Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan_h 
The analog input stage of the Onkyo is what is sub-par -- as in, not transparent, in a way that doesn't let good analog source equipment shine through untouched.
The DACs and analog output stage are very good.
I recommend you give it a comparison: Listen to an excellent CD player (Bryston? Arcam? Ayre?) via the analog and via the digital input on the Onkyo. Level match them to within one db with an SPL meter. Disable bass management and Audyssey, etc., to listen to pure two channel audio. Decide for yourself.

The analog input stage of the Onkyo is what is sub-par -- as in, not transparent, in a way that doesn't let good analog source equipment shine through untouched.
The DACs and analog output stage are very good.
I recommend you give it a comparison: Listen to an excellent CD player (Bryston? Arcam? Ayre?) via the analog and via the digital input on the Onkyo. Level match them to within one db with an SPL meter. Disable bass management and Audyssey, etc., to listen to pure two channel audio. Decide for yourself.
I will give that a try with the CD-120. No need to use a different CD player as I am happy with the CD-120. I am sure the SQ is not on a par with those three but I am finding in my room the biggest changes have been with speakers and not CD players, DACs or amps.
Bill










. I think this comparison will be easier as I can match the volumes with the 885 and 2100 then all I have to do is switch inputs. I will post my thoughts when I have some listening time with the 2100. Will it ever end
.








