is to connect the inputs in parallel via the rear panel patch jacks. The combined output consists of pin 1+ of channel A and 1- of channel B. Alternately, if using the phone plug outputs (which you shouldn't due to their power limitations) the tip of the plug on channel A is + and the sleeve of channel B is the -. The eight ohm bridge spec then simply becomes twice the four ohm stereo spec."

And no, you should not try testing this with a 4 ohm load which essentially puts the unit into a dual 2 ohm load. The amplifier will run a 2 ohm load when playing music. (Probably all day and into the night. It did on my pair of sealed subs.) But when you try and measure the unit with sine waves for power output and distortion, etc. it will trip the breaker. It will only run in 2 ohm stereo for a minute or so with sine waves at full power. But with music, it will run all day.

So, no, I did not test it in bridge mode.

Chuck
post #1688 of 1913
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by stgdz View Post

Thanks Chuck, I absolutely enjoy this discussion and the points that you make. Doesn't this circle around burst vs rms discussion then? Are the digitals a lot better at applying burst of watts? Most sources don't run sine waves but it seems like you would almost have to hook the amp up to a subwoofer in a controlled environment to see if there would be a change in SPL when you send a signal through it, there shouldn't be.

Oh, it is absolutely the burst vs. RMS discussion. Digitals, Class D, Class A, Class A/B, etc. are not per se any better at burst than any other. And it is not really a burst vs. RMS because you are measuring RMS watts in both cases. You should properly call it a "Burst vs. Steady State" discussion. What determines how many watts an amplifier can put out in a given 'burst' of time is more determined by its slew rate. Back in prehistoric days when I went to school at Crown we were told that anything over 10V per microsecond slew rate didn't matter and you could not hear the difference. Now you are talking about a 10 volt change in a microsecond! That would interpolate out to a 100 volt difference in 10 micro seconds. 100 volts at 8 ohms = 1,250 watts RMS. So in 10 microseconds you can have a difference of 1,250 watts in any amplifier of any topology that can attain a slew rate above 10 uV per second. Obvioulsy the discussion comes down to..... can you maintain that 1,250 watts for more than 60 seconds? That is what the older generation of amps can do. Work out the numbers for a 60 ms burst time with 20 ms down time. Now we are talking about milliseconds. .06 seconds on, .02 seconds off and so forth. And then you need the test gear that is fast enough to measure at that short an interval. You will hear the argument that measuring by using a burst of power is more like "real world" usage. Let me know when you put on Slayer and crank it up as to whether or not there is any let up in the music that resembles 60 ms on, 20 ms off. Some would argue that most of Slayer's music is a bazillion ms on, NO seconds off! That may be an extreme example but if you are listeniong to a concert DVD of a fairly intense rock group at a loud volume, you are asking your amplifiers to put out continuous watts, not a burst here and there. And, yes, you can argue that a subwoofer amp will only need to supply megawatts for a short duration when called on so that burst testing is appropriate in that situation or is it? And then you come full circle to argue about what would be a fair cycle for burst testing or what would be a fair amount of time for steady state sine waves. And the arguments go on and on.

More long windedness.....

Chuck
post #1689 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasw98 View Post

You didn't miss it at all. When I asked the folks at Peavey about a 'bridged mono' setting, I was told this. (And this is why it is a unique amplifier!)

"Peavey does not advertise or list bridge specs. The amplifier can be externally bridged. This is because the B channel is already inverted on the output (and again on the input). That in effect puts the amp in bridge mode when it is in stereo mode. To externally bridge, all that is required is to connect the inputs in parallel via the rear panel patch jacks. The combined output consists of pin 1+ of channel A and 1- of channel B. Alternately, if using the phone plug outputs (which you shouldn't due to their power limitations) the tip of the plug on channel A is + and the sleeve of channel B is the -. The eight ohm bridge spec then simply becomes twice the four ohm stereo spec."

And no, you should not try testing this with a 4 ohm load which essentially puts the unit into a dual 2 ohm load. The amplifier will run a 2 ohm load when playing music. (Probably all day and into the night. It did on my pair of sealed subs.) But when you try and measure the unit with sine waves for power output and distortion, etc. it will trip the breaker. It will only run in 2 ohm stereo for a minute or so with sine waves at full power. But with music, it will run all day.

So, no, I did not test it in bridge mode.

Chuck

So if i understand this correctly, it will do an 8ohm bridge load but not a 4ohm load? Excellent reply & thanks for your efforts!
post #1690 of 1913
chas, thanks again for all your time and energy and especially the post mortem analysis. This piece of new equipment with it's electronic circuit design and function by Peavey will undoubtedly produce changes in the industry. The changes in circuit design will for sure lead the way but in my opinion, so will it's size and weight.
Already Peavey is placing the amp in speaker boxes and making THOSE units more functional with less weight and size but equal power than their competitors.
How us home theater officianados will choose to use the Peavey is yet to be determined.
The mid and high frequency performance was a nice surprise. Precision mid and high frequency reproduction has been an ongoing struggle by various manufactures for years, all attempting to gain the last microvolt of accurate and precise reproduction of musical sound stage.
Congratulations to PEAVEY for bringing this unit to the marketplace and thanks to you JD for your guts and help to us with your willingness to explain in detail and taking us on in this discussion forum.
It's been a pleasure finding you AND the IPR 1600.

Phil
post #1691 of 1913
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by robseyes View Post

So if i understand this correctly, it will do an 8ohm bridge load but not a 4ohm load? Excellent reply & thanks for your efforts!

Under normal conditions of playing music and movies it should do 4 ohm bridged or 2 ohm stereo (which are essentially the same to this amp).

Chuck
post #1692 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasw98 View Post

Here is the basic S/N, Frequency Response, and 8 ohm power tests.



And here are the 4 ohm power tests.



So bridged we can get > 800Watts into 4 ohms?
post #1693 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasw98 View Post

Under normal conditions of playing music and movies it should do 4 ohm bridged or 2 ohm stereo (which are essentially the same to this amp).

Chuck

How hot would this thing get in 2ohm stereo? There are a couple of Tapered horn designs that drop into the 2ohm range. The IPR is one that I have been looking at for this.
post #1694 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by stgdz View Post

How hot would this thing get in 2ohm stereo? There are a couple of Tapered horn designs that drop into the 2ohm range. The IPR is one that I have been looking at for this.

"drop into" won't phase it. Into clip might if you drop down to a frequency below horn cutoff. At that point, you could hit a protection circuit. Thermal is less likely. The good news is they are only $299 making it easy to buy one with a return privilege. Try it, see what happens. If you like it, come back in here and say totally wonderful stuff about it. If you don't like it, return it quietly and don't let anyone know Or.... move it to a full range app and use the 3000 for subs when it comes out.
post #1695 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasw98 View Post

Yes, here they are! 4 way programmable active and balanced.



These are before I mounted the power switch and summing switch. Obviously it is before I had the panels silkscreened. It works very well.

Chuck

Where do you get the enclosures, and do they come std with blank front panels?
post #1696 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by LINEARX View Post

Congratulations to PEAVEY for bringing this unit to the marketplace and thanks to you JD for your guts and help to us with your willingness to explain in detail and taking us on in this discussion forum.
It's been a pleasure finding you AND the IPR 1600.

Phil

Thank you Phil!

jd
post #1697 of 1913
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoaru99 View Post

Where do you get the enclosures, and do they come std with blank front panels?

Look here at Par-Metal. They come with a blank front panel that you can then machine or drill, whatever. They are available in different rack mount heights and depths. A reasonable price for a one off custom project.

Chuck
post #1698 of 1913
Thanks. Ordered one today.
post #1699 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoaru99 View Post

Thanks. Ordered one today.

Are you building an XO too?
post #1700 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Are you building an XO too?


No. PassDIY B1 preamp.

The case is actually way larger than needed, but the amp I'm going to be using it with also has a 19" rackmount front panel.

I've been screwing around with my 2-ch stuff again and figured I'd give it a try since I'm short on preamps anyway.
post #1701 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoaru99 View Post

No. PassDIY B1 preamp.

The case is actually way larger than needed, but the amp I'm going to be using it with also has a 19" rackmount front panel.

Who,

A TT preamp?

James
post #1702 of 1913
No, just a line stage preamp. Low parts count, no feedback, no gain, wide bandwidth (-3dB points about 0.3Hz and 700kHz); basically a cross between a passive attenuator and an active impedance buffer.
post #1703 of 1913
Very impressive
post #1704 of 1913
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoaru99 View Post

No. PassDIY B1 preamp.

The case is actually way larger than needed, but the amp I'm going to be using it with also has a 19" rackmount front panel.

I've been screwing around with my 2-ch stuff again and figured I'd give it a try since I'm short on preamps anyway.

Ahh, but will you take it to the next level? Build it so it is true balanced from input to output, then use a 46 position Shallco stepped attenuator with remote control option, matched pair fets all around (since you are building balanced you will need 2 sets of PC boards), and finally a low noise, low ripple, external DC power supply. Then you will have a preamp!

Oh, and don't forget the custom milled 1/2" aluminum faceplate instead of the faceplates that come with the Par-metal units

Chuck

Not that I have ever thought about building one of those...........
post #1705 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasw98 View Post

... What determines how many watts an amplifier can put out in a given 'burst' of time is more determined by its slew rate.

I don't think the reference is to bursts that are less than one cycle.

In any case, seems to me slew rate determines high freq response and PS voltage determines power available for bursts.
post #1706 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasw98 View Post

Ahh, but will you take it to the next level? Build it so it is true balanced from input to output, then use a 46 position Shallco stepped attenuator with remote control option, matched pair fets all around (since you are building balanced you will need 2 sets of PC boards), and finally a low noise, low ripple, external DC power supply. Then you will have a preamp!

Oh, and don't forget the custom milled 1/2" aluminum faceplate instead of the faceplates that come with the Par-metal units

Chuck

Not that I have ever thought about building one of those...........

Actually, I did buy two boards with the matched FETS, just in case the pilot build seems promising. But, I had not considered a fully balanced setup. Now that you mention it, that would only be right to have such a thing since the likely amp mate is also a fully balanced/fully differential unit.

I was somewhat thinking maybe the lightspeed attenuator for the volume control part could work too.

Oh, yeah, and I do have a nice little regulator board and toroid I picked up. Has big filter caps on the input and has the right type of caps around the regulator to get high rejection/low noise. Based on the minimal current draw of the preamp, power supply ripple should be 80dB below almost nothing, what ever that calculates out to be.
post #1707 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by penngray View Post

Thanks, I might have to try this amp with my new waveguides. I might even try the DSP version.

Although, Im looking for an extremely low noise floor because those 105dB horns make a 60dB hiss with my current amps. I doubt these have anything other then a standard noise floor.

Penn, I'm close to purchasing one of the kits from minidsp.com - I need an external DSP crossover (I want to ditch the computer/VST setup), and I'm hoping that their miniAMP board (with fully digital signal path to power out) will be low noise for my compression drivers.
post #1708 of 1913
Quote:
Originally Posted by findbuddha View Post

Penn, I'm close to purchasing one of the kits from minidsp.com - I need an external DSP crossover (I want to ditch the computer/VST setup), and I'm hoping that their miniAMP board (with fully digital signal path to power out) will be low noise for my compression drivers.

There is a current thread with someone thinking about using the minidsp (here http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...6#post18571326) and I believe forum member Monger is already testing with it.

Im definitely curious about it myself but its still a DSP where I believe Chuck's design above is purely an Analog XO design.
post #1709 of 1913
I may be misguided, but I'm hoping the combined SNR of the all-digital-to-PWM power stage might be low enough. Though a passive XO lingers at the back of my mind.


Chuck, do you mind sharing info about the guts of your crossover? Are you using commercially available PCBs? I'm curious how it's adjustable. Thanks
post #1710 of 1913
Glad it shut up that idiot that was chirping on this thread earlier.

If it wasn't for the blue led's I would have bought the larger one.

Next round
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DIY Speakers and Subs
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › Measuring Amplifiers