AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Official Epik Subwoofer Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Epik Subwoofer Thread - Page 476

post #14251 of 19461
Also, audyessy set my sub to -6db., if I want more bass is it ok to turn the db up? Is there some sort of "rule" of thumb for this?
post #14252 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasanii19 View Post

It was set to 80,not 120. Your saying I need to manually set it to 120hz? will I notice a sq difference at 120hz instead of 80hz?

Either i am confused or you, others are. You set the LPF of the LFE to 120HZ.
This is not a crossover. Audyessy will set the crossovers for each speaker. are we on the same page?
post #14253 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasanii19 View Post

Also, audyessy set my sub to -6db., if I want more bass is it ok to turn the db up? Is there some sort of "rule" of thumb for this?

-6 DB is ok to start. If you want more you can set the trims in the receiver up to another 3 db, which would put you to -3db on the sub channel. If you have a spl meter what is it telling you with the receiver test tones?
post #14254 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasanii19 View Post

It was set to 80,not 120. Your saying I need to manually set it to 120hz? will I notice a sq difference at 120hz instead of 80hz?


If you're referring to the LPF of the LFE then yes, that should always be 120. This setting is independent of the crossover settings of the rest of the system (ie where the sub takes over bass from the other speakers). By definition, the LFE channel contains material up to 120hz. So, setting it any lower than that will incur a premature rolloff to the LFE channel and you might lose some LFE material. Why they even include this setting on pre-amps/receivers is beyond me.
post #14255 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by warlord260 View Post

-6 DB is ok to start. If you want more you can set the trims in the receiver up to another 3 db, which would put you to -3db on the sub channel. If you have a spl meter what is it telling you with the receiver test tones?

Just don't go more then - or + 3 db from the Audyssey settings.
post #14256 of 19461
Has anyone listened to both the Empire and the Phoenix?

If so what were your thoughts? I have a pheonix but really want an empire.
post #14257 of 19461
Stupid Legend still isn't out. Wish they had a more precise release date than "September"... IT IS SEPTEMBER, GIMMIE A DAY!
post #14258 of 19461
Give'em a call.
post #14259 of 19461
I'm looking for some help with my setup.

I currently own a Dynasty attached to an Antimode. I love the Dynasty, but like others, I have felt the mid-bass was lacking. I really like the Dynasty for Blu-rays and deep bass music. I want to keep it. This thing is a real bottom feeder (quoting someone else). However, I want to fill in the mid-bass region.

I ordered an Empire and it shipped yesterday. I spent yesterday reading the April/May section of this thread. It seems that some people were trying to integrate the Empire with other subwoofers and not being thrilled with the results. Mixing ported with sealed gave an overall muddied bass as one example. I know that YMMV, but having this in mind, here are my thoughts: Please feel free to correct anything that I missed/misquoted/don't understand.

1- The Dynasty is best suited for the deepest bass.

2- The Empire's strong point is the mid-bass and has a rolloff starting at 20 HZ.

3- I can use both of them together as one big, yet modular, subwoofer.

4- I ordered a Behringer DCX2496. The thought here is to set the Behringer up so that the Empire will take the mid to high load and the Dynasty will take the low load. I don't know where this crossover would be. Maybe 30 HZ? The Behringer has many different options for the rolloff curve to help with this integration of the two subs.

5- I know that there are many factors to consider. Placement of each sub, gain on each sub, phase matching, delay, etc.

6- Behringer DCX2496 can fine tune each sub independently from the other with varying rolloff curves and a myriad of other things I have yet to learn (can you say winter project).

7- I can use the Antimode to then tame both subs or I can learn to use REW (more winter project) and then use the Behringer DCX2496 for corrections. I believe that the Behringer will allow me to correct each sub independently.

8- REW will eventually be my friend in trying to accomplish this.

9- I'm going to need some time and patience for this.

Any thoughts are appreciated.
Thanks,
MrJulius
post #14260 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjulius View Post

I'm looking for some help with my setup.

I currently own a Dynasty attached to an Antimode. I love the Dynasty, but like others, I have felt the mid-bass was lacking. I really like the Dynasty for Blu-rays and deep bass music. I want to keep it. This thing is a real bottom feeder (quoting someone else). However, I want to fill in the mid-bass region.

I ordered an Empire and it shipped yesterday. I spent yesterday reading the April/May section of this thread. It seems that some people were trying to integrate the Empire with other subwoofers and not being thrilled with the results. Mixing ported with sealed gave an overall muddied bass as one example. I know that YMMV, but having this in mind, here are my thoughts: Please feel free to correct anything that I missed/misquoted/don't understand.

1- The Dynasty is best suited for the deepest bass.

2- The Empire's strong point is the mid-bass and has a rolloff starting at 20 HZ.

3- I can use both of them together as one big, yet modular, subwoofer.

4- I ordered a Behringer DCX2496. The thought here is to set the Behringer up so that the Empire will take the mid to high load and the Dynasty will take the low load. I don't know where this crossover would be. Maybe 30 HZ? The Behringer has many different options for the rolloff curve to help with this integration of the two subs.

5- I know that there are many factors to consider. Placement of each sub, gain on each sub, phase matching, delay, etc.

6- Behringer DCX2496 can fine tune each sub independently from the other with varying rolloff curves and a myriad of other things I have yet to learn (can you say winter project).

7- I can use the Antimode to then tame both subs or I can learn to use REW (more winter project) and then use the Behringer DCX2496 for corrections. I believe that the Behringer will allow me to correct each sub independently.

8- REW will eventually be my friend in trying to accomplish this.

9- I'm going to need some time and patience for this.

Any thoughts are appreciated.
Thanks,
MrJulius

I'd be interested to hear how this eventually works out for you.
post #14261 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjulius View Post

6- Behringer DCX2496 can fine tune each sub independently from the other with varying rolloff curves and a myriad of other things I have yet to learn (can you say winter project).

7- I can use the Antimode to then tame both subs or I can learn to use REW (more winter project) and then use the Behringer DCX2496 for corrections. I believe that the Behringer will allow me to correct each sub independently.

8- REW will eventually be my friend in trying to accomplish this.

9- I'm going to need some time and patience for this.

Any thoughts are appreciated.
Thanks,
MrJulius

Yep, I think your cunning plan may in fact work!

By using two of the three input channels of the DCX2496, you can filter each sub independently. You will indeed have some work to do to make sure they don't interfere yet provide complete coverage across the whole range of frequencies.

REW is a very powerful piece of software (especially since it is free!), and the implementation tool (DCX2496) is well-suited to your plans, as far as I can tell (I'm not super-familiar with the DCX vs the FBQ2496 or DSP1124).

Please do keep us in the loop, and check out the Home Theater Shack for specific tips on REW and the Behringer (e.g. http://www.hometheatershack.com/foru...n-calibration/).

shinksma
post #14262 of 19461
This is not Epik specific, but I wanted to ask you fine ladies and gents that subscribe to this thead the following question. Why is it that everywhere I look and read, people have this "obsession" with mid-bass? Correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn't we want a subwoofer to be able to reproduce the lowest notes to their best abilities and leave most of the "mid-bass" to the mains? Shouldn't a good set of main speakers be able to reproduce better mid-bass than a lowly subwoofer? Why are we seeing lots of people saying that the older Epik subwoofer line "lacks" in the mid-bass department? Personally, I do not find that to be an issue at all with my Phoenix. Nor did I find it an issue with any of my past subwoofers as well.

Someone educate me please
post #14263 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gov View Post

This is not Epik specific, but I wanted to ask you fine ladies and gents that subscribe to this thead the following question. Why is it that everywhere I look and read, people have this "obsession" with mid-bass? Correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn't we want a subwoofer to be able to reproduce the lowest notes to their best abilities and leave most of the "mid-bass" to the mains? Shouldn't a good set of main speakers be able to reproduce better mid-bass than a lowly subwoofer? Why are we seeing lots of people saying that the older Epik subwoofer line "lacks" in the mid-bass department? Personally, I do not find that to be an issue at all with my Phoenix. Nor did I find it an issue with any of my past subwoofers as well.

Someone educate me please

No. I am more interested in the bass range that accounts for about 95%-98% of my movie time and 100% of my music time.
post #14264 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gov View Post

This is not Epik specific, but I wanted to ask you fine ladies and gents that subscribe to this thead the following question. Why is it that everywhere I look and read, people have this "obsession" with mid-bass? Correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn't we want a subwoofer to be able to reproduce the lowest notes to their best abilities and leave most of the "mid-bass" to the mains? Shouldn't a good set of main speakers be able to reproduce better mid-bass than a lowly subwoofer? Why are we seeing lots of people saying that the older Epik subwoofer line "lacks" in the mid-bass department? Personally, I do not find that to be an issue at all with my Phoenix. Nor did I find it an issue with any of my past subwoofers as well.

Someone educate me please

The other thing is people who mention sub 20hz in some movies usually talk about the Tap Scene in Finding Nemo or the Helicopter Scene in BHD. WTH! Don't those scenes last about 15 seconds combined?
post #14265 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gov View Post

This is not Epik specific, but I wanted to ask you fine ladies and gents that subscribe to this thead the following question. Why is it that everywhere I look and read, people have this "obsession" with mid-bass? Correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn't we want a subwoofer to be able to reproduce the lowest notes to their best abilities and leave most of the "mid-bass" to the mains? Shouldn't a good set of main speakers be able to reproduce better mid-bass than a lowly subwoofer? Why are we seeing lots of people saying that the older Epik subwoofer line "lacks" in the mid-bass department? Personally, I do not find that to be an issue at all with my Phoenix. Nor did I find it an issue with any of my past subwoofers as well.

Someone educate me please

Unless you spend alot of money on your mains, they are not going to be able to produce mid-bass (80-200hz) like a dedicated subwoofer can. Now, large ported subs like the Tower, Conquest and Dynasty were designed to produce very low frequencies, and they do with plenty gusto. Can you say flat to 10hz in room response? However, while those subs will play mid-bass just fine, there are better subs out there for mid-bass. I think that the Empire is a great solution for low and mid bass.

Then there is me who wants to try and incorporate dual empires or legends with my Tower/Dynasty combo. If I can get them to play nice together, then I will be VERY happy.
post #14266 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm1699 View Post

The other thing is people who mention sub 20hz in some movies usually talk about the Tap Scene in Finding Nemo or the Helicopter Scene in BHD. WTH! Don't those scenes last about 15 seconds combined?

There are many more scenes than just those two. WOTW, Kung Fu Panda, Cloverfield, etc.
post #14267 of 19461
News about the Epik Legend... I sent Epik the following email:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Email to Epik View Post

I'm emailing you in regards to
the Epik Legend that is due out this month. The "Add to cart" button
on the product's page does not function, so I'm presuming it's just
not out yet. Is this correct, or this there an error on the page?

When will the item actually be released this month?


They sent me back the following:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Email from Epik View Post

The Legend is not yet available. We are taking preorders by phone now and will begin taking preorders online (with the Add To Cart button) in a week or two.

The Legend will be released at the end of the month, although we do not have an exact date yet.

We will begin shipping out preorders at that time as well.


Yay.
post #14268 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepyourgameup View Post

There are many more scenes than just those two. WOTW, Kung Fu Panda, Cloverfield, etc.

What are the major parts in War of the Worlds? All I can think of is when the alien machines blow their horns. That it?
post #14269 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSteelPhantom View Post

What are the major parts in War of the Worlds? All I can think of is when the alien machines blow their horns. That it?

As far as I'm concerned it's pretty much worth watching everything from when the "lightning" strikes start to when they drive away in the van with the town coming apart in the background.
post #14270 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSteelPhantom View Post

What are the major parts in War of the Worlds? All I can think of is when the alien machines blow their horns. That it?

When the pod emerges from the ground mainly. Also Terminator Salvation has a good scene when the giant machine destroys the gas station.
post #14271 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepyourgameup View Post

There are many more scenes than just those two. WOTW, Kung Fu Panda, Cloverfield, etc.

Didn't "skidoosh"/whatever you call it last like 7 seconds. Also, are you guys inferring that I wouldn't hear that sub 20hz material or are you saying that it wouldn't be as impactful? The scenes that get mentioned...........are they sub 20hz or do the scenes "extend" below 20hz? Take for instance any of these scenes that you mention...........am I losing the entire wave or just a nano-second of the wave that extends below 20hz? Are we talking about what may really be less than 1% of our movie time? All this talk about subs that are getting more and more powerful amps leads me to think that we are feeling "more" bass as opposed to "deeper" bass.
post #14272 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by stepyourgameup View Post

When the pod emerges from the ground mainly. Also Terminator Salvation has a good scene when the giant machine destroys the gas station.

Try listening to those scenes on a cheap Infinity or Polk 10" or 12". Let me know if the sub stays silent for the duration of those scenes.
post #14273 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm1699 View Post

Didn't "skidoosh"/whatever you call it last like 7 seconds. Also, are you guys inferring that I wouldn't hear that sub 20hz material or are you saying that it wouldn't be as impactful? The scenes that get mentioned...........are they sub 20hz or do the scenes "extend" below 20hz? Take for instance any of these scenes that you mention...........am I losing the entire wave or just a nano-second of the wave that extends below 20hz? Are we talking about what may really be less than 1% of our movie time? All this talk about subs that are getting more and more powerful amps leads me to think that we are feeling "more" bass as opposed to "deeper" bass.

The scenes extend below 20hz, so some of the bass would still be heard from a cheaper/smaller sub but you will lose dBs as it goes further down. But the below 20hz stuff can't really be heard anyway. It's more felt. And it shakes your @$$ and rattles your head. Also, the above 20hz stuff will definately be more impactful.

If your listening to a movie at or near reference and you have less of a sub, it will start to distort and become muddy thus you will need to turn down your subs gain. Having a bigger/more expensive sub/s you will have more "headroom" which is absolutely awesome and you won't have distortion.
post #14274 of 19461
[quote=stepyourgameup;19163073]The scenes extend below 20hz, so some of the bass would still be heard from a cheaper/smaller sub but you will lose dBs as it goes further down. But the below 20hz stuff can't really be heard anyway. It's more felt. And it shakes your @$$ and rattles your head. Also, the above 20hz stuff will definately be more impactful.

If your listening to a movie at or near reference and you have less of a sub, it will start to distort and become muddy thus you will need to turn down your subs gain. Having a bigger/more expensive sub/s you will have more "headroom" which is absolutely awesome and you won't have distortion.[/QUOTE]

How many of us really push those expensive subs to reference level? It seems that we are paying for performance that we rarely, if ever, use. I guess some buy Corvettes to burn tires, and some buy them just because they can(and cringe at the thought of burning rubber). Some buy a mustang for the same reasons. Each reason is ok really. As long as we are happy/content.
post #14275 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm1699 View Post

The other thing is people who mention sub 20hz in some movies usually talk about the Tap Scene in Finding Nemo or the Helicopter Scene in BHD. WTH! Don't those scenes last about 15 seconds combined?

Go to the "sticky's" at the top of the forum. You'll find a "sticky" entitled: "The Master List of DVD, HD-DVD & Blu-ray Movies with BASS Thread...With WaterFalls" The 2 movies you mentioned barely scratch the surface.

To make it easy, here's a direct link:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=755493

Almost 5,000 posts, and over a half million views to date. Have fun.

Craig
post #14276 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm1699 View Post

How many of us really push those expensive subs to reference level? It seems that we are paying for performance that we rarely, if ever, use. I guess some buy Corvettes to burn tires, and some buy them just because they can(and cringe at the thought of burning rubber). Some buy a mustang for the same reasons. Each reason is ok really. As long as we are happy/content.

I drive my 335i like I stole it I also run my Sentinels at 0 without any issues what so ever. I keep turning it up and they keep on running harder with no sense of distortion or maxing out.
post #14277 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

Go to the "sticky's" at the top of the forum. You'll find a "sticky" entitled: "The Master List of DVD, HD-DVD & Blu-ray Movies with BASS Thread...With WaterFalls" The 2 movies you mentioned barely scratch the surface.

To make it easy, here's a direct link:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=755493

Almost 5,000 posts, and over a half million views to date. Have fun.

Craig

You are missing the point. I am very familiar with the thread. I don't care for most of those movies and have no intention of buying them for 5 seconds of sub 20hz vibration at a level that I find uncomfortable. I doubt that I will notice a nano-second of sub 20hz material within a 5 second wave.
post #14278 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishluck73 View Post

I drive my 335i like I stole it I also run my Sentinels at 0 without any issues what so ever. I keep turning it up and they keep on running harder with no sense of distortion or maxing out.

I have a feeling that you are happy. If you had quad Conquests you would still be happy. Do you push them for short bursts just for the heck of it or do you run them like that normally for the duration of use.
post #14279 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm1699 View Post

I have a feeling that you are happy. If you had quad Conquests you would still be happy. Do you push them for short bursts just for the heck of it or do you run them like that normally for the duration of use.

It depends, for music I crank it and keep'em rockin' for the entire CD so the whole house is jamming. For movies typically -10 to 0 depending on the flick and how it sounds. I've never had a single issue with the dual Sentinels and they go deep & loud and I've been very impressed. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend them to anyone.

However, I am looking to sell them and move up to dual Empires just due to doubling our house size and listening area, approx 10k cubic feet.
post #14280 of 19461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm1699 View Post

I have a feeling that you are happy. If you had quad Conquests you would still be happy. Do you push them for short bursts just for the heck of it or do you run them like that normally for the duration of use.

It's alll about SQ and spl! If you can get both, then you are in audio heaven. Lame SQ from a cheapo sub is just that, lame and unexciting. It adds nothing to the movie and is never what the director and sound engineers wanted fpr their movie. Start with one good quality sub and then add a second, then a third, then . . . a fourth? And to answer your question, I hardly push it just to see how much spl I can get with my Quad Empires. Not really what was intended for the movie.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Official Epik Subwoofer Thread