AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › The OFFICIAL JBL Owners Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The OFFICIAL JBL Owners Thread - Page 42

post #1231 of 14119
Hi all. A couple of months ago I upgraded my HT with JBL Studio L speakers. L890 mains, LC2 center, L820 surrounds. First let me say they are great speakers and at the prices you can buy them at, are an incredible bargain IMO. My only concern at all (if concern is even the right word) is what impedance I should be setting my AVR at (Onkyo 805) to get the most out of these speakers and to not overwork my amp. Why the concern? There have been a couple of reviews and tests of the Studio L series speakers that say impedance testing shows their nominal rating closer to a 4 ohm setting and to be careful with your amp set-up. They are rated at 8 ohm by JBL but test more like 4 ohm. Is this a marketing decision by JBL? I don't know but it has made me switch back and forth between settings on my AVR. As far as SOUND goes I think they sound better set at 8 ohms but I'm sure somebody here will say it's in my head. Today I came across this post in another forum and it makes me think I should stick with JBL's recommendation. This post refers to a blind speaker test done by the well-known Craigsub (whose tests I respect and thank him for--in fact I just today purchased a new sub based at least partially on his sub tests). Check this out and I would appreciate any comments--thanks. http://forum.ascendacoustics.com/showthread.php?t=2965
post #1232 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krazyboy View Post

Hi all. A couple of months ago I upgraded my HT with JBL Studio L speakers. L890 mains, LC2 center, L820 surrounds. First let me say they are great speakers and at the prices you can buy them at, are an incredible bargain IMO. My only concern at all (if concern is even the right word) is what impedance I should be setting my AVR at (Onkyo 805) to get the most out of these speakers and to not overwork my amp. Why the concern? There have been a couple of reviews and tests of the Studio L series speakers that say impedance testing shows their nominal rating closer to a 4 ohm setting and to be careful with your amp set-up. They are rated at 8 ohm by JBL but test more like 4 ohm. Is this a marketing decision by JBL? I don't know but it has made me switch back and forth between settings on my AVR. As far as SOUND goes I think they sound better set at 8 ohms but I'm sure somebody here will say it's in my head. Today I came across this post in another forum and it makes me think I should stick with JBL's recommendation. This post refers to a blind speaker test done by the well-known Craigsub (whose tests I respect and thank him for--in fact I just today purchased a new sub based at least partially on his sub tests). Check this out and I would appreciate any comments--thanks. http://forum.ascendacoustics.com/showthread.php?t=2965

You should leave the receiver set for an 8 ohm load. It will do fine.
post #1233 of 14119
T-nice job on the grills. Big improvement!
post #1234 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBryant View Post

T-nice job on the grills. Big improvement!

The black grill actually came from JBL that way. I wasn't able to figure out how to get a whole set of those and it would have been pretty expensive anyway, so I've ditched the JBL grills. The grills I made look a lot better than the silver, but they give everything a very "black box generic" look.

It may be possible to replace just the cloth on the JBL grills, but it'd be very time consuming. The frames are cheap plastic and they've used a lot of glue to hold things together. The replacement cost of a Stadium grill is about $35 as I recall, and I've only got about $900 in the whole 7.1 setup, so dropping a couple hundred in grills probably isn't real practical.

I do love the sound, though, and that's what counts.
post #1235 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by tatanka01 View Post

The black grill actually came from JBL that way. I wasn't able to figure out how to get a whole set of those and it would have been pretty expensive anyway, so I've ditched the JBL grills. The grills I made look a lot better than the silver, but they give everything a very "black box generic" look.

It may be possible to replace just the cloth on the JBL grills, but it'd be very time consuming. The frames are cheap plastic and they've used a lot of glue to hold things together. The replacement cost of a Stadium grill is about $35 as I recall, and I've only got about $900 in the whole 7.1 setup, so dropping a couple hundred in grills probably isn't real practical.

I do love the sound, though, and that's what counts.

Hows about posting some pics of the "new" grills?
post #1236 of 14119
Yes, make that two requests.
post #1237 of 14119
Just a side note to all you JBL nuts. FedEx just delivered the JBL Eons that I ordered for the Education Department here at my nonporift. We'll use them in our after school programs and for our alternative services for youth programs.

We got five pairs (ten) of these

http://www.jblpro.com/eong2/EON10G2.htm

and one complete E-system 15

http://www.jblpro.com/pages/mi/e_sys...tems_index.htm

Even kids in distressed and violent neighborhoods should get to hear JBLs. After all, music hath charms...
post #1238 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by filecat13 View Post

Just a side note to all you JBL nuts. FedEx just delivered the JBL Eons that I ordered for the Education Department here at my nonporift. We'll use them in our after school programs and for our alternative services for youth programs.

We got five pairs (ten) of these

http://www.jblpro.com/eong2/EON10G2.htm

and one complete E-system 15

http://www.jblpro.com/pages/mi/e_sys...tems_index.htm

Even kids in distressed and violent neighborhoods should get to hear JBLs. After all, music hath charms...


Good on you, Filecat!!
post #1239 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4DHD View Post

But one component that can have a big impact on the sound, are various types of caps. And how they are used in the circuit.

I suppose a circuit can be badly designed enough for that to make a difference.

http://www.provide.net/~djcarlst/abx_caps.htm
post #1240 of 14119
Hi there......a newbie to avsforum

Does anybody own JBL CS6100BG? If you do, how do you like the sound quality? I'm looking to buy a 5.1 system primarily for HT, and I saw this set on Amazon. I liked its size, look and price, and also the name JBL. But before forking out the money, I wanted to hear from anybody who owns this set.

-Tanx
post #1241 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by krabapple View Post

I suppose a circuit can be badly designed enough for that to make a difference.

http://www.provide.net/~djcarlst/abx_caps.htm

I wasn't thinking of bad circuitry, but better. Such as, using a Charged-Coupled circuit in xo, as opposed to using single caps.
post #1242 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mudslide View Post

Yes it has. Nevertheless you got your shot in. More experience talking and still no controlled environments and tests. We just do not need to be filling open minds, those new folks coming into the audio world, with unproven opinions stated as fact.


I wasn't taking a shot at you.

I use to be an electronics engineer so I have some knowledge on electronics down to the component level. Although, I have forgotten much in 10 years.

Receivers sound different. Some receivers are a better match with certain speakers. That is purely subjective.
post #1243 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBryant View Post

I wasn't taking a shot at you.

I use to be an electronics engineer so I have some knowledge on electronics down to the component level. Although, I have forgotten much in 10 years.

Receivers sound different. Some receivers are a better match with certain speakers. That is purely subjective.

That was the point I was making, receivers can sound different. And if the wrong receiver is paired with the wrong speakers....
Speaking of EE, I know one around here, that as a side line was building speakers. They were some of the best speakers I've ever heard. He built XOs, that he called "group delayed". He'd spec every conponent, measured every piece of wire, used in the xo, to predetermined lengths. The depth of the soundstage was at least 15ft deep and very wide.
post #1244 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBryant View Post

I wasn't taking a shot at you.

I use to be an electronics engineer so I have some knowledge on electronics down to the component level. Although, I have forgotten much in 10 years.

Receivers sound different. Some receivers are a better match with certain speakers. That is purely subjective.

Oh, no. I didn't mean taking a shot at me. I was just elbowing you for saying let's get back to discussion of the speakers after you had your say about receivers in the previous post. LOL.

Nope...if you guys don't want to read the scientific literature on amps (AND receivers), that's okay with me. Auditory memory is very poor. You guys are speaking from experience of sorts, but without controlling the room, the speakers, the conditions, and generally speaking from "I heard it once, so I should know" rather than repeatable and verifiable double-blind tests.

As we've said, this has been hashed enough. I just hope a few around here will take the time to actually read some modern, comparative, scientific studies on the equipment they're touting. I have provided you with some good primers that establish my POV. As I said earlier, I'm open to any scientific literature that proves your point. Please refer me if you have any. Thanks.
post #1245 of 14119
Here's what ten EON G2 boxes look like.
LL
post #1246 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by filecat13 View Post

Here's what ten EON G2 boxes look like.

Lovely.
post #1247 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by filecat13 View Post

Yes, make that two requests.

Here ya go. Sorry for the mess; Xmas, kids in town, new TV getting ready to go back to the store... And I REALLY need to clean up the wiring.

Ceiling mounted Monitor
SUB12
Stadium
And a view from the back.

The drivers in the speakers are showing up mostly from the camera flash. They're barely noticeable in normal light.







post #1248 of 14119
Looks like a nice job on the grilles.

The room looks "normal" (i.e., lived in).
post #1249 of 14119
HLS-810s right and left mains
HLS Center
HLS-610s rear surrounds
PSW1200 12" powered sub (plate amp died three days ago)
Sub was replaced with a KLH ASW15-200B 15" powered sub for $70 from pawn shop
Filled the KLHs cabinet with fiber fill to get rid of booming characteristics. Will experiment more with it.
Harmon/Kardon AVR-320 reciever

I auditioned the HLS speakers (when they were new in the stores) next to several Infinity, Polk, and Boston Acoustics models and I felt the HLS speakers blew them all away. To me the HLSs sounded much more detailed/natural than the others and I have never regretted buying them.
If I were ever to replace them, I would seriously look at Klipsh.
post #1250 of 14119
Yes, the HLS was a very nice line, that became more popular after it was discontinued. At the time, there was a lot of "Why did JBL stop making these?" questions flying around. Actually, the reason was simple: people weren't buying enough of them.

A similar, better, and more costly line was the JBL SVA Series. These can still be purchased online through harmanaudio.com in the specials section. The prices are ridiculous in a good way. I would think you'd need to pay 1.5x, 2x or 3x the money for a new set of Klipsch that could match them.
post #1251 of 14119
The cherry L8400 sub arrived on Thursday, and I had a chance to carry it downstairs today and set it up. It's fairly compact, just 5/8 of an inch or so bigger than the HTPS400 in each dimension, and likewise it's a sealed cube.

The cherry finish looks close to the cherry finish on some of my PT800s, thought perhaps slightly less convincing up close. From a foot or two away, it looks very good.

Set up was simple, and the short manual was more than adequate to cover all three connection possibilities. I used the simple approach with "line in" and "LFE" so that my pre/pro could do all the crossover work according to THX standard.

After some extensive listening, I have a few observations.
1) This is a far better sub than anything JBL sells below it, and it's much better than the S120PII.
2) This sub really can produce decent volume at 22Hz.
3) Cone excursion is precise and tightly controlled. The thick rubber surround, rigid cone, SFG, and (surprisingly) fiberglass voice coil work together well to produce a tight, controlled, powerful bass.
4) Its output, while less than the HTPS400 in brute strength, punch, and slam, was nearly as articulate and quick--a major surprise.
5) It is less "musical" than the PS1400, but then so is just about everything else. That's not to say it is NOT musical, it just doesn't match the PS1400.

I think, in most situations, two or four of these L8400Ps would be a better choice than one monster subwoofer. When following the procedures in the Harman International white paper on multisubs, a pair of these will fill a good sized room much more evenly and with greater distributed power than a single supersub.

For the money, I am not disappointed in the least, and this will find regular duty around the house, starting first as sub #4 (center rear wall) in the downstairs HT.
post #1252 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by filecat13 View Post

The cherry L8400 sub arrived on Thursday, and I had a chance to carry it downstairs today and set it up. It's fairly compact, just 5/8 of an inch or so bigger than the HTPS400 in each dimension, and likewise it's a sealed cube.

The cherry finish looks close to the cherry finish on some of my PT800s, thought perhaps slightly less convincing up close. From a foot or two away, it looks very good.

Set up was simple, and the short manual was more than adequate to cover all three connection possibilities. I used the simple approach with "line in" and "LFE" so that my pre/pro could do all the crossover work according to THX standard.

After some extensive listening, I have a few observations.
1) This is a far better sub than anything JBL sells below it, and it's much better than the S120PII.
2) This sub really can produce decent volume at 22Hz.
3) Cone excursion is precise and tightly controlled. The thick rubber surround, rigid cone, SFG, and (surprisingly) fiberglass voice coil work together well to produce a tight, controlled, powerful bass.
4) Its output, while less than the HTPS400 in brute strength, punch, and slam, was nearly as articulate and quick--a major surprise.
5) It is less "musical" than the PS1400, but then so is just about everything else. That's not to say it is NOT musical, it just doesn't match the PS1400.

I think, in most situations, two or four of these L8400Ps would be a better choice than one monster subwoofer. When following the procedures in the Harman International white paper on multisubs, a pair of these will fill a good sized room much more evenly and with greater distributed power than a single supersub.

For the money, I am not disappointed in the least, and this will find regular duty around the house, starting first as sub #4 (center rear wall) in the downstairs HT.

Good show, filecat13! Pretty soon you can start borrowing the neighbors' houses to setup numbers 13, 14, etc, LOL! Naw, you're right on the money. Multiple subs can provide a setup headache, but they sure do produce a better bass solution to most HT's.

Good work on getting this model, too, as I couldn't stand my (former) S120PII. It provided little punch compared to any of my current Hsu's. JBL makes some wonderful loudspeakers, but I doubted their consumer subs because of that experience. It's great to hear your report.
post #1253 of 14119
currently i own a pair of jbl northridge tower speakers nd310 was wondering if i placed them on the foor horizontally would it affect sound quality.I,m currently usung them for my front speakers in my home theater setup. i want to increase my projection screen size and the only way these speakers would fit is to lay them down on their side.if anyone can help thanks
post #1254 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by chachanyc View Post

currently i own a pair of jbl northridge tower speakers nd310 was wondering if i placed them on the foor horizontally would it affect sound quality.I,m currently usung them for my front speakers in my home theater setup. i want to increase my projection screen size and the only way these speakers would fit is to lay them down on their side.if anyone can help thanks

Dropping the tweeters from ear level will certainly affect your sound quality and imaging in a negative way. If you lay them on their sides, you will want to build stands to get them as close to the bottom of the screen as possible.

Also, the waveguides on the tweeters are designed more for horizontal dispersion than vertical dispersion. By laying them on their sides, you will be fine if you are sitting on axis, but those to the left and right where the tweeters are aiming will probably experience a lack of HF response.

Toe-in will also require more space when rotation a 36" long base vs. a 12" base.

Consider moving the towers to another room and buying some large bookshelves, or rethink increasing your screen size. If you decide to go horizontal with your towers, make sure you get them off the ground as much as possible (cinderblocks would work well).
post #1255 of 14119
Just a thing to note on Dec. 24th: the JBL Venue Series occupies four of the top 15 spots on Amazon's top sellers chart for speakers.

People who say that JBL lost its luster in the American marketplace are clueless and (usually) living 15 or more years in the past. I guess it's happy holidays for Harman.
post #1256 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by filecat13 View Post

The cherry L8400 sub arrived on Thursday,

After some extensive listening, I have a few observations.
1) This is a far better sub than anything JBL sells below it, and it's much better than the S120PII.
2) This sub really can produce decent volume at 22Hz.
3) Cone excursion is precise and tightly controlled. The thick rubber surround, rigid cone, SFG, and (surprisingly) fiberglass voice coil work together well to produce a tight, controlled, powerful bass.
4) Its output, while less than the HTPS400 in brute strength, punch, and slam, was nearly as articulate and quick--a major surprise.
5) It is less "musical" than the PS1400, but then so is just about everything else. That's not to say it is NOT musical, it just doesn't match the PS1400.

I think, in most situations, two or four of these L8400Ps would be a better choice than one monster subwoofer. When following the procedures in the Harman International white paper on multisubs, a pair of these will fill a good sized room much more evenly and with greater distributed power than a single supersub.

For the money, I am not disappointed in the least, and this will find regular duty around the house, starting first as sub #4 (center rear wall) in the downstairs HT.

I expected the L8400 would better than other JBL subs @ or below its price, although I haven't heard it. The fact that I find the entire Studio L series to be better than recent JBL lines, over the last decade, except the Performance Series, and above.
As for multi-subs, that is really the way to go, as you well know. The thought process about how subs should be used has come a long way over the last 30 years. ie, low bass being omni directional, so therefore, only need one, has long passed.
post #1257 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by chachanyc View Post

currently i own a pair of jbl northridge tower speakers nd310 was wondering if i placed them on the foor horizontally would it affect sound quality.I,m currently usung them for my front speakers in my home theater setup. i want to increase my projection screen size and the only way these speakers would fit is to lay them down on their side.if anyone can help thanks

I would advise against using ANY speaker horizontally, that was not designed to be horizontal. It causes way too many problems.
post #1258 of 14119
Hello folks,

Would an L890 owner provide me a precise measurement of the L890 height without feet?

Thanks,
post #1259 of 14119
I own a pair of JBL Studio Series S36II

I was wondering if anybody else that has these could tell me what the two screw holes are for on the bottom of them?

I assume a hanger or stand, but is there a special one I need to use with this speaker?


ALSO Can I combine my S series speakers with new L series speakers and be ok?
post #1260 of 14119
Quote:
Originally Posted by filecat13 View Post

Yes, the HLS was a very nice line, that became more popular after it was discontinued. At the time, there was a lot of "Why did JBL stop making these?" questions flying around. Actually, the reason was simple: people weren't buying enough of them.

A similar, better, and more costly line was the JBL SVA Series. These can still be purchased online through harmanaudio.com in the specials section. The prices are ridiculous in a good way. I would think you'd need to pay 1.5x, 2x or 3x the money for a new set of Klipsch that could match them.

Merry Christmas to me I think.
Ordered a JVC RXDP20 from ecost.com thanks to a tip in this thread.. Now I think I'm going to order 2x pairs of the SVA2100s. I love the looks. How is the midrange on them? Thinking either the L890s or these now.


Merry Christmas to all by the way!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › The OFFICIAL JBL Owners Thread