Baraka
recommendation: Tier 0 (nearly identical to the current placement in the middle)
This is a new placement for 2013 meant to supersede my prior recommendation, made all those years ago. Yes, the transfer still has traces of visible edge enhancement. That still does not move it out of consideration for Tier Zero, at least from my perspective. The 70mm photography was consciously made for eye candy, much more so than a normal Hollywood film.
Baraka's captivating subject matter simply produces more arresting imagery than the typical movie considered for the Picture Quality Tiers. That aspect alone gives Baraka a significant advantage over the rest of the field. This is not a list for the best transfers, but the absolute best picture quality.
Looking at it today, the Blu-ray from MPI would probably turn out a little differently if made in 2013. The following critique is reaching for the tiniest nit-picks to the film, in what is almost entirely reference-level video. Getting the compression issue out of the way, it is almost a certainty that one of the newest AVC encoders would be used now instead of the VC-1 video encode the disc currently possesses.
While the VC-1 encode runs at moderately high bitrates, the newest AVC encodes are a tad more refined and reproduce the master with greater transparency than this particular VC-1 encode. Smoke and fire once again prove to be a nemesis for the VC-1 codec in Baraka, as it does for most film-based features. As I watched from three feet away this time, there are two or three instances where the color gradients slightly degrade and the faintest hint of posterization enters the scene. The vast majority of the time there are no artifacts and the picture would largely duplicate the results of a new AVC encode, but we are striving for perfection here and I felt it needed to be mentioned.
If one is hunting for problems, the jet-black Asian hair featured in a couple of brief shots could be construed as a slight clipping of overall black levels. The contrast is usually pitch-perfect except for the tiniest loss in shadow structure, as the strands of hair partially meld into one cohesive wall of black. The wide variety of flesh-tones, presented in a completely realistic manner, are still among the best ever seen in 1080P.
The main source of controversy is obviously the ringing and apparent sharpening. Baraka's transfer definitely contains visible sharpening, though it is far more apparent in some scenes than others. If one is specifically looking for the ringing, it can be found scattered throughout certain locales in the movie. The brief clips of the Wailing Wall seems to it have worse than most, though I could list any number of scenes where the sharpening is evident. Would it have been better to see a completely unprocessed 8K master, unburdened with unnecessary ringing? Yes, but this sharpening is not egregious enough for me to condemn Baraka to Tier One. When push comes to shove, Baraka still looks better than almost all other Blu-rays I have seen. There is a visual excitement that has to be accounted for that goes beyond a simple checklist of videophile categories. Baraka still makes new Blu-ray owners sit up and marvel at the visuals.
If I were on some crusade against halos, the lowest I would even consider dropping the disc is Tier 1.0. Having seen many more Blu-rays since I first watched Baraka on the format, it still holds up as a spectacular example of the video quality possible in 1080P. Actual film doesn't get much better on Blu-ray. Is everything perfect with the disc? No, but we must deal in practical reality and not some vague platonic ideal that does not exist at the moment. People are holding some imagined version of Baraka against the actual disc, when it still outshines nearly all other films on the format.
Le mieux est l’ennemi du bien.
BDInfo scan (courtesy of CinemaSquid):
http://www.cinemasquid.com/blu-ray/movies/releases/baraka/25df7009-fa8a-419e-af1f-0e9a650d9643#specs
recommendation: Tier 0 (nearly identical to the current placement in the middle)
This is a new placement for 2013 meant to supersede my prior recommendation, made all those years ago. Yes, the transfer still has traces of visible edge enhancement. That still does not move it out of consideration for Tier Zero, at least from my perspective. The 70mm photography was consciously made for eye candy, much more so than a normal Hollywood film.
Baraka's captivating subject matter simply produces more arresting imagery than the typical movie considered for the Picture Quality Tiers. That aspect alone gives Baraka a significant advantage over the rest of the field. This is not a list for the best transfers, but the absolute best picture quality.
Looking at it today, the Blu-ray from MPI would probably turn out a little differently if made in 2013. The following critique is reaching for the tiniest nit-picks to the film, in what is almost entirely reference-level video. Getting the compression issue out of the way, it is almost a certainty that one of the newest AVC encoders would be used now instead of the VC-1 video encode the disc currently possesses.
While the VC-1 encode runs at moderately high bitrates, the newest AVC encodes are a tad more refined and reproduce the master with greater transparency than this particular VC-1 encode. Smoke and fire once again prove to be a nemesis for the VC-1 codec in Baraka, as it does for most film-based features. As I watched from three feet away this time, there are two or three instances where the color gradients slightly degrade and the faintest hint of posterization enters the scene. The vast majority of the time there are no artifacts and the picture would largely duplicate the results of a new AVC encode, but we are striving for perfection here and I felt it needed to be mentioned.
If one is hunting for problems, the jet-black Asian hair featured in a couple of brief shots could be construed as a slight clipping of overall black levels. The contrast is usually pitch-perfect except for the tiniest loss in shadow structure, as the strands of hair partially meld into one cohesive wall of black. The wide variety of flesh-tones, presented in a completely realistic manner, are still among the best ever seen in 1080P.
The main source of controversy is obviously the ringing and apparent sharpening. Baraka's transfer definitely contains visible sharpening, though it is far more apparent in some scenes than others. If one is specifically looking for the ringing, it can be found scattered throughout certain locales in the movie. The brief clips of the Wailing Wall seems to it have worse than most, though I could list any number of scenes where the sharpening is evident. Would it have been better to see a completely unprocessed 8K master, unburdened with unnecessary ringing? Yes, but this sharpening is not egregious enough for me to condemn Baraka to Tier One. When push comes to shove, Baraka still looks better than almost all other Blu-rays I have seen. There is a visual excitement that has to be accounted for that goes beyond a simple checklist of videophile categories. Baraka still makes new Blu-ray owners sit up and marvel at the visuals.
If I were on some crusade against halos, the lowest I would even consider dropping the disc is Tier 1.0. Having seen many more Blu-rays since I first watched Baraka on the format, it still holds up as a spectacular example of the video quality possible in 1080P. Actual film doesn't get much better on Blu-ray. Is everything perfect with the disc? No, but we must deal in practical reality and not some vague platonic ideal that does not exist at the moment. People are holding some imagined version of Baraka against the actual disc, when it still outshines nearly all other films on the format.
Le mieux est l’ennemi du bien.
BDInfo scan (courtesy of CinemaSquid):
http://www.cinemasquid.com/blu-ray/movies/releases/baraka/25df7009-fa8a-419e-af1f-0e9a650d9643#specs










![Inception (Two-Disc Edition) [Blu-ray]](http://cdn.avsforum.com/4/46/50x50px-ZC-462439c0_B002ZG981E-510BJ7kkgNL.jpeg)












